Human papillomavirus type distribution and correlation with cyto-histological patterns in women from the South of Italy

Comparison of HPV Testing and Colposcopy in Detecting Cervical Dysplasia in Patients With Cytological Abnormalities

AIM

The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic value of HPV testing and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cytology results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 186 women with cytological abnormalities were included in the study. The patients underwent colposcopy examinations and DNA HPV testing of cervical smear with genotyping.

RESULTS

The HPV test was demonstrated to be more sensitive (79.4%) than specific (60.2%) and was more sensitive than colposcopy for detecting CIN changes (79.4% vs. 73.7%). Combined tests achieved a high sensitivity (90.9%) and negative predictive value (96.1%) in detecting patients with CIN2+ and demonstrated the highest positive predictive value (77.3%) for detecting CIN1+. Colposcopy had a very good specificity (83.5%) and positive predictive value (71.2%) in finding CIN1+ cases.

CONCLUSION

HPV tests showed a higher sensitivity than colposcopy, but colposcopy results presented higher specificity. Combining HPV testing and colposcopy proved to be the most efficient method for detecting CIN lesions.

Genetic variability of human papillomavirus type 66 L1 gene among women presenting for cervical cancer screening in Chile

The high-risk human papillomaviruses (HR-HPVs) are involved in the development of cervical cancer. Nevertheless, there are differences in the oncogenic potential among them. HPV-16 and HPV-18 are associated with approximately 70% of cancer worldwide, and both types are the most extensively studied HR-HPV. Great variations in the prevalence of HR-HPV have been described in different countries. The impact of these variations on the epidemiology of lesions and cervical cancer is currently unknown. A high prevalence of HPV-66 has been detected in Chile. Here, we have analyzed the genetic variability of the L1 gene from HPV-66-infected Chilean women. Higher order interactions between identified mutations were analyzed by co-variation and cluster analyses. Antigenic-index alterations following L1 mutations and B-cell epitopes were predicted by BcePred algorithm. HPV-66 L1 sequences clustered phylogenetically into two main clades. The genetic variability in the HPV-66 L1 gene involved thirty nucleotide changes. Four of these were for the first time identified in this study. Some of these variants are embedded in the B-cell epitope regions. Amino acid homology in the immunodominant epitopes of HPV-66 L1 protein (DE, FG and H1 loops) was 42.9-59.1% and 28.6-68.9% compared with HPV-16 and HPV-18, respectively. The results of this research suggest that the neutralizing epitopes of HPV-66 are antigenically different compared to HPV-16 and HPV-18. Our findings show the need to perform new structural and immunological studies on HPV-66 L1 protein to evaluate the cross-protection conferred by current HPV vaccines.