Additional gastrectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer patients with comorbidities

Using nomogram, decision tree, and deep learning models to predict lymph node metastasis in patients with early gastric cancer: a multi-cohort study

The accurate assessment of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with early gastric cancer is critical to the selection of the most appropriate surgical treatment. This study aims to develop an optimal LNM prediction model using different methods, including nomogram, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, and deep learning methods. In this study, we included two independent datasets: the gastrectomy set (n=3158) and the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) set (n=323). The nomogram, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, and fully convolutional neural networks (FCNN) models were established based on logistic regression analysis of the development set. The predictive power of the LNM prediction models was revealed by time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration plots. We then used the ESD set as an external cohort to evaluate the models' performance. In the gastrectomy set, multivariate analysis showed that gender (P=0.008), year when diagnosed (2006-2010 year, P=0.265; 2011-2015 year, P=0.001; and 2016-2020 year, P<0.001, respectively), tumor size (2-4 cm, P=0.001; and ≥4 cm, P<0.001, respectively), tumor grade (poorly-moderately, P=0.016; moderately, P<0.001; well-moderately, P<0.001; and well, P<0.001, respectively), vascular invasion (P<0.001), and pT stage (P<0.001) were independent risk factors for LNM in early gastric cancer. The area under the curve (AUC) for the validation set using the nomogram, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, and FCNN models were 0.78, 0.76, 0.77, and 0.79, respectively. In conclusion, our multi-cohort study systematically investigated different LNM prediction methods for patients with early gastric cancer. These models were validated and shown to be reliable with AUC>0.76 for all. Specifically, the FCNN model showed the most accurate prediction of LNM risks in early gastric cancer patients with AUC=0.79. Based on the FCNN model, patients with LNM rates of >4.77% are strong candidates for gastrectomy rather than ESD surgery.

Impact of preceding noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection on patients with early gastric cancer who undergo subsequent surgery: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The influence of preceding noncurative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) on the efficacy of subsequent surgery is still controversial among early gastric cancer (EGC), especially for laparoscopic gastrectomy. The present meta-analysis was conducted to compare clinical outcomes between patients with EGC who underwent noncurative ESD before surgery (ESD group) and those who underwent direct surgery (non-ESD group).

METHODS

Related databases were searched, and articles comparing differences between ESD and non-ESD groups were included for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Ten retrospective studies with 3465 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with the non-ESD group, the ESD group was older and had more males, smaller tumors, more differentiated tumors and a higher proportion of pT1b, a shorter operation time, fewer dissected lymph nodes, a lower rate of positive lymph nodes and a lower rate of D2 dissection. There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss, postoperative complication rate, postoperative hospital stay or long-term prognosis, etc.

CONCLUSION

Preceding noncurative ESD has no negative impact on the short- and long-term results of additional gastrectomy (open surgery or laparoscopic surgery).

Accuracy of the revised Vienna Classification for predicting postendoscopic resection outcomes for gastric and oesophageal neoplasms: a retrospective cohort study of patients from a UK tertiary referral centre

AIMS

To review the effectiveness of the revised Vienna classification (rVC) at predicting histological outcome and defining the postendoscopic resection (ER) clinical management plan of gastro-oesophageal dysplasia and early neoplasia in a UK tertiary-centre population.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study between November 2011 and May 2018. 157 patients from Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust in the UK were included. The primary outcome was the histological results of postsurgical resection (SR) specimens compared with their post-ER rVC. The secondary outcome was overall survival rates of patients with category 4.4 and 5 of the rVC.

RESULTS

One-hundred and thirteen patients were diagnosed with category ≥4 of the rVC. 23 patients (20.4%) were referred for additional surgery, whereas 69 patients (61.1%) were on endoscopic surveillance only. 60.9% of post-SR specimens (14/23) revealed no residual neoplasia. 78.6% of these cancer-free specimens were classed as category 5 rVC. The overall 7-year survival rate of 25 patients with category ≥4.4 was 68% with causes of mortality not linked to upper gastrointestinal neoplasia. The overall 7-year and 3-year survival rates of category 4.4 and 5 were 73.6% and 50%, respectively, although age and comorbid state played a role.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides evidence of outcomes comparable to other reported cohorts for cases after ER in a single-centre UK population even at rVC 4.4/5. It suggests surgery may not be necessary in all cases due to the lack of residual disease and further refinement of the rVC category 5 may help guide management.

Additional surgical resection after endoscopic mucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: A medium-sized hospital's experience

PURPOSE

In Japan, the majority of early gastric cancers (EGCs) are now treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Patients with non-curative lesions treated by ESD are advised to undergo additional surgical resection (ASR) based on guidelines from the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society (JGES) and Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (JGCA). However, many studies have demonstrated that residual cancer and lymph node metastasis are only rarely found in ASR specimens. Here we retrospectively analyzed the conditions that could enable the avoidance of unnecessary ASR.

METHODS

The ESD data for 114 absolute indication lesions and 26 lesions of expanded indication lesions were analyzed. The indications and the curability were evaluated according to the JGES/JGCA guidelines.

RESULTS

The rates of non-curative resection and ASR were significantly higher in the expanded indication group compared to the absolute indication group (26.9% and 19.2% vs. 7.9% and 0.9%, respectively). ASR was performed for six patients. Three of their ARS specimens contained neither residual cancer nor lymph node metastasis, and the pathological findings of the preceding ESD specimens deviated slightly from the curative criteria defined by the guidelines. The conditions of the lesions that did not meet the curative criteria were as follows: (1) sm1 invasion of undifferentiated-type lesion <10 mm dia., (2) 21-25 mm dia. mucosal undifferentiated-type lesion, or (3) peacemeal resection with a horizontal margin positive for the mucosal differentiated-type.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that a close follow-up without ASR might be appropriate for patients in the above-mentioned three categories after non-curative ESD for EGC.

Risk factors and management of positive horizontal margin in early gastric cancer resected by en bloc endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Although endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a widely accepted treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC), there is no consensus regarding the management of positive horizontal margin (HM) despite en bloc ESD. The aim of the current study was to identify the risk factors and optimal management of positive HM in EGCs resected by en bloc ESD.

METHODS

A total of 890 consecutive patients with 1,053 intramucosal EGCs resected by en bloc ESD between April 2005 and June 2011. Clinicopathological data were retrieved retrospectively to assess the positive HM rate, local recurrence rate, risk factors for positive HM, and outcomes of treatment for local recurrent tumor. Positive HM was defined as a margin with direct tumor invasion (type A), the presence of cancerous cells on either end of 2-mm-thick cut sections (type B), or an unclear tumor margin resulting from crush or burn damage (type C).

RESULTS

The positive HM rate was 2.0% (21/1,053). The local recurrence rate was 0.3% (3/1,053). All local recurrent tumors were intramucosal carcinomas, and were resected curatively by re-ESD. Multivariate analysis with logistic regression showed tumor location in the upper third of the stomach and lesions not matching the absolute indication to be independent risk factors for positive HM.

CONCLUSION

The risk factors for HM positivity in cases of EGC resected by en bloc ESD are tumor location in the upper third of the stomach and dissatisfaction of the absolute indication for curative ESD.

Clinical outcomes of early gastric cancer with lymphovascular invasion or positive vertical resection margin after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

In early gastric cancer (EGC) cases with lymphovascular invasion or positive vertical margins after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), additional radical gastrectomy is performed on principle. However, an additional surgery is often difficult to consider if the surgical approach itself is challenging or the patient refuses surgery. In such cases, only close surveillance is performed without additional surgical procedures. This study aimed to examine the difference in clinical prognosis of EGC cases with lymphovascular invasion or positive vertical margins after ESD either with or without surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied 83 patients with lymphovascular invasion or positive vertical margins after ESD from July 2005 to November 2013.

RESULTS

Of the 83 patients, 45 (54.2%) underwent radical additional gastrectomy (surgical group) and 38 (45.8%) were under close surveillance without surgical or endoscopic treatments (close surveillance group.) The cancer-free survival period was 78.3 ± 3.4 months in the surgical group and 64.5 ± 4.6 months in the close surveillance group. The recurrence rates did not significantly differ between the 2 groups, at 7.9% in the surgical group and 6.7% in the non-surgical group.

CONCLUSIONS

Close surveillance may be suggested as an option for EGC patients for whom a surgical approach is difficult, who exhibit a positive vertical margin after ESD, and who have no lymphovascular or deep submucosa invasion after ESD.