Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): what are we getting into?

Learning curve of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILS): a preliminary study of 80 selected patients with benign gallbladder diseases

BACKGROUND

Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) is a new laparoscopic procedure in which only one transumbilical incision is made, demonstrated as a scarless procedure. Here we report a single-center preliminary experience of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) in the treatment of benign gallbladder diseases, defining a single surgeon's learning curve.

METHODS

A total of 80 patients underwent SILC successfully by a single experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The operation was performed following the routine LC procedure. Then the perioperative demographics were recorded and the operative time was used to define the learning curve.

RESULTS

The study group included 27 male and 53 female patients with gallstones (56 cases), cholesterol polyps (16 cases), an adenomatous polyp (3 cases), adenomyomatosis (1 case), or complex diseases (4 cases), and all consented to undergo SILC. No patient was converted to normal LC or open surgery. There were no perioperative port-related or surgical complications. The average operative time was 46.9 ± 14.6 min. The average postoperative hospital stay was 1.8 ± 1.3 days. The learning curve of the SILC procedures for this series of selected patients confirmed that SILC is a feasible, safe, and effective approach to the treatment of benign gallbladder diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

For experienced laparoscopic surgeons, SILC is an easy and safe procedure. Patients benefit from milder pain, a lower incidence of port-related complications, better cosmesis, and fast recovery. The SILC procedure may become another option for the treatment of benign gallbladder diseases for selected patients.

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery--here and now

Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) has captured the attention of physicians and patients alike. Although clinical experience remains limited as technological capacity lags someway behind concept, this revolutionary approach is already prompting reassessment of conventional surgical dogma. Indeed, this very aspect may in fact represent the greatest legacy of current endeavour aimed at progressing natural orifice intervention as the biological insights so gleaned may then be used to help hone standard operations further towards perfection. As a corollary, rather than viewing it as a mere means of reformatting laparoscopic operation without the abdominal wall access component, NOTES should be investigated fully from the perspective of how it may complement (rather than compete with) current conventional techniques. In this way patients may in due course be allowed benefit by selection of the procedure of 'best fit' from an expanded array of surgical interventions. A clear focus on identifying specific clinical niches that are currently imperfectly addressed would also considerably advance the rationale for new surgical innovations such as NOTES and allow them to be engineered in the directions most likely to result in therapeutic advance. Thus while NOTES approaches for operations for neoplasia of the colon and even rectum clearly require more nuanced deliberation and care than does for example cholecystectomy for uncomplicated cholelithiasis, the gain from such investment seems likely to more considerably aid both the development and stature of NOTES as well as providing the greater likelihood of clinical progress for our patients.