1
|
Davidson MJ, Keys RT, Szekely B, MacNeilage P, Verstraten F, Alais D. Continuous peripersonal tracking accuracy is limited by the speed and phase of locomotion. Sci Rep 2023; 13:14864. [PMID: 37684285 PMCID: PMC10491677 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40655-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that perceptual and cognitive functions are codetermined by rhythmic bodily states. Prior investigations have focused on the cardiac and respiratory rhythms, both of which are also known to synchronise with locomotion-arguably our most common and natural of voluntary behaviours. Compared to the cardiorespiratory rhythms, walking is easier to voluntarily control, enabling a test of how natural and voluntary rhythmic action may affect sensory function. Here we show that the speed and phase of human locomotion constrains sensorimotor performance. We used a continuous visuo-motor tracking task in a wireless, body-tracking virtual environment, and found that the accuracy and reaction time of continuous reaching movements were decreased at slower walking speeds, and rhythmically modulated according to the phases of the step-cycle. Decreased accuracy when walking at slow speeds suggests an advantage for interlimb coordination at normal walking speeds, in contrast to previous research on dual-task walking and reach-to-grasp movements. Phasic modulations of reach precision within the step-cycle also suggest that the upper limbs are affected by the ballistic demands of motor-preparation during natural locomotion. Together these results show that the natural phases of human locomotion impose constraints on sensorimotor function and demonstrate the value of examining dynamic and natural behaviour in contrast to the traditional and static methods of psychological science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Brian Szekely
- Department of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno, USA
| | | | - Frans Verstraten
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - David Alais
- School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
De Comite A, Lefèvre P, Crevecoeur F. Continuous evaluation of cost-to-go for flexible reaching control and online decisions. PLoS Comput Biol 2023; 19:e1011493. [PMID: 37756355 PMCID: PMC10561875 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Humans consider the parameters linked to movement goal during reaching to adjust their control strategy online. Indeed, rapid changes in target structure or disturbances interfering with their initial plan elicit rapid changes in behavior. Here, we hypothesize that these changes could result from the continuous use of a decision variable combining motor and cognitive components. We combine an optimal feedback controller with a real-time evaluation of the expected cost-to-go, which considers target- and movement-related costs, in a common theoretical framework. This model reproduces human behaviors in presence of changes in the target structure occurring during movement and of online decisions to flexibly change target following external perturbations. It also predicts that the time taken to decide to select a novel goal after a perturbation depends on the amplitude of the disturbance and on the rewards of the different options, which is a direct result of the continuous monitoring of the cost-to-go. We show that this result was present in our previously collected dataset. Together our developments point towards a continuous evaluation of the cost-to-go during reaching to update control online and make efficient decisions about movement goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine De Comite
- Institute of Neuroscience, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Philippe Lefèvre
- Institute of Neuroscience, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Frédéric Crevecoeur
- Institute of Neuroscience, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, Electronics and Applied Mathematics, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Česonis J, Franklin DW. Contextual cues are not unique for motor learning: Task-dependant switching of feedback controllers. PLoS Comput Biol 2022; 18:e1010192. [PMID: 35679316 PMCID: PMC9217135 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
The separation of distinct motor memories by contextual cues is a well known and well studied phenomenon of feedforward human motor control. However, there is no clear evidence of such context-induced separation in feedback control. Here we test both experimentally and computationally if context-dependent switching of feedback controllers is possible in the human motor system. Specifically, we probe visuomotor feedback responses of our human participants in two different tasks—stop and hit—and under two different schedules. The first, blocked schedule, is used to measure the behaviour of stop and hit controllers in isolation, showing that it can only be described by two independent controllers with two different sets of control gains. The second, mixed schedule, is then used to compare how such behaviour evolves when participants regularly switch from one task to the other. Our results support our hypothesis that there is contextual switching of feedback controllers, further extending the accumulating evidence of shared features between feedforward and feedback control. Extensive evidence has demonstrated that humans can learn distinct motor memories (i.e. independent feedforward controllers) using contextual cues. However, there is little evidence that such contextual cues produce similar separation of feedback controllers. As accumulating evidence highlights the connection between feedforward and feedback control, we propose that context may be used to separate feedback controllers as well. It has not been trivial to test experimentally whether a change in context also modulates the feedback control, as the controller output is affected by other non-contextual factors such as movement kinematics, time-to-target or the properties of the perturbation used to probe the control. Here we present a computational approach based on normative modelling where we separate the effects of the context from other non-contextual effects on the visuomotor feedback system. We then show experimentally that task context independently modulates the feedback control in a particular manner that can be reliably predicted using optimal feedback control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justinas Česonis
- Neuromuscular Diagnostics, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - David W. Franklin
- Neuromuscular Diagnostics, Department of Sport and Health Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence (MIRMI), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- Munich Data Science Institute (MDSI), Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Oostwoud Wijdenes L, Wynn SC, Roesink BS, Schutter DJLG, Selen LPJ, Medendorp WP. Assessing corticospinal excitability and reaching hand choice during whole-body motion. J Neurophysiol 2022; 128:19-27. [PMID: 35647760 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00699.2020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Behavioral studies have shown that humans account for inertial acceleration in their decisions of hand choice when reaching during body motion. Physiologically, it is unclear at what stage of movement preparation information about body motion is integrated in the process of hand selection. Here, we addressed this question by applying transcranial magnetic stimulation over left motor cortex (M1) of human participants who performed a preferential reach task while they were sinusoidally translated on a linear motion platform. If M1 only represents a read-out of the final hand choice, we expect the body motion not to affect the motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude. If body motion biases the hand selection process prior to target onset, we expect corticospinal excitability to be influenced by the phase of the motion, with larger MEP amplitudes for phases that show a bias to using the right hand. Behavioral results replicate our earlier findings of a sinusoidal modulation of hand choice bias with motion phase. MEP amplitudes also show a sinusoidal modulation with motion phase, suggesting that body motion influences corticospinal excitability which may ultimately reflect changes of hand preference. The modulation being present prior to target onset suggests that competition between hands is represented throughout the corticospinal tract. Its phase relationship with the motion profile indicates that other processes after target onset take up time until the hand selection process has been completely resolved, and the reach is initiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes
- Donders Institute of Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, grid.5590.9Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Syanah C Wynn
- School of Psychology, grid.6572.6University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Béla Sebastiaan Roesink
- Donders Institute of Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, grid.5590.9Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Dennis J L G Schutter
- Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, grid.5477.1Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Luc P J Selen
- Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, grid.5590.9Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - W Pieter Medendorp
- Donders institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, grid.5590.9Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Martin CZ, Lapierre P, Haché S, Lucien D, Green AM. Vestibular contributions to online reach execution are processed via mechanisms with knowledge about limb biomechanics. J Neurophysiol 2021; 125:1022-1045. [PMID: 33502952 DOI: 10.1152/jn.00688.2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies of reach control with the body stationary have shown that proprioceptive and visual feedback signals contributing to rapid corrections during reaching are processed by neural circuits that incorporate knowledge about the physical properties of the limb (an internal model). However, among the most common spatial and mechanical perturbations to the limb are those caused by our body's own motion, suggesting that processing of vestibular signals for online reach control may reflect a similar level of sophistication. We investigated this hypothesis using galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) to selectively activate the vestibular sensors, simulating body rotation, as human subjects reached to remembered targets in different directions (forward, leftward, rightward). If vestibular signals contribute to purely kinematic/spatial corrections for body motion, GVS should evoke reach trajectory deviations of similar size in all directions. In contrast, biomechanical modeling predicts that if vestibular processing for online reach control takes into account knowledge of the physical properties of the limb and the forces applied on it by body motion, then GVS should evoke trajectory deviations that are significantly larger during forward and leftward reaches as compared with rightward reaches. When GVS was applied during reaching, the observed deviations were on average consistent with this prediction. In contrast, when GVS was instead applied before reaching, evoked deviations were similar across directions, as predicted for a purely spatial correction mechanism. These results suggest that vestibular signals, like proprioceptive and visual feedback, are processed for online reach control via sophisticated neural mechanisms that incorporate knowledge of limb biomechanics.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Studies examining proprioceptive and visual contributions to rapid corrections for externally applied mechanical and spatial perturbations during reaching have provided evidence for flexible processing of sensory feedback that accounts for musculoskeletal system dynamics. Notably, however, such perturbations commonly arise from our body's own motion. In line with this, we provide compelling evidence that, similar to proprioceptive and visual signals, vestibular signals are processed for online reach control via sophisticated mechanisms that incorporate knowledge of limb biomechanics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Z Martin
- Département de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Philippe Lapierre
- Département de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Simon Haché
- Département de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Diderot Lucien
- Département de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Andrea M Green
- Département de Neurosciences, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|