A cross-Canada surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in respiratory tract pathogens

In vitro activity of cefepime against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, viridans group streptococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae from a cross-Canada surveillance study

OBJECTIVE

To determine the in vitro activity of cefepime against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and Gram-positive cocci obtained from an ongoing cross-Canada surveillance study.

DESIGN

Clinical isolates of aerobic Gram-negative bacilli with inducible and constitutive chromosomally mediated cephalosporinases, viridans group streptococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae were collected from laboratories serving hospitals, nursing homes and physician offices in the community from across Canada during 1996 and 1997. Laboratories were asked to submit only clinically relevant nonduplicate isolates for susceptibility testing. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing was carried out on all isolates of Gram-negative and viridans group streptococci. S pneumoniae were characterized as penicillin susceptible, intermediately resistant or highly resistant. Nonsusceptible isolates were defined as being intermediately or highly resistant (minimal inhibitory concentrations [MIC] greater than 0.06 mg/L). Only isolates of S pneumoniae that were nonsusceptible to penicillin were selected for further study. MICs were determined using a microbroth dilution technique according to the National Committee of Clinical Laboratory Standards.

RESULTS

A total of 727 Gram-negative bacilli samples were collected. No resistance to cefepime was detected with Citrobacter freundii, Serratia marcescens, Morganella morganii and Enterobacter species. Of these strains, Enterobacter species and C freundii were the most resistant to ceftazidime, cefotaxime and ceftriaxone with MIC(90S) of 32 mg/L or greater and resistance rates of 6% or greater. Resistance rates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species to cefepime were 4.8% and 3%, respectively. The two organisms had similar rates of resistance to ceftazidime. Less than 3% of the Gram-negative bacilli were resistant to imipenem and meropenem. There were 153 viridans group streptococci, of which 22 (14.4%) were resistant to penicillin. Of 1287 S pneumoniae samples, 193 (15%) were nonsusceptible to penicillin. Cefepime, ceftriaxone and cefotaxime had comparable activity against all isolates of viridans group streptococci and S pneumoniae.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefepime demonstrated excellent in vitro activity against Gram-negative bacilli with inducible and constitutive chromosomally mediated cephalosporinases, and had equal or superior activity versus comparator beta-lactams against all isolates of viridans group streptococci and S pneumoniae.

Reduced susceptibility to penicillin among pneumococci causing invasive infection in children - Canada, 1991 to 1998

OBJECTIVE

To determine, over time, the rate and serotypes of pneumococci with reduced penicillin susceptibility obtained from children with invasive infection.

DESIGN

Active, hospital-based, multicentre surveillance spanning from 1991 to 1998.

SETTING

Eleven Canadian tertiary care paediatric facilities located from coast to coast.

POPULATION STUDIED

1847 children with invasive pneumococcal infection whose isolates (from a normally sterile site) were available for serotyping and standardized testing for penicillin susceptibility at the National Centre for Streptococcus.

MAIN RESULTS

The prevalence of reduced penicillin susceptibility increased from 2.5% of 197 cases in 1991 to 13.0% of 276 cases in 1998. In the latter year, 8.7% of isolates had intermediate level resistance, and 4.3% had high level resistance. Since they were first detected in 1992, strains with high level resistance have been encountered only sporadically at most centres, but by 1998, all centres but two had encountered examples. Of 40 isolates with high level resistance and 101 isolates with intermediate level resistance, serotypes matched those included in new seven-valent conjugate vaccines for children in 97.5% and 79.2% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumococci with reduced susceptibility to penicillin are increasing in frequency across Canada among children with invasive infection. The Immunization Monitoring Program, Active data indicate that new conjugate vaccines could help to curb infections due to pneumococci with reduced susceptibility to penicillin but are unlikely to control completely the problem of antibiotic resistance.

How Nova Scotia general practitioners choose antibiotics for the empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia

OBJECTIVE

To gain an understanding of how physicians in general practice choose antibiotics for the empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

DESIGN

Questionnaire with three sample cases of CAP and a knowledge assessment (mailed to half of the physicians).

POPULATION STUDIED

Nova Scotia family physicians.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-four of the 841 (21.9%) physicians who were mailed a questionnaire responded. A knowledge assessment showed satisfactory knowledge except in two areas - an overestimation of the prevalence of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in Nova Scotia and the view that ciprofloxacin was an effective antibiotic for the treatment of CAP (42% of physicians). As the complexity of the case increased, there was decreasing consensus regarding the choice of antibiotic therapy and a decline in prescribing according to guidelines for the treatment of CAP. Also, as the complexity of the cases increased, it became increasingly difficult to discern a decision-making strategy. For the simplest case - a 17-year-old male with presumed Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia - physician factors (age, family practice training), desire to target specific pathogens, and concern with resistance and side effects affected the choice of antibiotic. However, for the most complex case - a 45-year-old female with severe pneumonia - familiarity with such a case was the only significant factor and led to treatment with a combination of antibiotics designed to treat both typical and atypical pathogens.

CONCLUSIONS

For uncomplicated cases of CAP, physician factors, desire to treat specific pathogens and concern with resistance affect the choice of antibiotic therapy. For complex cases, familiarity with such cases was the only factor that influenced choice of antibiotic therapy.

Macrolide and ketolide resistance with Streptococcus pneumoniae

Antimicrobial agents in the macrolide family have long been considered drugs of potential utility in the management of infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae. However, with the emergence of macrolide resistance, the clinical value of macrolides in pneumococcal infections is threatened. In part, as a consequence of the development of macrolide resistance, recently the first agent in the ketolide antimicrobial class, telithromycin, was developed and introduced into clinical practice. The ketolides are macrolide antimicrobials whose chemistry has been modified so as avoid the effects of the most common mechanisms of macrolide resistance with S pneumoniae. This discussion reviews the current state of resistance to macrolides and ketolides with S pneumoniae in North America.

Antimicrobial drug use and resistance among respiratory pathogens in the community

There is substantial evidence that the overuse of antibiotics is a major cause for the emergence of resistance in respiratory pathogens in the community. However, it is also recognized that the mechanisms of resistance, the cost of resistance to the fitness of the organism, and the ability of the resistant strain to disseminate are all important contributors to this problem. Therefore, when developing strategies to control and/or prevent the emergence of resistance, health care professionals must take each of these factors into consideration. As we enter a new era in the use of fluoroquinolones for the treatment of respiratory tract infections, we have an opportunity to apply such lessons learned in the past to minimize or prevent the development of resistance to this class of antimicrobial drugs in the future.

Review of macrolides and ketolides: focus on respiratory tract infections

The first macrolide, erythromycin A, demonstrated broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity and was used primarily for respiratory and skin and soft tissue infections. Newer 14-, 15- and 16-membered ring macrolides such as clarithromycin and the azalide, azithromycin, have been developed to address the limitations of erythromycin. The main structural component of the macrolides is a large lactone ring that varies in size from 12 to 16 atoms. A new group of 14-membered macrolides known as the ketolides have recently been developed which have a 3-keto in place of the L-cladinose moiety. Macrolides reversibly bind to the 23S rRNA and thus, inhibit protein synthesis by blocking elongation. The ketolides have also been reported to bind to 23S rRNA and their mechanism of action is similar to that of macrolides. Macrolide resistance mechanisms include target site alteration, alteration in antibiotic transport and modification of the antibiotic. The macrolides and ketolides exhibit good activity against gram-positive aerobes and some gram-negative aerobes. Ketolides have excellent activity versus macrolide-resistant Streptococcus spp. Including mefA and ermB producing Streptococcus pneumoniae. The newer macrolides, such as azithromycin and clarithromycin, and the ketolides exhibit greater activity against Haemophilus influenzae than erythromycin. The bioavailability of macrolides ranges from 25 to 85%, with corresponding serum concentrations ranging from 0.4 to 12 mg/L and area under the concentration-time curves from 3 to 115 mg/L x h. Half-lives range from short for erythromycin to medium for clarithromycin, roxithromycin and ketolides, to very long for dirithromycin and azithromycin. All of these agents display large volumes of distribution with excellent uptake into respiratory tissues and fluids relative to serum. The majority of the agents are hepatically metabolised and excretion in the urine is limited, with the exception of clarithromycin. Clinical trials involving the macrolides are available for various respiratory infections. In general, macrolides are the preferred treatment for community-acquired pneumonia and alternative treatment for other respiratory infections. These agents are frequently used in patients with penicillin allergies. The macrolides are well-tolerated agents. Macrolides are divided into 3 groups for likely occurrence of drug-drug interactions: group 1 (e.g. erythromycin) are frequently involved, group 2 (e.g. clarithromycin, roxithromycin) are less commonly involved, whereas drug interactions have not been described for group 3 (e.g. azithromycin, dirithromycin). Few pharmacoeconomic studies involving macrolides are presently available. The ketolides are being developed in an attempt to address the increasingly prevalent problems of macrolide-resistant and multiresistant organisms.

Susceptibility of Canadian isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae to oral antimicrobial agents

We measured the susceptibility of Canadian isolates of three respiratory tract pathogens (Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and Streptococcus pneumoniae) to several currently approved antimicrobial agents by two different methods. We also measured the susceptibility of isolates to seven fluoroquinolones. Beta-lactamase was produced by 123/566 (21.7%) of H. influenzae isolates compared with 178/200 (89%) of M. catarrhalis isolates. For S. pneumoniae 83/374 (22.2%) isolates were penicillin resistant and of these 2.1% (8/374) showed high level resistance (MIC > or = 2 mg/l). Regardless of methodology, all fluoroquinolones were highly active against H. influenzae (MIC(90) < or = 0.031 mg/l) and M. catarrhalis (MIC(90) < or = 0.064 mg/l) isolates. Susceptibility of H. influenzae to cefuroxime and amoxycillin/clavulanic acid was 99-100% whereas 84-85.5% were susceptible to cefaclor and cefprozil. Azithromycin susceptibility ranged from 82.6 to 99.2% depending on the method. M. catarrhalis isolates were uniformly susceptible to all agents tested except amoxycillin. Cross-resistance in S. pneumoniae to all non-quinolone agents was concurrent with increasing penicillin resistance as shown by increasing MIC90 values. For the fluoroquinolones tested, the rank order of potency based on MIC(90) values was as follows: gemifloxacin (0.031-0.063 mg/l), trovafloxacin (0.125 mg/l), moxifloxacin (0.125-0.25 mg/l), grepafloxacin (0.125-0.25 mg/l), gatifloxacin (0.5 mg/l), levofloxacin (1 mg/l) and ciprofloxacin (2 mg/l). Our study confirms either a high or increasing prevalence of antimicrobial resistant respiratory pathogens in Canada and also compares the new and old fluoroquinolones and their potential role as therapy for community-acquired infections. The prevalence of beta-lactamase positive H. influenzae may have decreased from levels reported in previous studies.

A review of antimicrobial resistance in Canada

Antimicrobial resistance is a global concern. Over the past 10 years, considerable efforts and resources have been expended to detect, monitor, and understand at the basic level the many different facets of emerging and increasing resistance. This review summarizes our current understanding of bacterial antimicrobial resistance issues in Canada with particular emphasis given to the Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus, Neisseria meningitidis, Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pyogenes. In addition, future concerns and programs for ongoing surveillance are discussed.

Comparative in vitro activities of ciprofloxacin, gemifloxacin, grepafloxacin, moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin, trovafloxacin, and other antimicrobial agents against bloodstream isolates of gram-positive cocci

The in vitro activity of gemifloxacin against 316 bloodstream isolates of staphylococci, pneumococci, and enterococci was compared with the activities of six fluoroquinolones and three other antimicrobial agents. Of the antimicrobial agents tested, gemifloxacin was the most potent against penicillin-intermediate and -resistant pneumococci, methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates, and coagulase-negative staphylococci.