Use of a level 3 portable monitor for the diagnosis and management of sleep disordered breathing in an inpatient tertiary care setting

A risk biomarker for obstructive sleep apnea in patients with coronary artery disease: monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio

PURPOSE

The monocyte to high-density lipoprotein ratio (MHR) has been postulated to be a novel indicator associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). These patients often have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and whether or not MHR may provide prognostic value for this comorbidity remains unclear. Therefore, we sought to explore the clinical value of MHR in evaluating OSA in patients with CAD.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with CAD were prospectively recruited and were assigned into four groups based on the quartiles of MHR. Portable monitoring for detecting nocturnal respiratory events was utilized to provide the diagnosis of OSA. Patients were defined as having OSA when respiratory event index ≥ 15 events/h. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to explore the independent association between the levels of MHR and OSA.

RESULTS

A total of 1243 patients with CAD was included with a prevalence of OSA reaching 40% (n = 497). Patients with higher levels of MHR experienced increasing severity of OSA. In univariate analysis, MHR was a risk factor for OSA (odds ratio [OR] 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.33-2.71, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that MHR was independently associated with the presence of OSA (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.06-2.52, p = 0.027) after adjusting for possible confounding factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated levels of MHR were independently associated with a higher likelihood of OSA in patients with CAD. MHR could be a screening tool and a risk biomarker of OSA in such patients.

Validation of home portable monitoring for the diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing in adolescents and adults with neuromuscular disorders

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in patients with neuromuscular disorders (NMD), developing before chronic hypercapnia appears. Polysomnography (PSG) is the diagnostic gold standard but is often impractical and poorly accessible for individuals with NMD. We sought to determine the diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, and patient preference of home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) compared with PSG for the detection of SDB in NMD.

METHODS

Participants with NMD at risk for SDB aged ≥ 13 years underwent HSAT followed by overnight PSG with concomitant laboratory sleep apnea testing (same device as HSAT). Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for standard apnea-hypopnea index cutoffs for mild (≥ 5 events/h), moderate (≥ 15 events/h), and severe SDB (≥ 30 events/h) and for an oxygen desaturation index ≥ 5 events/h. Receiver operating characteristic curves were built. A questionnaire assessed patient preference.

RESULTS

Of 38 participants, 73% had moderate to severe SDB and 79% had technically acceptable HSAT. For an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 events/h, HSAT sensitivity and specificity were 50% and 88%, respectively. For an oxygen desaturation index ≥ 5 events/h, HSAT sensitivity and specificity were 95% and 78%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for an apnea-hypopnea index ≥ 15 events/h was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-1.00) for HSAT. The HSAT underestimated the apnea-hypopnea index from PSG (bias, -10.7 ± 15.9 events/h). HSAT was preferred to PSG by 61% of participants.

CONCLUSIONS

HSAT is feasible, preferred by patients, and reliable for detecting SDB in most patients, although it cannot definitively rule out SDB. Therefore, HSAT is a viable diagnostic approach for SDB in NMD when PSG is not feasible, recognizing that it does not accurately distinguish between upper-airway obstruction and hypoventilation. Additional work is needed to further optimize home sleep testing in NMD.

CITATION

Westenberg JN, Petrof BJ, Noel F, et al. Validation of home portable monitoring for the diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing in adolescents and adults with neuromuscular disorders. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021;17(8):1579-1590.

The Feasibility and Utility of Level III Portable Sleep Studies in the Pediatric Inpatient Setting

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) may significantly impact the course of medical illness in hospitalized children. Polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for establishing diagnosis of SDB, but its availability is limited. The aim of this study was to explore the feasibility and utility of level III portable sleep studies in hospitalized children with SDB.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital over the preceding 2 years in hospitalized children < 18 years who had undergone a level III sleep study using the Nox T3 system. The information obtained included demographic data, comorbidities, indication for admission and sleep study, time interval between the study ordered and done, adequacy of technical data from sleep study, study diagnosis, and subsequent management interventions for SDB.

RESULTS

A total of 51 hospitalized children had these studies; 32 were female and mean age was 4.3 years. Approximately 90% of children had significant comorbidities, including neurological and craniofacial abnormalities. The majority (80%) of studies were conducted within 24 hours of the time requested and 92.1% studies had technically adequate data for analysis. Thirty-nine (76.5%) children were identified with SDB; all but one patient underwent therapy for SDB during that same hospitalization, including supplemental oxygen (48.7%), positive airway pressure therapy (23%), surgical intervention (38.2%) or caffeine (10.2%). Twelve percent of children had more than one intervention done.

CONCLUSIONS

The level III portable sleep study is readily available, sufficient to diagnose SDB, and help to provide appropriate medical and/or surgical therapies in hospitalized children with complex medical conditions.

Portable Sleep Monitoring for Diagnosing Sleep Apnea in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Sleep apnea is an underdiagnosed condition in patients with heart failure. Efficient identification of sleep apnea is needed, as treatment may improve heart failure-related outcomes. Currently, use of portable sleep monitoring in hospitalized patients and those at risk for central sleep apnea is discouraged. This study examined whether portable sleep monitoring with respiratory polygraphy can accurately diagnose sleep apnea in patients hospitalized with decompensated heart failure.

METHODS

Hospitalized patients with decompensated heart failure underwent concurrent respiratory polygraphy and polysomnography. Both recordings were scored for obstructive and central disordered breathing events in a blinded fashion, using standard criteria, and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was determined. Pearson's correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots were used to examine the concordance among the overall, obstructive, and central AHI values derived by respiratory polygraphy and polysomnography.

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 53 patients (47% women) with a mean age of 59.0 years. The correlation coefficient for the overall AHI from the two diagnostic methods was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.96). The average difference in AHI between the two methods was 3.6 events/h. Analyses of the central and obstructive AHI values showed strong concordance between the two methods, with correlation coefficients of 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.84-0.95), respectively. Complete agreement in the classification of sleep apnea severity between the two methods was seen in 89% of the sample.

CONCLUSIONS

Portable sleep monitoring can accurately diagnose sleep apnea in hospitalized patients with heart failure and may promote early initiation of treatment.

Portable Monitoring for the Diagnosis of OSA

In-laboratory, attended polysomnography has long been the gold standard for the diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB). In recent years, economic pressures and long wait times have driven interest in home sleep testing, which has, in turn, led to the development of algorithms that bypass the sleep laboratory in favor of portable monitoring studies and in-home initiation of positive airway pressure therapy. For appropriately selected outpatients, evidence is accumulating that portable monitors are a reasonable substitute for in-laboratory polysomnography. In the inpatient setting, in which SDB is both highly prevalent and associated with adverse outcomes in certain populations, the literature is evolving on the use of portable monitors to expedite diagnosis and treatment of SDB. This review discusses society guidelines and recent research in the growing field of portable monitoring.

Diagnosis of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Parkinson's Disease Patients: Is Unattended Portable Monitoring a Suitable Tool?

Purpose. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is frequent in Parkinson's disease (PD) and may contribute to nonmotor symptoms. Polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for OSA diagnosis. Unattended portable monitoring (PM) may improve access to diagnosis but has not been studied in PD. We assessed feasibility and diagnostic accuracy in PD. Methods. Selected PD patients without known OSA underwent home PM and laboratory PSG. The quality of PM signals (n = 28) was compared with matched controls. PM accuracy was calculated compared with PSG for standard apnea hypopnea index (AHI) thresholds. Results. Technical failure rate was 27.0% and airflow signal quality was lower than in controls. Sensitivity of PM was 84.0%, 36.4%, and 50.0% for AHI cut-offs of 5/h, 15/h, and 30/h, respectively, using the same cut-offs on PM. Specificity was 66.7%, 83.3%, and 100%, respectively. PM underestimated the AHI with a mean bias of 12.4/h. Discrepancy between PM and PSG was greater in those with more motor dysfunction. Conclusion. PM was adequate to “rule in” moderate or severe OSA in PD patients, but the failure rate was relatively high and signal quality poorer than in controls. PM overall underestimated the severity of OSA in PD patients, especially those with greater motor dysfunction.