Hippocampal anatomy supports the use of context in object recognition: a computational model

Dentate Gyrus Somatostatin Cells are Required for Contextual Discrimination During Episodic Memory Encoding

Memory systems ought to store and discriminate representations of similar experiences in order to efficiently guide future decisions. This problem is solved by pattern separation, implemented in the dentate gyrus (DG) by granule cells to support episodic memory formation. Pattern separation is enabled by tonic inhibitory bombardment generated by multiple GABAergic cell populations that strictly maintain low activity levels in granule cells. Somatostatin-expressing cells are one of those interneuron populations, selectively targeting the distal dendrites of granule cells, where cortical multimodal information reaches the DG. Nonetheless, somatostatin cells have very low connection probability and synaptic efficacy with both granule cells and other interneuron types. Hence, the role of somatostatin cells in DG circuitry, particularly in the context of pattern separation, remains uncertain. Here, by using optogenetic stimulation and behavioral tasks in mice, we demonstrate that somatostatin cells are required for the acquisition of both contextual and spatial overlapping memories.

Dorsoventral and Proximodistal Hippocampal Processing Account for the Influences of Sleep and Context on Memory (Re)consolidation: A Connectionist Model

The context in which learning occurs is sufficient to reconsolidate stored memories and neuronal reactivation may be crucial to memory consolidation during sleep. The mechanisms of context-dependent and sleep-dependent memory (re)consolidation are unknown but involve the hippocampus. We simulated memory (re)consolidation using a connectionist model of the hippocampus that explicitly accounted for its dorsoventral organization and for CA1 proximodistal processing. Replicating human and rodent (re)consolidation studies yielded the following results. (1) Semantic overlap between memory items and extraneous learning was necessary to explain experimental data and depended crucially on the recurrent networks of dorsal but not ventral CA3. (2) Stimulus-free, sleep-induced internal reactivations of memory patterns produced heterogeneous recruitment of memory items and protected memories from subsequent interference. These simulations further suggested that the decrease in memory resilience when subjects were not allowed to sleep following learning was primarily due to extraneous learning. (3) Partial exposure to the learning context during simulated sleep (i.e., targeted memory reactivation) uniformly increased memory item reactivation and enhanced subsequent recall. Altogether, these results show that the dorsoventral and proximodistal organization of the hippocampus may be important components of the neural mechanisms for context-based and sleep-based memory (re)consolidations.

Dissociation between complete hippocampal context memory formation and context fear acquisition

Rodents require a minimal time period to explore a context prior to footshock to display plateau-level context fear at test. To investigate whether this rapid fear plateau reflects complete memory formation within that short time-frame, we used the immediate-early gene product Arc as an indicator of hippocampal context memory formation-related activity. We found that hippocampal Arc expression continued to increase well past the minimal time required for plateau-level fear. This raises the possibility that context fear conditioning occurs more rapidly than complete memory formation. Thus, animals may be able to condition robustly to both complete and incomplete contextual representations.