Trends in finnish public orthodontic care from the professionals' perspective

Headgear therapy in children with Class II malocclusion and the role of compliance on treatment outcome: A nine-month randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate three-dimensional movements of maxillary teeth during headgear treatment in Class II growing children, using digital analytical tools, and to determine the effects of compliance on these movements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 9-month parallel-group randomized controlled trial was carried out on 40 children with Class II malocclusion, aged 8-12 years, half assigned to receive a cervical headgear and half to a no-treatment group, using block randomization. Subjects in the treatment group were instructed to wear the headgear for 12 hours daily and monitored using an electronic module. After 9 months, the following dental outcomes were measured: first maxillary molar distalisation, rotation, tip and torque, arch depth, and interpremolar and intermolar distances. Caregivers and participants were not blinded to group assignments, but those assessing outcomes were. Linear regression models were used to detect differences between groups and correlation coefficients to find correlations between compliance and dental outcomes.

RESULTS

All 40 included patients were analysed. A significant difference in molar distalisation was observed between the treatment (1.2 mm) and control groups (-0.2 mm). Arch depth change was also increased to a larger extent in the treatment groups (1.3 mm vs 0.1 mm), as was the interpremolar distance (1.9 mm vs 0.4 mm). In contrast, no significant differences in molar rotation or torque change were observed. With regard to compliance, average compliance was 55%. A significant correlation was found between molar distalisation and compliance in the treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Headgear therapy has significant effects on molar distalisation, arch depth, and arch width. Compliance has a significant positive effect on molar distalisation.

Early orthodontic treatment in a Finnish public health centre: a retrospective cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this observational cross-sectional one-centre study was to assess whether the previously described national orthodontic treatment practises and international recommendations are implemented in a public health care centre in Finland. We also assessed early treatment practices and appliances used.

METHODS

The study group comprised 801 children born in 2011 and 2012 residing in the Riihimäki health centre catchment area in Finland, representing 80% of the age cohort. The patient records were examined for data on orthodontic treatment, timing of treatment, appliances used, and occlusal traits.

RESULTS

The children had been examined by four orthodontist specialists and two orthodontic postgraduate students. Mean age at occlusal examination had been 9 years. Of the children, 212 (26%) were undergoing or had undergone orthodontic treatment. An additional 4.4% were scheduled for treatment. The proportion of children deemed to need treatment was significantly different between the different orthodontists. The most frequently used appliances were quad-helix (30%), eruption guidance appliance (20%), head gear (14%), fixed appliances (10%), protraction facemask (10%), and passive mandibular lingual arch (6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly one-third of children aged less than 12 years in the health centre were currently or had been in orthodontic treatment. Approximately half had received treatment with either quad-helix or eruption guidance appliance.

Longitudinal analysis of the quality of orthodontic treatment outcome and stability of occlusal traits

OBJECTIVES

To assess the quality and stability of orthodontic treatment outcome relative to the initial malocclusion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was performed in one public health care clinic in Finland. Study subjects comprised 51 orthodontic patients (age range 12.7-18.7 years). Pre-treatment medical records and lateral skull radiographs were analysed for malocclusion type. The main reasons for orthodontic treatment were mandibular retrognathia, Class II distal bite, deep bite and crowding. At the end of a retention phase (Examination 1), the quality of treatment outcome was assessed using the occlusal morphology and function index (OMFI) and patients were asked about treatment satisfaction. Stability of occlusal traits and patient satisfaction were re-evaluated after a two-year follow-up (Examination 2). Occlusal characteristics descriptive statistics were performed.

RESULTS

At Examination 1, all six morphological criteria for acceptability were fulfilled by 76% and all functional criteria by 82% of the patients. All OMFI criteria were met by 67% of the patients. At Examination 2, 68% of the patients fulfilled all morphological and 82% all functional criteria of acceptability. At Examination 2, all the OMFI criteria were still met by 64% of the patients and 92% expressed satisfaction with own occlusion. The main reasons for unacceptability were deficiencies in canine relationship and overbite, in addition to functional protrusion interferences.

CONCLUSIONS

In the evaluated health care clinic, patient satisfaction and the quality of treatment outcome were high. However, deep bite showed a tendency for relapse.

The impact of orthodontic treatment on choosing a career in dentistry

INTRODUCTION

Many studies, globally, have aimed at elucidating reasons to choose a career in dentistry. The most common motives found are reasonable working hours and aspiration to help. The aim of this study was to explore whether eventual past personal experience of orthodontic treatment and particularly the interpersonal skills of the treating orthodontist are of significance in this respect.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic questionnaire, consisting of multiple choice and descriptive questions about dental history and experiences in dental care, was sent to dental and, as controls, psychology students within the same Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Finland. The answers between the two groups were compared and differences tested statistically.

RESULTS

The questionnaire was answered by 143 (46.0%) dental students and 94 (17.6%) psychology students. Dental students, compared to psychology students, had more positive views of their dentition and dental treatment in general (p = 0.000). Amongst participants, 47.9% of dental students and 57.4% of psychology students had received orthodontic treatment. Of those, dental students had perceived their orthodontic treatment as less painful (p = 0.001) and less uncomfortable (p = 0.000) than psychology students. Moreover, dental students reported more often experiences of orthodontist taking into account their situation in life during treatment (p = 0.011) and gave more positive descriptions of the orthodontist's interpersonal skills (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Dental students, compared to psychology students, had statistically significantly more positive personal experiences related to dentistry and orthodontics, supporting our hypothesis that positive experiences with orthodontic treatment likely increase the probability of choosing dentistry as the future career.

Adherence to instructions and fluctuation of force magnitude in cervical headgear therapy

OBJECTIVES

To investigate how patients adhere to instructions and how force magnitude fluctuates and influences the use of cervical headgear (CHG) therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this controlled clinical trial, subjects (n = 40) were treated with CHG with light (L, 300 g) or heavy (H, 500 g) force. Patients were asked to wear CHG for 10 hours per day for 10 months (ie, during sleep), but the importance for treatment of wearing CHG also in the evening hours was emphasized. Adherence to instructions and force magnitude in CHG use were monitored by electronic module (Smartgear, Swissorthodontics, Switzerland).

RESULTS

Force magnitude can be set at a certain level, L or H, even if great individual variability is seen in all subjects (0-900 g). Children in the L group used CHG longer per day than those in the H group (9.3 hours ±1.5 hours and 7.8 hours ± 2.1 hours, respectively, P = .002). During evening hours, CHG was used more ( P = .02) in the L group than in the H group. In both groups, CHG was used less in the evening hours during school breaks than in the evening hours during school ( P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with lower force in CHG seem to adhere better to the instructions for CHG use. Daily rhythm also influences the time of appliance use regardless of force magnitude. The force can be set to a certain magnitude level, even though there is substantial individual variability.

Inhalation or ingestion of orthodontic objects in Finland

OBJECTIVES

Although inhalation or ingestion of orthodontic appliances can lead to serious medical problems, the real incidence of these complications is anecdotal. This study had two aims: (1) to define the frequency of accidental inhalation/ingestion of orthodontic objects in Finland and (2) to analyze their further management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic, semi-structured questionnaire was sent to all members of the Orthodontic Section of Apollonia, the Finnish Dental Society (n=251) and the Finnish Federation of Dental Hygienists (n=437). After one reminder, 55.8% of dentists and 34.8% of dental hygienists responded.

RESULTS

In total, 20.0% of the dentists and 6.9% of the dental hygienists reported having one patient who had ingested or inhaled an orthodontic object. The percentages for two or more cases were 18.6% and 6.9%, respectively. According to dentists' answers, the procedures following these complications were (1) observation for 2-14 days (n=27), (2) radiologic evaluation (n=14), (3) medical emergency (n=6) and (4) dietary instruction (n=4). Dental hygienists reported (1) observation (n=9), (2) dietary instruction (n=3) and (3) medical emergency (n=1). None of the cases had been life-threatening.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the risk of inhalation or ingestion of orthodontic objects is small and the consequences rarely serious, it should be taken into consideration. Prospective patients should be informed of this possibility.

An analysis of residual orthodontic treatment need in municipal health centres

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyse residual orthodontic treatment need in Finnish municipal health centres.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A random sample of two age groups, 16- and 18-year-olds (n = 2212), from seven municipalities was invited for a clinical examination, and 1041 adolescents participated. Two calibrated orthodontists blindly examined the participants for residual treatment need, applying the Dental Health Component (DHC) and Aesthetic Component (AC) of the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need. Self-perceived treatment need, satisfaction with occlusal function, and dental appearance were evaluated with a questionnaire. Differences between objective and self-perceived treatment need and between treated and untreated adolescents were analysed using the chi-square test.

RESULTS

A total of 18.8 per cent of all adolescents had DHC grade 4 or 5 and/or AC category 8-10, indicating a definite need for treatment. In the analysis between treated and untreated adolescents, orthodontic treatment history or gender had no statistically significant association with the objectively defined need (P > 0.05). Self-perceived treatment need was reported by 9.6 per cent of adolescents. This need was more common among treated (13.9 per cent) than untreated (4.6 per cent) adolescents (P < 0.001). Among all adolescents, satisfaction with occlusal function was high, 91.3 per cent; 78.9 per cent of adolescents were satisfied with their dental appearance. The main reasons for dissatisfaction and self-perceived need were visible contact point displacements.

CONCLUSIONS

The observed proportion of residual orthodontic treatment need is in line with earlier findings. The high satisfaction with occlusal function reflects the applied selection criteria; orthodontic treatment of displacements causing only aesthetic concern is not prioritized.