Role of stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis in the post-SAMMPRIS era

The effectiveness of enterprise stent use on the treatment of intracranial atherosclerosis disease

OBJECTIVE

To examine the clinical outcome of Enterprise stent in patients with severe and symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Twenty-five patients who underwent Enterprise stenting between January 2012 and March 2019 were included in this study. Exclusion criteria were previous intracranial stenting and inadequate follow-up. Technical success rates of the procedures were recorded. Clinical outcome was evaluated with pre- and post-treatment modified Rankin Scale scores. The patients were monitored for 18 months clinically and for 14.3 months radiologically.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 15 males and 10 females was 61.6 ± 8.19. Of these 25 patients, 6 (24%) were in the anterior system and 19 (76%) were in posterior system. The mean degree of pre-treatment stenosis was 86.4% ± 7 with the mean lesion length of 12.5 ± 7.5 mm. The residual stenosis rate was 23.8% ± 8.81. Technical success rate was 100%. There were two major complications within the first 30 days (8%). Late major complications (after 30 days) occurred in one case (4%). Stent restenosis was detected in two patients (8%). No intracranial bleeding or mortality was observed.

CONCLUSION

In this single-center study, we achieved high technical success and tolerable complication rates. Enterprise stent may be a good treatment alternative for severe intracranial stenosis especially in patients resistant to medical treatment when correct patient selection is made. However, further randomized controlled studies, including more cases should be carried out.

Blood biomarkers of progressive atherosclerosis and restenosis after stenting of symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis

In-stent restenosis (ISR) represents a major complication after stenting of intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS). Biomarkers derived from routine blood sampling including C-reactive protein (CRP), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and mean platelet volume (MPV) have been associated with progressive atherosclerosis. We investigated the role of CRP, NLR, PLR and MPV on the development of intracranial ISR and recurrent stroke risk. We retrospectively included all patients who had undergone stenting of symptomatic ICAS at our university hospital between 2005 and 2016. ISR (≥ 50% stenosis) was diagnosed by regular Duplex sonography follow-up studies and confirmed by digital subtraction angiography or computed tomography angiography (mean follow-up duration: 5 years). Laboratory parameters were documented before stenting, at the time of restenosis and at last clinical follow-up. Of 115 patients (mean age: 73 ± 13 years; female: 34%), 38 (33%) developed ISR. The assessed laboratory parameters did not differ between patients with ISR and those without (p > 0.1). While ISR was associated with the occurrence of recurrent ischemic stroke (p = 0.003), CRP, NLR, PLR and MPV were not predictive of such events (p > 0.1). Investigated blood biomarkers of progressive atherosclerosis were not predictive for the occurrence of ISR or recurrent ischemic stroke after ICAS stenting during a 5-year follow-up.

Controversies and Advances in Adult Intracranial Bypass Surgery in 2020

Cerebral revascularization utilizing a variety of bypass techniques can provide either flow augmentation or flow replacement in the treatment of a range of intracranial pathologies, including moyamoya disease, intracranial atherosclerotic disease, and complex aneurysms that are not amenable to endovascular or simple surgical techniques. Though once routine, the publication of high-quality prospective evidence, along with the development of flow-diverting stents, has limited the indications for extracranial-to-intracranial (EC-IC) bypass. Nevertheless, advances in imaging, assessment of cerebral hemodynamics, and surgical technique have changed the risk-benefit calculus for EC-IC bypass. New variations of revascularization surgery involving multiple anastomoses, flow preserving solutions, IC-IC constructs, and posterior circulation bypasses have been pioneered for otherwise difficult to treat pathology including giant aneurysms, dolichoectasia, and medically refractory intracranial atherosclerosis. This review provides a practical update on recent advances in adult intracranial bypass surgery.

Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Artery Stenosis in Northeast of China: A Single-Center Study

Objective: We described the incidence of surgery-related complications to evaluate the safety of endovascular therapy for severe symptomatic intracranial vertebral basilar artery stenosis (IVBS) in our stroke center in Northeast of China.

Methods: Consecutive patients with symptomatic IVBS caused by 70–99% stenosis despite standard medical treatment of antiplatelet agents plus statin were enrolled. Either balloon-mounted stent or balloon predilation plus self-expanding stent was performed. Clinical adverse events such as stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and death after the surgery were documented. Radiological events such as in-stent thrombosis, dissection, and guide-wire perforation during the process were recorded as complications as well. The baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients among different Mori types were compared.

Results: From January 2017 to December 2018, 97 patients with stroke or TIA due to intracranial IVBS were treated by stenting, including 30 patients with basilar artery (BA) stenosis, 55 patients with intracranial vertebral artery (V4) stenosis, and 12 patients with V4-BA stenosis. The primary events include two intracranial hemorrhage (2.1%, 2/97), seven ischemic events (7.2%, 7/97), and two death (2.1%, 2/97). The successful stent deployment rate was 98.9% (96/97). The Apollo stents were used more for Mori A lesions. Self-expanding stents were more used in Mori C lesions. Mori C lesions were more vulnerable to endovascular procedure and showed higher rate of complications than A (p = 0.008) and B type (p = 0.047).

Conclusion: A high technical success rate of IVBS stenting could be achieved, and the safety was acceptable, whereas Mori C lesions were more vulnerable to endovascular procedure and showed a higher rate of complications than A and B types.

Medium-term results of undersized angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic high-grade intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis with Enterprise

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate medium-term results of undersized balloon angioplasty and stenting for symptomatic high-grade (70-99%) stenosis of a major intracranial artery with Enterprise stent.

METHODS

This study included 68 consecutive symptomatic (recurrent transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke under dual antiplatelet treatment) patients with high-grade (70-99%) stenosis of a major intracranial artery who were endovascularly treated with undersized balloon angioplasty and Enterprise stent deployment between July 2012 and December 2017. Primary outcomes were any stroke or death within 30 days after procedure. Secondary outcomes were technical success rates, stroke and restenosis during the follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total of 68 lesions in 68 patients (mean age: 62 ± 7 years) were treated with a technical success rate of 99%. The degree of pre-procedural stenosis was 92 ± 6% and dropped to 12 ± 10% after stent deployment. No patient developed any stroke or death during the periprocedural period. Intracranial hemorrhage was observed in 1 (1.5%) patient. In 60 (88%) patients with available imaging follow-up in-stent restenosis was observed in 2 patients. Mean follow-up period was 22 ± 17 months (range 6-72) and none of the patients experienced recurrent TIA or stroke during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective single-center study undersized balloon angioplasty and deployment of a self-expandable stent with relatively low radial force was safe and effective for endovascular treatment of high-grade intracranial arterial stenosis with high technical success rate, low periprocedural complication rates and favorable medium-term follow-up results.

Concomitant Asymptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Increase the 30-Day Risk of Stroke in Patients Undergoing Symptomatic Intracranial Atherosclerotic Stenosis Stenting

BACKGROUND

In the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial, 19.1% of ischemic strokes occurred out of the territory of previously symptomatic stenosis during the mean follow-up period of 23.4 months. However, it is unknown how many ischemic strokes were due to a previously asymptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). The objective of this study was to investigate whether the concomitant asymptomatic ICAS influences the outcome of patients undergoing symptomatic ICAS stenting.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 576 consecutive patients with nondisabling ischemic stroke (modified Rankin scale score of ≤3) who were treated with symptomatic ICAS (≥70% stenosis) stenting with or without concomitant asymptomatic ICAS. The baseline characteristics and the 30-day primary end points (stroke or death after stenting) were compared by bivariate and multivariable logistic analyses.

RESULTS

The 30-day rate of primary end points was 5.2%, which was higher in patients with concomitant asymptomatic ICAS (≥50% stenosis) than in those without asymptomatic ICAS (no stenosis or <50% stenosis) (8.9% versus 3.8%, P = .014). In patients with concomitant asymptomatic ICAS, 25% of ischemic strokes occurred out of the territory of the stented artery, whereas in patients without asymptomatic ICAS, no ischemic stroke occurred out of the territory of the stented artery. Multivariable analysis showed that concomitant asymptomatic ICAS was an independent risk factor for 30-day stroke (odds ratio = 2.37, 95% confidence interval, 1.14-5.63; P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant asymptomatic ICAS (≥50% stenosis) might increase the 30-day risk of stroke in patients undergoing symptomatic ICAS stenting.

Assessment of Arterial Wall Enhancement for Differentiation of Parent Artery Disease from Small Artery Disease: Comparison between Histogram Analysis and Visual Analysis on 3-Dimensional Contrast-Enhanced T1-Weighted Turbo Spin Echo MR Images at 3T

Objective

The purpose of this study was to compare the histogram analysis and visual scores in 3T MRI assessment of middle cerebral arterial wall enhancement in patients with acute stroke, for the differentiation of parent artery disease (PAD) from small artery disease (SAD).

Materials and Methods

Among the 82 consecutive patients in a tertiary hospital for one year, 25 patients with acute infarcts in middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory were included in this study including 15 patients with PAD and 10 patients with SAD. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced T1-weighted turbo spin echo MR images with black-blood preparation at 3T were analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively. The degree of MCA stenosis, and visual and histogram assessments on MCA wall enhancement were evaluated. A statistical analysis was performed to compare diagnostic accuracy between qualitative and quantitative metrics.

Results

The degree of stenosis, visual enhancement score, geometric mean (GM), and the 90th percentile (90P) value from the histogram analysis were significantly higher in PAD than in SAD (p = 0.006 for stenosis, < 0.001 for others). The receiver operating characteristic curve area of GM and 90P were 1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86–1.00).

Conclusion

A histogram analysis of a relevant arterial wall enhancement allows differentiation between PAD and SAD in patients with acute stroke within the MCA territory.

Risk factors associated with in-hospital serious adverse events after stenting of severe symptomatic intracranial stenosis

OBJECTIVES

Severe symptomatic intracranial stenosis is an important cause of stroke. Intracranial stenting is alternatively applied to treat intracranial atherosclerotic disease. However, Stenting versus Aggressive Medical Therapy for Intracranial Arterial Stenosis trial (SAMMPRIS) and Vitesse Stent Ischemic Therapy trial (VISSIT) both demonstrated intracranial stenting were inferior to aggressive medical treatment. But careful patient selection probably can improve the outcome of stenting in intracranial artery stenosis. Therefore, the validation of risk factors associated with serious adverse events (SAEs) after intracranial stenting may contribute to identify patients who are at high risk of stenting therapy and benefit patient selection for stenting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent intracranial stenting with symptom attributable to severe (>70%) intracranial stenosis were included in our institution. In-hospital SAEs after procedure were reviewed. Risk factors associated with SAEs were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULT

Thirty serious adverse events (5.1%) occurred among a total of 583 patients, with a mean age of 58.1±9.7, including 13 ischemic strokes, 12 brain hemorrhages and 5 deaths. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis showed age (OR=0.94, 95% CI:0.900-0.983), history of DM (OR=2.439, 95% CI:1.107-5.371), preprocedural mRS score (OR=3.076, 95% CI:1.290-7.336) and lesion site in BA (OR=9.056, 95% CI:1.147-71.524) were risk factors associated with SAEs.

CONCLUSION

History of DM and lesion site in BA were risk factors associated with postprocedural in-hospital SAEs after stenting of severe symptomatic intracranial stenosis. But considering of the limitation of this retrospective study, further studies are necessary to confirm our results.

Wingspan stenting can effectively prevent long-term strokes for patients with severe symptomatic atherosclerotic basilar stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the safety and long-term effect of using the Wingspan stent for severe symptomatic atherosclerotic basilar artery stenosis (≥70%).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between July 2007 and April 2013, we had 91 consecutive patients (age range 41-82 years old) with symptomatic severe basilar stenosis (70-99%) who underwent Wingspan stenting at our center. All patients had stenosis-related temporary ischemic attack or strokes. We analyzed the demographic data, pre- and post-procedural cerebral angiography, technical success rate, peri-procedural complications, and clinical and imaging follow-ups.

RESULTS

The Wingspan stenting procedure was successful in all patients: The stenosis was reduced from 82.2% ± 5.8% pre-stenting to 15.9% ± 5.7% post-stenting. The 30-day peri-operative rate for stroke or death was 14.3%, which included ischemic stroke in 12 cases (12/91 = 13.2%) and subarachnoid hemorrhage in one case (1/91 = 1.1%), with a fatal or disabling stroke rate of 2.2%. Among the 77 patients with clinical follow-up assessment within 7-60 months (mean 31.3 ± 15.1 months) after stenting, four patients (5.2%) had posterior ischemia, including one patient with disabling ischemic stroke (1.3%) and three patients (3.9%) with temporary ischemic attack. The 2-year cumulative stroke rate was 16% (95% CI: 8.2-23.8%). Among 46 patients with imaging assessments at 3-45 months (mean, 9.5 ± 8.3) post-stenting, six (13.0%) patients had restenosis, including two (2/46 = 4.3%) with symptomatic restenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The benefit of stenting for patients with severe basilar artery stenosis (> 70%) may lie in lowering the long-term fatal and disabling stroke rate; and as long as the peri-operative stroke rate can be kept at a relatively lower level, patients with severe basilar stenosis can benefit from basilar artery stenting.

Thirty-Day Outcome of a Multicenter Registry Study of Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Artery Stenosis in China

Background and Purpose—

Although recent trials have suggested that stenting is worse than medical therapy for patients with severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, it is not clear whether this conclusion applies to a subset of patients with hypoperfusion symptoms. To justify for a new trial in China, we performed a multicenter prospective registry study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting within 30 days for patients with severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis.

Methods—

Patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis caused by 70% to 99% stenosis combined with poor collaterals were enrolled. The patients were treated either with balloon-mounted stent or with balloon predilation plus self-expanding stent as determined by the operators following a guideline. The primary outcome within 30 days is stroke, transient ischemic attack, and death after stenting. The secondary outcome is successful revascularization. The baseline characteristics and outcomes of the 2 treatment groups were compared.

Results—

From September 2013 to January 2015, among 354 consecutive patients, 300 patients (aged 58.3±9.78 years) were recruited, including 159 patients treated with balloon-mounted stent and 141 patients with balloon plus self-expanding stent. The 30-day rate of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and death was 4.3%. Successful revascularization was 97.3%. Patients treated with balloon-mounted stent were older, less likely to have middle cerebral artery lesions, more likely to have vertebral artery lesions, more likely to have Mori A lesions, less likely to have Mori C lesions, and likely to have lower degree of residual stenosis than patients treated with balloon plus self-expanding stent.

Conclusions—

The short-term safety and efficacy of endovascular stenting for patients with severe symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis in China is acceptable. Balloon-mounted stent may have lower degree of residual stenosis than self-expanding stent.

Clinical Trial Registration—

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01968122.

China Angioplasty and Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Severe Stenosis (CASSISS): A new, prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial in China

BACKGROUND

Patients with symptomatic stenosis of intradural arteries are at high risk for subsequent stroke. Since the SAMMPRIS trial, stenting is no longer recommended as primary treatment; however, the results of this trial, its inclusion criteria and its center selection received significant criticism and did not appear to reflect our experience regarding natural history nor treatment complications rate. As intracranial atherosclerosis (ICAS) is the most common cause for stroke in Asian countries, we are hereby proposing a refined prospective, randomized, multicenter study in an Asian population with strictly defined patient and participating center inclusion criteria.

METHODS

The China Angioplasty and Stenting for Symptomatic Intracranial Severe Stenosis (CASSISS) trial is an ongoing, government-funded, prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. It recruits patients with recent TIA or stroke caused by 70%-99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery. Patients with previous stroke related to perforator ischemia will not be included. Only high-volume centers with a proven track record will enroll patients as determined by a lead-in phase. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to best medical therapy alone or medical therapy plus stenting. Primary endpoints are any stroke or death within 30 days after enrollment or after any revascularization procedure of the qualifying lesion during follow-up, or stroke in the territory of the symptomatic intracranial artery beyond 30 days. The CASSISS trial will be conducted in eight sites in China with core imaging lab review at a North American site and aims to have a sample size of 380 participants (stenting, 190; medical therapy, 190). Recruitment is expected to be finished by December 2016. Patients will be followed for at least three years. The trial is scheduled to complete in 2019.

CONCLUSION

In the proposed trial, certain shortcomings of SAMMPRIS including patient and participating center selection will be addressed. The present manuscript outlines the rationale and design of the study. We estimate that this trial will allow for a critical reappraisal of the role of intracranial stenting for selected patients in high-volume centers.

Cerebrovascular neurosurgery 2014

Continued advances in our understanding of the management of cerebrovascular disease were made in 2014. A randomized trial for management of unruptured brain arteriovenous malformation (ARUBA) (Mohr et al. Lancet 2014;383:614-21.) and the Scottish intracranial vascular malformation study (Al-Shahi Salman et al. JAMA 2014;311:1661-9) were published and contrasted with reports based on extensive surgical experience. We highlight the results from the simvastatin in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage study (STASH) (Kirkpatrick et al. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:666-75) which unfortunately did not demonstrate a benefit of simvastatin on outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. The 10 year follow-up of the international subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) (Molyneux et al. Lancet 2014 [E-pub]) and the 3 year follow-up results from the stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis (SAMMPRIS) (Derdeyn et al. Lancet 2014;383:333-41) were also reported. Results from the Japan adult Moyamoya trial (JAM) (Miyamoto et al. Stroke 2014;45:1415-21) are also briefly reviewed. Furthermore, benefits of familial screening for relatives of intracranial aneurysm and arteriovenous malformation patients, a promising angioscopic experience for endovascular procedures, as well as a modified bypass technique for management of complex aneurysms are outlined. The largest literature series to date for coiling large and giant aneurysms together with the midterm results of the Solitaire stent (ev3, Irvine, CA, USA) aneurysm remodeling study in coiling wide-necked aneurysms (SOLARE) are also presented (Gory et al. Neurosurgery 2014;75:215-9).