Activated Protein C Does Not Alleviate the Course of Systemic Inflammation in the APCAP Trial

Fire in the belly: A scoping review of the immunopathological mechanisms of acute pancreatitis

Introduction

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is characterised by an inflammatory response that in its most severe form can cause a systemic dysregulated immune response and progression to acute multi-organ dysfunction. The pathobiology of the disease is unclear and as a result no targeted, disease-modifying therapies exist. We performed a scoping review of data pertaining to the human immunology of AP to summarise the current field and to identify future research opportunities.

Methods

A scoping review of all clinical studies of AP immunology was performed across multiple databases. Studies were included if they were human studies of AP with an immunological outcome or intervention.

Results

205 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review. Severe AP is characterised by significant immune dysregulation compared to the milder form of the disease. Broadly, this immune dysfunction was categorised into: innate immune responses (including profound release of damage-associated molecular patterns and heightened activity of pattern recognition receptors), cytokine profile dysregulation (particularly IL-1, 6, 10 and TNF-α), lymphocyte abnormalities, paradoxical immunosuppression (including HLA-DR suppression and increased co-inhibitory molecule expression), and failure of the intestinal barrier function. Studies including interventions were also included. Several limitations in the existing literature have been identified; consolidation and consistency across studies is required if progress is to be made in our understanding of this disease.

Conclusions

AP, particularly the more severe spectrum of the disease, is characterised by a multifaceted immune response that drives tissue injury and contributes to the associated morbidity and mortality. Significant work is required to develop our understanding of the immunopathology of this disease if disease-modifying therapies are to be established.

Meta-Analysis of Early Nutrition: The Benefits of Enteral Feeding Compared to a Nil Per Os Diet Not Only in Severe, but Also in Mild and Moderate Acute Pancreatitis

The recently published guidelines for acute pancreatitis (AP) suggest that enteral nutrition (EN) should be the primary therapy in patients suffering from severe acute pancreatitis (SAP); however, none of the guidelines have recommendations on mild and moderate AP (MAP). A meta-analysis was performed using the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P). The following PICO (problem, intervention, comparison, outcome) was applied: P: nutrition in AP; I: enteral nutrition (EN); C: nil per os diet (NPO); and O: outcome. There were 717 articles found in Embase, 831 in PubMed, and 10 in the Cochrane database. Altogether, seven SAP and six MAP articles were suitable for analyses. In SAP, forest plots were used to illustrate three primary endpoints (mortality, multiorgan failure, and intervention). In MAP, 14 additional secondary endpoints were analyzed (such as CRP (C-reactive protein), WCC (white cell count), complications, etc.). After pooling the data, the Mann-Whitney U test was used to detect significant differences. Funnel plots were created for testing heterogeneity. All of the primary endpoints investigated showed that EN is beneficial vs. NPO in SAP. In MAP, all of the six articles found merit in EN. Analyses of the primary endpoints did not show significant differences between the groups; however, analyzing the 17 endpoints together showed a significant difference in favor of EN vs. NPO. EN is beneficial compared to a nil per os diet not only in severe, but also in mild and moderate AP.

[Recent Advances in Management of Acute Pancreatitis]

Acute pancreatitis is common but remains a condition with significant morbidity and mortality. Despite a better understanding of the pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis achieved during the past few decades, there is no specific pharmacologic entity available. Therefore, supportive care is still the mainstay of treatment. Recently, novel interventions for increasing survival and minimizing morbidity have been investigated, which are highlighted in this review.

Twenty-four hour infusion of human recombinant activated protein C (Xigris) early in severe acute pancreatitis: The XIG-AP 1 trial

OBJECTIVE

Patients with severe acute pancreatitis were excluded from major trials of human recombinant activated protein C (Xigris) because of concern about pancreatic haemorrhage although these individuals have an intense systemic inflammatory response that may benefit from treatment. The object of this study was to provide initial safety data evaluating Xigris in severe acute pancreatitis.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial recruiting between November 2009 and October 2011. Patients received human recombinant activated protein C (Xigris) for 24 h by intravenous infusion (24 μg/kg/h) in addition to standard clinical care. A matched historical control group treated within the same hospital unit were used to compare outcomes. Of 166 consecutive admitted patients, 43 met the screening criteria for severe acute pancreatitis and 19 were recruited, all contributing to the analyses.

RESULTS

Compared to historical controls, there were fewer bleeding events in the Xigris group although the finding did not reach significance (Xigris 0% vs. Control 21%, p = 0.13), similarly further intervention appeared less frequent (11% vs. 47%, p = 0.07) in the treatment group. Length of stay was shorter for patients receiving Xigris (19 vs. 41 days, p = 0.03) as was inotrope use (5% vs. 32%, p = 0.02); mortality and incidence of infections in both groups were similar. Biomarker protein C increased while IL-6 decreased following infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

A 24-hr infusion of Xigris appears safe when used in patients with severe acute pancreatitis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Eudract Number 2007-003635-23.