Large format histology may aid in the detection of unsuspected pathologic findings of potential clinical significance: a prospective multiyear single institution study

Can we improve breast cancer management using an image-guided histopathology workup supported by larger histopathology sections?

PURPOSE

Breast radiologists examine the entire breast in full-size images, while breast pathologists examine small tissue samples at high magnification. The diagnostic information from these complementary imaging approaches can be difficult to integrate for a more clinically relevant evaluation of malignancies spanning several centimetres. We have explored the advantages and disadvantages of imaging guided larger section pathology techniques compared with the standard 2 × 2.5 cm. small section technique.

METHODS

We compared the ability of conventional small section histopathology with larger section histopathology techniques to examine surgical resection margins and full disease extent. We evaluated the pre-surgical imaging workup and use of microfocus magnification radiography of sliced surgical specimens in the histopathologic evaluation of disease extent and status of surgical margins.

RESULTS

Image assisted large section histopathology of excised breast tissue enables comprehensive examination of an approximately tenfold larger contiguous tissue area than is provided by conventional small section technology. Attempting to cover the full area of each consecutive slice of resected tissue is more labour-intensive and expensive with the small section approach and poses challenges in reconstituting three-dimensional tumour architecture after morcellation and sectioning. Restricting histopathologic examination to a limited number of samples provides an incomplete evaluation of surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerably improved documentation of breast cancer and a more reliable assessment of tissue margins is provided by using larger sized histopathology samples to correlate with breast imaging findings. These in turn can enable more appropriate treatment planning, improved surgical performance, fewer recurrences, and better patient outcome. Uncertainty of surgical margin evaluation inherent to the standard small section technique can lead to inappropriate decisions in surgical management and adjunctive therapy. Progress in breast diagnosis and treatment will largely depend on whether histopathology terminology and technique will undergo a revolution similar to the one that has already occurred in breast imaging.

Application of large format tissue processing in the histology laboratory

In clinical, research and veterinary laboratories of North America, large format histology has more recently been improved with newer equipment and better methodology. Large tissue specimens are frequently sliced in the grossing room and processed in multiple smaller, standard size tissue cassettes. Justifiably, submitting more blocks inherently lends itself to a greater confidence in the accuracy of the diagnosis, yet guidelines for tissue sampling often suggest taking fewer samples. For example, large tumor specimen protocols recommend taking one standard-sized tissue block for each cm diameter of tumor. However, cancers are the culmination of many complex changes in cell metabolism and often appear dissimilar at different tissue locations. As these changes have an uncertain behavior, many other tissue samples are often taken from areas that appear to have either a variable texture or color. Consequently, at microscopy, the complete tissue sample may need to be reassembled like a jigsaw puzzle as the stained sections are frequently presented over many slides. This problem has easily been overcome by using large format cassettes since the entire cross-section of the tissue sample can often be viewed on a single slide. Because these cassettes can effectively hold up to 10 times the volume of conventional standard size cassettes, they are a more efficient way of assessing large areas of tissue samples. This system is easily adapted for all tissue types and has become the established method for assessing large tissue samples in many laboratory settings.

Three-dimensional tumor visualization of invasive breast carcinomas using whole-mount serial section histopathology: implications for tumor size assessment

PURPOSE

Linear tumor size (T-size) estimated with conventional histology informs breast cancer management. Previously we demonstrated significant differences in margin and focality estimates using conventional histology versus digital whole-mount serial sections (WMSS). Using WMSS we can measure T-size or volume. Here, we compare WMSS T-size with volume, and with T-size measured conventionally. We also compare the ellipsoid model for calculating tumor volume to direct, WMSS measurement.

METHODS

Two pathologists contoured regions of invasive carcinoma and measured T-size from both WMSS and (simulated) conventional sections in 55 consecutive lumpectomy specimens. Volume was measured directly from the contours. Measurements were compared using the paired t-test or Spearman's rank-order correlation. A five-point 'border index' was devised and assigned to each case to parametrize tumor shape considering 'compactness' or cellularity. Tumor volumes calculated assuming ellipsoid geometry were compared with direct, WMSS measurements.

RESULTS

WMSS reported significantly larger T-size than conventional histology in the majority of cases [61.8%, 34/55; means = (2.34 cm; 1.99 cm), p < 0.001], with a 16.4% (9/55) rate of 'upstaging'. The majority of discordances were due to undersampling. T-size and volume were strongly correlated (r = 0.838, p < 0.001). Significantly lower volume was obtained with WMSS versus ellipsoid modeling [means = (1.18 cm³; 1.45 cm³), p < 0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Significantly larger T-size is measured with WMSS than conventionally, due primarily to undersampling in the latter. Volume and linear size are highly correlated. Diffuse tumors interspersed with normal or non-invasive elements may be sampled less extensively than more localized masses. The ellipsoid model overestimates tumor volume.

The value of large sections in surgical pathology

Large format sections (LS) first have been introduced in breast pathology more than a century ago. Since then, they constituted for longtime a research tool to better understand breast microanatomy and the relationship between radiological images and pathological features. Similarly LS have been used to study neoplastic, inflammatory, and degenerative diseases affecting various organs, as brain, lung, gastrointentinal tract, bone, urinary tract, prostate, and placenta. Currently LS are mostly applied to diagnostic routine to better stage tumours such as prostate and breast carcinomas or to correlate radiologic imaging to gross specimens. The purpose of the present paper is to review the historical background and the basis of the applications of LS in surgical pathology, with special emphasis on breast tumours.