Transperitoneal calcium balance in anuric continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and automated peritoneal dialysis patients

Calcium balance in peritoneal dialysis patients treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) cyclers

INTRODUCTION

Although vascular calcification is a recognised complication for haemodialysis patients, peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are also at risk. As such we wished to review peritoneal and urinary calcium balance and the effect of calcium containing phosphate binders (CCPBs).

METHODS

Twenty-four-hour peritoneal calcium balance and urinary calcium were reviewed in PD patients undergoing their first assessment of peritoneal membrane function.

RESULTS

Results from 183 patients, 56.3% male, 30.1% diabetic, mean age 59.4 ± 16.4 years, median 2.0 (2-6) months of PD, 29% treated by automated PD (APD), 26.8% continuous ambulatory (CAPD) and 44.2% APD with a day-time exchange (CCPD) were reviewed. Peritoneal calcium balance was positive in 42.6%, and remained positive in 21.3% after including urinary calcium losses. PD calcium balance was negatively associated with ultrafiltration (odds ratio 0.99 (95% confidence limits 0.98-0.99), p = 0.005. PD calcium balance was lowest with APD (APD - 0.45 (- 0.78 to 0.05) vs CAPD - 0.14 (- 1.18 to 0.59) vs CCPD - 0.03) - 0.48 to 0.5) mmol/day), p < 0.05, with 82.1% of patients with a positive balance prescribed icodextrin, when combining peritoneal and urinary losses. When considering CCPB prescription, then 97.8% of subjects prescribed CCPD had an over-all positive calcium balance.

DISCUSSION

Over 40% of PD patients had a positive peritoneal calcium balance. Elemental calcium intake from CCPB had a major effect on calcium balance, as median combined peritoneal and urinary calcium losses were < 0.7 mmol/day (26 mg), so caution is required to prevent excessive CCPB prescribing, increasing the exchangeable calcium pool and thus potentially increasing vascular calcification, particularly for anuric patients.

Factors affecting the relationship between ionized and corrected calcium levels in peritoneal dialysis patients: a retrospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) management in patients with end-stage renal disease is important owing to the risk of cardiovascular diseases. In clinical practice, we manage patients not by monitoring the levels of biologically active ionized calcium (iCa) but by monitoring total serum calcium or corrected calcium (cCa). We previously reported that iCa/cCa ratio was different between patients with hemodialysis and those with peritoneal dialysis (PD). In PD patients, several factors are expected to affect iCa/cCa ratio. Therefore, modifying the strategy to achieve better CKD-MBD management might be necessary; however, no reports have studied this to date. Therefore, we investigated the factors influencing iCa/cCa ratio in PD patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study examined background and laboratory data, including iCa, collected at routine outpatient visits. The patients were divided into the first, second, and third tertile of iCa/cCa ratio groups to compare patient background and laboratory data. Multiple regression analysis was used to investigate the factors influencing iCa/cCa ratio. We used multiple imputation to deal with missing covariate data.

RESULTS

In total, 169 PD patients were enrolled. In PD patients with lower iCa/cCa ratio, PD duration was longer and pH was higher. Urine volume and weekly renal Kt/V were lower in the patients with lower iCa/cCa ratio than in those with higher iCa/cCa ratio. iCa/cCa ratio and weekly renal Kt/V were directly correlated (r = 0.41, p < 0.01), and weekly renal Kt/V and pH were independent factors affecting iCa/cCa ratio (t = 2.86, p < 0.01 and t = - 5.42, p < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

iCa levels were lower in PD patients with lower residual renal function (RRF) even though their cCa levels were equal to those with maintained RRF, warranting caution in the assessment and management of CKD-MBD in PD patients.