Reply to O'Grady et al

Role of Ion Channels in the Chemotransduction and Mechanotransduction in Digestive Function and Feeding Behavior

The gastrointestinal tract constantly communicates with the environment, receiving and processing a wide range of information. The contents of the gastrointestinal tract and the gastrointestinal tract generate mechanical and chemical signals, which are essential for regulating digestive function and feeding behavior. There are many receptors here that sense intestinal contents, including nutrients, microbes, hormones, and small molecule compounds. In signal transduction, ion channels are indispensable as an essential component that can generate intracellular ionic changes or electrical signals. Ion channels generate electrical activity in numerous neurons and, more importantly, alter the action of non-neurons simply and effectively, and also affect satiety, molecular secretion, intestinal secretion, and motility through mechanisms of peripheral sensation, signaling, and altered cellular function. In this review, we focus on the identity of ion channels in chemosensing and mechanosensing in the gastrointestinal tract.

Problems with extracellular recording of electrical activity in gastrointestinal muscle

Motility patterns of the gastrointestinal tract are important for efficient processing of nutrients and waste. Peristalsis and segmentation are based on rhythmic electrical slow waves that generate the phasic contractions fundamental to gastrointestinal motility. Slow waves are generated and propagated actively by interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC), and these events conduct to smooth muscle cells to elicit excitation-contraction coupling. Extracellular electrical recording has been utilized to characterize slow-wave generation and propagation and abnormalities that might be responsible for gastrointestinal motility disorders. Electrode array recording and digital processing are being used to generate data for models of electrical propagation in normal and pathophysiological conditions. Here, we discuss techniques of extracellular recording as applied to gastrointestinal organs and how mechanical artefacts might contaminate these recordings and confound their interpretation. Without rigorous controls for movement, current interpretations of extracellular recordings might ascribe inaccurate behaviours and electrical anomalies to ICC networks and gastrointestinal muscles, bringing into question the findings and validity of models of gastrointestinal electrophysiology developed from these recordings.