1
|
Jin J, van Dieën JH, Kistemaker D, Daffertshofer A, Bruijn SM. Does ankle push-off correct for errors in anterior-posterior foot placement relative to center-of-mass states? PeerJ 2023; 11:e15375. [PMID: 37273538 PMCID: PMC10234269 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Understanding the mechanisms humans use to stabilize walking is vital for predicting falls in elderly. Modeling studies identified two potential mechanisms to stabilize gait in the anterior-posterior direction: foot placement control and ankle push-off control: foot placement depends on position and velocity of the center-of-mass (CoM) and push-off covaries with deviations between actual and predicted CoM trajectories. While both control mechanisms have been reported in humans, it is unknown whether especially the latter one is employed in unperturbed steady-state walking. Based on the finding of Wang and Srinivasan that foot placement deviates in the same direction as the CoM states in the preceding swing phase, and assuming that this covariance serves the role of stabilizing gait, the covariance between the CoM states and foot placement can be seen as a measure of foot placement accuracy. We subsequently interpreted the residual variance in foot placement from a linear regression model as "errors" that must be compensated, and investigated whether these foot placement errors were correlated to push-off kinetic time series of the subsequent double stance phase. We found ankle push-off torque to be correlated to the foot placement errors in 30 participants when walking at normal and slow speeds, with peak correlations over the double stance phase up to 0.39. Our study suggests that humans use a push-off strategy for correcting foot placement errors in steady-state walking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Jin
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap H. van Dieën
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dinant Kistemaker
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas Daffertshofer
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoerd M. Bruijn
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Institute of Brain and Behavior Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beck ON, Shepherd MK, Rastogi R, Martino G, Ting LH, Sawicki GS. Exoskeletons need to react faster than physiological responses to improve standing balance. Sci Robot 2023; 8:eadf1080. [PMID: 36791215 PMCID: PMC10169237 DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.adf1080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Maintaining balance throughout daily activities is challenging because of the unstable nature of the human body. For instance, a person's delayed reaction times limit their ability to restore balance after disturbances. Wearable exoskeletons have the potential to enhance user balance after a disturbance by reacting faster than physiologically possible. However, "artificially fast" balance-correcting exoskeleton torque may interfere with the user's ensuing physiological responses, consequently hindering the overall reactive balance response. Here, we show that exoskeletons need to react faster than physiological responses to improve standing balance after postural perturbations. Delivering ankle exoskeleton torque before the onset of physiological reactive joint moments improved standing balance by 9%, whereas delaying torque onset to coincide with that of physiological reactive ankle moments did not. In addition, artificially fast exoskeleton torque disrupted the ankle mechanics that generate initial local sensory feedback, but the initial reactive soleus muscle activity was only reduced by 18% versus baseline. More variance of the initial reactive soleus muscle activity was accounted for using delayed and scaled whole-body mechanics [specifically center of mass (CoM) velocity] versus local ankle-or soleus fascicle-mechanics, supporting the notion that reactive muscle activity is commanded to achieve task-level goals, such as maintaining balance. Together, to elicit symbiotic human-exoskeleton balance control, device torque may need to be informed by mechanical estimates of global sensory feedback, such as CoM kinematics, that precede physiological responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Owen N Beck
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.,Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Max K Shepherd
- Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rish Rastogi
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Giovanni Martino
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Lena H Ting
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Division of Physical Therapy, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Gregory S Sawicki
- George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.,School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Keemink AQL, Brug TJH, van Asseldonk EHF, Wu AR, van der Kooij H. Whole Body Center of Mass Feedback in a Reflex-Based Neuromuscular Model Predicts Ankle Strategy During Perturbed Walking. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2021; 29:2521-2529. [PMID: 34847033 DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2021.3131366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Active prosthetic and orthotic devices have the potential to increase quality of life for individuals with impaired mobility. However, more research into human-like control methods is needed to create seamless interaction between device and user. In forward simulations the reflex-based neuromuscular model (RNM) by Song and Geyer shows promising similarities with real human gait in unperturbed conditions. The goal of this work was to validate and, if needed, extend the RNM to reproduce human kinematics and kinetics during walking in unperturbed and perturbed conditions. The RNM was optimized to reproduce joint torque, calculated with inverse dynamics, from kinematic and force data of unperturbed and perturbed treadmill walking of able-bodied human subjects. Torques generated by the RNM matched closely with torques found from inverse dynamics analysis on human data for unperturbed walking. However, for perturbed walking the modulation of the ankle torque in the RNM was opposite to the modulation observed in humans. Therefore, the RNM was extended with a control module that activates and inhibits muscles around the ankle of the stance leg, based on changes in whole body center of mass velocity. The added module improves the ability of the RNM to replicate human ankle torque response in response to perturbations. This reflex-based neuromuscular model with whole body center of mass velocity feedback can reproduce gait kinetics of unperturbed and perturbed gait, and as such holds promise as a basis for advanced controllers of prosthetic and orthotic devices.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ha SY, Han JH, Ko YJ, Sung YH. Ankle exercise with functional electrical stimulation affects spasticity and balance in stroke patients. J Exerc Rehabil 2020; 16:496-502. [PMID: 33457385 PMCID: PMC7788250 DOI: 10.12965/jer.2040780.390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 11/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Stroke patients have limited motor function due to ankle spasticity, and various interventions are applied to solve this problem. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of functional electrical stimulation (FES) with ankle exercise on spinal cord motor neuron excitability and balance in stroke patients. Twenty-five stroke patients were divided into the three groups. For the intervention, the control group applied general physiotherapy, the experimental group I applied a sham FES with ankle exercise, and the experimental group II applied a FES with ankle exercise. All groups applied the intervention for 30 min per session, 5 times a week, for a total of 8 weeks. The functional reaching test (FRT), Timed Up and Go test was used to measure balance ability, and H-reflex was used to measure spinal motor neuron excitability. All tests were measured before and after the intervention. In the ankle exercise with FES group, spinal motor neuron excitability significantly decreased (P<0.05), and FRT was significantly increased (P<0.05). Therefore, FES with ankle exercise for stroke patients could be suggested as an effective intervention for improving motor function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun-Young Ha
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Kyungnam University, Changwon, Korea
| | - Jun-Ho Han
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Kyungnam University, Changwon, Korea
| | - Young Jun Ko
- Major in Sport Service Practice, College of Welfare Covergence, Kangnam University, Yongin, Korea
| | - Yun-Hee Sung
- Department of Physical Therapy, Graduate School, Kyungnam University, Changwon, Korea.,Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Kyungnam University, Changwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reimann H, Fettrow T, Grenet D, Thompson ED, Jeka JJ. Phase-Dependency of Medial-Lateral Balance Responses to Sensory Perturbations During Walking. Front Sports Act Living 2019; 1:25. [PMID: 33344949 PMCID: PMC7739817 DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2019.00025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The human body is mechanically unstable during walking. Maintaining upright stability requires constant regulation of muscle force by the central nervous system to push against the ground and move the body mass in the desired way. Activation of muscles in the lower body in response to sensory or mechanical perturbations during walking is usually highly phase-dependent, because the effect any specific muscle force has on the body movement depends upon the body configuration. Yet the resulting movement patterns of the upper body after the same perturbations are largely phase-independent. This is puzzling, because any change of upper-body movement must be generated by parts of the lower body pushing against the ground. How do phase-dependent muscle activation patterns along the lower body generate phase-independent movement patterns of the upper body? We hypothesize that when a sensory system detects a deviation of the body in space from a desired state that indicates the onset of a fall, the nervous system generates a functional response by pushing against the ground in any way possible with the current body configuration. This predicts that the changes in the ground reaction force patterns following a balance perturbation should be phase-independent. Here we test this hypothesis by disturbing upright balance in the frontal plane using Galvanic vestibular stimulation at three different points in the gait cycle. We measure the resulting changes in whole-body center of mass movement and the location of the center of pressure of the ground reaction force. We find that the magnitude of the initial center of pressure shift in the direction of the perceived fall is larger for perturbations late in the gait cycle, while there is no statistically significant difference in onset time. These results contradict our hypothesis by showing that even the initial CoP shift in response to a balance perturbation depends upon the phase of the gait cycle. Contrary to expectation, we also find that the whole-body balance response is not phase-independent. Both the onset time and the magnitude of the whole-body center of mass shift depend on the phase of the perturbation. We conclude that the central nervous system recruits any available mechanism to generate a functional balance response by pushing against the ground as fast as possible in response to a perturbation, but that the different mechanisms available at different phases in the gait cycle are not equally strong, leading to phase-dependent differences in the overall response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hendrik Reimann
- Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States
- Department of Kinesiology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Tyler Fettrow
- Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States
- Department of Kinesiology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - David Grenet
- Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States
| | - Elizabeth D. Thompson
- Department of Kinesiology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States
- Department of Physical Therapy, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - John J. Jeka
- Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, United States
- Department of Kinesiology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|