Long-Term Results of Radiofrequency Energy Delivery for the Treatment of GERD: Results of a Prospective 48-Month Study. Diagn Ther Endosc. 2011;2011:507157. [PMID: 22110288 PMCID: PMC3202130 DOI: 10.1155/2011/507157]

Short and long term effect of anti-reflux mucosectomy with cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection for refractory gastroesophageal disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Anti-reflux mucosectomy with cap-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection (ARMS-C) is a safe and effective treatment for managing refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study aimed to investigate the short and long-term outcomes of ARMS-C.

METHODS

This study was conducted from 2018 to 2022, during which 115 eligible patients underwent ARMS-C. The primary endpoints of this study were to evaluate the GERD-Q questionnaire score and determine the number of patients who reduced their proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dosage or discontinued PPI usage. The secondary endpoints included the evaluation of the DeMeester score, acid exposure time (AET), gastroesophageal flap valve grade (GEFV), lower esophageal sphincter pressure, the rate of successful esophageal peristalsis, and GERD-Q questionnaires. Additionally, we analyzed the long-term efficacy of ARMS-C.

RESULTS

Out of the 120 patients, 115 underwent ARMS-C, 96 were followed up for at least six months after the procedure, and 22 were followed up for at least two years. The primary outcome showed a significant improvement in GERD-Q scores, decreasing from 10.67 to 7.55 (p < 0.001). Out of the 96 patients, 36 were able to reduce or completely stop using PPIs. The DeMeester score, GEFV, AET, and the proportion of intact peristalsis also demonstrated improvement. As for the long-term efficacy of ARMS-C, 86% of patients showed improvement in symptoms, and no serious adverse effects were reported after the procedure.

CONCLUSION

ARMS-C is a safe and effective endoscopic technique to treat refractory GERD patients.

Is patient satisfaction sufficient to validate endoscopic anti-reflux treatments?

Endoscopic anti-reflux treatment is emerging as a new option for gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) treatment in patients with the same indications as for laparoscopic fundoplication. There are many techniques, the first of which are transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) and nonablative radio-frequency (STRETTA) that have been tested with comparative studies and randomized controlled trials, whereas the other more recent ones still require a deeper evaluation. The purpose of the latter is to verify whether reflux is abolished or significantly reduced after intervention, whether there is a valid high pressure zone at the gastroesophageal junction, and whether esophagitis, when present, has disappeared. Unfortunately in a certain number of cases, and especially in the more recently introduced ones, the evaluation has been based almost exclusively on subjective criteria, such as improvement in the quality of life, remission of heartburn and regurgitation, and reduction or suspension of antacid and antisecretory drug consumption. However, with the most studied techniques such as TIF and STRETTA, an improvement in symptoms better than that of laparoscopic fundoplication can often be observed, whereas the number of acid episodes and acid exposure time are similar or higher, as if the acid refluxes are better tolerated by these patients. The suspicion of a local hyposensitivity taking place after anti-reflux endoscopic intervention seems confirmed by a Bernstein test at least for STRETTA. This examination should be done for all the other techniques, both old and new, to identify the ones that reassure rather than cure. In conclusion, the evaluation of the effectiveness of the endoscopic anti-reflux techniques should not be based exclusively on subjective criteria, but should also be confirmed by objective examinations, because there might be a gap between the improvement in symptoms declared by the patient and the underlying pathophysiologic alterations of GERD.

Recent Advances in the Endoscopic Management of Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disorder: A Review of Literature

Gastro-esophageal reflux disorder (GERD) is the most common gastrointestinal tract disorder with high morbidity and heavy economic burden. Despite being treated with high-dose proton-pump inhibitors or H2 receptor blockers, a considerable percentage of patients have GERD that is only partially controlled or refractory. The majority of these patients forego surgical treatment for fear of adverse outcomes, putting them at a financial disadvantage and causing loss of productivity. Untreated GERD is the sole known risk factor for developing Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma if left untreated. With the advancement in therapeutic modalities in recent years, and given the issues such as medication compliance, the risk of adverse events with long-term antisecretory treatment, and fear of undergoing surgical treatment, endoscopic treatments such as Stretta and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) have become a safe, cost-effective, and resilient option for the treatment of refractory GERD. Patients with refractory GERD ineligible for endoscopic therapies due to a large hiatal hernia can have their hiatal hernia corrected simultaneously with TIF (C-TIF). For the treatment of refractory GERD, endoscopic therapy is a viable and compelling option. Endoscopic therapies for refractory GERD patients are highly recommended due to their reproducible and standardized results as well as the potential to address the fundamental mechanical issue.

Clinical efficacy of endoscopic antireflux mucosectomy vs. Stretta radiofrequency in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a retrospective, single-center cohort study

Background

Currently, antireflux mucosectomy (ARMS) and Stretta radiofrequency (SRF) are the most commonly used minimally invasive antireflux therapies. To date, there have not been any reports comparing ARMS and SRF. Our aim was to compare the clinical efficacies of these two therapeutic methods.

Methods

We analyzed data from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients, including 39 who received ARMS treatment and 30 who received SRF treatment between January 2020 and May 2021. Symptom control, gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERDQ) score, gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) withdrawal, and PPI reduction were analyzed and compared.

Results

After 6 months of follow-up, the results showed that both therapies were effective in improving symptoms and quality of life. No difference was found between the ARMS group and SRF group in GERDQ score, GERD-HRQL score, PPI withdrawal rate, or PPI reduction rate (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the PPI withdrawal rate between the two therapies among patients with gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) grade II and grade III (P>0.05), but the PPI withdrawal rate in the ARMS group was significantly higher than that in the SRF group among patients with GEFV grade IV (P<0.05).

Conclusions

The clinical efficacies of ARMS and SRF 6 months postoperation were equivalent. The results showed that both ARMS and SRF treatment were acceptable for patients with GEFV grades II and III, while ARMS should be selected for patients with GEFV grade IV.

Endoscopic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Panacea for proton pump inhibitors dependent/refractory patients

Endoscopic therapies in proton pump inhibitors (PPI) dependent/refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are increasingly indicated in patients who are not suitable or willing for chronic medical therapy and surgical fundoplication. Currently available endoluminal anti-reflux procedures include radiofrequency therapy (Stretta), suturing/plication and mucosal ablation/resection techniques at the gastroesophageal junction. Meticulous work up and patient selection results in a favorable outcome with these endoscopic therapies, especially the quality of life and partially the PPI independence. Stretta can be considered in patients with PPI refractory GERD and might have a role in patients with reflux hypersensitivity and functional heartburn. Endoscopic fundoplication using the Esophyx device and the GERD-X device have strong evidence (multiple randomized controlled trials) in patients with small hiatus hernia and high volume reflux episodes. Mucosal resection/ablation techniques like anti-reflux mucosectomy and anti-reflux mucosal ablation have shown promising results but need long term follow-up studies to prove their efficacy. The subset of PPI dependent GERD population will benefit from endoscopic therapies and the future of endoscopic management of GERD looks promising.

Endoscopic Management of GERD

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has consistently been the most frequently diagnosed gastrointestinal malady in the USA. The mainstay of therapy has traditionally been medical management, including lifestyle and dietary modifications as well as antacid medications. In those patients found to be refractory to medical management or with a contraindication to medications, the next step up has been surgical anti-reflux procedures. Recently, though innovative advancements in therapeutic endoscopy have created numerous options for the endoscopic management of GERD, in this review, we discuss the various endoscopic therapy options, as well as suggested strategies we use to recommend the most appropriate therapy for patients.

Endoscopic approaches to gastroesophageal reflux disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common chronic conditions affecting adults. A substantial proportion of patients continue to have symptoms despite medical therapy, and there has been increased demand for minimally invasive GERD therapy. We will examine currently available techniques and outcomes data on endoscopic approaches to the treatment of GERD.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the last 2 years, research has given rise to more robust understanding of not only the pathophysiology of GERD but also how to better manage the various phenotypes. We are learning the ideal patient to benefit from endoscopic GERD therapy. In this review, we describe the four major endoluminal techniques for treating GERD and summarize current data.

SUMMARY

Endoscopic therapies are well positioned to fill the 'therapy gap' between medical therapy and more invasive surgical procedures.

Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Lung Transplant Using Radiofrequency Ablation to the Lower Esophageal Sphincter (Stretta Procedure)

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with chronic lung allograft dysfunction after lung transplant. Treating GERD after lung transplant has been shown to improve lung allograft function. This case series describes the efficacy of the Stretta procedure to control GERD after lung transplant at our institution.

METHODS

Eleven patients underwent the Stretta procedure at our institution for GERD after lung transplant during the years 2016-2017. Pre- and post-Stretta reflux parameters were gathered. Pulmonary function was followed up until subsequent fundoplication surgery, death, or end of study observation.

RESULTS

Reflux on esophagram was noted in 9 patients before Stretta and 8 patients after Stretta. The median number of acid reflux events was 31.5 vs. 26 after Stretta (P = .95), and median percent time in reflux was 17.7% before vs. 14.5% after Stretta (P = .76). Median DeMeester score before Stretta was 65.5 (range: 33.2-169.8) vs. 42.5 (range: 19.2-109.8) after the procedure (P = .14). Median lower esophageal resting pressure was 20.7 mm Hg (n = 7) compared to 25.9 mm Hg (n = 9) on post-Stretta follow-up (P = .99). Median FEV₁% predicted was 84% (41-97%) before compared to 71% (23-108%) at 1 year after the procedure (P = .14). Seven patients required fundoplication surgery for continued reflux. All patients were on triple immunosuppression, most commonly prednisone, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate (n = 9).

DISCUSSION

The Stretta procedure did not provide expected results at our institution after lung transplant surgery. Based on our limited series, we do not recommend routine use of the Stretta procedure for management of GERD in lung transplant patients.

Mind the Gap: Current Treatment Alternatives for GERD Patients Failing Medical Treatment and Not Ready for a Fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with Barrett esophagus, esophageal adenocarcinoma, and significantly impacts quality of life. Medical management is the first line therapy with surgical fundoplication as an alternative therapy. However, a small portion of patients who fail medical therapy are referred for surgical consultation. This creates a "gap" in therapy for those patients dissatisfied with medical therapy but are not getting referred for surgical consultation. Three procedures have been designed to address these patients. These include radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the lower esophageal sphincter, transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF), and magnetic sphincter augmentation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A Pubmed literature review was conducted of all publications for RFA, TIF, and MSA. Four most common endpoints for the 3 procedures were compared at different intervals of follow-up. These include percent of patients off proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), GERD-HRQL score, DeMeester score, and percent of time with pH <4. A second query was performed for patients treated with PPI and fundoplications to match the same 4 endpoints as a control.

RESULTS

Variable freedom from PPI was reported at 1 year for RFA with a weighted mean of 62%, TIF with a weighted mean of 61%, MSA with a weighted mean of 85%, and fundoplications with a weighted mean of 84%. All procedures including PPIs improved quality-of-life scores but were not equal. Fundoplication had the best improvement followed by MSA, TIF, RFA, and PPI, respectively. DeMeester scores are variable after all procedures and PPIs. All MSA studies showed normalization of pH, whereas only 4 of 17 RFA studies and 3 of 11 TIF studies reported normalization of pH.

CONCLUSIONS

Our literature review compares 3 rival procedures to treat "gap" patients for gastroesophageal reflux disease with 4 common endpoints. Magnetic sphincter augmentation appears to have the most reproducible and linear outcomes but is the most invasive of the 3 procedures. MSA outcomes most closely mirrors that of fundoplication.

Endoscopic treatments for GERD

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a condition with increasing prevalence and morbidity in the United States and worldwide. Despite advances in medical and surgical therapy over the last 30 years, gaps remain in the therapeutic profile of options. Flexible upper endoscopy offers the promise of filling in these gaps in a potentially minimally invasive approach. In this concise review, we focus on the plethora of endoluminal therapies available for the treatment of GERD. Therapies discussed include injectable agents, electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter, antireflux mucosectomy, radiofrequency ablation, and endoscopic suturing devices designed to create a fundoplication. As new endoscopic treatments become available, we come closer to the promise of the incisionless treatment of GERD. The known data surrounding the indications, benefits, and risks of these historical, current, and emerging approaches are reviewed in detail.

Stretta radiofrequency treatment vs Toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease: a comparative study

Background

Outcomes of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) using Toupet fundoplication (TF) and Stretta radiofrequency (SRF) have not been compared and this study was conducted to compare therapeutic efficacy of the two methods.

Methods

This retrospective study analyzed a total of 230 patients undergoing TF or SRF at our hospital. Baseline data, reflux symptoms, the DeMeester scores, lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and adverse events were compared over 1 year period.

Results

A total of 226 patients were included in the study. The time and frequency of reflux and percentage of reflux time before and 12 months after therapy were not significantly different. There were significantly interactions between the therapy method and follow-up time on the DeMeester score and LES pressure. Twelve months post therapy, the DeMeester score was significantly higher in SRF than in TF group, while the LES pressure was lower. At 12 months after therapy, multivariate Cox proportional regression analysis showed that reflux frequency, the DeMeester score and LES pressure were risk factors for poor prognosis in TF group, while reflux frequency and the DeMeester score, and LES pressure were risk factors for poor prognosis in SFR group.

Conclusions

Compared with TF, SFR can significantly improve the esophageal pH and pressure in GERD patients without increasing the risk of poor prognosis.

Nonablative Radiofrequency Treatment for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (STRETTA)

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most frequent outpatient diagnosis in the United States. There has been significant development in the endoscopic treatment of GERD, with several devices that have reached the market. One of the endoscopic devices for the management of GERD in the United States is the Stretta system. This procedure uses radiofrequency energy, which is applied to the muscles of the lower esophageal sphincter and the gastric cardia resulting in an improvement of reflux symptoms. This review evaluates the most recent data on the efficacy, mechanisms of action, and safety of this procedure.

Treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease using radiofrequency ablation (Stretta procedure): An interim analysis of a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common chronic gastrointestinal disorder, affecting one third of the population worldwide. Recently, there has been a renewed interest in Stretta therapy in view of potential long-term side effects of PPIs and the durability of relief with fundoplication.

METHOD

Prospective randomized study comparing the Stretta treatment with controls receiving PPIs. Patient (> 18 years, n = 20) with symptoms of heartburn, regurgitation, abnormal esophageal acid exposure (≥ 4%), and endoscopically confirmed esophagitis were included into the study. The primary measure was improvement in quality of life (QOL) and decrease in the frequency and severity of GERD symptoms.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 39 (± 15) years and controls were 34 (± 11) years. Three months after Stretta, 80% reported improvement in QOL compared to 40% in the control group. At the end of 3 months, significant (p < 0.05) improvement in GERD symptom score for heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, and cough compared with the control group was observed. After Stretta treatment, 60% of the patients were free of PPIs whereas there was no change in the control group. Almost 80% of the patients on Stretta treatment were satisfied with the treatment compared to 30% of the patients in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Stretta was effective in the short-term for the management of GERD.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled and prospective cohort efficacy studies of endoscopic radiofrequency for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND

The endoscopic radiofrequency procedure (Stretta) has been used for more than a decade to treat patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the efficacy of the procedure in improving objective and subjective clinical endpoints needs to be further established.

AIM

To determine the efficacy of the Stretta procedure in treating patients with GERD, using a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled and cohort studies.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases for English language clinical studies of the Stretta procedure, published from inception until May 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that included the use of the Stretta procedure in GERD patients were included. A generalized inverse weighting was used for all outcomes. Results were calculated by both fixed effects and random effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies (4 RCTs, 23 cohort studies, and 1 registry) representing 2468 unique Stretta patients were included in the meta-analysis. The (unweighted) mean follow-up time for the 28 studies was 25.4 [14.0, 36.7] months. The pooled results showed that the Stretta reduced (improved) the health-related quality of life score by -14.6 [-16.48, -12.73] (P < 0.001). Stretta also reduced (improved) the pooled heartburn standardized score by -1.53 [-1.97, -1.09] (P < 0.001). After Stretta treatment, only 49% of the patients using proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) at baseline required PPIs at follow-up (P < 0.001). The Stretta treatment reduced the incidence of erosive esophagitis by 24% (P < 0.001) and reduced esophageal acid exposure by a mean of -3.01 [-3.72, -2.30] (P < 0.001). Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) basal pressure was increased post Stretta therapy by a mean of 1.73 [-0.29, 3.74] mmHg (P = NS).

CONCLUSIONS

The Stretta procedure significantly improves subjective and objective clinical endpoints, except LES basal pressure, and therefore should be considered as a viable alternative in managing GERD.

Early and Midterm Outcome After Laparoscopic Fundoplication and a Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Procedure in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although the minimally invasive endoscopic Stretta procedure is being increasingly used as an alternative strategy to manage gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the benefits of this procedure have to be further evaluated in clinical settings. This prospective observational study assessed the short-term and midterm outcomes associated with laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF) and the Stretta procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From January 2011 to January 2012, we allocated 80 patients to LTF and 85 to the Stretta procedure. Primary outcome measures, including symptom scores of heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, belching, hiccup, cough, and asthma, as well as proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, were analyzed at midterm follow-up (1-3 years).

RESULTS

Of the 165 patients, 125 patients following LTF (n=65) or the Stretta procedure (n=60) completed the designated 3-year follow-up and were included in the final analysis. At the end of the 3-year follow-up, the symptom scores were all significantly decreased compared with the corresponding values before the two procedures in both groups (P<.05). After LTF and the Stretta procedure, 47/65 (72.3%) and 41/60 (68.3%) patients, respectively, achieved complete PPI therapy independence (72.3% versus 68.3%, P=.627). Comparing with LTF, however, the Stretta procedure had less effect on improving typical symptoms of heartburn, regurgitation, and chest pain and reducing the rate of re-operation (11.8% versus 0%, P=.006).

CONCLUSIONS

LTF and the Stretta procedure were equally effective in controlling GERD symptoms and reducing PPI use. However, LTF can achieve more improvement on typical symptoms and has a lower rate of re-operation.

Comparison of Stretta procedure and toupet fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease-related extra-esophageal symptoms

AIM: To compare the outcomes between the Stretta procedure and laparoscopic toupet fundoplication (LTF) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-related extra-esophageal symptoms.

METHODS: From January 2011 to February 2012, a total of 98 patients diagnosed with GERD-related extra-esophageal symptoms who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. All patients who either underwent the Stretta procedure or LTF treatment have now completed the 3-year follow-up. Primary outcome measures, including frequency and severity of extra-esophageal symptoms, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, satisfaction, and postoperative complications, were assessed. The results of the Stretta procedure and LTF therapy were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS: There were 47 patients in the Stretta group and 51 patients in the LTF group. Ninety patients were available at the 3-year follow-up. The total of the frequency and severity scores for every symptom improved in both groups (P < 0.05). Improvement in symptom scores of cough, sputum, and wheezing did not achieve statistical significance between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the score for globus hysterics was different between the Stretta group and the LTF group (4.9 ± 2.24 vs 3.2 ± 2.63, P < 0.05). After the Stretta procedure and LTF treatment, 29 and 33 patients in each group achieved PPI therapy independence (61.7% vs 64.7%, P = 0.835). The patients in the LTF group were more satisfied with their quality of life than those in the Stretta procedure group (P < 0.05). Most complications resolved without intervention within two weeks; however, two patients in the LTF group still suffered from severe dysphagia 2 wk after the operation, and it improved after bougie dilation treatment in both patients.

CONCLUSION: The Stretta procedure and LTF were both safe and effective for the control of GERD-related extra-esophageal symptoms and the reduction of PPI use.

Long-term outcomes of patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease following a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common digestive disease, affecting one third of the world's population. The minimally invasive endoscopic Stretta procedure is being increasingly used as an alternative strategy to manage refractory GERD. However, long-term benefits of this procedure have to be further evaluated in clinical settings. This prospective observational study was therefore conducted to evaluate the outcome of patients with refractory GERD 5 years after the Stretta procedure.

METHODS

A total of 152 patients with refractory GERD underwent the Stretta procedure in our department between April 2007 and September 2008. They were followed up for 5 years, during which the primary outcome measures including symptom scores of heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, cough and asthma and the secondary outcome measures including proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and patients' satisfaction were analysed at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 152 patients, 138 completed the designated 5-year follow-up and were included in the final analysis. At the end of the 5-year follow-up, the symptom scores of heartburn (2.47 ± 1.22 vs. 5.86 ± 1.52), regurgitation (2.23 ± 1.30 vs. 5.56 ± 1.65), chest pain (2.31 ± 0.76 vs. 4.79 ± 1.59), cough (3.14 ± 1.43 vs. 6.62 ± 1.73) and asthma (3.26 ± 1.53 vs. 6.83 ± 1.46) were all significantly decreased as compared with the corresponding values before the procedure (P < 0.001). After the Stretta procedure, 59 (42.8%) patients achieved complete PPI therapy independence and 104 (75.4%) patients were completely or partially satisfied with the GERD symptom control. Moreover, no severe complications were observed except for complaint of abdominal distention in 12 (8.7%) patients after the Stretta procedure.

CONCLUSION

The Stretta procedure may achieve an effective and satisfactory long-term symptom control and considerably reduce the reliance on medication without significant adverse effects in adult patients with refractory GERD, thereby having profound clinical implications.

Long-term outcomes of patients with refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease following a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the most common digestive disease, affecting one third of the world's population. The minimally invasive endoscopic Stretta procedure is being increasingly used as an alternative strategy to manage refractory GERD. However, long-term benefits of this procedure have to be further evaluated in clinical settings. This prospective observational study was therefore conducted to evaluate the outcome of patients with refractory GERD 5 years after the Stretta procedure.

METHODS

A total of 152 patients with refractory GERD underwent the Stretta procedure in our department between April 2007 and September 2008. They were followed up for 5 years, during which the primary outcome measures including symptom scores of heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, cough and asthma and the secondary outcome measures including proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and patients' satisfaction were analysed at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 152 patients, 138 completed the designated 5-year follow-up and were included in the final analysis. At the end of the 5-year follow-up, the symptom scores of heartburn (2.47 ± 1.22 vs. 5.86 ± 1.52), regurgitation (2.23 ± 1.30 vs. 5.56 ± 1.65), chest pain (2.31 ± 0.76 vs. 4.79 ± 1.59), cough (3.14 ± 1.43 vs. 6.62 ± 1.73) and asthma (3.26 ± 1.53 vs. 6.83 ± 1.46) were all significantly decreased as compared with the corresponding values before the procedure (P < 0.001). After the Stretta procedure, 59 (42.8%) patients achieved complete PPI therapy independence and 104 (75.4%) patients were completely or partially satisfied with the GERD symptom control. Moreover, no severe complications were observed except for complaint of abdominal distention in 12 (8.7%) patients after the Stretta procedure.

CONCLUSION

The Stretta procedure may achieve an effective and satisfactory long-term symptom control and considerably reduce the reliance on medication without significant adverse effects in adult patients with refractory GERD, thereby having profound clinical implications.

Nonmedical therapeutic strategies for nonerosive reflux disease

There has been a marked decline over the last several years in drug development for gastroesophageal reflux disease and specifically for nonerosive reflux disease (NERD), despite there being many areas of unmet need. In contrast, we have seen a proliferation, during the same period of time, in development of novel, nonmedical therapeutic strategies for NERD using cutting-edge technology. Presently, compliance and lifestyle modifications are readily available noninvasive therapeutic interventions for NERD. Other nonmedical therapies include, the Stretta procedure, transoral incisionless fundoplication, and the magnetic sphincter augmentation device (LINX). Antireflux surgery, in experienced hands, has been repeatedly shown to be efficacious in resolving NERD-related symptoms. Psychological therapeutic interventions and alternative medicine techniques, such as acupuncture, continue to show promise, especially in NERD patients who failed antireflux treatment.

Durability of Stretta Radiofrequency Treatment for GERD: Results of an 8-Year Follow-Up

From June 2002 to March 2013 26 patients that underwent Stretta procedure (16 females, 10 males) reached to date an eight-year follow-up. Primary end point of the study was to verify the durability of the procedure at this time. All patients underwent clinical evaluation by upper endoscopy, oesophageal pressure, and pH studies. For each patient 8-year data were compared to those recorded at baseline and at 4 years. There was a significant decrease in both heartburn and GERD HRQL scores at 4 years (P = 0.001) and at 8 years (P = 0.003) as well as a significant increase of QoL scores at each control time (mental SF-36 and physical SF-36, P = 0.001). After 4 and 8 years, 21 patients (80.7%, P = 0.0001) and 20 patients (76.9%, P = 0.0001) were completely off PPIs. Median LES pressure did not show significant amelioration at 4 and 8 years and mean oesophageal acid exposure significantly improved at 4 years (P = 0.001) but returned to baseline values after 8 years. This further follow-up study of ours from four to eight years confirms that RF energy delivery for GERD provides durable improvement in symptoms and in quality of life and reduces antireflux drugs consumption.

Long-term maintenance effect of radiofrequency energy delivery for refractory GERD: a decade later

BACKGROUND

Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) often seek alternative therapy for inadequate symptom control, with over 40% not responding to medical treatment. We evaluated the long-term safety, efficacy, and durability of response to radiofrequency treatment of the lower esophageal sphincter (Stretta).

METHODS

Using an intent-to-treat analysis, we prospectively assessed 217 patients with medically refractory GERD before and after Stretta. There was no concurrent control group in the study. Primary outcome measure was normalization of GERD-health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) in 70% or greater of patients at 10 years. Secondary outcomes were 50% reduction or elimination of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and 60% or greater improvement in satisfaction at 10 years. Successful treatment was defined as achievement of secondary outcomes in a minimum of 50% of patients. Complications and effect on existing comorbidities were evaluated. The results of a 10-year study are reported.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was achieved in 72% of patients (95% confidence interval 65-79). For secondary outcomes, a 50% or greater reduction in PPI use occurred in 64% of patients, (41% eliminating PPIs entirely), and a 60% or greater increase in satisfaction occurred in 54% of patients. Both secondary endpoints were achieved. The most common side effect was short-term chest pain (50%). Pre-existing Barrett's metaplasia regressed in 85% of biopsied patients. No cases of esophageal cancer occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

In this single-group evaluation of 217 patients before and after Stretta, GERD-HRQL scores, satisfaction, and PPI use significantly improved and results were immediate and durable at 10 years.

Stretta Radiofrequency Treatment for GERD: A Safe and Effective Modality

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is one of the leading gastrointestinal disorders. Current treatments include lifestyle modifications, pharmacological therapies, surgical fundoplications, and, more recently, endoscopic procedures. The rising concern of long-term side effects of the popular proton-pump inhibitors and the more recent evidence raising doubts about the durability of fundoplication have spurred reinterest in endoscopic procedures to treat reflux disorders. In the aftermath of several innovative antireflux procedures that were introduced and failed clinically or financially over the past decade, there is lingering confusion regarding the merits of the presently available interventions. This paper focuses on one endoscopic procedure, Stretta, which now enjoys the longest experience, a recent meta-analysis, and robust data supporting its safety, efficacy, and durability. Stretta reduces esophageal acid exposure, decreases the frequency of transient lower esophageal relaxation, increases patient satisfaction, decreases medication use, and improves quality of life. As such, this procedure remains a valuable nonsurgical treatment option in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Antireflux endoluminal therapies: past and present

The basic principle of antireflux procedures employing endoscopic intervention aims to create a mechanical barrier to prevent primary pathophysiology in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We review, highlight, and discuss the past and present status of endoluminal therapy. Currently, there are 3 commonly employed anti-reflux endoluminal procedures: fundoplication or suturing techniques (EndoCinch, NDO, and EsophyX), intramural injection or implant techniques (enhancing lower esophageal sphincter (LES) volume and/or strengthening compliance of the LES-Enteryx and Gatekeeper), and radiofrequency ablation of LES and cardia. EndoCinch plication requires further study and modification of technique before it can be recommended because of durability issues. Esophynx, the transoral incisionless fundoplication, may reduce hiatal hernias and increase LES length. Preliminary studies have shown promising reduction in symptoms and medication use but evidence concerning safety and long-term durability is still pending. The safety issue with injection technique is the main concern as evident from the incidences of implant withdrawals after reported major adverse events. Future research with cautious monitoring is required before any new implant material can be recommended for commercial application. Radiofrequency ablation therapy is regaining popularity in treating refractory symptoms despite PPI use due to improved efficacy, durability, and safety after years of refinement of protocol.