A history of low back pain associates with altered electromyographic activation patterns in response to perturbations of standing balance

Reactive postural adjustment in response to predictable and unpredictable perturbations in healthy adults: A comparison between swayback, hyperlordotic and erect postures

BACKGROUND

Promoting an erect posture in standing has been advocated to offer superior protection to the spine when compared to hyperlordotic and swayback postures.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do postural adjustments towards external perturbation differ between erect, hyperlordotic and swayback postures? If so, which posture offers better protection to lumbar spine?

METHODS

Forty-four healthy adults received top-down perturbations under unpredictable (without visual-and-auditory input) and predictable (with visual-and-auditory input) conditions in three simulated postures: erect, hyperlordotic, and swayback. Postural adjustments namely the centre of pressure parameters, joint angle onsets, and neuromuscular responses measured by muscle onsets and co-contraction between muscle pairs upon the perturbation were compared using the two-way repeated measures ANOVA. Post-hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction was conducted to identify the between-posture differences for the respective postural adjustment parameters.

RESULTS

Path length, ellipse area and average velocity of centre of pressure were significantly greater under unpredictable condition as compared to predictable condition (p < 0.001). Significant between-posture difference was detected in centre of pressure path length (p < 0.035), pelvic tilt onset (p < 0.038) and all muscle co-contraction indexes (p < 0.001). Post-hoc analysis revealed significantly smaller centre of pressure path length in erect posture as compared to hyperlordotic and swayback postures (p < 0.01) under unpredictable conditions. Significantly greater co-contraction indexes of lumbar multifidus and erector spinae, and internal oblique and lumbar multifidus were found in hyperlordotic as compared to erect and swayback postures (p < 0.05).

SIGNIFICANCE

Compared to erect posture, adoption of hyperlordotic and swayback postures altered the contributions of the active and passive subsystems of the spine that regulates postural control upon external perturbations. Such differences in neuromuscular control may lessen the capacity of the human spine to withstand loading and shear forces. Prospective studies are required to validate if habitually adopted hyperlordotic and swayback postures contribute to an earlier/ higher prevalence of spinal dysfunctions.

The immediate effects of iTBS on the muscle activation pattern under challenging balance conditions in the patients with chronic low back pain: A preliminary study

Background

The patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) showed impaired postural control, especially in challenging postural task. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is reported to involve in the complex balance task, which required considerable attentional control. The effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) over the DLPFC to the capacity of postural control of CLBP patients is still unknown.

Methods

Participants diagnosed with CLBP received a single-session iTBS over the left DLPFC. All the participants completed the postural control tasks of single-leg (left/right) standing before and after iTBS. The activation changes of the DLPFC and M1 before and after iTBS were recorded by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). The activation pattern of the trunk [transversus abdominis (TrA), superficial lumbar multifidus (SLM)] and leg [tibialis anterior (TA), gastrocnemius medialis (GM)] muscles including root mean square (RMS) and co-contraction index (CCI) during single-leg standing were measured by surface electromyography (sEMG) before and after the intervention. The paired t-test was used to test the difference before and after iTBS. Pearson correlation analyses were performed to test the relationship between the oxyhemoglobin concentration and sEMG outcome variables (RMS and CCI).

Results

Overall, 20 participants were recruited. In the right-leg standing condition, compared with before iTBS, the CCI of the right TrA/SLM was significantly decreased (t = −2.172, p = 0.043), and the RMS of the right GM was significantly increased (t = 4.024, p = 0.001) after iTBS. The activation of the left DLPFC (t = 2.783, p = 0.012) and left M1 (t = 2.752, p = 0.013) were significantly decreased and the relationship between the left DLPFC and M1 was significant after iTBS (r = 0.575, p = 0.014). Correlation analysis showed the hemoglobin concentration of M1 was negatively correlated with the RMS of the right GM (r = −0.659, p = 0.03) and positively correlated between CCI of the right TrA/SLM (r = 0.503, p = 0.047) after iTBS. There was no significant difference in the brain or muscle activation change in the left leg-standing condition between before and after iTBS.

Conclusion

Intermittent theta burst stimulation over the left DLPFC seems to be able to improve the muscle activation pattern during postural control ability in challenging postural task, which would provide a new approach to the treatment of CLBP.

Biofeedback EMG alternative therapy for chronic low back pain: Study protocol of a pilot randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain affects about 100 million U.S. adults, with chronic low back pain (CLBP) cited as the most prevalent type. Although there is evidence that non-pharmacological therapies seem to be effective for treating low back pain, there is limited evidence of the effectiveness of EMG biofeedback with non-specific chronic low back pain (NCLBP). The purpose of this study is, therefore, to determine the efficacy of a portable EMG biofeedback device on pain in individuals with CLBP.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study is a prospective, single-center, assessor-blind, two-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial to be conducted at Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA. Eighty patients with CLBP will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive sEMG-BF (surface EMG biofeedback) or continued care (no intervention). All participants will receive treatment virtually weekly for 8 weeks. The primary outcome will be pain intensity (Brief Pain Inventory). The secondary outcomes will include pain interference (Brief Pain Inventory), disability (The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 months follow-up.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this study will be the first powered randomized controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of a virtual sEMG-BF protocol specifically designed for CLBP. The outcome of the study may provide evidence for the effectiveness of biofeedback using digital therapeutics to relieve pain in individuals with CLBP.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials Registry (http://ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04607460). Registered on October 29, 2020.

Abdominal bracing changes lower quarter muscle activity but not reach distances during active forward reach on an unstable surface

OBJECTIVE

This study examined the effects of abdominal bracing maneuver (ABM) performance on stable and unstable surfaces on active forward reach (AFR) distance as a measure of trunk control, measuring changes in reach distance and muscle activation patterns.

DESIGN

Single-group, repeated measures design.

METHODS

Twenty-eight subjects (mean age 25 ± 5.09 years) performed an AFR with and without ABM while on stable and unstable surfaces. Lower quarter muscle activity and forward reach distances were recorded.

RESULTS

Forward reach distances on the unstable surface were significantly decreased compared to the stable condition with and without ABM (p < .001). The surface-by-contraction interaction was significant for the tibialis anterior (TA) and gastrocnemius (GS). Significant main effects were found for internal oblique, external oblique, gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, TA, and GS, where muscle activity significantly increased during the ABM trials. The interaction between surface and contraction was significant for the TA and GS muscles. TA (p = .007) and GS (p < .001) activity increased with ABM on the unstable surface. TA activity increased with ABM on the stable surface (TA: p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Reach distances decreased on the unstable surface, but ABM did not change reaching distance. Ankle muscle co-contraction occurred during ABM trials and posterior chain activity increased. These changes suggest ABM may be beneficial during forward reaching activities.

Acute effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation exercises on the postural strategy in patients with chronic low back pain

INTRODUCTION

Active treatments focused on improvement in motor function are postulated in chronic low back patients (CLBP).

OBJECTIVE

to establish the acute effects of PNF exercise on the postural control strategy.

METHODS

The sway of the body was tested before intervention in fifty-three CLBP patients and after that participants were randomly assigned into the intervention PNF group (n = 25). Mean velocity (VEL) and sample entropy (SEn), over the center of pressure in the mediolateral (ML) and anterior-posterior (AP) planes served to estimate the postural strategy and automaticity levels in the neuromuscular controller. Tandem and one-leg standing tests (OLST) with eyes open and eyes closed were used.

RESULTS

Pain intensity decreased after the intervention. The VEL was no longer vision-dependent in both planes. The SEn decreased immediately after the exercise and either returned to or even exceeded the baseline values in the OLST ML plane.

CONCLUSION

A single session of PNF exercise may have a beneficial effect on pain and postural control in CLBP patients. The statistically significant pain relief combined with newly acquired better control of posture may have encouraged the PNF group participants to a subconscious exploration of the stability area. Postural movements were more automatized in OLST in the delayed test.

Individuals with recurrent low back pain exhibit further altered frontal plane trunk control in remission than when in pain

BACKGROUND

Movement alterations due to low back pain (LBP) could lead to long-term adverse consequences if they do not resolve after symptoms subside. This study aims to determine if altered trunk control associated with recurrent low back pain persists beyond symptom duration.

METHODS

Twenty young adults with recurrent LBP were tested once during an LBP episode and once in symptom remission, and twenty matched back-healthy participants served as controls. Participants walked on a treadmill with five prescribed step widths (0.33, 0.67, 1, 1.33, 1.67 × preferred step width). Motion capture and surface electromyography were used to record trunk kinematics and muscle activation. Thorax-pelvis coordination was calculated using vector coding, and longissimus activation and co-activation were analyzed.

FINDINGS

Young adults with recurrent LBP exhibited a "looser" trunk control strategy in the frontal plane during gait that was persistent regardless of pain status across multiple step widths compared to controls. The looser trunk control was demonstrated by a greater pelvis-only, less thorax-only coordination pattern, and decreased bilateral longissimus co-activation in individuals with recurrent LBP compared to controls. The looser trunk control strategy was further amplified when individuals were in symptom remission and exhibited greater trunk excursion and reduced in-phase coordination in the frontal plane.

INTERPRETATION

The amplification of aberrant movement during symptom remission may suggest that movement patterns or anatomical factors existing prior to the tested painful episode underlie altered trunk control in individuals with recurrent LBP. The symptom remission period of recurrent LBP may be a critical window into clinical evaluation and treatment.

Understanding the impact of lumbar disc degeneration and chronic low back pain: A cross-sectional electromyographic analysis of postural strategy during predicted and unpredicted postural perturbations

People with chronic low back pain (LBP) exhibit changes in postural control. Stereotypical muscle activations resulting from external perturbations include anticipatory (APAs) and compensatory (CPAs) postural adjustments. The aim and objective of this study was to determine differences in postural control strategies (peak amplitude, APAs and CPAs) between symptomatic and asymptomatic adults with and without Lumbar Disc Degeneration (LDD) using surface electromyography during forward postural perturbation. Ninety-seven subjects participated in the study (mean age 50 years (SD 12)). 3T MRI was used to acquire T2 weighted images (L1-S1). LDD was determined using Pfirrmann grading. A bespoke translational platform was designed to deliver horizontal perturbations in sagittal and frontal planes. Electromyographic activity was analysed bilaterally from 8 trunk and lower limb muscles during four established APA and CPA epochs. A Kruskal-Wallis H test with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was conducted. Four groups were identified: no LDD no pain (n = 19), LDD no pain (n = 38), LDD pain (n = 35) and no LDD pain (n = 5). There were no significant differences in age or gender between groups. The most significant difference between groups was observed during forward perturbation. In the APA and CPA phases of predictable forward perturbation there were significant differences ankle strategy between groups (p = 0.007–0.008); lateral gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior activity was higher in the LDD pain than the LDD no pain group. There were no significant differences in the unpredictable condition (p>0.05). These findings were different from the remaining groups, where significant differences in hip strategy were observed during both perturbation conditions (p = 0.004–0.006). Symptomatic LDD patients exhibit different electromyographic strategies to asymptomatic LDD controls. Future LBP electromyographic research should benefit from considering assessment of both lower limbs in addition to the spine. This approach could prevent underestimation of postural control deficits and guide targeted rehabilitation.

Assessing sensorimotor control of the lumbopelvic-hip region using task-based functional MRI

Recent brain imaging studies have suggested that cortical remodeling within sensorimotor regions are associated with persistent low back pain and may be a driving mechanism for the impaired neuromuscular control associated with this condition. This paper outlines a new approach for investigating cortical sensorimotor integration during the performance of small-amplitude lumbopelvic movements with functional MRI. Fourteen healthy right-handed participants were instructed in the lumbopelvic movement tasks performed during fMRI acquisition. Surface electromyography (EMG) collected on 8 lumbopelvic and thigh muscles captured organized patterns of muscle activation during the movement tasks. fMRI data were collected on 10 of 14 participants. Sensorimotor cortical activation across the tasks was identified using a whole brain analysis and further explored with regional analyses of key components of the cortical sensorimotor network. Head motion had low correlation to the tasks (r = -0.101 to 0.004) and head translation averaged 0.98 (0.59 mm) before motion correction. Patterns of activation of the key lumbopelvic and thigh musculature (average amplitude normalized 2-17%) were significantly different across tasks (P > 0.001). Neuroimaging demonstrated activation in key sensorimotor cortical regions that were consistent with motor planning and sensory feedback needed for performing the different tasks. This approach captures the specificity of lumbopelvic sensorimotor control using goal-based tasks (e.g., "lift your hip" vs. "contract your lumbar multifidus to 20% of maximum") performed within the confines of the scanner. Specific patterns of sensorimotor cortex activation appear to capture differences between bilateral and unilateral tasks during voluntary control of multisegmental movement in the lumbopelvic region.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrated the feasibility of using task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) protocols for acquiring the blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) response of key sensorimotor cortex regions during voluntary lumbopelvic movements. Our approach activated lumbopelvic muscles during small-amplitude movements while participants were lying supine in the scanner. Our data supports these tasks can be done with limited head motion and low correlation of head motion to the task. The approach provides opportunities for assessing the role of brain changes in persistent low back pain.

Electromyographic Analysis of Shoulder Neuromuscular Activity in Women Following Breast Cancer Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study

Certain secondary effects derived from medical treatment in breast cancer can favor the development of alterations in shoulder biomechanics. To the best of our knowledge, persistent peripheral pain as a key factor for the development of neuromuscular activity impairments has not been analyzed. A cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out. A total of 90 women were included and allocated to three groups: (i) 30 women with persistent peripheral pain after breast cancer treatment, (ii) 30 women without pain after breast cancer treatment, and (iii) 30 healthy women. Surface electromyography was employed to measure the onset and amplitude of the muscle activity of three shoulder movements. Statistically significant differences were found in the neuromuscular activity for all the muscles and shoulder movements among women with persistent pain versus healthy women (i.e., amplitude muscle activity variable p < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were also observed in the neuromuscular activity for certain muscles in shoulder movements among women with persistent pain versus women without pain, as well as between women without pain versus healthy women. Therefore, following breast cancer treatment, women showed alterations in their shoulder neuromuscular activity, which were more significant if persistent pain existed. These findings may contribute to developing a selective therapeutic exercise program that optimizes the shoulder neuromuscular activity in women after breast cancer treatment.

Effect of increased relative stiffness of the lumbar spine on hamstring muscle stretching in individuals with a history of low back pain suspected to have a clinical lumbar instability: A randomized crossover design

BACKGROUND

Theoretically, lumbopelvic stabilization techniques during hamstring muscle stretching could increase lumbar stiffness relative to hamstring muscle in individuals with a history of low back pain and suspected clinical lumbar instability. However, evidence to support this theory is limited. This study aimed to 1) determine changes in lumbopelvic, lumbar, and hip motions, and hamstring muscle length after stretching exercises with lumbopelvic stiffening or relaxing techniques, and 2) compare those changes between techniques.

METHODS

This study used a randomized crossover design. Thirty-two participants with a history of low back pain and bilateral hamstring muscle tightness were recruited. The order of the first technique was randomly assigned. After a 2-day washout, participants were crossed over to the second technique. Motion data during active forward trunk bending and bilateral hamstring muscle length during passive knee extension were collected pre- and post-intervention.

FINDINGS

Significant increases (P < 0.05) were found in bilateral hamstring muscle length for both techniques. However, stiffening technique demonstrated a significant decrease in lumbar motion (P < 0.05) and increase in hip motion (P < 0.05), while relaxing technique demonstrated trends showing increases in lumbar and hip motions (P = 0.134 and 0.115, respectively). The findings showed significantly greater improvement (P < 0.05) in lumbar and hip motions with stiffening technique.

INTERPRETATION

The findings suggest increased relative stiffness of the lumbar spine during hamstring muscle stretching can specifically lengthen bilateral hamstring muscle and decrease excessive lumbar motion. This stiffening technique may prevent excessive movement of the lumbar spine, thereby reducing the risk of recurrent low back pain.

Non-specific chronic low back pain and physical activity: A comparison of postural control and hip muscle isometric strength: A cross-sectional study

Most research on sedentary lifestyle has focused on pain and disability, while neuromuscular outcomes (postural control and strength) have received less attention. The objective of the study was to determine whether low level of physical activity is negatively associated with measures of lower body muscular strength and postural control in individuals with and without non-specific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP).Twenty-four subjects with NSCLBP (28.8 ± 5.9 years) and 24 age, gender, and body mass index matched healthy controls participated in the study. Subjects were sub-classified into 4 subgroups based on their physical activity level: Non-active NSCLBP; Active NSCLBP; Non-active healthy control; and Active healthy control. Each subgroup consisted of 12 subjects. Peak force of hip muscles strength was assessed using a handheld dynamometer. Postural control was assessed using computerized posturography and the Y Balance Test.There was no significant group by physical activity interaction for strength and static and dynamic postural control, except for static control during left single leg stance with eyes closed (P = .029). However, there was a significant difference in strength and postural control by physical activity (P < .05). Postural control and peak force of hip muscles strength were significantly associated with physical activity (r ranged from 0.50 to 0.66, P < .001 and r ranged from 0.40 to 0.59, P < .05, respectively).Postural control and hip strength were independently related to physical activity behavior. A sedentary behavior may be an important risk factor for impaired postural control and hip muscles strength, and that physical fitness is vital to neuromuscular outcomes.

The Effects of Stabilization Exercise on the Thickness of Lateral Abdominal Muscles During Standing Tasks in Women With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Triple-Blinded Clinical Trial Study

CONTEXT

Chronic low back pain (CLBP) often presents with a dysfunction in deep abdominal muscles activity during standing tasks. Although some studies indicated that deep abdominal muscle activity improved during some functional tasks following stabilization exercise (SE), there is no study to evaluate the effect of SE on lateral abdominal muscles thickness during standing postural tasks.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate the lateral abdominal muscles thickness in the participants with CLBP while standing on a balance board and (2) to compare the effects of SE and a general exercise (GE) program on the lateral muscles thickness changes.

METHODS

This was a between-groups, triple-blinded randomized controlled trial design. In total, 40 females with CLBP were randomly assigned into 2 groups:  GE (control group) and supervised progressive SE (experimental group). Diagnostic ultrasound imaging was used before and after the intervention to measure lateral abdominal muscles thickness during standing on 2 different levels of platform in the Biodex Balance System. Visual analog scale and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire were used to evaluate changes in pain intensity and disability.

RESULTS

The results indicated significant increases in transverse abdominis muscle thickness during all standing tasks (P = .02) and significant decreases in pain intensity and disability following SE intervention (P < .001). However, the lateral abdominal muscle thicknesses were not changed after GE intervention while standing postural tasks (P > .05). The GE group revealed only significant decreases in pain intensity after intervention (P = .03).

CONCLUSION

Supervised progressive SE improved the activity of deep abdominal muscles in standing postural tasks in the patients with CLBP.

Anticipatory postural control differs between low back pain and pelvic girdle pain patients in the absence of visual feedback

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of vision on anticipatory postural control (APA) responses in two groups of clinically diagnosed chronic low back pain patients, those with Posterior Pelvic Girdle pain and those with Non-Specific Low Back Pain compared to a matched group of healthy controls during the modified Trendelenburg task.

METHODS

Seventy-eight volunteer participants (60 females and 18 males) gave informed consent to take part in this study. 39 with confirmed LBP or PGP lasting longer than 12 weeks and 39 healthy matched controls performed 40 single leg lift tasks (hip flexion to 90° as quickly as possible) with their non-dominant lower limb. A force plate was used to determine the medial-lateral displacement of the center of pressure, and the initiation of weight shift; kinematics was used to determine initiation of leg lift; and electromyography was used to determine onset times from the external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO) and lumbar multifidus (MF), gluteus maximus (GM) and biceps femoris (BF).

RESULTS

The PGP group showed significantly longer muscle onset latencies in the BF, EO MF with visual occlusion (F_2,746 = 4.51, p < .0001).

CONCLUSION

The muscle onset delays identified between the two LBP sub-groups suggests that pain may not be the primary factor in alteration of APA response. The PGP group show a greater reliance on vision which may signal impairment in multiple feedback channels.

Are Functional Brain Alterations Present in Low Back Pain? A Systematic Review of EEG Studies

This systematic review analyzed available literature on functional brain alterations in low back pain (LBP) measured with electroencephalography (EEG), as until now evidence thereof was unclear. Four electronic databases were systematically searched the 10th of March 2018, resulting in 12 included studies. Studies showed a risk of bias of 37.5 to 75% using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for case-control studies. Limited evidence reported higher amplitudes of balance-related potentials and early components of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) to noxious stimuli, and altered feedback-related negativity and P300 potentials during decision-making in chronic LBP (CLBP). These findings suggest postural strategies requiring a higher cortical attention-demand, increased sensory-discriminative processing of noxious input, and altered decision-making in CLBP. However, further research is warranted as these inferences were based on single studies. Moderate evidence for unaltered amplitude of late-phase SEPs to noxious stimuli and auditory evoked potentials in LBP implies that the affective-emotional processing of stimuli might be unaffected in LBP. Furthermore, moderate evidence indicated disturbed habituation of somatosensory stimuli in LBP. Most studies examined nonspecific or mixed CLBP populations, hence EEG-quantified brain activity in (sub)acute or recurrent LBP still needs to be explored. PERSPECTIVE: This review presents an overview of the current understanding of the functional LBP brain measured with EEG. The limited evidence in current research suggests altered cortical function regarding balance control, somatosensory processing, and decision making in LBP, and highlights opportunities for future EEG-research.

Lower back pain and healthy subjects exhibit distinct lower limb perturbation response strategies: A preliminary study

BACKGROUND

It is hypothesized that inherent differences in movement strategies exist between control subjects and those with a history of lower back pain (LBP). Previous motion analysis studies focus primarily on tracking spinal movements, neglecting the connection between the lower limbs and spinal function. Lack of knowledge surrounding the functional implications of LBP may explain the diversity in success from general treatments currently offered to LBP patients.

OBJECTIVE

This pilot study evaluated the response of healthy controls and individuals with a history of LBP (hLBP) to a postural disturbance.

METHODS

Volunteers (n= 26) were asked to maintain standing balance in response to repeated balance disturbances delivered via a perturbation platform while both kinematic and electromyographic data were recorded from the trunk, pelvis, and lower limb.

RESULTS

The healthy cohort utilized an upper body-focused strategy for balance control, with substantial activation of the external oblique muscles. The hLBP cohort implemented a lower limb-focused strategy, relying on activation of the semitendinosus and soleus muscles. No significant differences in joint range of motion were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that particular reactive movement patterns may indicate muscular deficits in subjects with hLBP. Identification of these deficits may aid in developing specific rehabilitation programs to prevent future LBP recurrence.

Effect of corporal suspension and pendulum exercises on neuromuscular properties and functionality in patients with medullar thoracic injury

BACKGROUND

Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is one of the most devastating injuries that has a physical impact on patients. The CHORDATA® method involves suspension and pendulous exercises and has been clinically used to treat patients with TSCI. Although empirically used to treat neurological patients, there is no scientific evidence of the efficacy of this method.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the chronic effects of CHORDATA® method on torque, muscle activation, muscle thickness, and functionality in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury.

METHODS

Twenty-six male patients with medullar thoracic injury were randomly categorised into two groups: intervention group (n = 14) and control group (n = 12). Rehabilitation program comprised of 16 sessions of body suspension and pendulum exercises (twice/week). The maximal voluntary isometric trunk flexion and extension torques, muscle activation and thickness (external and internal oblique, rectus and transversus abdominis, longissimus, and multifidus muscles), and functionality (adapted reach test) were evaluated before and after of rehabilitation program.

FINDINGS

A significant increase was observed in maximal voluntary isometric torque (flexion, 58%; extension, 76%), muscle activation of the rectus abdominis muscle, and muscle thickness of all intervention group muscles, without changes in the control group. Compared to the pre-intervention period, the intervention group also showed improvement in functionality at post-intervention, but no such differences were noted in the control group.

INTERPRETATION

The corporal suspension and pendulum exercises training improved rectus abdominis muscle activation, trunk muscles structure and strength, and reaching capacity in medullar thoracic injury patients.

Effect of dual tasking on anticipatory and compensatory postural adjustments in response to external perturbations in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain: Electromyographic analysis

BACKGROUND

In patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), postural control is a demanding task in terms of attention. Although the attentional demands of postural control have been investigated in these patients, the attentional demands of postural recovery during dual task performance have not been evaluated in patients with nonspecific CLBP.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of dual tasking on anticipatory and compensatory postural adjustments in response to an external perturbation in patients with nonspecific CLBP.

METHODS

Twenty-five patients with nonspecific CLBP of at least 3 months' duration and 25 healthy persons were exposed to predictable and unpredictable external perturbations. The attentional demands of postural adjustments were evaluated while participants simultaneously performed a cognitive task. Onset latency and integrated electromyographic activity of the trunk and leg muscles were compared between dual task (postural recovery and backward digit span memory) and single task conditions (postural recovery only).

RESULTS

The results showed delayed activation of the tibialis anterior (agonist) and early activation of the gastrocnemius (antagonist) muscles during the dual task in patients with nonspecific CLBP compared to healthy participants. Integrated electromyographic activity was significantly greater in the dual task than the single task condition in the gastrocnemius (antagonist) muscle in patients with nonspecific CLBP compared to healthy persons during unpredictable perturbations.

CONCLUSION

The impaired ankle muscle activities during a cognitive task suggest that postural control recovery following external perturbation requires attentional resources in patients with nonspecific CLBP. This may increase the risk of re-injury in people with nonspecific CLBP while they perform an attentionally demanding task in more difficult circumstances.

What If Low Back Pain Is the Most Prevalent Parkinsonism in the World?

Low back pain (LBP) has a point prevalence of nearly 10% and ranks highest in global disease burden for years lived with disability; Parkinson’s disease (PD) ranks in the top 100 most disabling health conditions for years lost and years lived with disability (1). Recent evidence suggests that people with chronic, recurrent LBP exhibit many postural impairments reminiscent of a neurological postural disorder such as PD. We compare and contrast postural impairments associated with LBP and PD in order to inform treatment strategies for both conditions. The literature suggests that both LBP and PD associate with impaired proprioceptive function, sensory orientation during standing balance, anticipatory postural adjustments, automatic postural responses, and striatal-cortical function. Although postural impairments are similar in nature for LBP and PD, the postural impairments with LBP appear more specific to the trunk than for PD. Likewise, although both health conditions associate with altered striatal-cortical function, the nature of the altered neural structure or function differ for PD and LBP. Due to the high prevalence of LBP associated with PD, focused treatment of LBP in people with PD may render benefit to their postural impairments and disabilities. In addition, LBP would likely benefit from being considered more than just a musculoskeletal injury; as such, clinicians should consider including approaches that address impairments of postural motor control.

Experimental Low Back Pain Decreased Trunk Muscle Activity in Currently Asymptomatic Recurrent Low Back Pain Patients During Step Tasks

Low back pain (LBP) patients show reorganized trunk muscle activity but if similar changes are manifest in recurrent LBP (R-LBP) patients during asymptomatic periods remains unknown. In 26 healthy and 27 currently asymptomatic R-LBP participants electromyographic activity (EMG) was recorded from trunk and gluteal muscles during series of stepping up and down on a step bench before and during experimentally intramuscular induced unilateral and bilateral LBP. Pain intensity was assessed using numeric rating scale (NRS) scores. Root mean square EMG (RMS-EMG) normalized to maximal voluntary contraction EMG and pain-evoked differences from baseline (ΔRMS-EMG) were analyzed. Step task duration was calculated from foot sensors. R-LBP compared with controls showed higher baseline RMS-EMG and NRS scores of experimental pain (P < .05). In both groups, bilateral compared with unilateral experimental NRS scores were higher (P < .001) and patients compared with controls reported higher NRS scores during both pain conditions (P < .04). In patients, unilateral pain decreased ΔRMS-EMG in the Iliocostalis muscle and bilateral pain decreased ΔRMS-EMG in all back and gluteal muscles during step tasks (P < .05) compared with controls. In controls, bilateral versus unilateral experimental pain induced increased step task duration and trunk RMS-EMG whereas both pain conditions decreased step task duration and trunk RMS-EMG in R-LBP patients compared with controls (P < .05).

PERSPECTIVE

Task duration and trunk muscle activity increased in controls and decreased in R-LBP patients during experimental muscle LBP. These results indicate protective strategies in controls during acute pain whereas R-LBP patients showed higher pain intensity and altered strategies that may be caused by the higher pain intensity, but the long-term consequence remains unknown.

Efficacy of Biofeedback in Chronic back Pain: a Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The aims of the present analysis were to investigate the short- and long-term efficacy and treatment moderators of biofeedback as a psychological treatment option for chronic back pain.

METHOD

A literature search using PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Library identified 21 eligible studies including 23 treatment conditions and 1062 patients.

RESULTS

Meta-analytic integration resulted in a significant small-to-medium effect size for pain intensity reduction (Hedges' g = 0.60; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.44, 0.76) that proved to be stable with a significant small-to-large effect size (Hedges' g = 0.62; 95 % CI 0.40, 0.84) over an average follow-up phase of 8 months. Biofeedback also proved to be effective in reducing depression (Hedges' g = 0.40; 95 % CI 0.27, 0.52), disability (Hedges' g = 0.49; 95 % CI 0.34, 0.74), reduction of muscle tension (EMG; Hedges' g = 0.44; 95 % CI 0.22, 0.65), and improving cognitive coping (Hedges' g = 0.41; 95 % CI 0.26, 0.57). These effects remained comparatively stable at follow-up and for controlled studies only. Moderator analyses revealed longer biofeedback treatments to be more effective for reducing disability and a greater proportion of biofeedback in the treatment to be more effective for reducing depression. Publication bias analyses demonstrated the consistency of these effects.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that biofeedback treatment can lead to improvements on various pain-related outcomes in the short and long terms, both as a standalone and as an adjunctive intervention.

The effect of surface instability on the differential activation of muscle activity in low back pain patients as compared to healthy individuals: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dynamic tasks over unstable surfaces are commonly done in daily activities.

OBJECTIVE

A number of studies indicated positive effect of doing postural tasks over unstable surface on trunk muscle activities in patients with low back pain (LBP), while the others reported opposite effects. Due to lack of consensus in the findings in this area of research, we aimed to systematically review studies, which investigated the effect of surface instability on trunk muscle activity in patients with LBP as compared to healthy individuals.

METHIDS

A literature search was performed using the PubMed, Science Direct, OVID, CINAHL, PEDro, Cochrane, Scopus and MEDLINE databases. Low back pain, unstable surface, posture or stability and trunk muscle activity were applied as keywords. The methodological quality was examined using valid assessment tools.

RESULTS

The activity of superficial trunk muscles is impaired in patients with LBP during dynamic tasks over unstable surfaces. Differences in the methodology of included studies could be considered as reasons behind the inconsistencies in the findings in included studies. These studies included investigation of superficial or deep muscles, the timing of recorded muscle activity, the level of surface instability and the length of time over unstable surfaces.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic tasks over unstable surfaces could decrease pre-program reaction (PPR) and increase voluntary reaction (VR) of superficial trunk muscles in patients with LBP, which may reduce the ratio of deep versus superficial muscles, compared to healthy individuals.

Wearing an Inflatable Vest Alters Muscle Activation and Trunk Angle While Paddling a Surfboard

Low back pain is a commonly reported problem among recreational surfers. Some individuals report that wearing a vest with an inflatable bladder that alters trunk angle may help to alleviate pain. The purpose of this study was to determine whether such a vest has an effect on muscle activation and extension of the lower back. Twelve recreational surfers completed 12 paddling trials at 1.1 m/s in a swim flume on both a shortboard and a longboard on 2 separate days. Three conditions of no vest, vest uninflated, and vest inflated were presented to participants in random order. Surface EMG and trunk angle were acquired via wireless sensors placed over the right erector spinae, mid-trapezius, upper trapezius, and latissimus dorsi. Wearing the inflated vest affected muscle activation: erector spinae and mid-trapezius demonstrated a significant decrease in activation relative to wearing no vest (12% and 18% respectively, p < .05). Trunk extension was also significantly reduced when the vest was inflated (18% reduction, p < .05). Results were similar for both the short and longboard, though this effect was greater while paddling the larger board. These results suggest that a properly inflated vest can alter trunk extension and muscle activity while paddling a surfboard in water.

Task-related and person-related variables influence the effect of low back pain on anticipatory postural adjustments

BACKGROUND

People with low back pain exhibit altered postural coordination that has been suggested as a target for treatment, but heterogeneous presentation has rendered it difficult to identify appropriate candidates and protocols for such treatments. This study evaluated the associations of task-related and person-related factors with the effect of low back pain on anticipatory postural adjustments.

METHODS

Thirteen subjects with and 13 without low back pain performed seated, rapid arm flexion in self-initiated and cued conditions. Mixed-model ANOVA were used to evaluate group and condition effects on APA onset latencies of trunk muscles, arm-raise velocity, and pre-movement cortical potentials. These measures were evaluated for correlation with pain ratings, Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire scores, and Modified Oswestry Questionnaire scores.

FINDINGS

Delayed postural adjustments of subjects with low back pain were greater in the cued condition than in the self-initiated condition. The group with low back pain exhibited larger-amplitude cortical potentials than the group without pain, but also significantly slower arm-raise velocities. With arm-raise velocity as a covariate, the effect of low back pain remained significant for the latencies of postural adjustments but not for cortical potentials. Latencies of the postural adjustments significantly correlated with Oswestry and Fear Avoidance Beliefs scores.

INTERPRETATION

Delayed postural adjustments with low back pain appear to be influenced by cueing of movement, pain-related disability and fear of activity. These results highlight the importance of subject characteristics, task condition, and task performance when comparing across studies or when developing treatment of people with low back pain.

Effects of Muscle Fatigue, Creep, and Musculoskeletal Pain on Neuromuscular Responses to Unexpected Perturbation of the Trunk: A Systematic Review

Introduction: Trunk neuromuscular responses have been shown to adapt under the influence of muscle fatigue, as well as spinal tissue creep or even with the presence of low back pain (LBP). Despite a large number of studies exploring how these external perturbations affect the spinal stability, characteristics of such adaptations remains unclear.

Aim: The purpose of this systematic review was to assess the quality of evidence of studies investigating trunk neuromuscular responses to unexpected trunk perturbation. More specifically, the targeted neuromuscular responses were trunk muscle activity reflex and trunk kinematics under the influence of muscle fatigue, spinal creep, and musculoskeletal pain.

Methods: A research of the literature was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and Sport-Discus databases using terms related to trunk neuromuscular reflex responses, measured by electromyography (baseline activity, reflex latency, and reflex amplitude) and/or trunk kinematic, in context of unexpected external perturbation. Moreover, independent variables must be either trunk muscle fatigue or spinal tissue creep or LBP. All included articles were scored for their electromyography methodology based on the “Surface Electromyography for the Non-Invasive Assessment of Muscles (SENIAM)” and the “International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology (ISEK)” recommendations whereas overall quality of articles was scored using a specific quality checklist modified from the Quality Index. Meta-analysis was performed on reflex latency variable.

Results: A final set of 29 articles underwent quality assessments. The mean quality score was 79%. No effect of muscle fatigue on erector spinae reflex latency following an unexpected perturbation, nor any other distinctive effects was found for back muscle fatigue and reflex parameters. As for spinal tissue creep effects, no alteration was found for any of the trunk reflex variables. Finally, the meta-analysis revealed an increased erector spinae reflex latency in patients with chronic LBP in comparison with healthy controls following an unexpected trunk perturbation.

Conclusion: The literature provides some evidence with regard to trunk adaptions in a context of spinal instability. However, most of the evidence was inconclusive due to a high methodological heterogeneity between the studies.

Neural mechanisms and functional correlates of altered postural responses to perturbed standing balance with chronic low back pain

This study sought to determine the effects of chronic low back pain (LBP) on the cortical evoked potentials, muscle activation, and kinematics of postural responses to perturbations of standing balance. Thirteen subjects with chronic, recurrent, non-specific LBP and 13 subjects without LBP participated. The subjects responded to unpredictably timed postural perturbations while standing on a platform that randomly rotated either "toes up" or "toes down". Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to calculate the negative peak (N1) and subsequent positive peak (P2) amplitudes of the perturbation-evoked cortical potentials. Passive-marker motion capture was used to calculate joint and center-of-mass (CoM) displacements. Surface electromyography was used to record muscle onset latencies. Questionnaires assessed pain, interference with activity, fear of activity, and pain catastrophizing. Results demonstrated that subjects with LBP exhibited significantly larger P2 potentials, delayed erector spinae, rectus abdominae, and external oblique onset latencies, as well as smaller trunk extension yet larger trunk flexion, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion displacements compared to subjects without LBP. For the subjects with LBP, CoM displacements significantly and positively correlated with knee displacements as well as activity interference and fear scores. The P2 potentials significantly and negatively correlated with CoM displacements as well as activity interference, catastrophizing, and fear scores. These results demonstrate that people with LBP exhibit altered late-phase cortical processing of postural perturbations concomitant with altered kinematic and muscle responses, and these cortical and postural response characteristics correlate with each other as well as with clinical reports of pain-related fears and activity interference.

Star Excursion Balance Test in Young Athletes with Back Pain

The Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) is effective in measuring dynamic postural control (DPC). This research aimed to determine whether DPC measured by the SEBT in young athletes (YA) with back pain (BP) is different from those without BP (NBP). 53 BP YA and 53 NBP YA matched for age, height, weight, training years, training sessions/week and training minutes/session were studied. Participants performed 4 practice trials after which 3 measurements in the anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral SEBT reach directions were recorded. Normalized reach distance was analyzed using the mean of all 3 measurements. There was no statistical significant difference (p > 0.05) between the reach distance of BP (87.2 ± 5.3, 82.4 ± 8.2, 78.7 ± 8.1) and NBP (87.8 ± 5.6, 82.4 ± 8.0, 80.0 ± 8.8) in the anterior, posteromedial and posterolateral directions respectively. DPC in YA with BP, as assessed by the SEBT, was not different from NBP YA.

Balance recovery reactions in individuals with recurrent nonspecific low back pain: Effect of attention

People who suffer from Low Back Pain (LBP) demonstrate impaired postural control. Deficits in sensory-motor systems have been proposed to be related to these changes. Considering higher cognitive process contribution to postural control, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of cognitive load on balance control of patients with LBP. Twenty subjects with recurrent non-specific LBP and 20 healthy controls participated. They stood on a moveable platform with each foot placed on a separate force plate. They were asked to maintain their balance (a) while expecting translations of the support surface at two sizes of perturbation (b) with and without performing a cognitive (auditory Stroop) task. The outcomes included reaction time (RT), latency, initial velocity and amplitude of center of pressure response for balance, and RT for cognitive performance. Compared to the healthy group, LBP group demonstrated delayed RT and latency, and reduced initial velocity (P<0.05). Moreover, they had slower Stroop RT (F=70.88, P<0.001). Concurrent performance of tasks resulted in increased Stroop RT (F=3.42, P=0.03) and adaptation in initial velocity (F=6.70, P=0.01). At the smaller size of perturbation, cognitive load increased velocity in LBP group but decreased this variable in the healthy group. When the cognitive load was added at the larger size of perturbation, velocity of response decreased in LBP group (P<0.05). These findings imply altered cognitive regulation of dynamic balance in patients with LBP and suggest that the adopted strategy might alter depending upon the characteristics of the postural challenge.

Effects of low back pain and of stabilization or movement-system-impairment treatments on induced postural responses: A planned secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Motor retraining for non-specific chronic low back pain (LBP) often focuses on voluntary postural tasks. This training, however, may not transfer to other known postural impairments, such as automatic postural responses to external perturbations.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the extent current treatments of motor retraining ameliorate impaired postural coordination when responding to a perturbation of standing balance.

DESIGN

Planned secondary analysis of a prospectively registered (NCT01362049), randomized controlled trial with a blinded assessor.

METHOD

Sixty-eight subjects with chronic, recurrent, non-specific LBP were allocated to perform a postural response task as a secondary assessment one week before and one week after receiving either stabilization or Movement System Impairment (MSI)-directed treatment over 6 weekly 1-h sessions plus home exercises. For assessment, subjects completed the Oswestry disability and numeric pain rating questionnaires and then performed a postural response task of maintaining standing balance in response to 3 trials in each of 4 randomly presented directions of linear surface translations of the platform under the subjects' feet. Integrated amplitudes of surface electromyography (EMG) were recorded bilaterally from the rectus abdominis (RA), internal oblique (IO), and external oblique (EO) muscles during the postural response task.

RESULTS

No significant effects of treatment on EMG responses were evident. Oswestry and numeric pain ratings decreased similarly following both treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Stabilization and MSI-directed treatments do not affect trunk EMG responses to perturbations of standing balance in people with LBP, suggesting current methods of motor retraining do not sufficiently transfer to tasks of reactive postural control.

Ultrasound measurement of deep and superficial abdominal muscles thickness during standing postural tasks in participants with and without chronic low back pain

BACKGROUND

Activity of deep abdominal muscles increases the lumbar stability. Majority of previous studies indicated abdominal muscle activity dysfunction during static activity in patients with low back pain (LBP). However, the number of studies that evaluated deep abdominal muscle activity in dynamic standing activities in patients is limited, while this assessment provides better understanding of pain behavior during these activities.

OBJECTIVE

Investigation of superficial and deep abdominal muscles activity in participants with chronic LBP as compared to healthy individuals during standing tasks.

DESIGN

Case control study.

METHODS

Ultrasound imaging was used to measure the thickness of transverse abdominis (TrA), internal oblique (IO) and external oblique (EO) muscles in female participants with (N = 45) and without chronic LBP (CLBP) (N = 45) during tests. The Biodex Balance System was used to provide standing tasks. The thickness of each muscle in a standing task was normalized to actual thickness at rest in the supine lying position to estimate its activity.

RESULTS

The results indicate increases in thickness of all muscles in both groups during dynamic as compared to static standing tasks (P < 0.05, ES > 0.5). Lower percentages of thickness change for TrA muscle and higher for EO muscle were found in the patients as compared to healthy individuals during all tests (P < 0.05, ES > 1.28).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher activity of superficial than deep abdominal muscles in patients as compared to healthy individuals during standing tasks indicates motor control dysfunction in patients with CLBP. Standing tasks can discriminate the individuals with and without LBP and can be progressively used in training.

Surface electromyography studies in standing position confirm that ankle strategy remains disturbed even following successful treatment of patients with a history of sciatica

[Purpose] It is hypothesized that ankle strategy can be changed in patients with a history of sciatica. The aim of this study was to detect residual disturbances following successful treatment. [Subjects and Methods] In patients with a history of sciatica (N=11) and pseudo-sciatica (N=9), differences in muscle activity were recorded with bilateral surface polyelectromyography and stability measurements (center of foot pressure sway and center of spectrum) in normal standing and tandem positions. Results were compared with recordings in healthy people (N=9) to identify abnormalities in electromyographic and postural studies. [Results] Increased amplitude of electromyographic recordings from the gastrocnemius and extensor digiti muscles on the affected side was detected more in patients with a history of sciatica than pseudo-sciatica syndromes in tandem position. Fewer amplitude fluctuations were observed in both positions preferably in patients following sciatica. Changes in center of foot pressure sway and center of spectrum during balance platform studies were detected in normal standing position in this group of patients. No similar abnormalities in electromyographic and postural studies were detected in healthy people. [Conclusion] Sciatica and pseudo-sciatica evoke persistent disturbances in activity of muscles responsible for ankle strategy. Electromyography differentiates the two groups of patients better than postural studies.

The effects of arm movement on reaction time in patients with latent and active upper trapezius myofascial trigger point

BACKGROUND

Myofascial pain syndrome is a significant source of mechanical pain. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of arm movement on reaction time in females with latent and active upper trapezius myofascial trigger point.

METHODS

In this interventional study, a convenience sample of fifteen women with one active MTP, fifteen women with one latent MTP in the upper trapezius, and fifteen normal healthy women were participated. Participants were asked to stand for 10 seconds in an erect standing position. Muscle reaction times were recorded including anterior deltoid (AD), cervical paraspinal (CP) lumbar paraspinal (LP), both of upper trapezius (UT), sternocleidomastoid (SCM) and medial head of gastrocnemius (GcM). Participants were asked to flex their arms in response to a sound stimulus preceded by a warning sound stimulus. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA Test.

RESULTS

There was significant differences in motor time and reaction time between active and control groups (p< 0.05) except for GcM. There was no significant difference in motor time between active and passive groups except for UT without MTP and SCM (p< 0.05). Also, there were no significant differences in motor times between latent MTP and control groups. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in premotor times between the three groups.

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that patients with active MTP need more time to react to stimulus, but patients with latent MTP are similar to healthy subjects in the reaction time. Patients with active MTP had less compatibility with environmental stimulations, and they responded to a specific stimulation with variability in Surface Electromyography (SEMG).

Effects of low back pain stabilization or movement system impairment treatments on voluntary postural adjustments: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

People with low back pain (LBP) exhibit impaired anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether current motor retraining treatments address LBP-associated changes in movement coordination during tasks that do and do not require APAs.

DESIGN

Prospectively registered randomized controlled trial with a blinded assessor.

SETTING

Outcome evaluations occurred in a university laboratory; treatments were carried out in outpatient physical therapy clinics.

PATIENTS

Fifteen subjects without LBP and 33 subjects with chronic, recurrent, and nonspecific LBP.

INTERVENTION

Twelve subjects with LBP received stabilization treatment, 21 received movement system impairment-based treatment, for more than 6 weekly 1-hour sessions plus home exercises.

MEASUREMENTS

Pre- and post-treatment, surface electromyography (EMG) was recorded bilaterally from trunk and leg muscles during unsupported and supported leg-lifting tasks, which did and did not require an APA, respectively. Vertical reaction forces under the contralateral leg were recorded to characterize the APA. Oswestry disability scores and numeric pain ratings were also recorded.

RESULTS

Persons with LBP demonstrated an impaired APA compared with persons without LBP, characterized by increased premovement contralateral force application and increased postmovement trunk EMG amplitude, regardless of the task. After treatments, both groups similarly improved in disability and function; however, APA characteristics did not change (ie, force application or EMG amplitude) in either task.

LIMITATIONS

Treating clinicians were not blinded to treatment allocation, only short-term outcomes were assessed, and main effects of treatment do not rule out nonspecific effects of time or repeated exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

Movement impairments in persons with LBP are not limited to tasks requiring an APA. Stabilization and movement system impairment-based treatments for LBP do not ameliorate and may exacerbate APA impairments (ie, excessive force application and increased post-movement trunk muscle activation).

Competing effects of pain and fear of pain on postural control in low back pain?

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional, observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether pain and fear of pain have competing effects on postural sway in patients with low back pain (LBP).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Competing effects of pain and pain-related fear on postural control can be proposed as the likely explanation for inconsistent results regarding postural sway in the LBP literature. We hypothesized that although pain might increase postural sway, fear of pain might reduce sway through an increased cognitive effort or increased cocontraction to restrict body movement. The cognitive strategy would be less effective under dual-task conditions and the cocontraction strategy was expected to be less effective when standing on a narrow base of support surface.

METHODS

Postural sway was measured in combined conditions of base of support (full and narrow) and cognitive loading (single and dual tasks) in 3 experimental groups with current LBP, recent LBP, and no LBP. Sway amplitude, path length, mean power frequency, and sample entropy were extracted from center-of-pressure data.

RESULTS

The current-LBP group and recent-LBP group reported significantly different levels of pain, but similar levels of pain catastrophizing and kinesiophobia. The current-LBP group tended to display larger sway amplitudes in the anteroposterior direction compared with the other 2 groups. Mean power frequency values in mediolateral direction were lower in patients with the current LBP compared with recent LBP. Smaller sample entropy was found in the current-LBP group than the other groups in most experimental conditions, particularly when standing on a narrow base of support.

CONCLUSION

Alterations of postural sway are mostly mediated by pain but not pain-related fear. LBP tends to increase sway amplitude, which seems to be counteracted by increased effort invested in postural control leading to decreased frequency and increased regularity of sway particularly under increased task demands.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Cross-sectional study.

Altered postural responses persist following physical therapy of general versus specific trunk exercises in people with low back pain

Interventions that target trunk muscle impairments in people with LBP have been promoted; however, the treatment effects on muscle activation impairments during postural tasks remain unclear. Thus, our objective was to evaluate the effects trunk stabilization vs. general strength and conditioning exercises on the automatic postural response in persons with chronic low back pain (LBP). Fifty-eight subjects with chronic, recurrent LBP (n = 58) (i.e., longer than six months) were recruited and randomly assigned to one of two, 10-week physical therapy programs: stabilization (n = 29) or strength and conditioning (n = 29). Pain and function were measured at 11 weeks and 6 months post-treatment initiation. To quantify postural following support surface perturbations, surface electrodes recorded electromyography (EMG) of trunk and leg muscles and force plates recorded forces under the feet, to calculate the center of pressure. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in pain and function out to 6 months. There were also changes in muscle activation patterns immediately post-treatment, but not at 6 months. However, changes in center of pressure (COP) responses were treatment specific. Following treatment, the stabilization group demonstrated later onset of COP displacement, while the onset of COP displacement in the strengthening group was significantly earlier following treatment. Despite two different treatments, clinical improvements and muscle activation patterns were similar for both groups, indicating that the stabilization treatment protocol does not preferentially improve treatment outcomes or inter-muscle postural coordination patterns for persons with LBP.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01611792.

Protocol to assess the neurophysiology associated with multi-segmental postural coordination

Anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) stabilize potential disturbances to posture caused by movement. Impaired APAs are common with disease and injury. Brain functions associated with generating APAs remain uncertain due to a lack of paired tasks that require similar limb motion from similar postural orientations, but differ in eliciting an APA while also being compatible with brain imaging techniques (e.g., functional magnetic resonance imaging; fMRI). This study developed fMRI-compatible tasks differentiated by the presence or absence of APAs during leg movement. Eighteen healthy subjects performed two leg movement tasks, supported leg raise (SLR) and unsupported leg raise (ULR), to elicit isolated limb motion (no APA) versus multi-segmental coordination patterns (including APA), respectively. Ground reaction forces under the feet and electromyographic activation amplitudes were assessed to determine the coordination strategy elicited for each task. Results demonstrated that the ULR task elicited a multi-segmental coordination that was either minimized or absent in the SLR task, indicating that it would serve as an adequate control task for fMRI protocols. A pilot study with a single subject performing each task in an MRI scanner demonstrated minimal head movement in both tasks and brain activation patterns consistent with an isolated limb movement for the SLR task versus multi-segmental postural coordination for the ULR task.

Effects of acute low back pain on postural control

Objective

To evaluate the changes in static and dynamic postural control after the development of acute low back pain.

Methods

Thirty healthy right-handed volunteers were divided into three groups; the right back pain group, the left back pain group, and the control group. 0.5 mL of 5% hypertonic saline was injected into L4-5 paraspinal muscle for 5 seconds to cause muscle pain. The movement of the center of gravity (COG) during their static and dynamic postural control was measured with their eyes open and with their eyes closed before and 2 minutes after the injection.

Results

The COGs for the healthy adults shifted to the right quadrant and the posterior quadrant during their static and dynamic postural control test (p<0.05). The static and dynamic instability index while they had their eyes closed was significantly increased than when they had their eyes open with and without acute back pain. After pain induction, their overall and anterior/posterior instability was increased in both the right back pain group and the left back pain group during the static postural control test (p<0.05). A right deviation and a posterior deviation of the COG still remained, and the posterior deviation was greater in the right back pain group (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The static instability, particularly the anterior/posterior instability was increased in the presence of acute low back pain, regardless of the visual information and the location of pain.

Comparison of trunk muscle activity during bridging exercises using a sling in patients with low back pain

The aims of this study were to compare the activation of global and local muscles of the trunk during bridging with sling exercise (BSE), bridging with ball exercise (BBE), and normal bridging exercise (NBE) and to conduct and analyze these exercises in supine and prone positions to prove the effectiveness of sling exercises. Thirty patients with current low back pain (LBP) were recruited. In the supine and prone bridging exercise, each subject lifted their pelvis with their legs and feet in contact with the sling, ball, or normal surface. The electrical activities of the inferior oblique (IO), rectus abdominis (RA), multifidus (MF), and erector spinae (ES) muscles during the bridging exercises on the 3 surfaces were measured using surface electromyography (sEMG). For normalization, maximum sEMG signals were evaluated during each maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) maneuver. The root mean square during the exercise was normalized as a percentage of the MVIC (%MVIC). In the supine and prone positions, %MVIC of the IO, RA, MF, and ES during BSE was significantly higher than those during BBE and NBE (p < 0.05). In the supine position, %MVIC of the RA and ES during BBE was significantly higher than that during NBE (p < 0.05). In the prone position, all %MVIC during BBE were significantly higher than NBE (p < 0.05). These results verify the theory that the use of an unstable surface increases the activation of global and local trunk muscles during bridging exercises in the supine and prone positions. In conclusion, the use of BSE in a rehabilitation program may have therapeutic effects for patients with LBP by increasing trunk muscle activation. Key pointsCompared with the BBE and NBE, the BSE increased the %MVIC values of the IO, RA, MF, and ES muscles in the supine and prone positions in the patients with LBP.We verified that activation of the global and local trunk muscles was increased by the use of unstable surfaces during the bridging exercises in the supine and prone positions.The BSE was shown to be an effective exercise method for patients with LBP in a rehabilitation program by increasing trunk muscle activation.

Individuals with non-specific low back pain in an active episode demonstrate temporally altered torque responses and direction-specific enhanced muscle activity following unexpected balance perturbations

Individuals with a history of non-specific low back pain (LBP) while in a quiescent pain period demonstrate altered automatic postural responses (APRs) characterized by reduced trunk torque contributions and increased co-activation of trunk musculature. However, it is unknown whether these changes preceded or resulted from pain. To further delineate the relationship between cyclic pain recurrence and APRs, we quantified postural responses following multi-directional support surface translations, in individuals with non-specific LBP, following an active pain episode. Sixteen subjects with and 16 without LBP stood on two force plates that were translated unexpectedly in 12 directions. Net joint torques of the ankles, knees (sagittal only), hips, and trunk, in the frontal and sagittal planes, were quantified and the activation of 12 muscles of the lower limb unilaterally and the dorsal and ventral trunk, bilaterally, were recorded using surface electromyography (EMG). Peaks and latencies to peak joint torques, rates of torque development (slopes), and integrated EMGs characterizing baseline and active muscle contributions were analyzed for group by perturbation direction (torques) and group by perturbation by epoch interaction (EMG) effects. In general, the LBP cohort demonstrated APRs that were of similar torque magnitude and rate but peaked earlier compared to individuals without LBP. Individuals with LBP also demonstrated increased muscle activity following perturbation directions in which the muscle was acting as a prime mover and reduced muscle activity in opposing directions, proximally and distally, with some proximal asymmetries. These altered postural responses may reflect increased muscle spindle sensitivity. Given that these motor alterations are demonstrated proximally and distally, they likely reflect the influence of central nervous system processing in this cohort.