The clinical application of anterolateral thigh flap

Variability of anterolateral thigh flap perforator locations - clinical implications

<b><br>Introduction:</b> The anterolateral thigh flap is an example of a free flap widely applied for reconstruction of tissues within various areas of the body.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The aim of the study was to determine the most common locations of the ALT flap perforators in men and women as well as to clarify any potential differences in the location of the vessel in male vs. female subjects.</br> <b><br>Material and method:</b> In years 2021-2022, a study was conducted at the Plastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery Clinic in a group of 90 volunteers (45 women and 45 men, a total of 180 lower extremities) to determine the location of the anterolateral thigh flap perforator against the flap surface using a portable Doppler probe.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> Variable locations were revealed for the anterolateral thigh flap perforator within the study. In women, the perforator is located more distally from the anterior superior iliac spine, most frequently within the inferolateral quadrant, while being located closer to the anterior superior iliac spine, and most frequently within the superolateral quadrant, in men. No perforator was found in 3.3% of the examined limbs. No statistically significant differences were observed between the course of the perforators within the left and right lower limbs in individual patients.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> The location of the ALT flap perforator is subject to sexual dimorphism, which facilitates the investigation area being narrowed down to the well-defined locations of its most frequent occurrence when planning anterolateral thigh flap reconstructive procedures.</br>.

Comparison of Different Reconstruction Flap for Maxillofacial Region: An Original Research

Introduction

Large chunks of the tissue are sacrificed during the surgical procedures for the treatment if oral cancers. Our goal was to assess the viability of "Buccal reconstruction using the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps, platysma myocutaneous (PM), and radial forearm free (RFF)".

Material and Methods

Sixty subjects were included in this investigation, and they were divided into 3 groups. The follow-up as accompanied for six months. Comparisons were made for the time for the operations, reduction in the width of the mouth opening and the survival rates of the flaps. The data that was collected for the above two parameters and compared for the significance using the ANOVA, keeping P < 0.05 as significant.

Results

In the subjects with the PM, the width of the mouth opening reduced comparatively greater than that of the subjects who received other two flaps. The reduction in the mouth opening in the PM was significantly greater compared to that of the ALT and RFF. Survival was greater for the groups ALT and RFF compared to PM. Time of the surgery was the greatest for the ALT and least for the PF.

Conclusion

The observations point to the fact that the PF requires more time than that of the other two flaps. The survival was however better for the ALT and RFF. Further research is suggested for suggesting an appropriative flap design.

Harmonic scalpels compared with electrocautery in reconstructive flap harvesting: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have compared electrical devices used for flap surgery, but the results are inconsistent. This research was performed to evaluate the efficacy of two different types of electric devices: electrocautery and ultrasonic shears.

METHODS

The PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched systematically. A total of 505 cases were included in this study, including 209 electrocautery and 296 harmonic scalpel cases. The following information was retrieved from the included studies: the first author of the article, publication year, flap type, flap harvest time, drain volume, bleeding volume and postoperative complications. Hematoma, infection, flap necrosis and wound dehiscence were considered postoperative complications. The Q statistic for heterogeneity and the I² index were calculated. If I²  < 50%, we used a fixed-effects model; if I²  > 50%, we employed a random-effects model in our meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies which met the inclusion criteria were included and reviewed systematically for a meta-analysis. The harmonic scalpel yielded a statistically significantly more favorable flap harvest time and drain volume than did electrocautery. The Harmonic scalpel led to a shorter flap harvest time by 26.29 min (95% CI = -39.38 to -13.2; p < .00001) and smaller drain volume by 58.76 ml (95% CI = -105.27 to -12.25; p = .01) on average. However, there were no significant differences in the bleeding volume or incidence rates of infection, flap necrosis and wound dehiscence.

CONCLUSION

The Harmonic scalpel method yields better outcomes in terms of the flap harvest time and drain volume than does the conventional electrocautery method. Therefore, the Harmonic scalpel is a better option for cauterization and dissection in flap surgery.

Comparison of the outcomes between free anteromedial thigh flap and anterolateral thigh flap in head and neck cancer reconstruction: Analysis of propensity-score-matched patient cohorts

BACKGROUND

The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap is a workhorse flap in head and neck cancer reconstruction. The anteromedial thigh (AMT) flap was developed as a rescue or alternative flap whenever the ALT flap is not available; however, the harvest of AMT flap seems to be more challenging in the sense that perforators have multiple variations. This study was designed to compare the outcome of the AMT and ALT flaps in head and neck cancer reconstruction.

METHODS

A total of 1,547 ALT and 57 AMT flaps were used for head and neck cancer reconstruction between March 1, 2008 and February 28, 2017. Differences in patient and operative characteristics were compared between the patients undergoing AMT and ALT flap reconstruction. The primary outcome of the free flap was its survival or failure, while the second outcome was the associated complications.

RESULTS

Compared to those who had ALT flap reconstruction, the patients who underwent AMT flap reconstruction had a higher rate of conditions that required reconstruction after previous cancer ablation and recurrence but a lower rate of primary cancer and deeply located cancer. Analysis of the 40 well-balanced pairs of propensity-score-matched patient cohorts revealed that the AMT flaps were associated with a significantly higher failure rate than the ALT flaps (15.0 vs. 0.0%, respectively; p = .026).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that AMT flaps were associated with a significantly higher failure rate than ALT flaps in head and neck cancer reconstruction in the cohort of total patients and the propensity-score-matched cohorts.

Use of Free Anterolateral Thigh Flap in Reconstruction of Soft Tissue Defects in Orthopedic Oncology: What are the Outcomes?

INTRODUCTION

Soft tissue defects due to trauma with crush injuries and post-tumor excision are large in size. Free anterolateral flap provides a stable and durable coverage of soft tissue defects and leads to good functional outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2017 and January 2019, eight males and six female patients with soft tissue defects were operated upon using a free anterolateral thigh flaps. The defects in ten patients were due to post-tumor extirpation and in four patients due to wound breakdown following post-tumor extirpation.

RESULTS

The average flap dimension was 14 cm × 12 cm. The mean follow-up was 11 months (4-28 months). All the flaps survived well except in one patient who with an upper limb defect, had flap necrosis owing to which patient needed to undergo abdominal flap coverage. Two patients with sarcoma developed local recurrence and had to undergo above‑knee amputation.

CONCLUSION

The method of reconstruction depends on the size of defect and area to be covered and need of post-surgery mobilization and need for radiotherapy. The free anterolateral thigh flap has varied uses in orthopedics with very good extent of coverage and provides very potent coverage of neurovascular structures, bones, tendons, and implants.

The vascularized fascia lata free flap: an anatomical study and clinical considerations

Purpose

Fascia lata (FL) is often used as fascial component of the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap in head and neck reconstruction. No distinct data exist on whether the FL has its own reliable vascular supply and whether the fascia alone can be harvested as a fascia lata free flap.

Methods

We dissected 25 thighs of 15 cadavers. The lateral circumflex femoral artery (LCFA) was identified, and the size of stained fascia and skin were measured after injection of methylene blue into the descending branch (DB). Finally, topography of fascial vessels was determined.

Results

Staining of fascia and skin paddle was found in all 25 cases. Ascending skin perforators of the DB of the LCFA gave off branches for supply of the FL enabling harvest of a fascia lata free flap. Septo- or musculocutaneous perforators pierced FL and entered skin within the proximal 38.6–60% of the thigh. The mean length and width of stained FL was 15.8 ± 4.1 cm and 8.7 ± 2.0 cm, respectively, and size of stained FL ranged from 40.0 to 336.0 cm². In 20 cases (80%), skin paddles were 2.4 times larger on average compared to corresponding FL.

Conclusion

We could demonstrate that the FL receives its own vascular supply from perforators of the DB originating from the LCFA. Hence, harvest of a fascia lata free flap is possible, reliable, and the size of the fascia is suitable for reconstruction of small and large defects of the head and neck.

Lymphoedema rates in pedicled anterolateral thigh flaps for coverage of irradiated groin defects

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage surgery in conjunction with adjuvant radiotherapy is the preferred treatment for soft tissue sarcoma. This study aims to determine if ipsilateral pedicled anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap reconstruction of groin defects post soft tissue sarcoma resection results in acceptable rates of lymphoedema, while also providing good soft tissue cover and minimal donor site morbidity.

METHODS

A retrospective chart audit was conducted with ethics approval, obtaining a case series of 16 patients operated on at a single institution by the senior surgeon. Patients who underwent ipsilateral pedicled ALT flap coverage of irradiated groin defects following soft tissue sarcoma resection were included. Comparative six-point limb circumference measurements were utilized to diagnose lymphoedema, with a difference of 10% when compared to the non-operative side being deemed significant.

RESULTS

Lymphoedema was noted in three patients (18.8%) with an average follow-up period of 40.9 (range 8-59) months.

CONCLUSION

Previously published lymphoedema rates in sarcoma limb salvage surgery of 15.5-30% are comparable to the rates obtained in this cohort. Lymphoedema rates do not appear to be higher in patients undergoing ipsilateral pedicled ALT flap reconstruction, thus making it a useful soft tissue coverage technique in this cohort.

Functional tongue reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh flap

BACKGROUND

A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the advantages of anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap in tongue reconstruction.

METHOD

From September 2008 to February 2012, patients receiving ALT flap tongue reconstruction were included in the study. Patients undergoing ALT flap were compared with those undergoing similar surgery with radial forearm flap (RFF). The medical records of the included patients were reviewed, and a questionnaire was used to assess acceptability of the surgery.

RESULTS

All flaps (both ALT and RFF) were successful In the ALT group, most patients were satisfied with the appearance of the reconstructed tongue and the intelligibility of their speech, and there were fewer complications with this technique compared with the RFF.

CONCLUSION

The ALT flap is an ideal method for tongue reconstruction. The thickness and volume of the ALT flap can be adjusted based on the individual extent of the defect, and it can not only provide bulk but also ensure mobility, and it has other advantages also, including a long pedicle and low donor site morbidity.