Spinal glycinergic currents are reduced in a rat model of neuropathic pain following partial nerve ligation but not chronic constriction injury

Aged females unilaterally hypersensitize, lack descending inhibition, and overexpress alpha1D adrenergic receptors in a murine posttraumatic chronic pain model

ABSTRACT

Vulnerability to chronic pain is found to depend on age and sex. Most patients with chronic pain are elderly women, especially with posttraumatic pain after bone fracture that prevails beyond the usual recovery period and develops into a complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). There, a distal bone fracture seems to initiate a pathophysiological process with unknown mechanism. To investigate whether sex, age, and alpha adrenergic receptors also contribute to a CRPS-like phenotype in animals, we performed experiments on tibia-fractured mice. Those mice commonly are resilient to the development of a CRPS-like phenotype. However, we found them to be vulnerable to long-lasting pain after distal bone fracture when they were of old age. These mice expressed mechanical and thermal hypersensitivity, as well as weight-bearing and autonomic impairment following bone trauma, which persisted over 3 months. Site-specific and body side-specific glycinergic and α1D-noradrenergic receptor expression in the spinal cord and the contralateral locus coeruleus were misbalanced. Aged female tibia-fractured mice lost descending noradrenergic inhibition and displayed enhanced spinal activity on peripheral pressure stimuli. Together, changes in the noradrenergic, hence, glycinergic system towards excitation in the pain pathway-ascending and descending-might contribute to the development or maintenance of long-lasting pain. Conclusively, changes in the noradrenergic system particularly occur in aged female mice after trauma and might contribute to the development of long-lasting pain. Our data support the hypothesis that some patients with chronic pain would benefit from lowering the adrenergic/sympathetic tone or antagonizing α1(D).

Neuropathic pain; what we know and what we should do about it

Neuropathic pain can result from injury to, or disease of the nervous system. It is notoriously difficult to treat. Peripheral nerve injury promotes Schwann cell activation and invasion of immunocompetent cells into the site of injury, spinal cord and higher sensory structures such as thalamus and cingulate and sensory cortices. Various cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, monoamines and neuropeptides effect two-way signalling between neurons, glia and immune cells. This promotes sustained hyperexcitability and spontaneous activity in primary afferents that is crucial for onset and persistence of pain as well as misprocessing of sensory information in the spinal cord and supraspinal structures. Much of the current understanding of pain aetiology and identification of drug targets derives from studies of the consequences of peripheral nerve injury in rodent models. Although a vast amount of information has been forthcoming, the translation of this information into the clinical arena has been minimal. Few, if any, major therapeutic approaches have appeared since the mid 1990's. This may reflect failure to recognise differences in pain processing in males vs. females, differences in cellular responses to different types of injury and differences in pain processing in humans vs. animals. Basic science and clinical approaches which seek to bridge this knowledge gap include better assessment of pain in animal models, use of pain models which better emulate human disease, and stratification of human pain phenotypes according to quantitative assessment of signs and symptoms of disease. This can lead to more personalized and effective treatments for individual patients. Significance statement: There is an urgent need to find new treatments for neuropathic pain. Although classical animal models have revealed essential features of pain aetiology such as peripheral and central sensitization and some of the molecular and cellular mechanisms involved, they do not adequately model the multiplicity of disease states or injuries that may bring forth neuropathic pain in the clinic. This review seeks to integrate information from the multiplicity of disciplines that seek to understand neuropathic pain; including immunology, cell biology, electrophysiology and biophysics, anatomy, cell biology, neurology, molecular biology, pharmacology and behavioral science. Beyond this, it underlines ongoing refinements in basic science and clinical practice that will engender improved approaches to pain management.