Radiological classification of glenoid deformity in rheumatoid arthritis

Risk factors for retear of large/massive rotator cuff tears after arthroscopic surgery: an analysis of tearing patterns

Background

Previous studies have evaluated the risk factors for retear of large/massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs) that were treated arthroscopically; however, most studies did not evaluate tear patterns. The present study hypothesized that postoperative risk factors are affected by the tearing patterns in large/massive cuff tears in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR).

Methods

One hundred fifty patients with large/massive cuff tears underwent ARCR at our institution. Of these, 102 patients were enrolled in this study, with an average symptom duration of 36.3 ± 43.9 months and average age of 63.9 ± 9.4 years. According to the arthroscopic findings and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the 102 patients were divided into three groups based on the tendon location: anterosuperior tears (N = 59, group AS), posteosuperior tears (N = 21, group PS), and anteroposterior-extending tears (N = 22, group APE). Functional outcome was evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) score. Retear was evaluated with MRI at a minimum of 1 year after surgery, using Sugaya’s classification; Types IV and V were considered postoperative retears. Factors affecting postoperative retear were examined with univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

JOA/UCLA scores significantly improved postoperatively in the three groups (P < 0.01 for all). Postoperative retear was noted in 26 of 102 patients (25.5%) in this series: 10 patients in group AS (16.9%), 9 in group PS (42.9%), and 7 in group APE (31.8%). The retear rate was significantly higher in group PS than in the other two groups (P = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that decreased preoperative active external rotation range was a unique risk factor for postoperative retear in the PS and APE groups (95% confidence interval: 0.02–0.18, cut-off value: 25°, with an area under the curve of 0.90, P = 0.0025).

Conclusions

Although multivariate analysis failed to detect significant risk factor for retear in patients with anterosuperior large/massive cuff tears who undergo ARCR, it demonstrated that active external rotation less than 25° before surgery is a significant risk factor in those with posterosuperior large/massive tears. This study may help surgeons understand the results of arthroscopic surgery in patients with large/massive tears.

The subscapularis-sparing approach in humeral head replacement

BACKGROUND

This report represents a prospective case series evaluating an open deltopectoral approach, both radiologically and clinically, without tenotomy or complete takedown of the subscapularis tendon insertion. We hypothesized that this novel technical approach would allow preservation of the upper tendon border, thus decreasing subscapularis repair failures and fatty infiltration while simultaneously allowing accelerated rehabilitation.

METHODS

Fifty patients underwent humeral head replacement surgery through a subscapularis-sparing approach. In this approach, we take down only the inferior 30% to 50% of the subscapularis tendon, leaving the critical superior aspect of the tendon attached to the lesser tuberosity. Forty-three patients were included in the postoperative results (7 were lost to follow-up). Nineteen patients had a postoperative magnetic resonance imaging study, and 24 patients had ultrasound evaluation. Physical examination included belly-press and lift-off tests; follow-up included visual analog scale, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Constant, modified UCLA, Rowe, and Short Form 12 scores.

RESULTS

All patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. All patients had subscapularis strength equal to the opposite side as measured by lift-off, belly-press, and bear hug tests. Average postoperative scores all showed statistically significant improvement except for general health. All had an intact subscapularis tendon attachment as evaluated by either magnetic resonance imaging or ultrasound imaging. None had atrophy in the muscle belly.

CONCLUSIONS

The subscapularis-sparing, minimally invasive approach to the glenohumeral joint provides adequate exposure to allow humeral head replacement. When the upper border of the subscapularis insertion is left intact, there is a decreased risk of postoperative failure (rupture or atrophy) of the subscapularis tendon.