Clear-cell adenocarcinoma of vesical origin: a case study of metastatic disease treated with chemotherapy

Clear cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: a systematic review

PURPOSE

We conducted a systematic review of the literature on primary clear cell carcinoma (CCC) of the urinary bladder.

METHODS

A literature search using keywords and MeSH terms related to "clear cell carcinoma", "clear cell adenocarcinoma", "mesonephroma" and "urinary bladder" in EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed. A manual search was performed with web-based search engine Google Scholar. Reference lists of the included studies were screened for additional articles. Articles up till 16th July 2020 were retrieved. Observational human studies on primary CCC in urinary bladder with English full-text were included for further analysis.

RESULTS

904 articles were identified and 44 articles were included for further analysis. Data including clinical features, tumour characteristics, treatment and oncological outcomes were reviewed. There were 70 patients (44 females and 26 males) reported in literatures and included in this review. Gross haematuria was the most common presentation (79.7%), followed by irritative urinary symptoms (47.5%). Regarding the histology, tubulocystic pattern is the most common histologic pattern (49.1%), and 52.6% had muscle invasion. Most cases were CK7 (96.6%) and CK20 (88.9%) positive. CA125 (96%) was commonly positive, indicating its potential origin from mullerian duct. Most patients received surgery (95.5%) as primary treatment. However, the oncological outcomes were unsatisfactory with a 2-year survival rate of 60.0%.

CONCLUSION

Clear cell carcinoma is an uncommon subtype of bladder cancer which can be diagnosed by histology and immunohistochemical staining result. The majority of patients presented with muscle invasion and had a poor survival despite aggressive treatment.

Primary Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Urinary Bladder

Primary clear cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder (PCCUB) is rare. Literature review has revealed 47 cases of PCCUB which commonly affects women. The histogenesis of PCCUB is not certain and Müllerian origin and urotheilal origin have been postulated. The microscopic characteristics of PCCUB include cells with abundant clear cytoplasm, arranged in a solid, glandular, tubulocystic, or papillary pattern. The cells may be flat or cuboidal with abundant clear eosinophilic cytoplasm. Hobnailing may be evident. PCCUB, on immunohistochemistry, stain positively with pan-cytokeratin, cytokeratin 7, and CA 125. PCCUB may manifest with visible haematuria, lower urinary tract symptoms, and discharge. There is no consensus opinion regarding the best treatment option for PCCUBs and patient outcomes are not very clear. Surgery has been the adopted treatment of choice. Differential diagnoses of PCCUB include nephrogenic metaplasia, urothelial carcinoma with clear cell cytoplasm, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and metastatic clear cell carcinoma with the primary originating elsewhere. Conclusions. A thorough radiological imaging assessment is required in cases of PCCUB to exclude a primary tumour elsewhere. Urologists and oncologists should report cases of PCCUB they encounter and should enter them into a multicentric trial to ascertain the best management option.