Enhancing research quality of studies on VEMPs in central neurological disorders: a scoping review

A Thematic Survey on the Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials in Rehabilitation: The Case of Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Optimal reporting is a critical element of scholarly communications. Several initiatives, such as the EQUATOR checklists, have raised authors' awareness about the importance of adequate research reports. On these premises, we aimed at appraising the reporting quality of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) dealing with rehabilitation interventions. Given the breadth of such literature, we focused on rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis (MS), which was taken as a model of a challenging condition for all the rehabilitation professionals.A thematic methodological survey was performed to critically examine rehabilitative RCTs published in the last 2 decades in MS populations according to 3 main reporting themes: (1) basic methodological and statistical aspects; (2) reproducibility and responsiveness of measurements; and (3) clinical meaningfulness of the change.

SUMMARY OF KEY POINTS

Of the initial 526 RCTs retrieved, 370 satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. The survey revealed several sources of weakness affecting all the predefined themes: among these, 25.7% of the studies complemented the P values with the confidence interval of the change; 46.8% reported the effect size of the observed differences; 40.0% conducted power analyses to establish the sample size; 4.3% performed retest procedures to determine the outcomes' reproducibility and responsiveness; and 5.9% appraised the observed differences against thresholds for clinically meaningful change, for example, the minimal important change.

RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

The RCTs dealing with MS rehabilitation still suffer from incomplete reporting. Adherence to evidence-based checklists and attention to measurement issues and their impact on data interpretation can improve study design and reporting in order to truly advance the field of rehabilitation in people with MS.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1 available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A424).

Assessment of balance after recovery from Covid-19 disease

OBJECTIVE

To answer the question whether balance related systems have been affected in adults who recovered from Covid-19 disease. This is the first case-control study to assess balance objectively and quantitatively in Covid-19 disease.

METHODS

Thirty-seven patients who recovered from Covid-19 disease and 30 healthy controls were compared using Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), Computerized Dynamic Posturography (CDP), Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials(VEMP) and Video Head Impulse Test (v-HIT).

RESULTS

On CDP, the composite and visual general scores of the patients were significantly lower than controls (p<0.01). The v-HIT gains of the patients significantly decreased in the vertical semicircular canals compared to controls (p<0.01).There was a significant difference between the patients and controls regarding the absence of o-VEMPs (p<0.01) while the amplitudes and latencies were similar between the groups (p>0.05). Decreased P1/N1 amplitudes and elongated N1 latencies were found on c-VEMP testing (p<0.05). Anosmia, taste disorder and gender were not associated with subjective and objective test results (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The Covid-19 disease can cause dizziness rather that incapacitating vertigo. Dizziness can be seen in almost one-fifth of the adult covid19 out-patients, which may be due to involvement of vestibular and visual systems,ortheir central connections. The squeals created in the balance related systems may be irreversible as they have persisted after the recovery of the patients. It is also plausible to anticipate more severe condition in the older patients who were treated in the intensive care units. In the long term follow up of the survivors, the need for balance rehabilitation programs should be remembered in order to minimize risks of falling down.

Differentiating neurodegenerative parkinsonian syndromes using vestibular evoked myogenic potentials and balance assessment

OBJECTIVE

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) were investigated to differentiate between parkinsonian syndromes. We correlated balance and VEMP parameters to investigate the VEMP brainstem circuits as possible origin for postural instability.

METHODS

We assessed clinical status, ocular and cervical VEMP (oVEMP, cVEMP) and conducted a balance assessment (posturography, Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale, Berg Balance Scale, modified Barthel Index) in 76 subjects: 30 with Parkinson's disease (PD), 16 with atypical parkinsonism (AP) and 30 healthy controls. VEMP were elicited by using a mini-shaker on the forehead.

RESULTS

Patients with PD had a prolonged oVEMP n10 in comparison to controls and prolonged p15 compared to controls and AP. Patients with AP showed reduced oVEMP amplitudes compared to PD and controls. CVEMP did not differ between groups. Postural impairment was higher in AP compared to controls and PD, particularly in the rating scales. No correlations between VEMP and posturography were found. A support vector machine classifier was able to automatically classify controls and patient subgroups with moderate to good accuracy based on oVEMP latencies and balance questionnaires.

CONCLUSIONS

Both oVEMP and posturography, but not cVEMP, may be differentially affected in PD and AP. We did not find evidence that impairment of the cVEMP or oVEMP pathways is directly related to postural impairment.

SIGNIFICANCE

OVEMP and balance assessment could be implemented in the differential diagnostic work-up of parkinsonian syndromes.

Weak Vestibular Response in Persistent Developmental Stuttering

Vibrational energy created at the larynx during speech will deflect vestibular mechanoreceptors in humans (Todd et al., 2008; Curthoys, 2017; Curthoys et al., 2019). Vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (VEMP), an indirect measure of vestibular function, was assessed in 15 participants who stutter, with a non-stutter control group of 15 participants paired on age and sex. VEMP amplitude was 8.5 dB smaller in the stutter group than the non-stutter group (p = 0.035, 95% CI [−0.9, −16.1], t = −2.1, d = −0.8, conditional R² = 0.88). The finding is subclinical as regards gravitoinertial function, and is interpreted with regard to speech-motor function in stuttering. There is overlap between brain areas receiving vestibular innervation, and brain areas identified as important in studies of persistent developmental stuttering. These include the auditory brainstem, cerebellar vermis, and the temporo-parietal junction. The finding supports the disruptive rhythm hypothesis (Howell et al., 1983; Howell, 2004) in which sensory inputs additional to own speech audition are fluency-enhancing when they coordinate with ongoing speech.

Reporting quality of TMS studies in neurological conditions: A critical appraisal of the main gaps, challenges and clinical implications

Transparent reporting of study methods and findings can dramatically expand the reliability and impact of health research. Evidence-based reporting checklists and guidelines, such as those hosted by the EQUATOR network, provide a framework for summarizing statistics, methods and data presentation. While being increasingly used in several research fields, such trend toward better control seems in its infancy in the field of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). By the present work we aimed at assessing the quality of methodological and statistical reporting of TMS-based investigations in individuals with neurological motor impairments. We completed a methodological survey of all the studies conducted in the last two decades on the application of TMS to evaluate motor impairments in individual with neurological conditions. The pre-planned literature search of three major biomedical databases resulted in 1109 articles retrieved, 571 of which satisfied the eligibility criteria. The survey revealed that most of the studies suffered from relevant methodological and statistical issues, which potentially affect data interpretation and usability. Among these, sample size calculation, indices of change other than p values, reproducibility and clinical relevance/responsiveness emerged as those elements most commonly neglected. To increase research reliability of TMS data, we recommend adhering to international initiatives like the EQUATOR, that can impact clinical research by promoting adequate reporting. In particular, we advocate an update of the submission policies of the journals active in this field in line with adjacent areas, such as neurorehabilitation, that require the uploading of completed checklists that rationalize reporting.

The clinical utility of the cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) in university-level athletes with concussion

INTRODUCTION

Concussion is defined as a mild traumatic brain injury that can occur in all sport activities. Cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs) are accepted to demonstrate the vestibulocollic reflex. MAIN: To evaluate subclinical cervical abnormalities in the vestibulospinal pathway in subjects with concussion history with and without related symptoms via evoked vestibular potential.

METHODS

Monaurally air conduction cVEMP (500 Hz tone bursts) at intensity of 100 dBnHL and 200 sweeps. All responses were replicated.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-four participants were initially tested; however, three (03) participants did not produce usable data (no response) and were eliminated for the dataset cutoff values analysis, being considered just as abnormal response. One hundred fifty-one responses consisted of 45 non-athlete individuals without any history of a concussion or concussion symptoms (normative group), 45 athletes without any history of a concussion or concussion symptoms (control group), 33 athletes with a history of at least one concussion but no concussion symptoms related (history group), and 28 athletes with a history of at least one concussion and concussion symptoms (symptoms group). The history and symptoms groups had statistically higher latency scores than the control and the normative groups. The Index Ratio data and Threshold data did not produce a significant effect for four groups. But, a pattern of abnormal cVEMP was found when comparing those without a history of concussion (0% abnormal response) versus the history group (24%) and symptoms group (32.3%).

CONCLUSION

The study provides data which supports the positive impact of cVEMP when evaluating athletes and identifying concussion processes.

The vestibulo-masseteric reflex and the acoustic-masseteric reflex: a reliability and responsiveness study in healthy subjects

The vestibulo-masseteric reflex (VMR or p11 wave), the acoustic-masseteric reflex (AMR or p1/n21 wave) and the mixed vestibulo-cochlear p11/n21 potential are responses of masseter muscles to sound that can be employed to evaluate brainstem function. This study was aimed at establishing the test-retest reliability and responsiveness of these reflex parameters according to the type of electrode configuration. Twenty-two healthy volunteers (M:F = 11:11; mean age 25.3 ± 5.2 years) participated in two testing sessions separated by one week. Zygomatic and mandibular montages were compared following unilateral and bilateral stimulations. For reliability purposes, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation of the method error (CVME) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were calculated. The minimal detectable difference (MDD) was also determined as a measure of responsiveness. Both VMR (p11 wave) and AMR could be consistently evoked from test to retest, although the frequency rate was significantly higher (all p values ≤ 0.009) with zygomatic (VMR: 97.7-100%; AMR: 86.9-97.6%) than mandibular montage (VMR: 84.7-89.8%; AMR: 65.0-67.8%), with no significant differences between unilateral and bilateral stimulations. Good-to-excellent reliability and responsiveness (high ICC, low CV_ME, SEM and MDD scores) were detected for corrected amplitudes and peak latencies for all reflex responses, whereas raw amplitudes were associated to poor reliability. The reliability of the zygomatic montage proved superior to the mandibular montage for all reflex responses. Given their high test-retest consistency and capability to study different features of the reflex arch, both peak latencies and corrected amplitudes should be reported and considered in the interpretation of reflex testing results.