1
|
Wolfaardt JF, Brecht LE, Taft RM, Grant GT. The future of maxillofacial prosthodontics in North America: The role of advanced digital technology and artificial intelligence - A discussion document. J Prosthet Dent 2024; 131:1253.e1-1253.e34. [PMID: 38744560 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Maxillofacial prosthodontists were advanced digital technology (ADT) adopters early in the new Millennium. The past two decades saw a range of digital enablers emerge including digital imaging (internal and surface), digital surgical planning, digital functional assessment, subtractive and additive manufacturing, navigation, and robotics among others. Artificial Intelligence (AI) is the latest ADT arrival that will be a challenging disruptive technology. ADT has served as a profound change agent in maxillofacial prosthodontics. The intent was to explore the process and level of ADT engagement in maxillofacial prosthodontics. PURPOSE The purpose was twofold. Firstly, to explore maxillofacial prosthodontic engagement of ADT. Secondly, to develop a discussion document to assist the American Academy of Maxillofacial Prosthetics (AAMP) with establishing a collective awareness and considered opinion on the future of maxillofacial prosthodontics in the digital era. MATERIAL AND METHODS AAMP member interest in ADT was assessed through analysis of AAMP annual congress programs and publications in the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (JPD). The history of the maxillofacial prosthodontic journey to the digital era was undertaken with a selective literature review. The perceptions maxillofacial prosthodontists hold on ADT engagement was assessed through a survey of AAMP members. Developing an understanding of the influence AI was conducted with a review of pertinent literature. RESULTS From 2011-2020, an annual mean of 38% of papers published in the JPD involved clinical use of ADT. From 2017-2019, 44% of invited presentations at AAMP annual congresses included clinical use of ADT. The journey to the digital era distinguished three periods with formative and consolidation periods influencing the innovation digital era. The AAMP member survey had a 59% response rate and studied 10 domains through 31 questions. Of the respondents, 89% thought ADT important to the future of maxillofacial prosthodontics. CONCLUSIONS The discussion document will assist the AAMP in developing a collective consciousness and considered opinion on ADT in the future of maxillofacial prosthodontics. Members of the AAMP have a developed interest in clinical applications of ADT. A great challenge is that no formal education, training, or clinical competency requirements for ADT could be identified. Clinical competency requirements are important to prepare maxillofacial prosthodontics for the inevitability of a digital era future. The discussion document poses the fundamental question of whether maxillofacial prosthodontists will remain as passive end users of ADT and AI or will they become engaged knowledge workers that have determined clinical competency in ADT and AI in patient care. Without this knowledge worker role, maxillofacial prosthodontists may experience difficulty being part of the inevitable ADT-AI driven future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johan F Wolfaardt
- Professor Emeritus, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Lawrence E Brecht
- Adjunct Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Director of Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Jonathan & Maxine Ferencz Advanced Education Program in Prosthodontics, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY; and Director, Maxillofacial Prosthetics, Department of Otolaryngology, Division of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital-Northwell Health, New York, NY
| | - Robert M Taft
- Professor Emeritus, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Md
| | - Gerald T Grant
- Professor and Associate Dean, Advanced Digital Technologies and Innovation, University of Louisville School of Dentistry, Louisville, Ky
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tanveer W, Ridwan-Pramana A, Molinero-Mourelle P, Forouzanfar T. Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Auricular Prostheses-Systematic Review. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5950. [PMID: 37762891 PMCID: PMC10532239 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12185950] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This systematic review was aimed at gathering the clinical and technical applications of CAD/CAM technology for craniofacial implant placement and processing of auricular prostheses based on clinical cases. According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, an electronic data search was performed. Human clinical studies utilizing digital planning, designing, and printing systems for craniofacial implant placement and processing of auricular prostheses for prosthetic rehabilitation of auricular defects were included. Following a data search, a total of 36 clinical human studies were included, which were digitally planned and executed through various virtual software to rehabilitate auricular defects. Preoperative data were collected mainly through computed tomography scans (CT scans) (55 cases); meanwhile, the most common laser scanners were the 3dMDface System (3dMD LLC, Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (6 cases) and the 3 Shape scanner (3 Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) (6 cases). The most common digital design software are Mimics Software (Mimics Innovation Suite, Materialize, Leuven, Belgium) (18 cases), Freeform software (Freeform, NC, USA) (13 cases), and 3 Shape software (3 Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark) (12 cases). Surgical templates were designed and utilized in 35 cases to place 88 craniofacial implants in auricular defect areas. The most common craniofacial implants were Vistafix craniofacial implants (Entific Medical Systems, Goteborg, Sweden) in 22 cases. A surgical navigation system was used to place 20 craniofacial implants in the mastoid bone. Digital applications of CAD/CAM technology include, but are not limited to, study models, mirrored replicas of intact ears, molds, retentive attachments, customized implants, substructures, and silicone prostheses. The included studies demonstrated a predictable clinical outcome, reduced the patient's visits, and completed the prosthetic rehabilitation in reasonable time and at reasonable cost. However, equipment costs and trained technical staff were highlighted as possible limitations to the use of CAD/CAM systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Waqas Tanveer
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Angela Ridwan-Pramana
- Center for Special Care in Dentistry, Department of Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Stichting Bijzondere Tandheelkunde, 1081 LA Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Pedro Molinero-Mourelle
- Department of Reconstructive Dentistry and Gerodontology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, CHE 3012 Bern, Switzerland;
| | - Tymour Forouzanfar
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cruz RLJ, Ross MT, Nightingale R, Pickering E, Allenby MC, Woodruff MA, Powell SK. An automated parametric ear model to improve frugal 3D scanning methods for the advanced manufacturing of high-quality prosthetic ears. Comput Biol Med 2023; 162:107033. [PMID: 37271110 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Ear prostheses are commonly used for restoring aesthetics to those suffering missing or malformed external ears. Traditional fabrication of these prostheses is labour intensive and requires expert skill from a prosthetist. Advanced manufacturing including 3D scanning, modelling and 3D printing has the potential to improve this process, although more work is required before it is ready for routine clinical use. In this paper, we introduce a parametric modelling technique capable of producing high quality 3D models of the human ear from low-fidelity, frugal, patient scans; significantly reducing time, complexity and cost. Our ear model can be tuned to fit the frugal low-fidelity 3D scan through; (a) manual tuning, or (b) our automated particle filter approach. This potentially enables low-cost smartphone photogrammetry-based 3D scanning for high quality personalised 3D printed ear prosthesis. In comparison to standard photogrammetry, our parametric model improves completeness, from (81 ± 5)% to (87 ± 4)%, with only a modest reduction in accuracy, with root mean square error (RMSE) increasing from (1.0 ± 0.2) mm to (1.5 ± 0.2) mm (relative to metrology rated reference 3D scans, n = 14). Despite this reduction in the RMS accuracy, our parametric model improves the overall quality, realism, and smoothness. Our automated particle filter method differs only modestly compared to manual adjustments. Overall, our parametric ear model can significantly improve quality, smoothness and completeness of 3D models produced from 30-photograph photogrammetry. This enables frugal high-quality 3D ear models to be produced for use in the advanced manufacturing of ear prostheses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rena L J Cruz
- QUT Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Maureen T Ross
- QUT Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Renee Nightingale
- QUT Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Edmund Pickering
- QUT Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Mark C Allenby
- QUT Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Maria A Woodruff
- QUT Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - Sean K Powell
- QUT Centre for Biomedical Technologies, School of Mechanical, Medical, and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bansod AV, Pisulkar SG, Dahihandekar C, Beri A. Rapid Prototyping in Maxillofacial Rehabilitation: A Review of Literature. Cureus 2022; 14:e28969. [PMID: 36237787 PMCID: PMC9548214 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.28969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
5
|
Jablonski RY, Veale BJ, Coward TJ, Keeling AJ, Bojke C, Pavitt SH, Nattress BR. Outcome measures in facial prosthesis research: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 126:805-815. [PMID: 33581868 PMCID: PMC8664412 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2020] [Revised: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Facial prosthesis research uses a wide variety of outcome measures, which results in challenges when comparing the effectiveness of interventions among studies. Consensus is lacking regarding the most appropriate and meaningful outcome measures to use in facial prosthesis research to capture important perspectives. PURPOSE The purpose of the systematic review was to identify and synthesize outcome measures used in facial prosthesis research. MATERIAL AND METHODS Electronic searches were performed in 11 databases (including nonpeer-reviewed literature). The citations were searched, and expert societies were contacted to identify additional studies. Inclusion criteria comprised studies of participants with facial defects who required or had received prosthetic rehabilitation with an external facial prosthesis. Exclusion criteria comprised participants with ocular prostheses, case reports, case series with fewer than 5 participants, laboratory-based studies, and studies published before 1980. Study selection was performed independently by 2 reviewers. Discrepancies were resolved through discussion or by a third reviewer. Outcome measures were synthesized with a categorization approach based on the perspective, theme, and subtheme of the outcome measures. Quality assessment was performed with an appraisal tool that enabled evaluation of studies with diverse designs. RESULTS Database searching identified 13 058 records, and 7406 remained after duplications were removed. After initial screening, 189 potentially relevant records remained, and 186 full texts were located (98% retrieval rate). After full-text screening, 124 records were excluded. Citation searches and contact with expert societies identified 4 further records. In total, 69 articles (grouped into 65 studies) were included. Studies were categorized as per the perspective of their outcome measures, with the following findings: patient-reported (74% of studies), clinical indicators (34%), clinician-reported (8%), multiple viewpoints (6%), and independent observer-reported (3%). Patient-reported outcome measures included tools to assess satisfaction, quality of life, and psychologic health. Variability in the choice of outcome measures was evident among the studies, with many self-designed, unvalidated, condition-specific questionnaires reported. A greater number of outcome measure themes emerged over time; themes such as service delivery and health state utility have recently been evaluated. CONCLUSIONS Over the past 40 years, facial prosthesis research has focused on patient-reported outcome measures. Outcome measures relating to other perspectives have been used less frequently, although new themes appear to be emerging in the literature. Future research should use outcome measures with appropriate measurement properties for use with facial prosthetics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Y Jablonski
- Specialty Registrar in Restorative Dentistry and NIHR Doctoral Fellow, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Benjamin J Veale
- Medical Student, Hull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK
| | - Trevor J Coward
- Reader and Honorary Consultant in Maxillofacial and Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Academic Centre of Reconstructive Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew J Keeling
- Clinical Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Chris Bojke
- Professor of Health Economics, Academic Unit of Health Economics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Sue H Pavitt
- Professor of Translational and Applied Health Research, Dental Translational and Clinical Research Unit, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Brian R Nattress
- Clinical Professor and Honorary Consultant, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dholam KP, Parkar SP, Dugad JA, Kharade PP, Shinde AA, Gurav SV. Development of a psychosocial perception scale and comparison of psychosocial perception of patients with extra oral defects before and after facial prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 2021; 128:1398-1404. [PMID: 33985758 DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM Loss of facial organs and subsequent rehabilitation affects a patient's psychological status. Understanding the perceived psychosocial aspects of quality of life among patients with missing organs and after prosthetic rehabilitation is essential, but studies that quantify this aspect are lacking. PURPOSE The purpose of this clinical study was to develop and validate a psychosocial perception scale and compare psychosocial perception before and after the prosthetic rehabilitation of a missing facial part. MATERIAL AND METHODS A psychosocial perception scale was developed to quantitatively measure the perceived psychosocial aspects of quality of life among patients with extraoral defects. The instrument was translated in the Hindi and Marathi Indian languages by using a forward and backward translation method. Depending on the responses obtained from the patients in the interview about the interpretation and ease of understanding, the questionnaire was modified and further pilot testing conducted. In the first phase, validation of the questionnaire was carried out with internal consistency, interdomain correlation, and intraclass correlation assessed by using the Cronbach α, Pearson correlation, and test retest reliability. Construct validity was established by the exploratory factor analysis. In the second phase, 32 participants were evaluated for their psychosocial response before and 3 months after prosthetic rehabilitation. Responsiveness and change in the domains scores of the psychosocial perception scale were studied by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test (α=.05). RESULTS The Cronbach α for internal consistency of overall psychosocial perception was .855 and .809 in the pretreatment and post-treatment visits consecutively. Most of the domains in the psychosocial perception scale had a Pearson correlation (r)>0.40. The domain of esthetics had r=0.84(confidence interval: .43-0.95), indicating good intraclass correlation. The domains of esthetics (P<.005), function (P<.005), positive emotions (P<.005), negative emotions (P=.011), and social and personal relationship P=.003) of the psychosocial perception scale showed statistically significant improvement in the scores after prosthetic intervention and had excellent (r>0.90) intraclass correlation. CONCLUSIONS The psychosocial perception scale was a reliable tool to assess the patient response toward the prosthetic rehabilitation of extraoral defects. Positive improvements in the domains score (esthetics, function, positive emotions, and social and personal relationship) contributed to better perception after prosthetic rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kanchan P Dholam
- Professor and Head, Department of Dental and Prosthetic Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Shubhangi P Parkar
- Professor and Head, Department of Psychiatry, GS Medical College, Parel, Mumbai, India
| | - Jinesh A Dugad
- Consultant, Department of Dental & Prosthetics, Asian Cancer Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Pankaj P Kharade
- Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India
| | - Arti A Shinde
- Dental Technician, Department of Dental and Prosthetic surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Sandeep Vivek Gurav
- Professor Department of Dental and Prosthetic surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Digital Workflow in Maxillofacial Prosthodontics—An Update on Defect Data Acquisition, Editing and Design Using Open-Source and Commercial Available Software. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/app11030973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background: A maxillofacial prosthesis, an alternative to surgery for the rehabilitation of patients with facial disabilities (congenital or acquired due to malignant disease or trauma), are meant to replace parts of the face or missing areas of bone and soft tissue and restore oral functions such as swallowing, speech and chewing, with the main goal being to improve the quality of life of the patients. The conventional procedures for maxillofacial prosthesis manufacturing involve several complex steps, are very traumatic for the patient and rely on the skills of the maxillofacial team. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing have opened a new approach to the fabrication of maxillofacial prostheses. Our review aimed to perform an update on the digital design of a maxillofacial prosthesis, emphasizing the available methods of data acquisition for the extraoral, intraoral and complex defects in the maxillofacial region and assessing the software used for data processing and part design. Methods: A search in the PubMed and Scopus databases was done using the predefined MeSH terms. Results: Partially and complete digital workflows were successfully applied for extraoral and intraoral prosthesis manufacturing. Conclusions: To date, the software and interface used to process and design maxillofacial prostheses are expensive, not typical for this purpose and accessible only to very skilled dental professionals or to computer-aided design (CAD) engineers. As the demand for a digital approach to maxillofacial rehabilitation increases, more support from the software designer or manufacturer will be necessary to create user-friendly and accessible modules similar to those used in dental laboratories.
Collapse
|
8
|
Cruz RLJ, Ross MT, Skewes J, Allenby MC, Powell SK, Woodruff MA. An advanced prosthetic manufacturing framework for economic personalised ear prostheses. Sci Rep 2020; 10:11453. [PMID: 32651436 PMCID: PMC7351946 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67945-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Craniofacial prostheses are commonly used to restore aesthetics for those suffering from malformed, damaged, or missing tissue. Traditional fabrication is costly, uncomfortable for the patient, and laborious; involving several hours of hand-crafting by a prosthetist, with the results highly dependent on their skill level. In this paper, we present an advanced manufacturing framework employing three-dimensional scanning, computer-aided design, and computer-aided manufacturing to efficiently fabricate patient-specific ear prostheses. Three-dimensional scans were taken of ears of six participants using a structured light scanner. These were processed using software to model the prostheses and 3-part negative moulds, which were fabricated on a low-cost desktop 3D printer, and cast with silicone to produce ear prostheses. The average cost was approximately $3 for consumables and $116 for 2 h of labour. An injection method with smoothed 3D printed ABS moulds was also developed at a cost of approximately $155 for consumables and labour. This contrasts with traditional hand-crafted prostheses which range from $2,000 to $7,000 and take around 14 to 15 h of labour. This advanced manufacturing framework provides potential for non-invasive, low cost, and high-accuracy alternative to current techniques, is easily translatable to other prostheses, and has potential for further cost reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rena L J Cruz
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Maureen T Ross
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Jacob Skewes
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Mark C Allenby
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sean K Powell
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - Maria A Woodruff
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cruz RLJ, Ross MT, Powell SK, Woodruff MA. Advancements in Soft-Tissue Prosthetics Part A: The Art of Imitating Life. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020; 8:121. [PMID: 32300585 PMCID: PMC7145402 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.00121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Physical disfigurement due to congenital defects, trauma, or cancer causes considerable distress and physical impairment for millions of people worldwide; impacting their economic, psychological and social wellbeing. Since 3000 B.C., prosthetic devices have been used to address these issues by restoring both aesthetics and utility to those with disfigurement. Internationally, academic and industry researchers are constantly developing new materials and manufacturing techniques to provide higher quality and lower cost prostheses to those people who need them. New advanced technologies including 3D imaging, modeling, and printing are revolutionizing the way prostheses are now made. These new approaches are disrupting the traditional and manual art form of prosthetic production which are laborious and costly and are being replaced by more precise and quantitative processes which enable the rapid, low cost production of patient-specific prostheses. In this two part review, we provide a comprehensive report of past, present and emerging soft-tissue prosthetic materials and manufacturing techniques. In this review, part A, we examine, historically, the ideal properts of a polymeric material when applied in soft-tissue prosthetics. We also detail new research approaches to target specific tissues which commonly require aesthetic restoration (e.g. ear, nose and eyes) and discuss both traditional and advanced fabrication methods, from hand-crafted impression based approaches to advanced manufactured prosthetics. We discuss the chemistry and related details of most significant synthetic polymers used in soft-tissue prosthetics in Part B. As advanced manufacturing transitions from research into practice, the five millennia history of prosthetics enters a new age of economic, personalized, advanced soft tissue prosthetics and with this comes significantly improved quality of life for the people affected by tissue loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sean K. Powell
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Restoration of Ear Defects by Prefabricated Radial Forearm Flap. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN 2020; 8:e2616. [PMID: 32095416 PMCID: PMC7015584 DOI: 10.1097/gox.0000000000002616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The case report involved a 36-year-old man. He was injured in a road traffic accident and had extensive third- and fourth-degree facial burns over the right side of his face, with complete loss of his right auricle. We performed a free flap coverage of the right face with the anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap. The reconstruction of his auricle was performed by culturing a cartilage framework on the forearm and transferring it straight to the original location to rebuild the new ear as free flap. Results were assessed 12 months after surgery. The follow-up is still short, but the patient is satisfied with the results achieved.
Collapse
|
11
|
Farook TH, Jamayet NB, Abdullah JY, Asif JA, Rajion ZA, Alam MK. Designing 3D prosthetic templates for maxillofacial defect rehabilitation: A comparative analysis of different virtual workflows. Comput Biol Med 2020; 118:103646. [PMID: 32174323 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.103646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2019] [Revised: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To design and compare the outcome of commercial (CS) and open source (OS) software-based 3D prosthetic templates for rehabilitation of maxillofacial defects using a low powered personal computer setup. METHOD Medical image data for five types of defects were selected, segmented, converted and decimated to 3D polygon models on a personal computer. The models were transferred to a computer aided design (CAD) software which aided in designing the prosthesis according to the virtual models. Two templates were designed for each defect, one by an OS (free) system and one by CS. The parameters for analyses were the virtual volume, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff's distance (HD) and were executed by the OS point cloud comparison tool. RESULT There was no significant difference (p > 0.05) between CS and OS when comparing the volume of the template outputs. While HD was within 0.05-4.33 mm, evaluation of the percentage similarity and spatial overlap following the DSC showed an average similarity of 67.7% between the two groups. The highest similarity was with orbito-facial prostheses (88.5%) and the lowest with facial plate prosthetics (28.7%). CONCLUSION Although CS and OS pipelines are capable of producing templates which are aesthetically and volumetrically similar, there are slight comparative discrepancies in the landmark position and spatial overlap. This is dependent on the software, associated commands and experienced decision-making. CAD-based templates can be planned on current personal computers following appropriate decimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taseef Hasan Farook
- Maxillofacial Prosthetic Service, Prosthodontic Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, 16150, Malaysia
| | - Nafij Bin Jamayet
- Maxillofacial Prosthetic Service, Prosthodontic Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, 16150, Malaysia.
| | - Johari Yap Abdullah
- Craniofacial Imaging and Design, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, 16150, Malaysia
| | - Jawaad Ahmed Asif
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dental Sciences, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, 16150, Malaysia
| | - Zainul Ahmad Rajion
- Kulliyah of Dentistry, Dept. of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery and Oral Diagnosis, IIUM, Bandar Indera Mahkota, 25200, Kuantan, Malaysia
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Skin cancer is a common indication for reconstructive surgery of the ear. The unique anatomy of the external ear makes the restoration of form and function challenging for the reconstructive surgeon. This article reviews the relevant anatomy of the ear, defines the goals of reconstruction, outlines the assessment of defects based on location, and describes specific surgical techniques useful in auricular reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan M Smith
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 North Caroline Street, 6th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| | - Patrick J Byrne
- Division of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, 601 North Caroline Street, 6th Floor, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Unkovskiy A, Spintzyk S, Axmann D, Engel EM, Weber H, Huettig F. Additive Manufacturing: A Comparative Analysis of Dimensional Accuracy and Skin Texture Reproduction of Auricular Prostheses Replicas. J Prosthodont 2017; 28:e460-e468. [PMID: 29125215 DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/19/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and additive manufacturing in maxillofacial prosthetics has been widely acknowledged. Rapid prototyping can be considered for manufacturing of auricular prostheses. Therefore, so-called prostheses replicas can be fabricated by digital means. The objective of this study was to identify a superior additive manufacturing method to fabricate auricular prosthesis replicas (APRs) within a digital workflow. MATERIALS AND METHODS Auricles of 23 healthy subjects (mean age of 37.8 years) were measured in vivo with respect to an anthropometrical protocol. Landmarks were volumized with fiducial balls for 3D scanning using a handheld structured light scanner. The 3D CAD dataset was postprocessed, and the same anthropometrical measurements were made in the CAD software with the digital lineal. Each CAD dataset was materialized using fused deposition modeling (FDM), selective laser sintering (SLS), and stereolithography (SL), constituting 53 APR samples. All distances between the landmarks were measured on the APRs. After the determination of the measurement error within the five data groups (in vivo, CAD, FDM, SLS, and SL), the mean values were compared using matched pairs method. To this, the in vivo and CAD dataset were set as references. Finally, the surface structure of the APRs was qualitatively evaluated with stereomicroscopy and profilometry to ascertain the level of skin detail reproduction. RESULTS The anthropometrical approach showed drawbacks in measuring the protrusion of the ear's helix. The measurement error within all groups of measurements was calculated between 0.20 and 0.28 mm, implying a high reproducibility. The lowest mean differences of 53 produced APRs were found in FDM (0.43%) followed by SLS (0.54%) and SL (0.59%)--compared to in vivo, and again in FDM (0.20%) followed by SL (0.36%) and SLS (0.39%)--compared to CAD. None of these values exceed the threshold of clinical relevance (1.5%); however, the qualitative evaluation revealed slight shortcomings in skin reproduction for all methods: reproduction of skin details exceeding 0.192 mm in depth was feasible. CONCLUSION FDM showed the superior dimensional accuracy and best skin surface reproduction. Moreover, digital acquisition and CAD postprocessing seem to play a more important role in the outcome than the additive manufacturing method used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexey Unkovskiy
- Department of Prosthodontics, Tüebingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Spintzyk
- Medical Material Science and Technology, Tüebingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Detlef Axmann
- Department of Prosthodontics, Tüebingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Engel
- Department of Prosthodontics, Tüebingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Heiner Weber
- Department of Prosthodontics, Tüebingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Huettig
- Department of Prosthodontics, Tüebingen University Hospital, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ebrahimi A, Kazemi A, Rasouli HR, Kazemi M, Kalantar Motamedi MH. Reconstructive Surgery of Auricular Defects: An Overview. Trauma Mon 2015; 20:e28202. [PMID: 26839867 PMCID: PMC4727475 DOI: 10.5812/traumamon.28202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2015] [Accepted: 02/24/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Context: Despite the ongoing advances in surgical procedures and promising progress in bioengineering techniques, auricular reconstruction remains a significant challenge in plastic surgery. There are different causes for acquired auricular defects, including trauma, tumor ablation and burns. The management options for upper, middle and lower third auricular defects are briefly reviewed in the current paper. Evidence Acquisition: Original research papers investigating the plastic surgeons, otolaryngologists and maxillofacial surgeons in approaching the complicated issue of auricular reconstruction published from January 1995 to December 2014 were aggregated and used in the current study. Results: Utilizing autologous stem cell populations to treat craniofacial defects is a promising field of ongoing investigations. Studies show that cartilage stem/progenitor cells (CSPCs) are highly chondrogenic and can produce elastic reconstructive material with long-term tissue restoration. Conclusions: Auricular reconstruction surgery is a challenging plastic procedure that requires great expertise and expert knowledge of the various techniques available. Novel techniques in the fields of reconstructive bioengineering and regenerative medicine are promising but further research is required before widespread clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Ebrahimi
- Trauma Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
| | - Alireza Kazemi
- Education Development Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
| | - Hamid Reza Rasouli
- Trauma Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
| | - Maryam Kazemi
- Education Development Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
| | - Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi
- Trauma Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
- Corresponding author: Mohammad Hosein Kalantar Motamedi, Trauma Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, P. O. Box: 19647, Tehran, IR Iran. Tel: +98-2122616946, Fax: +98-2188053766, E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|