Impact of right-sided nephrectomy on long-term outcomes in retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy at single center

Retroperitoneoscopic Donor Nephrectomy on the Right Side Provides Equivalent Outcomes and Donor Safety to That on the Left Side

BACKGROUND

The left kidney is typically selected for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. In contrast, right kidney donation raises concerns for donor safety, and venous anastomosis may be difficult to achieve due to the short renal vein. We investigated the safety and operative outcomes of right donor nephrectomy compared with those of the left.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical records of living donor-kidney transplant donors and evaluated operative outcomes such as operative time, ischemic time, blood loss, and surgical complications in the donor.

RESULTS

We identified 79 donors (left:right = 62:17 cases) between May 2020 and March 2023. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding age, sex, body mass index, and number of renal arteries. Although the operative time (left and right: 190 and 225 minutes, excluding waiting time; P = .009) and warm ischemic time (left and right: 143 and 193 seconds, P = .021) were significantly longer on the right side, the total ischemic time (82 and 86 minutes, P = .463) and blood loss (left and right: 35 and 25 mL, P = .159) were comparable between the groups. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the surgical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative outcomes were similar in both donor sides in the retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomies. The right side should be considered for donation in this operative procedure.

Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy offers more liberal use of right kidneys: lessons learned from 565 cases - a retrospective single-center study

The introduction of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy caused a shift toward' left donor nephrectomy. Some centers report a significantly low rate of endoscopic right donor nephrectomy. Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (HARP-DN) was introduced as a novel surgical technique, which aims to avoid intra-abdominal complications. It was also reported to provide technical advantages for right-sided DN. In this retrospective single-center study, we evaluated the impact of HARP-DN technique on utilization of right-sided DNs. After the implementation of HARP-DN on February 2009, a total of 565 DNs were performed until December 2015. The introduction of HARP-DN technique resulted in an immediate increase in the utilization of right kidneys from 6.1% to an average of 19.6% annually. The donors 'outcome was similar to the left-sided and right-sided DN groups, excluding the increased incidence of incisional hernias in left kidney donors. None of the donors developed intra-abdominal complications. In conclusion, the implementation of HARP technique significantly increased the use of right-sided DNs, which enables a more liberal use of donors in LDKT.

Strategies to Perform Pure Retroperitoneoscopic Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-Center Cohort Study

Background: Considering the increase in a number of vascular complications, right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy is less preferred due to achieving not only shorter renal vein but also longer renal artery. However, recent studies have indicated that the side of the surgery would not affect the outcomes. Aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes and strategies to increase the safety of pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN). Methods: We analyzed the prospectively collected medical records of 158 kidney donors who underwent RDN from January 2010 to August 2018. The patients were divided into two groups based on their side of surgery. Right- and left-sided RDNs were compared in terms of demographics, intraoperative, and postoperative data, including the development of incisional hernia (IH). The outcomes of the recipients were also evaluated. Results: Right RDN was performed in 40 (25.3%) and left RDN was performed in 118 (74.7%) donors. Operation time (P = .593), warm ischemia time (P = .271), blood loss (P = .787), and length of hospital stay (P = .908) were statistically similar in right and left RDN groups. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were statistically showed no difference between right and left RDNs. No IH was observed in any group. One-year and five-year patient survival and graft survival rates were 100% versus 97% (P = .299) and 100% versus 95% (P = .126) on both sides, respectively. Conclusion: Right RDN is an effective and safe method as on the left side. RDN has an additional advantage in the absence of IH. Experience with other retroperitoneoscopic urological interventions may have had a positive effect on the outcomes of pure RDN.

Single-port live donor nephrectomy using a novel Curved Radius r2 Surgical System in an in vivo model

OBJECTIVE

Single-port laparoscopic donor nephrectomy provides low morbidity and satisfactory cosmetic results for patients. The aim of this animal study was to establish a surgical technique of single-site (LESS) living donor nephrectomy using novel curved r2 CURVE manipulators specially designed for single-port access.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of six LESS nephrectomies were performed in three female pigs. r2 CURVE-instruments (Tuebingen Scientific Medical GmbH) were used providing a curved rotatable shaft, endless tip rotation, as well as 90° tip deflection. A 10 mm 30° extra long laparoscope, r2-curved Grasper, Maryland dissector and bipolar scissors were used for mobilization and dissection.

RESULTS

All LESS nephrectomies were performed successfully. Average operative time was 80 min (range, 42-149 min). No technical problems were observed. Insertion and extraction of the instruments through the single-port were easy to conduct. The diameter of the used single-port was sufficient for safe manual organ harvesting. Potential conflict between the laparoscope and the instrument handles was avoided by using an extra long laparoscope.

CONCLUSIONS

The new curved and deflectable instruments showed that single-port nephrectomy using the R2 manipulators is feasible. Single-port laparoscopic nephrectomy might be more patient-friendly and improve the willingness of potential donors to donate live organs.