Levosimendan as treatment option in severe verapamil intoxication: a case report and review of the literature

Levosimendan in the modern treatment of patients with acute heart failure of various aetiologies

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is a common clinical problem associated with a high mortality rate. Because ADHF has various aetiologies, there are a range of therapeutic options, among others, positive inotropes (inotropic drugs). As an inotropic agent whose mechanism is different than that of "classical" medicines, levosimendan (LSM) is one of the most common therapeutic options. Despite many publications on LSM, some issues related to its application remain unclear. The authors of this paper have attempted to summarise expert recommendations and reports available in the literature.

Levosimendan exerts anticonvulsant properties against PTZ-induced seizures in mice through activation of nNOS/NO pathway: Role for KATP channel

AIMS

Although approving new anticonvulsants was a major breakthrough in the field of epilepsy control, so far we have met limited success in almost one third of patients suffering from epilepsy and a definite and reliable method is yet to be found. Levosimendan demonstrated neuroprotective effects and reduced mortality in conditions in which seizure can be an etiology of death; however, the underlying neuroprotective mechanisms of levosimendan still eludes us. In the light of evidence suggesting levosimendan can be a K_ATP channel opener and nitrergic pathway activator, levosimendan may exert antiseizure effects through K_ATP channels and nitrergic pathway.

MAIN METHODS

In this study, the effects of levosimendan on seizure susceptibility was studied by PTZ-induced seizures model in mice.

KEY FINDINGS

Administration of a single effective dose of levosimendan significantly increased seizures threshold and the nitrite level in the hippocampus and temporal cortex. Pretreatment with noneffective doses of glibenclamide (a K_ATP channel blocker) and L-NAME (a non-selective NOS inhibitor) neutralize the anticonvulsant and nitrite elevating effects of levosimendan. While 7-NI (a neural NOS inhibitor) blocked the anticonvulsant effect of levosimendan, Aminoguanidine (an inducible NOS inhibitor) failed to affect the anticonvulsant effects of levosimendan. Cromakalim (a K_ATP channel opener) or l-arginine (an NO precursor) augmented the anticonvulsant effects of a subeffective dose of levosimendan. Moreover, co-administration of noneffective doses of Glibenclamide and L-NAME demonstrated a synergistic effect in blocking the anticonvulsant effects of levosimendan.

SIGNIFICANCE

Levosimendan has anticonvulsant effects possibly via K_ATP/nNOS/NO pathway activation in the hippocampus and temporal cortex.

Treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning: a systematic review

CONTEXT

Calcium channel blocker poisoning is a common and sometimes life-threatening ingestion.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the reported effects of treatments for calcium channel blocker poisoning. The primary outcomes of interest were mortality and hemodynamic parameters. The secondary outcomes included length of stay in hospital, length of stay in intensive care unit, duration of vasopressor use, functional outcomes, and serum calcium channel blocker concentrations.

METHODS

Medline/Ovid, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, TOXLINE, International pharmaceutical abstracts, Google Scholar, and the gray literature up to December 31, 2013 were searched without time restriction to identify all types of studies that examined effects of various treatments for calcium channel blocker poisoning for the outcomes of interest. The search strategy included the following Keywords: [calcium channel blockers OR calcium channel antagonist OR calcium channel blocking agent OR (amlodipine or bencyclane or bepridil or cinnarizine or felodipine or fendiline or flunarizine or gallopamil or isradipine or lidoflazine or mibefradil or nicardipine or nifedipine or nimodipine or nisoldipine or nitrendipine or prenylamine or verapamil or diltiazem)] AND [overdose OR medication errors OR poisoning OR intoxication OR toxicity OR adverse effect]. Two reviewers independently selected studies and a group of reviewers abstracted all relevant data using a pilot-tested form. A second group analyzed the risk of bias and overall quality using the STROBE (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology) checklist and the Thomas tool for observational studies, the Institute of Health Economics tool for Quality of Case Series, the ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments) guidelines, and the modified NRCNA (National Research Council for the National Academies) list for animal studies. Qualitative synthesis was used to summarize the evidence. Of 15,577 citations identified in the initial search, 216 were selected for analysis, including 117 case reports. The kappa on the quality analysis tools was greater than 0.80 for all study types.

RESULTS

The only observational study in humans examined high-dose insulin and extracorporeal life support. The risk of bias across studies was high for all interventions and moderate to high for extracorporeal life support. High-dose insulin. High-dose insulin (bolus of 1 unit/kg followed by an infusion of 0.5-2.0 units/kg/h) was associated with improved hemodynamic parameters and lower mortality, at the risks of hypoglycemia and hypokalemia (low quality of evidence). Extracorporeal life support. Extracorporeal life support was associated with improved survival in patients with severe shock or cardiac arrest at the cost of limb ischemia, thrombosis, and bleeding (low quality of evidence). Calcium, dopamine, and norepinephrine. These agents improved hemodynamic parameters and survival without documented severe side effects (very low quality of evidence). 4-Aminopyridine. Use of 4-aminopyridine was associated with improved hemodynamic parameters and survival in animal studies, at the risk of seizures. Lipid emulsion therapy. Lipid emulsion was associated with improved hemodynamic parameters and survival in animal models of intravenous verapamil poisoning, but not in models of oral verapamil poisoning. Other studies. Studies on decontamination, atropine, glucagon, pacemakers, levosimendan, and plasma exchange reported variable results, and the methodologies used limit their interpretation. No trial was documented in humans poisoned with calcium channel blockers for Bay K8644, CGP 28932, digoxin, cyclodextrin, liposomes, bicarbonate, carnitine, fructose 1,6-diphosphate, PK 11195, or triiodothyronine. Case reports were only found for charcoal hemoperfusion, dialysis, intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella device and methylene blue.

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning is supported by low-quality evidence drawn from a heterogeneous and heavily biased literature. High-dose insulin and extracorporeal life support were the interventions supported by the strongest evidence, although the evidence is of low quality.

Efficacy of methylene blue in an experimental model of calcium channel blocker-induced shock

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Calcium channel blocker poisonings account for a substantial number of reported deaths from cardiovascular drugs. Although supportive care is the mainstay of treatment, experimental therapies such as high-dose insulin-euglycemia and lipid emulsion have been studied in animal models and used in humans. In the most severe cases, even aggressive care is inadequate and deaths occur. In both experimental models and clinical cases of vasodilatory shock, methylene blue improves hemodynamic measures. It acts as a nitric oxide scavenger and inhibits guanylate cyclase that is responsible for the production of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). Excessive cGMP production is associated with refractory vasodilatory shock in sepsis and anaphylaxis. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of methylene blue in an animal model of amlodipine-induced shock.

METHODS

Sprague-Dawley rats were anesthetized, ventilated, and instrumented for continuous blood pressure and pulse rate monitoring. The dose of amlodipine that produced death within 60 minutes was 17 mg/kg per hour (LD50). Rats were divided into 2 groups: amlodipine followed by methylene blue or amlodipine followed by normal saline solution, with 15 rats in each group. Rats received methylene blue at 2 mg/kg during 5 minutes or an equivalent amount of normal saline solution in 3 intervals from the start of the protocol: minutes 5, 30, and 60. The animals were observed for a total of 2 hours after the start of the protocol. Mortality risk and survival time were analyzed with Fisher's exact test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with the log rank test.

RESULTS

Overall, 1 of 15 rats (7%) in the saline solution-treated group survived to 120 minutes compared with 5 of 15 (33%) in the methylene blue-treated group (difference -26%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -54% to 0.3%). The median survival time for the normal saline solution group was 42 minutes (95% CI 28.1 to 55.9 minutes); for the methylene blue group, 109 minutes (95% CI 93.9 to 124.1 minutes). Pulse rate and mean arterial pressure (MAP) differences between groups were analyzed until 60 minutes. Pulse rate was significantly higher in the methylene blue-treated group beginning 25 minutes after the start of the amlodipine infusion (95% CI 30 to 113 minutes) that was analyzed until 60 minutes. MAP was significantly higher in the methylene blue-treated group starting 25 minutes after the amlodipine infusion (95% CI 2 to 30 minutes) that was analyzed until 60 minutes.

CONCLUSION

Methylene blue did not result in a significant difference in mortality risk. There was an increased pulse rate, MAP, and median survival time in the methylene blue group.

Management of calcium channel blocker overdoses

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are some of the most commonly used medications in clinical practice to treat hypertension, angina, cardiac arrhythmias, and some cases of heart failure. Recent data show that CCBs are the most common of the cardiovascular medications noted in intentional or unintentional overdoses.(1) Novel treatment approaches in the form of glucagon, high-dose insulin therapy, and intravenous lipid emulsion therapies have been tried and have been successful. However, the evidence for these are limited to case reports and case series. We take this opportunity to review the various treatment options in the management of CCB overdoses with a special focus on high-dose insulin therapy as the emerging choice for initial therapy in severe overdoses.

Levosimendan Does Not Improve Cardiac Output or Blood Pressure in a Rodent Model of Propranolol Toxicity When Administered Using Various Dosing Regimens

Background: Levosimendan (CAS: 141505-33-1) is a myocardial calcium sensitizer that improves myocardial contractility in various forms of heart failure. It produces a moderate improvement in cardiac output (CO) without an improvement in blood pressure (BP) in verapamil and metoprolol poisoned rodents. Aim: To assess the effect of various levosimendan dosing regimens on hemodynamics in a rodent model of propranolol poisoning. Method: Male Wistar rats (350-450 g) were anesthetized, ventilated, and instrumented to record BP, heart rate (HR), and CO. Propranolol was infused continually. When BP dropped to 50% of baseline rats received 1 of 7 treatments: (1) 0.9% saline (control), (2) levosimendan 36 μg/kg loading dose then 0.6 μg/kg per min, (3) levosimendan 0.6 μg/kg per min, (4) epinephrine 0.5 μg/kg per min, (5) levosimendan 70 μg/kg loading dose then 1.2 μg/kg per min, (6) levosimendan 1.2 μg/kg per min, and (7) levosimendan 70 μg/kg loading dose alone. Hemodynamics were recorded every 10 minutes for 70 minutes. Cardiac output, mean arterial pressure, and HR for each group were compared with control. Results: All groups had comparable baseline and maximal toxicity hemodynamics prior to initiation of treatment. Levosimendan did not improve CO or BP with any dosing regimen. Blood pressure tended to be lower than control for all doses of levosimendan. Epinephrine significantly improved BP but not CO compared to all other treatment groups. Survival did not differ between groups. Conclusions: Unlike in verapamil and metoprolol poisoning models, levosimendan did not improve CO or survival in propranolol poisoning. Epinephrine improved BP, but not CO, suggesting that its actions were due to peripheral vasoconstriction.

Levosimendan infusion improves cardiac output but not blood pressure in a rodent model of severe metoprolol toxicity

Levosimendan (Levo) is an inodilator improving cardiac output (CO) and reducing afterload in heart failure. Previously, we reported that Levo improved CO but not blood pressure (BP) in a rodent model of verapamil poisoning. We theorised that Levo-induced vasodilation should not influence BP to a similar degree in metoprolol poisoning. Aim: To assess the effect of Levo on haemodynamics in a rodent model of metoprolol poisoning. Method: Anaesthetized male Wistar rats were infused metoprolol continuously. When the BP dropped to 50% of baseline (time 0) rats received 1 of the 4 treatments: (a) control (0.9% saline bolus + infusion); (b) Levo-l (Levo 36 μm/kg loading dose followed by 0.6 μm/kg/min); (c) Levo-I (Levo infusion only at 0.6 μm/kg/min); and (d) Epi (epinephrine 0.5 μm/kg/min). All groups received comparable fluid volumes. Haemodynamics were recorded every 10 min for 70 min. CO, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of each group were compared to the control. Results: All groups had comparable baseline and time 0 HR, MAP and CO. Levo-L and Levo-I rats showed significantly greater CO at t = 10 min ( p > 0.02 and p > 0.04, respectively). CO was higher at all other time points for both Levo groups. This was not statistically significant. Levo did not improve MAP compared to control. Adrenaline increased MAP but not CO compared to control and Levo groups. Conclusion: Levo did not improve MAP but moderately improved CO compared to control in this model of metoprolol poisoning. The response was similar to that reported previously in verapamil-poisoned rats. The improvement in MAP seen with epinephrine was most likely vasoconstriction mediated.