Improvements in Immune Function and Activation with 48-Week Darunavir/Ritonavir-Based Therapy: GRACE Substudy

Ritonavir nanosuspensions prepared by microfluidization with enhanced solubility and desirable immunological properties

The objective of this study was to develop ritonavir (RTV) nanosuspensions (NSs) by microfluidization method. Particle size (PS) measurements were performed by photon correlation spectroscopy. Amorphous properties of the particles were evaluated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The dissolution studies were conducted in fed state simulated intestinal fluid (FeSSIF) medium. The flow cytometry was utilized to determine the lymphocyte sub-groups and immune response of NSs. RTV NSs were obtained with 400-500 nm PS. The crystal properties of RTV remain unchanged. The solubility of NS was enhanced five times. 57% and 18% of RTV were dissolved in FeSSIF medium for NSs and coarse powder. According to immunological studies, the prepared NSs did not significantly alter the ratio of CD4⁺/CD8⁺. Therefore, NSs may be a beneficial approach for the oral administration of RTV.

Repurposing HIV Protease Inhibitors Atazanavir and Darunavir as Antifungal Treatments against Candida albicans Infections: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study

Candida albicans is the chief etiological agent of candidiasis, a mycosis prevalent in individuals with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). In recent years, the introduction of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease inhibitors (HIV-PI) has reduced the prevalence of candidiasis in these patients. Seeking new therapeutic strategies based on the perspective of drug repositioning, we evaluated the effects of two second-generation HIV-PIs, atazanavir (ATV) and darunavir (DRV), on virulence factors of C. albicans and experimental candidiasis. For this, clinical strains of C. albicans were subjected to in vitro and in vivo treatments with ATV or DRV. As a result, ATV and DRV exhibited antifungal activity against fungal cells at 512 μg/mL, reduced the viability and biomass of biofilms, and inhibited filamentation of C. albicans. In addition, these HIV-PIs downregulated the expression of SAP2 and BRC1 genes of C. albicans. In an in vivo study, prophylactic use of ATV and DRV prolonged the survival rate of Galleria mellonella larvae infected with C. albicans. Therefore, ATV and DRV showed activity against C. albicans by reducing cell growth, biofilm formation, filamentation, and expression of virulence genes. Furthermore, ATV and DRV decreased experimental candidiasis, suggesting the repurposing of HIV-PIs as antifungal treatments for C. albicans infections.

Do Combination Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens for HIV Infection Feature Diverse T-Cell Phenotypes and Inflammatory Profiles?

Immune abnormalities featuring HIV infection persist despite the use of effective combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and may be linked to the development of noninfectious comorbidities. The aim of the present narrative, nonsystematic literature review is to understand whether cART regimens account for qualitative differences in immune reconstitution. Many studies have reported differences in T-cell homeostasis, inflammation, coagulation, and microbial translocation parameters across cART classes and in the course of triple vs dual regimens, yet such evidence is conflicting and not consistent. Possible reasons for discrepant results in the literature are the paucity of randomized controlled clinical trials, the relatively short follow-up of observational studies, the lack of clinical validation of the numerous inflammatory biomarkers utilized, and the absence of research on the effects of cART in tissues. We are currently thus unable to establish if cART classes and regimens are truly accountable for the differences observed in immune/inflammation parameters in different clinical settings. Questions still remain as to whether an early introduction of cART, specifically in the acute stage of disease, or newer drugs and novel dual drug regimens are able to significantly impact the quality of immune reconstitution and the risk of disease progression in HIV-infected subjects.

T-cell phenotype and function following a first cART regimen containing either a protease inhibitor or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in HIV-infected late presenters: results from a retrospective, ex vivo study

BACKGROUND

We aimed to comparatively assess darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) and efavirenz (EFV)-based first-line cART regimens in the reconstitution of T-cell phenotype and function in HIV-infected, late presenter subjects.

METHODS

Retrospective, ex vivo study on stored peripheral blood mononuclear cell samples of cART-naive, HIV-infected individuals with CD4(+) T-cell counts <50>250/µl upon cART initiation with either DRV/r or EFV as third drugs of standard antiretroviral regimens. CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell maturation (CCR7/CD45RA) and proliferation (Ki67), CD8(+) T-cell activation (CD38/HLA-DR) as well as HIV- and cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific responses (CD4/CD8/IL-2/IFN-γ) were studied by flow cytometry at baseline (T0), T3, T6 and T12 months. Soluble inflammatory markers (IL-6 and sCD14) were measured in plasma at T0 and T12. Wilcoxon and Mann-Whitney tests were used for statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 19 patients started DRV/r and 15 EFV. Both regimens accounted for suppression of the HIV RNA load (<40 copies/ml), reconstitution of absolute CD4(+) T-cells and CD4(+)/CD8(+) T-cell ratio. All study participants displayed a significant decrease of activated HLA-DR(+)CD38(+) CD8(+) T-cells at all study time points, yet no differences were found between study groups in T-cell activation and maturation phenotype. From a functional standpoint, only individuals receiving DRV/r displayed transitory recovery of HIV-specific IL-2(+)IFN-γ(-) CD4(+) T-cells (T3: P=0.006) and IL-2(-)IFN-γ(+) CD8(+) T-cells (T3: P=0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

DRV/r- and EFV-based regimens have an equal effect on T-cell phenotype and function in HIV late presenters. A temporary restoration of HIV-specific T-cell immunity early in the course of therapy with DRV/r possibly implies a more effective control over HIV in the first months following a PI/r-based regimen, even at late stage of disease.