Evidence That Xenon Does Not Produce Open Channel Blockade of the NMDA Receptor

The cellular mechanisms associated with the anesthetic and neuroprotective properties of xenon: a systematic review of the preclinical literature

Introduction

Xenon exhibits significant neuroprotection against a wide range of neurological insults in animal models. However, clinical evidence that xenon improves outcomes in human studies of neurological injury remains elusive. Previous reviews of xenon's method of action have not been performed in a systematic manner. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the evidence underlying the cellular interactions responsible for two phenomena associated with xenon administration: anesthesia and neuroprotection.

Methods

A systematic review of the preclinical literature was carried out according to the PRISMA guidelines and a review protocol was registered with PROSPERO. The review included both in vitro models of the central nervous system and mammalian in vivo studies. The search was performed on 27th May 2022 in the following databases: Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Ovid Emcare, APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science. A risk of bias assessment was performed utilizing the Office of Health Assessment and Translation tool. Given the heterogeneity of the outcome data, a narrative synthesis was performed.

Results

The review identified 69 articles describing 638 individual experiments in which a hypothesis was tested regarding the interaction of xenon with cellular targets including: membrane bound proteins, intracellular signaling cascades and transcription factors. Xenon has both common and subtype specific interactions with ionotropic glutamate receptors. Xenon also influences the release of inhibitory neurotransmitters and influences multiple other ligand gated and non-ligand gated membrane bound proteins. The review identified several intracellular signaling pathways and gene transcription factors that are influenced by xenon administration and might contribute to anesthesia and neuroprotection.

Discussion

The nature of xenon NMDA receptor antagonism, and its range of additional cellular targets, distinguishes it from other NMDA antagonists such as ketamine and nitrous oxide. This is reflected in the distinct behavioral and electrophysiological characteristics of xenon. Xenon influences multiple overlapping cellular processes, both at the cell membrane and within the cell, that promote cell survival. It is hoped that identification of the underlying cellular targets of xenon might aid the development of potential therapeutics for neurological injury and improve the clinical utilization of xenon.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: 336871.

Xenon modulates synaptic transmission to rat hippocampal CA3 neurons at both pre- and postsynaptic sites

KEY POINTS

Xenon (Xe) non-competitively inhibited whole-cell excitatory glutamatergic current (I_Glu ) and whole-cell currents gated by ionotropic glutamate receptors (I_AMPA , I_KA , I_NMDA ), but had no effect on inhibitory GABAergic whole-cell current (I_GABA ). Xe decreased only the frequency of glutamatergic spontaneous and miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents and GABAergic spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents without changing the amplitude or decay times of these synaptic responses. Xe decreased the amplitude of both the action potential-evoked excitatory and the action potential-evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents (eEPSCs and eIPSCs, respectively) via a presynaptic inhibition in transmitter release. We conclude that the main site of action of Xe is presynaptic in both excitatory and inhibitory synapses, and that the Xe inhibition is much greater for eEPSCs than for eIPSCs.

ABSTRACT

To clarify how xenon (Xe) modulates excitatory and inhibitory whole-cell and synaptic responses, we conducted an electrophysiological experiment using the 'synapse bouton preparation' dissociated mechanically from the rat hippocampal CA3 region. This technique can evaluate pure single- or multi-synapse responses and enabled us to accurately quantify how Xe influences pre- and postsynaptic aspects of synaptic transmission. Xe inhibited whole-cell glutamatergic current (I_Glu ) and whole-cell currents gated by the three subtypes of glutamate receptor (I_AMPA , I_KA and I_NMDA ). Inhibition of these ionotropic currents occurred in a concentration-dependent, non-competitive and voltage-independent manner. Xe markedly depressed the slow steady current component of I_AMPA almost without altering the fast phasic I_AMPA component non-desensitized by cyclothiazide. It decreased current frequency without affecting the amplitude and current kinetics of glutamatergic spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents and miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents. It decreased the amplitude, increasing the failure rate (Rf) and paired-pulse rate (PPR) without altering the current kinetics of glutamatergic action potential-evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents. Thus, Xe has a clear presynaptic effect on excitatory synaptic transmission. Xe did not alter the GABA-induced whole-cell current (I_GABA ). It decreased the frequency of GABAergic spontaneous inhibitory postsynaptic currents without changing the amplitude and current kinetics. It decreased the amplitude and increased the PPR and Rf of the GABAergic action potential-evoked inhibitory postsynaptic currents without altering the current kinetics. Thus, Xe acts exclusively at presynaptic sites at the GABAergic synapse. In conclusion, our data indicate that a presynaptic decrease of excitatory transmission is likely to be the major mechanism by which Xe induces anaesthesia, with little contribution of effects on GABAergic synapses.

Open channel block of NMDA receptors by diphenhydramine

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Diphenhydramine is a well known H1-receptor antagonist that plays a major role in clinical practice. Nowadays, diphenhydramine is primarily applied to prevent nausea but also its sedative and analgesic effects are of clinical importance. As other drugs mediating sedative and analgesic properties partly operate via the inhibition of glutamate receptors, we tested the hypothesis that diphenhydramine, as well interacts with excitatory ionotropic glutamate receptors.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Electrophysiological patch-clamp experiments were performed on glutamate receptors which were heterologously expressed in human TsA cells.

KEY RESULTS

Diphenhydramine inhibits NMDA-mediated membrane currents in a reversible and concentration-dependent manner at clinically relevant concentrations. The inhibition occurred in a noncompetitive manner. Diphenhydramine did not compete with NMDA or glycine for their binding sites and half-maximal inhibition was obtained around 25 μM diphenhydramine, independent of the subunit composition. The inhibition was caused by a classical open channel blocking mechanism and varied strongly with the membrane potential. Our results suggest that diphenhydramine most probably interacts with the Mg2+ binding site or a very closely related area of the channel pore.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

The data presented here provide evidence that the NMDA receptor antagonism of diphenhydramine contribute to its sedative and potentially LTP-related effects like analgesia and amnesia.

Ethanol inhibition of constitutively open N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors

N-Methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors gate a slow and calcium-rich component of the postsynaptic glutamate response. Like all ionotropic glutamate receptors, NMDA subunits contain a highly conserved motif (SYTANLAAF) in the transmembrane (TM) 3 domain that is critically involved in channel gating. Mutation of an alanine in this domain (A7; underlined above) results in constitutively open receptors that show reduced sensitivity to several allosteric modulators. In this study, we examined the effects of ethanol, a substance that inhibits NMDA currents via an unknown mechanism, on tonically active NMDA receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. Ethanol (100 mM) inhibited currents from GluN1(A7R)/GluN2A and GluN1(A7R)/GluN2B receptors by approximately 50%, whereas those from GluN1/GluN2B(A7R) receptors were reduced by less than 10%. In cysteine-substituted GluN1 and GluN2 A7 mutants, estimated ethanol IC₅₀ values for agonist-gated currents were 101, 117, 103, and 69 mM for GluN1(A7C)/GluN2A, GluN1(A7C)/GluN2B, GluN1/GluN2A(A7C), and GluN1/GluN2B(A7C) receptors, respectively. After exposure to the thiol-modifying reagent 2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl methanethiosulfonate (MTSET), A7C mutants showed robust agonist-independent currents and reduced sensitivity to ethanol (IC₅₀ values of 371, 256, 715, and 958 mM, respectively, as above). In contrast, cysteine modification of the ligand-binding domain resulted in constitutively open receptors that showed robust ethanol inhibition. Ethanol inhibition of MTSET-treated GluN1(A7C) receptors was further reduced by TM3/TM4 mutations previously shown to reduce ethanol sensitivity of agonist-gated receptors. Overall, these results show that ethanol affects NMDA receptor function at a site distal from agonist binding and appears to exert greater effects via perturbation of GluN2 subunits.

Mechanistic insights into xenon inhibition of NMDA receptors from MD simulations

Inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors has been viewed as a primary cause of xenon anesthesia, yet the mechanism is unclear. Here, we investigated interactions between xenon and the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of a NMDA receptor and examined xenon-induced structural and dynamical changes that are relevant to functional changes of the NMDA receptor. Several comparative molecular dynamics simulations were performed on two X-ray structures representing the open- and closed-cleft LBD of the NMDA receptor. We identified plausible xenon action sites in the LBD, including those nearby agonist sites, in the hinge region, and at the interface between two subunits. The xenon-binding energy varies from -5.3 to -0.7 kcal/mol. Xenon's effect on the NMDA receptor is conformation-dependent and is produced through both competitive and noncompetitive mechanisms. Xenon can promote cleft opening in the absence of agonists and consequently stabilizes the closed channel. Xenon can also bind at the interface of two subunits, alter the intersubunit interaction, and lead to a reduction of the distance between two GT linkers. This reduction corresponds to a rearrangement of the channel toward a direction of pore size decreasing, implying a closed or desensitized channel. In addition to these noncompetitive actions, xenon was found to weaken the glutamate binding, which could lead to low agonist efficacy and appear as competitive inhibition.

[Benefits and indications of xenon anaesthesia]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the current knowledge related to xenon anaesthesia.

DATA SOURCES

References were obtained from computerized bibliographic research (Medline), recent review articles, the library of the service and personal files.

STUDY SELECTION

All categories of articles on this topic have been selected.

DATA EXTRACTION

Articles have been analyzed for biophysics, pharmacology, toxicity and environmental effects, clinical effects and using prospect.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The noble gas xenon has anaesthetic properties that have been recognized 50 years ago. Xenon is receiving renewed interest because it has many characteristics of an ideal anaesthetic. In addition to its lack of effects on cardiovascular system, xenon has a low solubility enabling faster induction of and emergence from anaesthesia than with other inhalational agents. Nevertheless, at present, the cost and rarity of xenon limits widespread use in clinical practice. The development of closed rebreathing system that allowed recycling of xenon and therefore reducing its waste has led to a recent interest in this gas.

CONCLUSION

Reducing its cost will help xenon to find its place among anaesthetic agents and extend its use to severe patients with specific pathologies.