Adverse effects of systemic immunosuppression in keratolimbal allograft

Healing the Cornea: Exploring the Therapeutic Solutions Offered by MSCs and MSC-derived EVs

Affecting a large proportion of the population worldwide, corneal disorders constitute a concerning health hazard associated to compromised eyesight or blindness for most severe cases. In the last decades, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) demonstrated promising abilities in improving symptoms associated to corneal diseases or alleviating these affections, especially through their anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory and pro-regenerative properties. More recently, MSC therapeutic potential was shown to be mediated by the molecules they release, and particularly by their extracellular vesicles (EVs; MSC-EVs). Consequently, using MSC-EVs emerged as a pioneering strategy to mitigate the risks related to cell therapy while providing MSC therapeutic benefits. Despite the promises given by MSC- and MSC-EV-based approaches, many improvements are considered to optimize the therapeutic significance of these therapies. This review aspires to provide a comprehensive and detailed overview of current knowledge on corneal therapies involving MSCs and MSC-EVs, the strategies currently under evaluation, and the gaps remaining to be addressed for clinical implementation. From encapsulating MSCs or their EVs into biomaterials to enhance the ocular retention time to loading MSC-EVs with therapeutic drugs, a wide range of ground-breaking strategies are currently contemplated to lead to the safest and most effective treatments. Promising research initiatives also include diverse gene therapies and the targeting of specific cell types through the modification of the EV surface, paving the way for future therapeutic innovations. As one of the most important challenges, MSC-EV large-scale production strategies are extensively investigated and offer a wide array of possibilities to meet the needs of clinical applications.

Topical Tacrolimus Compared With Oral Tacrolimus for Postoperative Immunosuppression in Primary Keratolimbal Allograft

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between topical tacrolimus and oral tacrolimus as the primary calcineurin inhibitor for postoperative immunosuppression after primary keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) transplantation for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, comparative cohort study at a single tertiary referral center (University of MN) of all patients who underwent primary KLAL between 2014 and 2021. Eyes were grouped into those which received topical tacrolimus as the only calcineurin inhibitor (topical group) and eyes in which patients received oral tacrolimus with or without topical tacrolimus (oral group). Clinical and donor tissue data were obtained and compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

In total, 27 eyes of 22 patients (median age 42 years, range 20-79 years) were included, of which 18 eyes were in the oral group and 9 eyes were in the topical group. The mean follow-up time was 33.2 ± 22.6 months. The most frequent etiology of LSCD was alkaline burn (33.3%). At 36 months, graft failure occurred in 6 eyes in the oral group (33.3%) and 2 eyes in the topical group (22.1%) ( P = 0.57). The failure rate in the oral group was 9.1 per 1000 person-months versus 8.4 per 1000 person-months in the topical group ( P = 0.96). The median improvement in BCVA was logMAR -0.975 and logMAR -0.45 for the oral and topical group, respectively ( P = 0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

With careful patient selection, topical tacrolimus may be a viable alternative to oral tacrolimus in KLAL.

A Review of Contact Lens-Induced Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

Limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) is a pathologic condition caused by the dysfunction and destruction of stem cells, stem cell precursors and limbal cell niche in the corneal epithelium, leading to severe conjunctivalization of the cornea. Etiologies for LSCD span from congenital (aniridia), traumatic (chemical or thermal injuries), autoimmune (Stevens-Johnson syndrome) and iatrogenic disease to contact lens (CL) wear. Of these, CL wear is the least understood and is often a subclinical cause of LSCD. Even with recent advances in LSCD research, limitations persist in establishing the pathogenesis and treatment guidelines for CL-induced LSCD. A literature search was conducted to include original articles containing patients with CL-induced LSCD. This review will critically discuss the complex pathophysiology behind CL-induced LSCD, the underlying risk factors and epidemiology of the disease as well as methods to obtain a diagnosis. Various treatment options will be reviewed based on proposed treatment strategies.

Genetic analysis of allogenic donor cells after successful allo-limbal epithelial transplantation in simple and cultivated limbal epithelial transplantation procedures

This non-comparative cohort study investigated long-term donor cell survival after allogenic simple/cultivated limbal epithelial transplantations (allo-SLET/allo-CLET, respectively) by genetic analysis. Transplanted corneal epithelial cells, which underwent impression cytology and/or corneal-button biopsy, were examined for personal identities of autosomal short-tandem repeats; the percentages of donor cells were calculated based on matching recipient or donor buccal-DNA references. Twelve patients were included; 4 underwent allo-CLET, 8 underwent allo-SLET. Eight patients (67%) had total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). Genetic analysis was performed postoperatively (mean, 55.3 months). Donor cells were detected in 4 of 12 patients (25%), all of whom underwent allo-SLET; 1 patient had a donor genotype and 3 patients had a mixed donor/recipient genotype. The longest time of donor cell detection was 30 months. Seven patients (58%) used systemic immunosuppressives at the time of genetic analysis (mean use, 22.5 months). Allogenic donor cells survived in both procedures for the long term postoperatively, which encourages the long-term use of systemic immunosuppressives. Donor cells may not be the only factor in graft survival, in that most successful cases had a recipient profile. Their presence for a specific time may promote niches for the patients' own cells to repopulate, especially for partial LSCD.

Outcome of keratolimbal allograft transplantation with deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty for bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate and compare the outcome of keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) transplantation with or without deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for bilateral severe limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD).

METHODS

This retrospective review included 49 eyes of 46 patients who underwent KLAL transplantation at the Department of Ophthalmology of Chinese PLA general hospital, 2009-2020, for bilateral severe LSCD were examined for corneal clarity and corneal scarring to determine whether to combine DALK with KLAL transplantation. Preoperative information, surgical decision tree, surgical procedures, and postoperative data were collected for each eye.

RESULTS

All patients had preoperative severe or total LSCD. Twenty-four eyes underwent KLAL transplantation only, 25 KLAL transplantation plus DALK. The mean follow-up was 46.80 ± 31.22 months (18-158 months). Overall KLAL survival (with or without DALK) was 71.43% at the final follow-up (KLAL-only 66.67%, KLAL-DALK 76%). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the 3-year survival probability of all grafts was 70.53 ± 10.89% (KLAL-only 64.86 ± 10.11%, KLAL-DALK 75.79 ± 8.62%). The proportion of BCVA ≥ 20/200 eyes among all KLAL transplantations increased from 11 eyes (22.45%) preoperatively to 25 eyes (51.02%) after 1 year and 24 eyes (48.98%) at the last follow-up (P = 0.01). The proportion of BCVA ≥ 20/200 eyes in the KLAL-DALK group increased significantly (P = 0.04), from 16.0% at baseline to 48.0% after 1 year to 44.0% at the last follow-up. Seventeen eyes (34.69%) had postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

KLAL-DALK is an effective option to restore a stable ocular surface and visual acuity rapidly in patients with bilateral, late-stage, severe LSCD.

Corneal Epithelial Stem Cells-Physiology, Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Options

In the human cornea, regeneration of the epithelium is regulated by the stem cell reservoir of the limbus, which is the marginal region of the cornea representing the anatomical and functional border between the corneal and conjunctival epithelium. In support of this concept, extensive limbal damage, e.g., by chemical or thermal injury, inflammation, or surgery, may induce limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) leading to vascularization and opacification of the cornea and eventually vision loss. These acquired forms of limbal stem cell deficiency may occur uni- or bilaterally, which is important for the choice of treatment. Moreover, a variety of inherited diseases, such as congenital aniridia or dyskeratosis congenita, are characterized by LSCD typically occurring bilaterally. Several techniques of autologous and allogenic stem cell transplantation have been established. The limbus can be restored by transplantation of whole limbal grafts, small limbal biopsies or by ex vivo-expanded limbal cells. In this review, the physiology of the corneal epithelium, the pathophysiology of LSCD, and the therapeutic options will be presented.

Understanding cornea epithelial stem cells and stem cell deficiency: Lessons learned using vertebrate model systems

Animal models have contributed greatly to our understanding of human diseases. Here, we focus on cornea epithelial stem cell (CESC) deficiency (commonly called limbal stem cell deficiency, LSCD). Corneal development, homeostasis and wound healing are supported by specific stem cells, that include the CESCs. Damage to or loss of these cells results in blindness and other debilitating ocular conditions. Here we describe the contributions from several vertebrate models toward understanding CESCs and LSCD treatments. These include both mammalian models, as well as two aquatic models, Zebrafish and the amphibian, Xenopus. Pioneering developments have been made using stem cell transplants to restore normal vision in patients with LSCD, but questions still remain about the basic biology of CESCs, including their precise cell lineages and behavior in the cornea. We describe various cell lineage tracing studies to follow their patterns of division, and the fates of their progeny during development, homeostasis, and wound healing. In addition, we present some preliminary results using the Xenopus model system. Ultimately, a more thorough understanding of these cornea cells will advance our knowledge of stem cell biology and lead to better cornea disease therapeutics.

Management Strategies of Ocular Chemical Burns: Current Perspectives

Ocular chemical burns are absolute ophthalmic emergencies and require immediate management to minimize devastating sequelae. Management of alkali and acid burns is started at the scene of the accident by copious irrigation. Treatment is directed at improving epithelial integrity and stromal stability, reduction of undue inflammation, and prevention or timely management of complications. To ascertain the best possible outcome, numerous biological medications and surgical interventions have been merged into conventional therapeutic regimens. These include autologous and umbilical cord serum preparations, platelet-rich plasma, amniotic membrane transplantation, limbal stem-cell transplantation, and anti-angiogenic agents.

Clinical Trials of Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency Treated with Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cells

The corneal surface is an essential organ necessary for vision, and its clarity must be maintained. The corneal epithelium is renewed by limbal stem cells, located in the limbus and in palisades of Vogt. Palisades of Vogt maintain the clearness of the corneal epithelium by blocking the growth of conjunctival epithelium and the invasion of blood vessels over the cornea. The limbal region can be damaged by chemical burns, physical damage (e.g., by contact lenses), congenital disease, chronic inflammation, or limbal surgeries. The degree of limbus damage is associated with the degree of limbal stem cells deficiency (partial or total). For a long time, the only treatment to restore vision was grafting part of the healthy cornea from the other eye of the patient or by transplanting a cornea from cadavers. The regenerative medicine and stem cell therapies have been applied to restore normal vision using different methodologies. The source of stem cells varies from embryonic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, to induced pluripotent stem cells. This review focuses on the use of oral mucosa epithelial stem cells and their use in engineering cell sheets to treat limbal stem cell deficient patients.

Systemic Immunosuppression for Limbal Allograft and Allogenic Limbal Epithelial Cell Transplantation

Bilateral limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) treatment requires the need to obtain allogenic limbal tissue for transplantation. Outcomes of different surgical techniques depend on multiple factors, including the underlying etiology, ocular surface, eyelid status and used surgical intervention. Some of the management options for bilateral LSCD include cadaveric, living related or living non-related conjunctival limbal allograft (CLAL), keratolimbal allograft (KLAL), allogenic cultured limbal epithelial transplantation (CLET) and allogenic simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET). Systemic immunosuppressive therapy plays a pivotal role in survival of transplanted tissue. The present review focuses on different systemic immunosuppression protocols for limbal allograft and allogenic limbal epithelial cell transplantation, with specific emphasis on different surgical techniques and their outcomes. We included all reports with details of different systemic immunosuppression protocols for limbal allograft and allogenic limbal epithelial cell transplantation. Oral cyclosporine A at different doses is the most commonly used immunosuppressive agent in limbal allograft and allogenic limbal epithelial cell transplantation. However, different studies using oral mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus also reported good results. In conclusion, systemic immunosuppression protocols for limbal allograft and allogenic limbal epithelial cell transplantation are not standardized. Further studies regarding different surgical techniques should assess outcomes and adverse effects of such protocols.

Strategies for reconstructing the limbal stem cell niche

The epithelial cell layer that covers the surface of the cornea provides a protective barrier while maintaining corneal transparency. The rapid and effective turnover of these epithelial cells depends, in part, on the limbal epithelial stem cells (LESCs) located in a specialized microenvironment known as the limbal niche. Many disorders affecting the regeneration of the corneal epithelium are related to deficiency and/or dysfunction of LESCs and the limbal niche. Current approaches for regenerating the corneal epithelium following significant injuries such as burns and inflammatory attacks are primarily aimed at repopulating the LESCs. This review summarizes and assesses the clinical feasibility and efficacy of current and emerging approaches for reconstruction of the limbal niche. In particular, the application of mesenchymal stem cells along with appropriate biological scaffolds appear to be promising strategies for long-term revitalization of the limbal niche.

Emerging Therapeutic Strategies for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

Identification and characterization of the limbal epithelial stem cells (LESCs) has proven to be a major accomplishment in anterior ocular surface biology. These cells have been shown to be a subpopulation of limbal epithelial basal cells, which serve as the progenitor population of the corneal epithelium. LESCs have been demonstrated to play an important role in maintaining corneal epithelium homeostasis. Many ocular surface diseases, including intrinsic (e.g., Sjogren's syndrome) or extrinsic (e.g., alkali or thermal burns) insults, which impair LESCs, can lead to limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). LSCD is characterized by an overgrowth of conjunctival-derived epithelial cells, corneal neovascularization, and chronic inflammation, eventually leading to blindness. Treatment of LSCD has been challenging, especially in bilateral total LSCD. Recently, advances in LESC research have led to novel therapeutic approaches for treating LSCD, such as transplantation of the cultured limbal epithelium. These novel therapeutic approaches have demonstrated efficacy for ocular surface reconstruction and restoration of vision in patients with LSCD. However, they all have their own limitations. Here, we describe the current status of LSCD treatment and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the available therapeutic modalities.

Repairing the corneal epithelium using limbal stem cells or alternative cell-based therapies

INTRODUCTION

The corneal epithelium is maintained by limbal stem cells (LSCs) that reside in the basal epithelial layer of the tissue surrounding the cornea termed the limbus. Loss of LSCs results in limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) that can cause severe visual impairment. Patients with partial LSCD may respond to conservative therapies designed to rehabilitate the remaining LSCs. However, if these conservative approaches fail or, if complete loss of LSCs occurs, transplantation of LSCs or their alternatives is the only option. While a number of clinical studies utilizing diverse surgical and cell culture techniques have shown favorable results, a universal cure for LSCD is still not available. Knowledge of the potential risks and benefits of current approaches, and development of new technologies, is essential for further improvement of LSCD therapies.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on cell-based LSCD treatment approaches ranging from current available clinical therapies to preclinical studies of novel promising applications.

EXPERT OPINION

Improved understanding of LSC identity and development of LSC expansion methods will influence the evolution of successful LSCD therapies. Ultimately, future controlled clinical studies enabling direct comparison of the diverse employed approaches will help to identify the most effective treatment strategies.

Long-term Outcomes of Ocular Surface Stem Cell Allograft Transplantation

PURPOSE

To investigate the long-term outcomes of ocular surface stem cell allograft transplantation (OSST) in patients with total limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) owing to various etiologies with a follow-up ≥ 5 years.

DESIGN

Retrospective interventional cohort.

METHODS

Setting: Single tertiary referral hospital.

STUDY POPULATION

Patients who had (1) presence of total LSCD, (2) surgical treatment with at least 1 allograft OSST procedure, and (3) minimum follow-up ≥ 5 years after OSST.

INTERVENTION

All patients underwent allograft OSST from March 1998 to June 2009. All patients received systemic immunosuppression.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Ocular surface stability, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA).

RESULTS

A total of 165 eyes of 110 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria with a mean follow-up period of 109.22 ± 35.7 months or approximately 9.1 years (range 5.2-17.7 years). Ocular surface stability was achieved in 72.7% (120/165) of eyes at last follow-up, while 15.2% (25/165) maintained an improved ocular surface and 12.1% (20/165) developed total surface failure. Additional OSST surgery was necessary in 30.9% (51/165 eyes) to maintain a stable ocular surface. There was ≥ 2 lines BCVA improvement in 62.1%, no change in 7.7%, and a worsened BCVA in 18.6% at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

With proper immunosuppression and repeat procedure in case of failure, allograft OSST can provide true long-term ocular surface stability and successful visual outcomes.

Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation and Complications

Corneal epithelial stem cells are adult somatic stem cells located at the limbus and represent the ultimate source of transparent corneal epithelium. When these limbal stem cells become dysfunctional or deficient, limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) develops. LSCD is a major cause of corneal scarring and is particularly prevalent in chemical and thermal burns of the ocular surface. LSCD leads to conjunctivalization of the corneal surface, neovascularization, recurrent or persistent epithelial defects, ocular surface inflammation, and scarring that, in turn, lead to decreased vision, pain, and impaired quality of life. Several techniques have been reported for limbal stem cell transplantation (LSCT). We introduce the surgical techniques, examine the success rate, and discuss the postoperative complications of conjunctival limbal autograft (CLAU), cultivated limbal stem cell transplantation (CLET), simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET), and limbal allograft, including keratolimbal allografts (KLAL) and living-related conjunctival allograft (LR-CLAL).

Late Acute Rejection After Allograft Limbal Stem Cell Transplantation: Evidence for Long-Term Donor Survival

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical presentation and management of late (>3.0 years) acute graft rejection in keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) recipients.

METHODS

This was a multicenter, retrospective observational case series. Six eyes of 6 patients with ocular surface transplant at a mean age of 36.2 years were seen at 3 tertiary referral centers for acute graft rejection between 2007 and 2013. Main outcome measures included strength of systemic immunosuppression (SI) at the time of rejection, time to rejection, and clinical presentation of rejection.

RESULTS

Preoperative diagnoses included total limbal stem cell deficiency because of aniridia (n = 2) or chemical injury (n = 4). After an initially successful outcome, patients experienced late acute graft rejection at a mean time of 67.8 ± 24.1 months (range: 41-98) after KLAL while receiving suboptimal levels of SI because of medication taper (n = 5) or noncompliance (n = 1). Objective findings included an epithelial rejection line (n = 6), edema (n = 2), corneal epithelial irregularities (n = 2), and neovascularization (n = 1). Antirejection management consisted of topical corticosteroids (n = 6) and augmentation of SI therapy (n = 5).

CONCLUSIONS

These cases of late acute graft rejection in KLAL patients support the notion that allodonor cells can persist over the long run and remain at risk for immunologic rejection. It further underscores the fact that long-term success with KLAL may require extension of SI beyond the first few years, albeit at lower levels individualized to each patient.

Keratolimbal allograft

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Keratolimbal allograft (KLAL) transplants limbal tissue attached to a corneoscleral carrier from a cadaveric donor to deliver a large number of stem cells to the recipient. The present article will provide a review of KLAL focusing on the recent literature.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent findings pertain to tissue selection, immunosuppression and adverse event profiles, and postoperative complications (particularly related to immunologic rejection).

SUMMARY

KLAL permits the treatment of limbal stem cell deficiency eyes when there is no available living-related or autograft tissue with minimal risk of irreversible toxicity from modern systemic immunosuppression. The prevention of immunologic graft rejection with the use of systemic immunosuppression after KLAL is critical and may require extending systemic immunosuppression treatment longer than previously thought. With vigilant postoperative management, KLAL can allow successful treatment of the most severely diseased eyes.

Contact Lens-induced Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency

Limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) is a pathologic condition caused by the dysfunction and/or destruction of stem cell precursors of the corneal epithelium, typified clinically by corneal conjunctivalization. The purpose of this review is to critically discuss a less well-known cause of limbal stem cell disease: contact lens (CL) wear. A literature search was conducted to include original articles containing patients with CL-induced LSCD. This review describes epidemiology, diagnostic strategies, pathogenesis, differential diagnosis, and treatment modalities for this condition.

Current and Upcoming Therapies for Ocular Surface Chemical Injuries

Chemical injuries frequently result in vision loss, disfigurement, and challenging ocular surface complications. Acute interventions are directed at decreasing the extent of the injury, suppressing inflammation, and promoting ocular surface re-epithelialization. Chronically, management involves controlling inflammation along with rehabilitation and reconstruction of the ocular surface. Future therapies aimed at inhibiting neovascularization and promoting ocular surface regeneration should provide more effective treatment options for the management of ocular chemical injuries.

Limbal stem cell transplantation: current perspectives

Regeneration of the corneal surface after an epithelial insult involves division, migration, and maturation of a specialized group of stem cells located in the limbus. Several insults, both intrinsic and extrinsic, can precipitate destruction of the delicate microenvironment of these cells, resulting in limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD). In such cases, reepithelialization fails and conjunctival epithelium extends across the limbus, leading to vascularization, persistent epithelial defects, and chronic inflammation. In partial LSCD, conjunctival epitheliectomy, coupled with amniotic membrane transplantation, could be sufficient to restore a healthy surface. In more severe cases and in total LSCD, stem cell transplantation is currently the best curative option. Before any attempts are considered to perform a limbal stem cell transplantation procedure, the ocular surface must be optimized by controlling causative factors and comorbid conditions. These factors include adequate eyelid function or exposure, control of the ocular surface inflammatory status, and a well-lubricated ocular surface. In cases of unilateral LSCD, stem cells can be obtained from the contralateral eye. Newer techniques aim at expanding cells in vitro or in vivo in order to decrease the need for large limbal resection that may jeopardize the “healthy” eye. Patients with bilateral disease can be treated using allogeneic tissue in combination with systemic immunosuppressive therapy. Another emerging option for this subset of patients is the use of noncorneal cells such as mucosal grafts. Finally, the use of keratoprosthesis is reserved for patients who are not candidates for any of the aforementioned options, wherein the choice of the type of keratoprosthesis depends on the severity of the disease. In summary, limbal stem cell transplantation improves both vision and quality-of-life in patients with ocular surface disorders associated with LSCD, and overall, the use of autologous tissue offers the best results. Future studies aim at improving cellular expansion and finding different sources of stem cells.

Modified simple limbal epithelial transplantation using cryopreserved amniotic membrane for unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency

PURPOSE

To report the results of simple limbal epithelial transplantation using a double-layered cryopreserved amniotic membrane graft for the management of unilateral limbal stem cell deficiency.

DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Four consecutive patients with unilateral partial (2 eyes) and total (2 eyes) limbal stem cell deficiency secondary to ocular surface burns (2 eyes), trauma (1 eye) and conjunctival melanoma treatment (1 eye) underwent modified simple limbal epithelial transplantation at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute. Preoperative and postoperative visual acuity and quality of corneal epithelium were evaluated.

RESULTS

The patients were followed up for a mean ± standard deviation of 7.5 ± 1.3 months. The donor eye returned to a healthy state in all patients. All patients had significant improvement in visual acuity and resolution of ocular pain in the affected eye. Regular corneal epithelium and a quiet ocular surface were obtained in all patients by a median of 4 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with the currently used surgical techniques for management of limbal stem cell deficiency, simple limbal epithelial transplantation seems to be a safe, reproducible, and effective alternative. The use of a double layer allows more protection for the explant without impacting outcomes. Also, the use of cryopreserved amniotic membrane allows surgeons to perform this procedure in the Unites States. More cases with longer follow-up will be needed to assess the outcomes further.

The ocular surface chemical burns

Ocular chemical burns are common and serious ocular emergencies that require immediate and intensive evaluation and care. The victims of such incidents are usually young, and therefore loss of vision and disfigurement could dramatically affect their lives. The clinical course can be divided into immediate, acute, early, and late reparative phases. The degree of limbal, corneal, and conjunctival involvement at the time of injury is critically associated with prognosis. The treatment starts with simple but vision saving steps and is continued with complicated surgical procedures later in the course of the disease. The goal of treatment is to restore the normal ocular surface anatomy and function. Limbal stem cell transplantation, amniotic membrane transplantation, and ultimately keratoprosthesis may be indicated depending on the patients' needs.