Nerve excitability differences in slow and fast motor axons of the rat: more than just Ih

Slow or fast: Implications of myofibre type and associated differences for manifestation of neuromuscular disorders

Many neuromuscular disorders can have a differential impact on a specific myofibre type, forming the central premise of this review. The many different skeletal muscles in mammals contain a spectrum of slow- to fast-twitch myofibres with varying levels of protein isoforms that determine their distinctive contractile, metabolic, and other properties. The variations in functional properties across the range of classic 'slow' to 'fast' myofibres are outlined, combined with exemplars of the predominantly slow-twitch soleus and fast-twitch extensor digitorum longus muscles, species comparisons, and techniques used to study these properties. Other intrinsic and extrinsic differences are discussed in the context of slow and fast myofibres. These include inherent susceptibility to damage, myonecrosis, and regeneration, plus extrinsic nerves, extracellular matrix, and vasculature, examined in the context of growth, ageing, metabolic syndrome, and sexual dimorphism. These many differences emphasise the importance of carefully considering the influence of myofibre-type composition on manifestation of various neuromuscular disorders across the lifespan for both sexes. Equally, understanding the different responses of slow and fast myofibres due to intrinsic and extrinsic factors can provide deep insight into the precise molecular mechanisms that initiate and exacerbate various neuromuscular disorders. This focus on the influence of different myofibre types is of fundamental importance to enhance translation for clinical management and therapies for many skeletal muscle disorders.

Neuropathy in sporadic inclusion body myositis: A multi-modality neurophysiological study

OBJECTIVE

Sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) has been associated with neuropathy. This study employs nerve excitability studies to re-examine this association and attempt to understand underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

METHODS

Twenty patients with sIBM underwent median nerve motor and sensory excitability studies, clinical assessments, conventional nerve conduction testing (NCS) and quantitative thermal threshold studies. These results were compared to established normal controls, or results from a normal cohort of older control individuals.

RESULTS

Seven sIBM patients (35%) demonstrated abnormalities in conventional NCS, with ten patients (50%) demonstrating abnormalities in thermal thresholds. Median nerve motor and sensory excitability differed significantly in sIBM patients when compared to normal controls. None of these neurophysiological markers correlated significantly with clinical markers of sIBM severity.

CONCLUSION

A concurrent neuropathy exists in a significant proportion of sIBM patients, with nerve excitability studies revealing changes possibly consistent with axolemmal depolarization or concurrent neuronal adaptation to myopathy. Neuropathy in sIBM does not correlate with muscle disease severity and may reflect a differing tissue response to a common pathogenic factor.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study affirms the presence of a concurrent neuropathy in a large proportion of sIBM patients that appears independent of the severity of myopathy.