Results from a Patient-Based Health Education Intervention in Reducing Antibiotic Use for Acute Upper Respiratory Tract Infections in the Private Sector Primary Care Setting in Singapore

We investigated the efficacy of patient-targeted education in reducing antibiotic prescriptions for upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) among adults in the private primary care setting in Singapore. Our randomized controlled trial enrolled patients aged 21 years and above presenting at general practitioner (GP) clinics with URTI symptoms for 7 days or less. Intervention arm patients were verbally educated via pamphlets about the etiology of URTIs, the role of antibiotics in treating URTIs, and the consequences of inappropriate antibiotic use. Control arm patients were educated on influenza vaccinations. Both arms were compared regarding the proportions prescribed antibiotics and the patients' postconsultation views. A total of 914 patients consulting 35 doctors from 24 clinics completed the study (457 in each arm). The demographics of patients in both arms were similar, and 19.1% were prescribed an antibiotic, but this varied from 0% to 70% for individual GPs. The intervention did not significantly reduce antibiotic prescriptions (odds ratio [OR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83–1.73) except in patients of Indian ethnicity (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09–0.93). Positive associations between the intervention and the view that antibiotics were not needed most of the time for URTIs (P = 0.047) and on being worried about the side effects of antibiotics (P = 0.018) were restricted to the Indian subgroup. GPs in limited liability partnerships or clinic chains prescribed less (OR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.92), while certain inappropriate patient responses were associated with the receipt of antibiotics. Follow-up studies to investigate differences in responses to educational programs between ethnicities and to explore GP-targeted interventions are recommended.

Risks of venous thromboembolism in patients with liver cirrhosis: a nationwide cohort study in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

The results of various studies attempting to assess the risks of venous thromboembolism in liver cirrhosis have been conflicting. Furthermore, although the incidence of venous thromboembolism is thought to be low in Asians, the relationship between venous thromboembolism and liver cirrhosis has not been investigated in Asian countries.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the risks of venous thromboembolism in cirrhotic patients in Taiwan to evaluate whether the risk is higher than in the general population.

METHODS

The data from 1,000,000 National Health Insurance beneficiaries were utilized. All adult beneficiaries were followed from 1 January 2007 to 31 December 2010 to identify those who developed venous thromboembolism. Each identified patient with liver cirrhosis was matched with 10 non-cirrhotic patients on the basis of high-dimensional propensity score. Cox regression models were applied to compare the hazards of venous thromboembolism in the matched cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 757,940 patients were enrolled. After matching, 2223 cirrhotic patients and 22,230 non-cirrhotic patients were selected. The adjusted hazard ratio of venous thromboembolism was significantly increased by having cirrhosis (1.71; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-2.78). A subgroup analysis revealed a much higher hazard ratio of venous thromboembolism in an advanced cirrhosis subgroup (n = 293) than in a matched non-cirrhosis subgroup (n = 2930) (4.36; 95% CI 1.36-14.01).

CONCLUSION

The risk of venous thromboembolism may be higher in Asian patients with cirrhosis than in the general Asian population, especially in those with advanced cirrhosis.