Rapid crossed responses in an intrinsic hand muscle during perturbed bimanual movements

The modulation of short and long-latency interhemispheric inhibition during bimanually coordinated movements

Bimanual coordination is essential for the performance of many everyday tasks. There are several types of bimanually coordinated movements, classified according to whether the arms are acting to achieve a single goal (cooperative) or separate goals (independent), and whether the arms are moving symmetrically or asymmetrically. Symmetric bimanual movements are thought to facilitate corticomotor excitability (CME), while asymmetric bimanual movements are thought to recruit interhemispheric inhibition to reduce functional coupling between the motor cortices. The influences of movement symmetry and goal conceptualisation on interhemispheric interactions have not been studied together, and not during bimanually active dynamic tasks. The present study used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to investigate the modulation of CME and short- and long-latency interhemispheric inhibition (SIHI and LIHI, respectively) during bimanually active dynamic tasks requiring different types of bimanual coordination. Twenty healthy right-handed adults performed four bimanual tasks in which they held a dumbbell in each hand (independent) or a custom device between both hands (cooperative) while rhythmically flexing and extending their wrists symmetrically or asymmetrically. Motor-evoked potentials were recorded from the right extensor carpi ulnaris. We found CME was greater during asymmetric tasks than symmetric tasks, and movement symmetry did not modulate SIHI or LIHI. There was no effect of goal conceptualisation nor any interaction with movement symmetry for CME, SIHI or LIHI. Based on these results, movement symmetry and goal conceptualisation may not modulate interhemispheric inhibition during dynamic bimanual tasks. These findings contradict prevailing thinking about the roles of CME and interhemispheric inhibition in bimanual coordination.

Voluntary modification of rapid tactile-motor responses during reaching differs from its visuomotor counterpart

People commonly hold and manipulate a variety of objects in everyday life, and these objects have different physical properties. To successfully control this wide range of objects, people must associate new patterns of tactile stimuli with appropriate motor outputs. We performed a series of experiments investigating the extent to which people can voluntarily modify tactile-motor associations in the context of a rapid tactile-motor response guiding the hand to a moving target (previously described in Pruszynski JA, Johansson RS, Flanagan JR. Curr Biol 26: 788-792, 2016) by using an anti-reach paradigm in which participants were instructed to move their hands in the opposite direction of a target jump. We compared performance to that observed when people make visually guided reaches to a moving target (cf. Day BL, Lyon IN. Exp Brain Res 130: 159-168, 2000; Pisella L, Grea H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Desmurget M, Rode G, Boisson D, Rossetti Y. Nat Neurosci 3: 729-736, 2000). When participants had visual feedback, motor responses during the anti-reach task showed early automatic responses toward the moving target before later modification to move in the instructed direction. When the same participants had only tactile feedback, however, they were able to suppress this early phase of the motor response, which occurs <100 ms after the target jump. Our results indicate that while the tactile motor and visual motor systems both support rapid responses that appear similar under some conditions, the circuits underlying responses show sharp distinctions in terms of their malleability.NEW & NOTEWORTHY When people reach toward a visual target that moves suddenly, they automatically correct their reach to follow the object; even when explicitly instructed not to follow a moving visual target, people exhibit an initial incorrect movement before moving in the correct direction. We show that when people use tactile feedback, they do not show an initial incorrect response, even though early muscle activity still occurs.