Minor adverse events postcolonoscopy

Factors Associated With Fecal Calprotectin Sample Collection Compliance: An IBD Center Quality Improvement Project

Background

Fecal calprotectin (Fcal) is a noninvasive, inexpensive biomarker of disease activity. However, patient compliance with this test is variable and incompletely described. We assessed compliance rates with Fcal tests and identified factors associated with noncompliance.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who had a Fcal test ordered through our center between August 2021 and December 2021 was conducted. Demographic, clinical, disease, and test-related information were recorded. Patients with incomplete Fcal orders were sent a survey to better understand their reasons for noncompliance. Simple statistical analysis and and multivariable logistic regression modeling were performed.

Results

Of 303 patients, 165 (54.4%) had an order for Fcal. Of the Fcal tests ordered, 55 (33.3%) were not completed. Remission of IBD, no prior Fcal completion, and tests ordered at a distant site were all associated with test noncompletion. A multivariable logistic regression revealed that history of a prior completed Fcal test is associated with subsequent test completion (odds ratio = 2.1, 95% confidence interval 1.9-35.5, P = .004). Patients who did not complete the test described the pandemic and third-party testing center issues as the most common reasons for noncompliance.

Conclusions

In this single center experience with Fcal testing in patients with IBD, we identified that a history of incomplete Fcal testing and distant location of lab testing were significantly associated with noncompletion of the test. We provide practical guidance for future utilization and compliance, including the impact of home-based testing.

Compliance with the faecal calprotectin test in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

We investigated, for the first time, levels of compliance with faecal calprotectin test in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

METHODS

All consecutive adult inflammatory bowel disease patients having been prescribed an faecal calprotectin test between December 2014-July 2015 were included. At their next visit to the hospital, patients had to return a stool sample for the faecal calprotectin test and answer a simple questionnaire: 'Have you brought a stool sample? If not, why not? If so, did you encounter any difficulties when collecting the sample? Were you aware of faecal calprotectin before being asked to take the test?'.

RESULTS

One hundred and one patients were included (50 men; 77 patients with Crohn's disease). The range age was 40 years (19-68). Eighty-nine patients were being treated with infliximab, 10 were on vedolizumab, and two were not being treated with a biologic. Thirty-seven patients (35%) had performed the faecal calprotectin test. Eighty-one patients (80%) had not been aware of faecal calprotectin before being asked to take the test. Of the 64 patients who did not take the test, the prime reasons for non-compliance were forgetfulness (n = 49, 76.6%), a lack of perceived benefit for the test (n = 7, 11%), constipation (n = 5, 7.8%), refusal to handle faeces (n = 2, 3.1%), and difficulty collecting the stool sample (n = 1, 1.5%).

CONCLUSION

Only one-third of the patients performed the faecal calprotectin test. The main reason for non-compliance was forgetfulness. Our present results emphasise the need for better patient education on the importance of complying with faecal calprotectin testing and the future of faecal calprotectin testing at home.