The effect of antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy on the development of neovascular glaucoma after central retinal vein occlusion: a retrospective analysis

Review: The Development of Risk Factors and Cytokines in Retinal Vein Occlusion

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most prevalent retinal disease. Despite this, the pathogenic mechanisms and risk factors are not entirely clear. In this article, we review recent publications on the classification, pathogenesis, risk factors, ischemic changes, cytokines, and vital complications of RVO. Risk factors and cytokines are important for exploring the mechanisms and new treatment targets. Furthermore, risk factors are interrelated, making RVO mechanisms more complex. Cytokines act as powerful mediators of pathological conditions, such as inflammation, neovascularization, and macular edema. This review aims to summarize the updated knowledge on risk factors, cytokines of RVO and signaling in order to provide valuable insight on managing the disease.

Central retinal thickness changes and risk of neovascular glaucoma after intravitreal bevacizumab injection in patients with central retinal vein occlusion

This retrospective study evaluated changes in the central retinal thickness (CRT) and the risk factors for neovascular glaucoma (NVG) after intravitreal bevacizumab injection under a pro re nata (PRN) regimen for macular oedema in 57 eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO). The clinical characteristics at the time of NVG diagnosis were assessed, and baseline and final clinical characteristics and mean CRT values at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-up evaluations were recorded. The incidence of NVG was 21.1%, with the neovascular group (12 eyes) showing poor baseline and final visual acuity, a higher incidence of baseline ischaemic-type CRVO and subretinal fluid, a higher mean CRT at the 1-month follow-up, and a higher number of intravitreal bevacizumab injections during the 6-month follow-up. Nine eyes with NVG (75%) showed a mean CRT < 300 μm at the time of diagnosis. An ischaemic CRVO and higher CRT at the 1-month follow-up were related to the development of NVG in the multivariate analysis. Thus, NVG development in CRVO patients treated with intravitreal bevacizumab injections was associated with an ischaemic CRVO and elevated CRT at the 1-month follow-up; PRN bevacizumab regimens based on CRT or control of macular oedema did not completely prevent NVG development.

Neovascular glaucoma in patients with central retinal vein occlusion: A real-life study in the anti-VEGF era

PURPOSE

To investigate the characteristics and treatment patterns of patients developing a neovascular event (NE) in the anterior chamber secondary to central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in an ordinary clinical setting.

METHODS

In this retrospective real-life study, data from 243 eyes presenting with CRVO during 2012-2013 were collected. Maximum follow-up was 5 years. All patients that developed NE were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Of 243 eligible patients, 72 (30%) either presented with or developed NE during the follow-up. In these 72 patients, 23 (32%) eyes already had evidence of NE at baseline. Twenty-eight eyes (39%) developed NE after discontinuation of intravitreal therapy for macular oedema (ME). In this subgroup, the NE occurred 15.6 ± 13.8 months after the baseline visit and 4.1 ± 2.6 months after the last injection. Final best-corrected visual acuity was 8.6 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters in the group of patients presenting with NE compared to 8.1 ETDRS letters in the group that developed NE later on. Of the patients presenting with intraocular pressure (IOP) below 30 mmHg, 3/29 (10%) needed subsequent cyclodiode laser therapy compared to 35/43 (81%) patients with a baseline IOP above 30 mmHg (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a clinical setting, many patients show evidence of NE already at the first visit. A substantial part of patients develops NE a long time after presentation, commonly a few months after discontinuation of intravitreal therapy for ME. The visual prognosis is similar for patients presenting with NE and patients developing NE during follow-up. A high baseline IOP predicts the need for subsequent pressure-lowering procedures.

Results from the Population-Based Gutenberg Health Study Revealing Four Altered Autoantibodies in Retinal Vein Occlusion Patients

Purpose

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second most common retinal vascular disease and a major cause of visual impairment. In this study, we aimed to observe whether RVO cases have different antibody profiles as a new potential risk factor and whether a conversion of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) to neovascular glaucoma (NVG), one of the major complications, is occurring within a 5-year timeframe.

Methods

We performed a nested case-control study (1 : 4) within the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS), a population-based, prospective cohort study in the Rhine-Main Region of Germany including 15,010 participants. RVO subjects (n = 59) were identified by grading of fundus photographs. Optic nerves of RVO subjects and age- and sex-matched controls (n = 229) at baseline and their follow-up examination after 5 years were analyzed for glaucomatous alterations. Of all RVO subjects and controls, serum autoantibody profiles were measured using in-house manufactured antigen-antibody microarrays.

Results

Of the 59 RVO patients, 3 patients (5%) showed glaucomatous optic disc alterations at baseline, whereas no new glaucoma case was detected at 5-year follow-up. Four of the autoantibodies measured (against dermcidin, neurotrophin-3, superoxide dismutase 1, and signal recognition particle 14 kDa protein) were significantly increased in the serum of RVO patients (p < 0.001). Multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis showed that 3 of these 4 antibodies were independent of cardiovascular risk factors.

Conclusions

We found several autoantibodies associated with RVO, targeting proteins and structures possibly involved in RVO pathogenesis.

Baseline clinical features predict visual outcome in young patients with central retinal vein occlusion

PURPOSE

To evaluate prognostic factors in young patients with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).

METHODS

Retrospective case series. CRVO patients aged ≤ 50 and follow-up ≥ 6 months were enrolled. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and last visit were documented. Severity of retinopathy was graded by comparing to standard photos. Prognostic factors associated with visual outcome at 6 months were evaluated by multiple linear regression models.

RESULTS

A total of 73 eyes from 69 patients with mean age 37.6 ± 8.5 were enrolled. Forty-seven (68%) patients were male. The mean follow-up duration was 25.9 ± 23.0 months. LogMAR BCVA improved from 0.979 ± 0.785 at baseline to 0.594 ± 0.748 at the 6 months (p < 0.001) and CRT improved from 475 ± 222 μm to 299 ± 104 μm (p < 0.001). Forty-eight (66%) eyes required anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment. The mean number of injections was 2.25 ± 1.41 in the first 6 months and 75% of eyes received ≦ 3 injections during the clinical course. The baseline BCVA (coefficient 0.518, p < 0.001), grade of retinal hemorrhage (coefficient 0.230, p = 0.006), grade of retinal venous engorgement (coefficient 0.238, p = 0.011), grade of optic disc edema (coefficient - 0.226, p = 0.005), and diabetes mellitus (coefficient 0.264, p = 0.047) were the independent factors associated with visual outcome at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline clinical features are useful for the prediction of visual outcome at 6 months in young CRVO patients.

The era of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drugs in ophthalmology, VEGF and anti-VEGF therapy

Angiogenesis is a clue process for tissue development and function, both in normal and pathological conditions. This process is regulated by multiple molecular systems. One of the most potent is vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR) system. Members of this family are involved in new vessel formation in embryogenesis and maturation, as well as in reparative or pathological reactions in later stages. They play a substantial role in regeneration, inflammation, wound healing, as well as in cancer pathology. Nowadays it is possible to modulate VEGF-VEGFR interactions in many pathological conditions using anti-VEGF therapy. This therapy has already achieved a grounded position in the management of rheumatological disorders, tumour progression, and metastasis. Such drugs as bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, and pegaptanib have also proven to be very effective in the treatment of several ocular diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD), macular oedema, or proliferative retinopathies and iris neovascularisation. The indications for the application of this therapy in ophthalmology are becoming wider and wider. It may also be used for corneal pathologies and in anti-glaucoma procedures.

Patterns of ranibizumab and aflibercept treatment of central retinal vein occlusion in routine clinical practice in the USA

Background

The intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments ranibizumab and aflibercept have proven efficacy in clinical trials, but their real world usage in central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) has not been assessed. We therefore evaluated the treatment patterns of both drugs in a US claims database.

Methods

The IMS Integrated Data Warehouse was used to identify the patients with CRVO in the USA with claims for ranibizumab or aflibercept between 24 September 2012 and 31 March 2014 with at least 12 months follow-up. Patients were required to have had no anti-VEGF treatment code for 6 months before index (‘treatment-naive'). Mean numbers of injections and non-injection visits to a treating physician were compared with patients receiving these treatments.

Results

Patient characteristics were similar for patients receiving ranibizumab (n=206) or aflibercept (n=79) at index. The mean (±SD) numbers of injections received by patients treated with ranibizumab or aflibercept were 4.4±2.8 and 4.7±2.9 (P=0.38), respectively; the total number of patient visits to their treating physician was 7.3±3.7 and 7.0±2.9 (P=0.52), respectively. For patients receiving one or more injections (n=238), the mean interval between injections was 55.1 days (ranibizumab) and 54.2 days (aflibercept; P=0.44).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that, in routine clinical practice, patients receive a comparable number of injections in the first year of treatment with ranibizumab or aflibercept. This may have implications for commissioning and service development of CRVO care pathways.