Silent uterine rupture with the use of misoprostol for second trimester termination of pregnancy : a case report

Comparing the outcomes of termination of second trimester pregnancy with a live fetus using intravaginal misoprostol between women with and without previous cesarean section

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of termination of pregnancy with live fetuses in the second trimester (14-28 weeks), using misoprostol 400 mcg intravaginal every 6 h, between women with previous cesarean section (PCS) and no previous cesarean section (no PCS).

METHODS

A comparative study was conducted on a prospective database of pregnancy termination in the second trimester, Chiang Mai university hospital. Inclusion criteria included: (1) singleton pregnancy; (2) gestational age between 14 and 28 weeks; and (3) pregnancy with a live fetus and medically indicated for termination. The participants were categorized into two groups; PCS and no PCS group. All were terminated using misoprostol 400 mcg intravaginal every 6 h. The main outcomes were induction to fetal delivery interval and success rate, defined as fetal delivery within 48 h.

RESULTS

A total of 238 women, including 80 PCS and 158 no PCS, were recruited. The success rate of fetal delivery within 48 h between both groups was not significantly different (91.3% vs. 93.0%; p-value 0.622). The induction to fetal delivery interval were not significantly different (1531 vs. 1279 min; p-value > 0.05). Gestational age was an independent factor for the success rate and required dosage of misoprostol. The rates of most adverse effects of misoprostol were similar. One case (1.3%) in the PCS group developed uterine rupture during termination, ending up with safe and successful surgical removal and uterine repair.

CONCLUSION

Intravaginal misoprostol is highly effective for second trimester termination of pregnancy with PCS and those with no PCS, with similar success rate and induction to fetal delivery interval. Gestational age was an independent factor for the success rate and required dosage of misoprostol. Uterine rupture could occur in 1.3% of PCS, implying that high precaution must be taken for early detection and proper management.

SYNOPSIS

Intravaginal misoprostol is highly effective for termination of second trimester pregnancy with a live fetus, with a comparable success rate between women with and without previous cesarean section, with a 1.3% risk of uterine rupture among women with previous cesarean section.

Clinical analysis of the regimens for terminating the second-trimester pregnancy in cesarean section women

OBJECTIVE

To explore the suitable regimens of induced termination of second-trimester pregnancy in women with prior cesareans.

METHODS

A total of 204 s-trimester pregnant women with prior cesareans at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from January 2019 to December 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Group A included pregnant women who were administered mifepristone with misoprostol, Group B included those administering mifepristone with misoprostol as well as a transcervical Cook double-balloon catheter, Group C included those receiving mifepristone with an intra-amniotic injection of ethacridine lactate, and Group D included those receiving mifepristone, transcervical Cook double-balloon catheter, and intra-amniotic injection of ethacridine lactate. Their characteristics, clinical outcomes, and complications among the four groups were compared.

RESULTS

All women had similar profiles in maternal age, gravidity, and previous cesarean delivery (p > .05). There was no significant difference in successful abortion among the four groups (p > .05). Group C had a significantly shorter induction-to-abortion interval than Group D (p < .01). The blood loss after abortion at 2 h in Group B was much less than Group A (p < .05). It made a significant difference between Group B and Group D regarding the blood loss after abortion at 2 h (p < .01). With regard to total incidences of adverse reactions, there were much fewer in the group B than the group A (p < .05).

CONCLUSION

The four regimens are all effective for the termination of second-trimester pregnancy in women with prior cesareans. The use of transcervical Cook double-balloon could reduce the risks caused by misoprostol, and the combination of these is feasible to induce second-trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior cesareans.

Unusual Posterior Wall Uterine Rupture with the Use of Misoprostol for Second Trimester Pregnancy Termination

Abortion is defined as the termination of pregnancy before the fetus is viable. It is one of the most commonly performed procedures in gynecological departments worldwide. Termination of pregnancy in second trimester is one of the greatest challenges because of multiple modes of termination options with their risks of complication and making it riskier than the first trimester termination. We report this case because of a rare occurrence of posterior wall rupture which would have led to grave complication if not anticipated and detected early.

Mifepristone Followed by Misoprostol or Ethacridine Lactate and Oxytocin for Second Trimester Abortion: A Randomized Trial

Objective

To compare two medical methods for second-trimester abortion, mifepristone followed by misoprostol versus mifepristone followed by ethacridine lactate and oxytocin for success rate, induction to abortion time and acceptability.

Materials and Methods

This is a randomized trial conducted from July 2014 to May 2016 and enrolled 120 women undergoing second trimester abortion (13-20 weeks). All patients received 200mg mifepristone orally and were randomized to receive further treatment after 36 hrs. Patients in Group M (n=60) received 400 microgram of misoprostol vaginally every 3 hours (maximum - 5 doses) and Group E (n=60) had extra-amniotic ethacridine lactate instillation followed by oxytocin infusion (max-100miu).

Results

Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable in both the groups. Success rate was 100% in group M and 98.3% in group E (p=0.31). Mean induction to abortion time was significantly shorter in group M than group E (8.2+2.3hours & 10.9+2.6 hours respectively; p=0.001). Majority of women reported side effects, 96.7% women in group M and 75% women in group E (p=0.001). Fall in hemoglobin after procedure was significantly higher in group M (0.70+0.33gram %) than group E (0.52+0.23 gram %) (p=0.001). Perception of intensity of pain was significantly more in group M but patient satisfaction in both groups was similar.

Conclusion

Both methods are comparable for success rate, induction interval was more for ethacridine lactate compared to misoprostol.

Clinical application of low-dose misoprostol in the induced labor of 16 to 28 weeks pathological pregnancies (a STROBE-compliant article)

Oral mifepristone combined with rivanol lactate (rivanol) is commonly used in second-trimester pregnancy termination. However, rivanol is not suitable to premature rupture of membranes and oligohydramnios because amniocentesis is difficult. Mifepristone combined with misoprostol is suitable for the patients with oligohydramnios. In accordance with the misoprostol dosing recommendations by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO), the incidences of uterine rupture and cervical laceration are relatively high in Chinese pregnant women. The aim of our study was to optimize misoprostol dosing regimen in terms of efficacy and safety in Chinese pregnant women.We modified the Bishop Score, and then gave patients low-dose misoprostol according to the modified Bishop score. Based on the amniotic fluid volume (AFV) indicated by type-B ultrasonic instrument, the cases with AFV ≤2 cm receiving low-dose misoprostol combined with mifepristone and the cases with amniocentesis failure followed by receiving low-dose misoprostol combined with mifepristone were enrolled into study group, and the cases with AFV >2 cm receiving rivanol combined with mifepristone were enrolled into control group. The start time of uterine contractions, time of fetal expulsion, birth process, hospital day, successful induced labor rate, complete induced labor rate, and incomplete induced labor rate were observed and compared between the 2 groups.There were significant differences in the start time of uterine contractions, time of fetal expulsion, birth process, and hospital day between the control group and the study group (all P < .05). The successful induced labor rate, complete induced labor rate, and incomplete induced labor rate were also significantly different between the 2 groups (all P < .05).In the induced labor of 16 to 28 weeks pathological pregnancy, low-dose misoprostol can markedly improve the successful induced labor rate and complete induced labor rate, shorten the birth process and hospital day, and decrease uterine curettage rate and uterine rupture risk. Low-dose misoprostol combined with mifepristone is suitable to the induced labor of 16 to 28 weeks pathological pregnancy in Chinese women.

Low-dose vaginal misoprostol with or without Foley catheter for late second-trimester pregnancy termination in women with previous multiple cesarean sections

Purpose: To compare between low dose vaginal misoprostol with and without Foley catheter for late second trimester pregnancy termination in women with previous multiple cesarean sections. Materials and methods: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial, patients were randomly allocated to either low dose vaginal misoprostol group (n = 40) or combined low dose vaginal misoprostol plus Foley catheter group (n = 38). The primary outcome was complete abortion. Secondary outcomes were induction-to-abortion interval, the number of misoprostol doses and occurrence of complications. Results: Incomplete abortion rate was significantly lower in combined group than misoprostol only group (2.6%versus 15% respectively, p = .03). Induction-to-expulsion interval with the combined vaginal misoprostol plus Foley catheter was significantly shorter (p = .01) and the number of misoprostol doses in the combined group was significantly lower (p = .04). No statistically significant difference in the frequency of complications between both groups. Conclusions: The combination of low dose vaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter is an effective and safe method for termination of second trimester pregnancy in women with previous multiple cesarean sections.

Clinical analyses of 66 cases of mid-trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior cesarean

Background:

The rate of cesarean delivery has significantly increased in China in the last decade. Women with prior cesarean history tend to have a higher risk of uterine rupture during termination of the pregnancy in mid-trimester than those without such a history. The aim of our study was to evaluate the influences of the potential risk factors on uterine rupture in women with prior cesarean.

Methods:

We conducted this retrospective study of women with prior cesarean section, who underwent mid-trimester pregnancy termination between January 2006 and December 2013 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital. The protocol was oral administration of mifepristone and misoprostol for the patients with the gestational ages below 16 weeks or intra-amniotic injection of ethacridine lactate (EL) for those with at least 16 weeks of gestational ages. The thickness of the lower uterine segment (LUS) was measured before the termination of pregnancy. Logistic regression was used to study the risk factors of uterine rupture.

Results:

The total rate of successful abortion was 93.9% (62/66). Four patients failed in induction, and one of them received curettage, whereas the other three experienced uterine rupture (4.5%). The successful rates of abortion were 85.7% (30/35) for women treated with mifepristone-misoprostol and 86.1% (31/36) for those treated with EL. There was a significant difference in the mean LUS thickness between the uterine rupture group (3.0 ± 2.0 mm) and the nonrupture group (7.0 ± 3.0 mm) (P < 0.05). The LUS thickness of <3 mm was associated with uterine rupture during mid-trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior cesarean (odds ratio, 94.0; 95% confidence interval 4.2–2106.1) after adjusted maternal age, gestational age, interdelivery interval and prior cesarean section. Severe bleeding that required transfusion occurred in one case (1.5%).

Conclusions:

Both the mifepristone-misoprostol and the EL regimens were effective and safe for the termination of mid-trimester pregnancy in women with prior cesarean. A thinner LUS is associated with a relatively high risk of uterine rupture.

Misoprostol versus High Dose Oxytocin and Laminaria in Termination of Pregnancy in Second Trimester Pregnancies

BACKGROUND

In 2 recent decades, found drug regimen to induce abortion that are more effective than surgery. Prostaglandins especially misoprostol, oxytocin and osmotic dilators such as laminaria use for termination but the best method is unknown. Therefore we aimed to assess the comparison between the Misoprostol regimen and the highly concentrated oxytocin with laminaria regimen in second trimester of pregnancy termination.

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial, 100 women with gestational age 14 to 24 week coming to hospital due to termination of pregnancy in the absence of uterine contractions and items of exclusion criteria enrolled to study and randomly assign to 2 groups and received misoprostol (group 1) or oxytocin (group 2). Data collected with use of observation, examination and demographic checklist. In group 1, in admission time and then every 6 hour patients received 200 µgr misoprostol until start the pain or vaginal bleeding or abortion in 48 hr. in group 2, patients first received laminaria in cervix with duration of 6 hr and then oxytocin 50 unit in 500 cc normal saline in 3 hr. after 1 hr rest, oxytocin dosage elevated as multiple into 2 and continue until termination or maximum dose of 300 u in 500 cc normal saline. Data entered to SPSS software version 16 and analyzed with use of descriptive methods and also Chi-square and T-test.

RESULTS

In each group enrolled 50 women that approximately no different in baseline characteristic. Number of abortion in misoprostol group was more than oxytocin group (P<0.001) and duration of abortion also was shorter than oxytocin in misoprostol group (P<0.001). Side effects in 23 (46%) women in misoprostol group were seen but no side effect seen in oxytocin group. Complementally interventions was seen in 31 women (60%) in misoprostol group versus 32 women (62%) in oxytocin group but this difference was not significant (P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that misoprostol is effective than oxytocin in termination of pregnancy but with attention to limitation of this study include of limited abortion causes due to legal laws, additional studies on different doses of misoprostol and oxytocin due to achieve to suitable regimen with lower side effects recommended.

Differences between selective termination of pregnancy and fetal reduction in multiple pregnancy: a narrative review

Although selective termination of pregnancy and fetal reduction in multiple pregnancy both involve the termination in utero of the development of live fetuses, these two procedures are different in several aspects. Nevertheless, several authors tend to amalgamate and confuse their psychosocial consequences and the ethical issues they raise. Therefore, this narrative review, derived from a comparative analysis of 91 articles, shines a light on these amalgamations and confusions, as well as on the medical, contextual, experiential and ethical differences specific to selective termination and fetal reduction.

Foley catheter versus intra-vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in post-term gestations

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether a fluid filled intra-uterine extra-amniotic Foley catheter is an effective alternative to vaginal misoprostol in inducing labor in primigravid women with post-term gestations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A prospective quasi-randomized controlled trial was designed and 100 primigravid women with post-term gestations were enrolled and equally allocated into two groups. A fluid filled intra-uterine extra-amniotic Foley catheter was inserted in women of group I. Women in group II received 25 microgram misoprostol vaginally every 4 h. Artificial rupture of membranes was performed for all women when their cervices reached 3-4 cm dilatation followed by oxytocin infusion if needed. The main primary outcome parameter was the induction to delivery interval. Results were tabulated and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

No significant difference was noted in any of the demographic data between both groups. The induction to delivery interval was shorter in the Foley group (897.36 ± 116.0 vs. 960.98 ± 94.18 min; P = 0.003). There were 34 cases which needed oxytocin augmentation in group I compared to 11 cases in group II (P < 0.01). Abnormal uterine activity occurred in three cases in the misoprostol group, but none in the Foley group. Ominous fetal heart rate was noted in one case in group I but three in group II.

CONCLUSION

Fluid filled Foley catheter seems to be superior to 25 μg vaginal misoprostol regimen, when used to induce labor in primigravidae with post-term gestations with the advantage of having a shorter induction delivery interval, but more need for oxytocin augmentation.