Efficacy of Onabotulinum Toxin A (Botox) versus Abobotulinum Toxin A (Dysport) Using a Conversion Factor (1 : 2.5) in Treatment of Primary Palmar Hyperhidrosis

The Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A in Treating Palmar Hyperhidrosis - a Literature Review

Background:Palmar hyperhidrosis, a condition characterized by excessive sweating in the palms, considerably impacts the quality of life (QoL). Although various treatment modalities are available, the efficacy and safety of Botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) needed further investigation. Methods:We conducted a literature review, with open-label, controlled trial, double-blind placebo-controlled and observational designs being eligible for inclusion, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Results:All the six selected studies consistently reported the efficacy of BTX-A in reducing symptoms of hyperhidrosis, without significant side effects. Botulinum toxin type A treatment was found to improve the QoL significantly, to reduce sweat rate and production and to have no detrimental effect on grip strength. The duration of the antisudorific effect also indicated the potential for long-term management of palmar hyperhidrosis with BTX-A. Conclusions:Our findings corroborated the effectiveness and safety of BTX-A in managing palmar hyperhidrosis across diverse patient outcomes and experiences. Botulinum toxin type A emerged as a promising treatment modality for this condition, capable of improving the QoL, reducing symptoms and offering long-term relief without significant side effects.

The mechanisms of action and use of botulinum neurotoxin type A in aesthetics: Key Clinical Postulates II

BACKGROUND

The literature on botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) is extensive, often contradictory, and confounded by a competitive market of products and research attempting to distinguish brand individuality.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of literature on the principles of BoNT-A in aesthetics as well as clinical examples.

RESULTS

In 2017, the Eight Key Clinical Postulates were formulated as a guide for the aesthetic practitioner in understanding BoNT-A pharmacodynamics and to compare different toxins. These are now updated to include (a) All type A toxins act identically; (b) The mathematical relationship between toxin and receptor is the basis of efficacy, and clinical efficacy is influenced by molecular potency and patient attributes including muscle mass, gender, age, and ethnicity; (c) Efficacy, onset, and duration are functions of "molecular potency" defined as the number of active 150 kDa molecules available for binding; (d) "Molecular potency" is difficult to objectively quantify for commercially available toxins; (e) Up to a point, increased molecular potency decreases time to onset and increases duration of effect, and the "Molecular Potency Quotient" is a construct for comparing molecular potency commercial cost; (f) The area of effect of a toxin injection is dependent upon molecular potency, diffusion (passive), and spread (active); (g) Differing reconstitution volumes; and (h) Increased number of injection sites can affect spread, onset, and duration of effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The principles of BoNT-A use in aesthetics are complex yet understandable as outlined in the framework of the updated Eight Key Clinical Postulates and serves as a useful tool for providing the most effective treatment and interpreting research on present and future toxin formulations.

What Are the Most Commonly Reported Complications With Cosmetic Botulinum Toxin Type A Treatments?

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to determine the most commonly reported complications with cosmetic botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A) treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was a cross-sectional review of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System. From January 2014 through September 2019, records were included in the study sample if they implicated Botox (onabotulinumtoxinA), Dysport (abobotulinumtoxinA), Xeomin (incobotulinumtoxinA), or Jeuveau (prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs), and if the indication for use had been to perform a cosmetic skin procedure. The study predictors included patient (ie, age, weight, gender) and treatment (ie, product, country of treatment, 10 most common reactions) characteristics. The study outcome was the frequency of serious events as defined by the standard FDA definition for biologic products. A multivariate logistical regression model was created for the study outcome using all significant univariate predictors.

RESULTS

The final sample included 10,577 reports detailing 29,471 adverse events and covering 1,473 reactions. The mean patient age was 48.4 ± 11.2 years, and nearly all patients were women (95.0%). The most commonly reported events were pain (9.3%), swelling (6.4%), and eyelid/brow ptosis (6.1%). Serious outcomes occurred in 13.5% of patients. In the multivariate model, serious outcomes were independently associated with older age, heavier weight, headache, allergy, vision changes, fatigue, facial paresis, and dizziness but notably were not associated with pain, swelling, or ptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide range of alleged complications have been reported to the FDA, many of which were likely not mediated through injection or direct toxin effects. Patients may have inaccurately attributed some of their symptoms to BTX-A, and providers should be prepared to dispel any misinformation. Local complications such as pain, swelling, and ptosis were the most common reactions but were not associated with serious patient outcomes. However, constitutional symptoms should be approached more carefully.

Safety of available and emerging drug therapies for hyperhidrosis

INTRODUCTION

Hyperhidrosis affects 4.8% of the U.S. population and has been underestimated by physicians for long time despite considerable interference with quality of life. Many patients suffer from primary (idiopathic) hyperhidrosis which results from over-activity of sympathetic nerves and is restricted to specific body areas, mostly the axillae, palms, soles, or head. Secondary hyperhidrosis is caused by an underlying disease or the intake of medications and often involves large parts of the body. Numerous effective therapies with topical or systemic drugs and surgical options are available. Areas covered: Efficacy and safety data on aluminum salts, anticholinergic drugs for topical or systemic application, and on intradermal botulinum toxin injections used to treat hyperhidrosis are critically evaluated, including data from clinical trials with focus on possible side effects and long-term complications in dispute. Expert opinion: Hyperhidrosis often responds well to available therapies. Depending on the type of hyperhidrosis treatment should be topical/local or systemic. Most of the side effects are mild, transient and easily manageable. In case of systemic treatment with anticholinergics low dosing and up-titration of medication is necessary to avoid severe adverse effects. Concerns about the promotion of breast cancer and Alzheimer disease by topical aluminum salts are unsolved.

Aesthetic use of BoNT: Options and outcomes

There are a multitude of uses for BoNT in the aesthetic realm. Efficacy has been shown in softening glabellar creases, crows feet, forehead rhytides, and in correcting facial asymmetries, including mild eyelid ptosis. Facial shape can be altered through injections of BoNT into masseter, and smiles can be altered with BoNT. Clinical examples of the above will be shown, as well as adverse outcomes with inaccurate injection techniques.