Silicone Oil Reinjection without Macular Buckling for Treatment of Recurrent Myopic Macular Hole Retinal Detachment after Silicone Oil Removal

Complications associated with the use of silicone oil in vitreoretinal surgery: A systemic review and meta-analysis

Silicone oil (SO) still represents the main choice for long-term intraocular tamponade in complicated vitreoretinal surgery. This review compared the complications associated with the use of SO and other vitreous substitutes after pars plana vitrectomy in patients with different underlying diseases. Meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We retrieved randomized clinical trials (RCTs), retrospective case-control and cohort studies evaluating the risk of using SO, published between 1994 and 2020, conducting a computer-based search of the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Embase. Primary outcome was the rate of complications such as intraocular hypertension, retinal re-detachment, unexpected vision loss or hypotony. Secondary outcome was to compare the rate of adverse events of different SO viscosities, especially emulsification. Forty-three articles were included. There were significant differences in intraocular hypertension (p = 0.0002, OR = 1.66; 95% CI = 1.27-2.18) and the rate of retinal re-detachment (p < 0.0009, OR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.50-0.64) between SO and other agents, including placebo. However, there were no differences in other complication rates. Silicone oil (SO)-emulsification rate was non-significantly higher in low than high SO viscosity, and results from other complications were comparable in both groups. The high quality of most of the studies included in this study is noteworthy, which provides some certainty to the conclusions. Among them is the high variability of the SO residence time. The fact that ocular hypertension and not hypotension is related to SO use. A clear relationship is not found for the so-called unexplained vision loss, which affects a significant percentage of eyes. Re-detachment cases are less if SO is used and that surprisingly there does not seem to be a relationship in the percentage of emulsification between the low- and high-viscosity silicones. All these data warrant more standardized prospective studies.

Long-Term Outcome After Silicone Oil Removal in Eyes with Myopic Retinal Detachment Associated with Macular Hole

Purpose

To assess the efficacy of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and silicone oil tamponade for management of myopic retinal detachment associated with macular hole (MRDMH) and to assess the anatomical and functional outcomes of this technique and its long-term validity after silicone oil removal.

Methods

Retrospective interventional non-comparative case series including consecutive patients who had PPV and silicone oil tamponade for MRDMH. All patients had an axial length ≥26 mm. Main outcome measures were retinal re-attachment and macular hole closure after silicone oil removal, improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications secondary to surgery. Chi square/Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze categorical variables, while One-way ANOVA/Kruskal–Wallis test was used to compare variables across the closure type and complications. Correlations between numerical variables were tested using Spearman correlation. Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate the event-free survival. P value is significant at 0.05.

Results

The study included 26 eyes of 26 patients. Retinal re-attachment rate after primary and secondary surgeries was 88.4% and 100%, respectively. W-type macular hole closure occurred in 58% of eyes. Vision improved in 58% of eyes. Mean final BCVA was 0.05 decimal units, p = 0.004. Cataract and glaucoma developed in 42% and 15% of eyes, respectively. Initial BCVA, axial length and duration of silicone oil tamponade did not correlate significantly with either the type of macular hole closure or the final BCVA.

Conclusion

PPV and silicone oil tamponade technique promotes successful anatomical and functional outcome in MRDMH. Long-term success is maintained after silicone oil removal. High incidence of silicone oil-induced complications mandate its removal from eyes with successful retinal re-attachment.

Silicone oil removal: post-operative complications

PURPOSE

To describe the characteristics, outcomes and complications of eyes after silicone oil removal.

METHODS

Retrospective case series of eyes that underwent oil removal between 2012 and 2016 at The Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science. Visual acuity (VA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and rates of retinal re-detachment, hypotony, ocular hypertension, corneal decompensation, cystoid macular edema (CME) and cataract progression were evaluated.

RESULTS

Totally, 101 eyes of 99 patients (65% male, average age 47.2 years) were identified. Oil tamponade had been used for retinal detachment (RD) repair in all eyes; 15 eyes had also undergone an open globe repair previously. The most common vitreous substitutes used after oil removal were balanced salt solution (BSS) and air in 90% of eyes. The average time of oil tamponade before removal was 9.46 months. The average logMAR VA before oil removal was 1.7 which improved to an average of 1.4 post-operatively. The average IOP pre-operatively was 16.1 mm Hg, which decreased to an average of 14.8 mm Hg post-operatively. Complications after oil removal, included retinal re-detachment (6.9%), hypotony (7.9%), ocular hypertension (12.9%), corneal decompensation (9.9%), CME (2%) and cataract progression (68%).

CONCLUSION

This study showed an overall improvement in VA and decrease in IOP after oil removal. Cataract progression was the most common complication.

Incidence and risk factors associated with retinal redetachment after silicone oil removal in the African population

The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence and risk factors associated with retinal redetachment after silicone oil (SO) removal in the African population. A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing SO removal over a period of 4 years. The risk factors assessed were (1) characteristics of the retinal detachments including type of retinal detachment, type, number and location of the retinal tears, and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) score, and (2) surgical factors including type of silicone oil used, use of laser prior to SO removal, and location of the laser (360° or around the tear only). SO was removed either through a pars plana approach or transpupillary approach and anterior limbal incision. Ninety-nine eyes met the inclusion criteria during the study period. Twelve patients (12 %) had retinal redetachment after SO removal. Factors associated with redetachment were a preexisting macular hole, PVR grade B or worse, and no intraoperative endolaser photocoagulation. The incidence of redetachment in African population is similar to that reported from developed countries and other advanced vitreoretinal centers. Redetachment occurred at higher rates in patients with preexisting macular holes and tears who did not receive intraoperative endolaser photocoagulation and patients with a severe grade of PVR.