Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Erlotinib following Gefitinib-Induced Hepatotoxicity: Review of 8 Clinical Cases

Multikinase inhibitor-induced liver injury in patients with cancer: A review for clinicians

BACKGROUND

Multikinase inhibitors (MKI) are targeted molecular agents that have revolutionized cancer management. However, there is a paucity of data concerning MKI-related liver injury risk and clinical guidelines for the management of liver toxicity in patients receiving MKI for cancer are scarce.

DESIGN

We conducted a PubMed search of articles in English published from January 2000 to December 2018 related to hepatotoxicity of the 29 FDA-approved MKIs at doses used in clinical practice. The search terms were the international non-proprietary name of each agent cross-referenced with «hepatotoxicity», «hepatitis», «hepatic adverse event», or «liver failure», and «phase II clinical trial», «phase III clinical trial», or «case report».

RESULTS

Following this search, 140 relevant studies and 99 case reports were considered. Although asymptomatic elevation of aminotransferase levels has been frequently observed in MKI clinical trials, clinically significant hepatotoxicity is a rare event. In most cases, the interval between treatment initiation and the onset of liver injury is between one week and two months. Liver toxicity is often hepatocellular and less frequently mixed. Life-threatening MKI-induced hepatic injury has been described, involving fulminant liver failure or death. Starting from existing data, a description of MKI-related liver events, grading of hepatotoxicity risk, and recommendations for management are also given for various MKI molecules.

CONCLUSION

All MKIs can potentially cause liver injury, which is sometimes irreversible. As there is still no strategy available to prevent MKI-related hepatotoxicity, early detection remains crucial. The surveillance of liver function during treatment may help in the early detection of hepatotoxicity. Furthermore, the exclusion of potential causes of hepatic injury is essential to avoid unnecessary MKI withdrawal.

Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Related Hepatotoxicity in Patients with Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Real-World Retrospective Study

Purpose

Hepatic injury is a common side effect following tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy and our understanding usually comes from clinical trials. In this retrospective study, we aimed to investigate the characteristics, risk factors and regimen-related differences of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-TKI-related hepatic toxicity in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (LAD).

Patients and Methods

Liver function tests were documented in 424 patients admitted into the Shanghai Chest Hospital between January 2014 and December 2016 with advanced (IIIB/IV) LAD who received first-line gefitinib, erlotinib or icotinib. Hepatotoxicity was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 4.0. The clinical spectrum and onset time of hepatic injury were evaluated. The risk factors of hepatic dysfunction were determined using a logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 87 (20.5%) patients experienced hepatotoxicity and 5.7% were of grade 3/4 liver dysfunction. The median onset time of hepatotoxicity was 7 weeks. Presence of hepatitis virus (HR: 2.593, 95% CI: 1.090–6.170, P=0.031) and pretreatment liver impairment (HR: 3.460, 95% CI: 1.746–6.855, P<0.001) were risk factors associated with increased risk of hepatotoxicity. Gefitinib (HR: 1.872, 95% CI: 1.028–3.412, P=0.040) and erlotinib (HR: 3.578, 95% CI: 1.683–7.609, P=0.001) had increased risk of hepatotoxicity compared to icotinib.

Conclusion

The different toxic profile of EGFR-TKIs should be taken into account in the choice of treatment based on the patients’ comorbidity.

[EGFR-TKI ADR Management Chinese Expert Consensus]

ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI), gefitinib, erlotinib, icotinib and aftinib, which are approved as a frontline treatment for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have tumors harboring EGFR mutations in China. And osimertinib was approved in second line setting for patients with EGFRT 790M-positive NSCLC. Rash, paronychia, diarrhea, stomatitis, liver dysfunction and (interstitial lung disease, ILD) are frequently observed in patients treated with EGFR-TKI. Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, organized Chinese experts to develop the Chinese expert consensus on EGFR-TKI adverse event (AE) management based on domestic diagnosis and treatment of ADR and also incorporating international updated theory and recommendations.
.

Safety of gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer treatment

INTRODUCTION

The development of EGFR TKI and the subsequent identification of activating EGFR mutations have dramatically changed how NSCLC is treated. With its recent approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, gefitinib adds to the list of recommended first-line treatments for lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations, which hitherto includes erlotinib and afatinib.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the pharmacological property, clinical efficacy, and safety of gefitinib in major clinical trials and post-marketing studies.

EXPERT OPINION

Gefitinib is a well-tolerated treatment for advanced NSCLC. The most common adverse events are skin reaction and diarrhea, both of which are generally mild, noncumulative, and manageable. Other side effects such as interstitial lung disease and liver toxicity are less common but can be serious. Which EGFR TKI is the preferred first-line treatment is a matter of debate. Gefitinib and erlotinib have comparable efficacy, whereas afatinib may exert superior clinical activity over gefitinib. In terms of the most common toxicities of skin reaction and diarrhea, gefitinib may be the most tolerable of the three. Hence, despite being the earliest EGFR TKI developed, gefitinib continues to be one of the first-line treatments for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC, especially when skin and gastrointestinal toxicity is a concern.

Hepatotoxicity of targeted therapy for cancer

INTRODUCTION

Understanding the mechanism of DILI with MTA, and how to avoid and manage these toxicities is essential for minimising inferior cancer treatment outcomes. An organised and comprehensive overview of MTA-associated hepatotoxicity is lacking; this review aims to fill the gap.

AREAS COVERED

A literature review was performed based on published case reports and relevant studies or articles pertaining to the topics on PubMed. Food and Drug Administration drug information documents and search on the US National Library of Medicine LiverTox database was performed for all relevant MTA.

EXPERT OPINION

MTA-associated hepatotoxicity is common but rarely fatal. The pattern of hepatotoxicity is predominantly idiosyncratic. Pharmacogenomics show potential in predicting patients at risk of poorly metabolising or developing immunoallergic responses to MTA, but prospective data is scant. Preventing reactivation of viral hepatitis using anti-viral drugs, and avoidance of drug combinations at high risk of negative interactions are the most readily preventable measures for DILI.