Influence of biases in numerical magnitude allocation on human prosocial decision making

Vestibular and Multi-Sensory Influences Upon Self-Motion Perception and the Consequences for Human Behavior

In this manuscript, we comprehensively review both the human and animal literature regarding vestibular and multi-sensory contributions to self-motion perception. This covers the anatomical basis and how and where the signals are processed at all levels from the peripheral vestibular system to the brainstem and cerebellum and finally to the cortex. Further, we consider how and where these vestibular signals are integrated with other sensory cues to facilitate self-motion perception. We conclude by demonstrating the wide-ranging influences of the vestibular system and self-motion perception upon behavior, namely eye movement, postural control, and spatial awareness as well as new discoveries that such perception can impact upon numerical cognition, human affect, and bodily self-consciousness.

Biased numerical cognition impairs economic decision-making in Parkinson's disease

Objective

Previous findings suggest a context‐dependent bihemispheric allocation of numerical magnitude. Accordingly, we predicted that lateralized motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD), which reflect hemispheric asymmetries, would induce systematic lateralized biases in numerical cognition and have a subsequent influence on decision‐making.

Methods

In 20 PD patients and matched healthy controls we assessed numerical cognition using a number‐pair bisection and random number generation task. Decision‐making was assessed using both the dictator game and a validated questionnaire.

Results

PD patients with predominant right‐sided motor symptoms exhibited pathological biases toward smaller numerical magnitudes and formulated less favorable prosocial choices during a neuroeconomics task (i.e., dictator game). Conversely, patients with left‐sided motor symptoms exhibited pathological biases toward larger numerical magnitudes and formulated more generous prosocial choices. Our account of context‐dependent hemispheric allocation of numerical magnitude in PD was corroborated by applying our data to a pre‐existing computational model and observing significant concordance. Notably, both numerical biasing and impaired decision‐making were correlated with motor asymmetry.

Interpretation

Accordingly, motor asymmetry and functional impairment of cognitive processes in PD can be functionally intertwined. To conclude, our findings demonstrate context‐dependent hemispheric allocation and encoding of numerical magnitude in PD and how biases in numerical magnitude allocation in Parkinsonian patients can correspondingly impair economic decision‐making.