Chronic Hepatitis C Therapy in Liver Cirrhosis Complicated by Telaprevir-Induced DRESS

Antibacterial antibiotic-induced drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome: a literature review

Background

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms syndrome (DRESS) is a delayed infrequent potentially life-threatening idiosyncratic drug reaction. Aromatic anticonvulsants and allopurinol are the most frequent causative agents. However, various reports of antibiotic-induced DRESS are available. In this review, we try to summarize reports of antibacterial antibiotic-induced DRESS focusing on characteristics of DRESS induced by each antibiotic group.

Methods

The data were collected by searching PubMed/MEDLINE and ScienceDirect. The keywords used as search terms were “DRESS syndrome,” “drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DIHS),” “antibiotics,” “antimicrobial,” and names of various antimicrobial groups. Finally, 254 relevant cases with a definite or probable diagnosis of DRESS based on RegiSCAR criteria were found until 30 May 2020 and reviewed.

Results and conclusion

Totally, 254 cases of antibacterial antibiotic-induced DRESS are reported. Most of them are related to antituberculosis drugs, vancomycin, and sulfonamides, respectively. Rash and fever were most frequent clinical findings. Eosinophilia and liver injury were the most reported hematologic and visceral organ involvement, respectively. Most of the patients are managed with systemic corticosteroids. The death occurred in 16 patients which most of them experienced liver or lung involvement. The reactivation of various viruses especially HHV-6 is reported in 33 cases. The mean latency period was 29 days. It is necessary to perform thorough epidemiological, genetic, and immunological studies, also systematic case review and causality assessment, as well as well-designed clinical trials for better management of antibiotic-induced DRESS.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00228-020-03005-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A case of erythema multiforme drug eruption associated with erythrodermic psoriasis induced by sofosbuvir and daclatasvir

WHAT IS KNOWN AND THE OBJECTIVE

Sofosbuvir (SOF) and daclatasvir (DCV) have revolutionized the treatment of hepatitis C virus and now represent the preferred therapy for this disease. Limited data are available on the dermatological side effects resulting from co-administration of SOF and DCV.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report a case of an erythema multiforme drug eruption associated with erythrodermic psoriasis induced by SOF and DCV. After ceasing treatment, the skin condition significantly improved.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

We should pay attention to adverse skin reactions resulting from SOF and DCV, especially if the patient has a pre-existing dermatosis.

Cutaneous Eruption due to Telaprevir

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) chronically infects 0.5–3% of the world population. A large group of patients develop cirrhosis and its complications. Since 2011, telaprevir and boceprevir are used, improving the disease evolution. One of the main side effects of these drugs is skin eruption. We report a 53-year-old patient with cirrhosis due to HCV who started the classic treatment associated with telaprevir. In the ninth week, he presented a severe rash that required the interruption of this drug. We emphasize the importance of early recognition and appropriate management of adverse skin reaction.

Dermatologic adverse events of protease inhibitor-based combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy with pegylated interferon, ribavirin and a first-generation NS3/4A protease inhibitor, telaprevir or boceprevir, is the new strategy for treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus infection. This combination improves therapeutic efficacy but it also increases the risk of adverse events.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to analyze frequency and severity of dermatological adverse events during protease inhibitor-based therapy and to evaluate the risk factors for their development.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 109 patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C treated with boceprevir (n=33) or telaprevir (n=76) based triple therapy. A logistic regression for relationship between clinical, demographic and laboratory factors and cutaneous adverse events was performed.

RESULTS

Dermatological adverse events (skin rash, pruritus, anorectal paresthesia) occurred in both treatments (boceprevir and telaprevir) with similar frequency: 28% in telaprevir and 21% in boceprevir. In patients treated with telaprevir, men were more predisposed to develop skin rashes compared to women (OR 4,1 p=0,014) and age above 45 years was associated with occurrence of pruritus in men (OR 8,16 p=0,014). Being a female, coexistence of autoimmune thyroiditis and advanced liver fibrosis were independent factors predisposing to development of anorectal paresthesia (OR 4,13 p=0,041, OR 4,25 p=0,029, OR 4,54 p=0,018 respectively) in this group. In patients treated with boceprevir, coexistence of autoimmune thyroiditis predisposed to skin rashes (OR 10,22 p=0,017) and being a female predisposed to pruritus (OR11,2 p=0,033). The adverse events occurred after a mean time of 8,6 (range 1-24) weeks after initiation of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with chronic hepatitis C who received the triple therapy, the anorectal paresthesias were observed only in patients treated with telaprevir. The predisposing factors for this adverse event were: female gender and advanced liver fibrosis. The risk factors for other dermatological adverse were: 1) being a male over 45 years, for skin rashes and pruritus (for telaprevir), 2) coexistence of autoimmune thyroiditis for skin rashes (for boceprevir), 3) being a female, for pruritus (for boceprevir).