1
|
Neri A, Coduri M, Penza V, Santangelo A, Oliveri A, Turco E, Pizzirani M, Trinceri E, Soriero D, Boero F, Ricci S, Mattos LS. A novel affordable user interface for robotic surgery training: design, development and usability study. Front Digit Health 2024; 6:1428534. [PMID: 39139587 PMCID: PMC11319275 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1428534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The use of robotic systems in the surgical domain has become groundbreaking for patients and surgeons in the last decades. While the annual number of robotic surgical procedures continues to increase rapidly, it is essential to provide the surgeon with innovative training courses along with the standard specialization path. To this end, simulators play a fundamental role. Currently, the high cost of the leading VR simulators limits their accessibility to educational institutions. The challenge lies in balancing high-fidelity simulation with cost-effectiveness; however, few cost-effective options exist for robotic surgery training. Methods This paper proposes the design, development and user-centered usability study of an affordable user interface to control a surgical robot simulator. It consists of a cart equipped with two haptic interfaces, a VR visor and two pedals. The simulations were created using Unity, which offers versatility for expanding the simulator to more complex scenes. An intuitive teleoperation control of the simulated robotic instruments is achieved through a high-level control strategy. Results and Discussion Its affordability and resemblance to real surgeon consoles make it ideal for implementing robotic surgery training programs in medical schools, enhancing accessibility to a broader audience. This is demonstrated by the results of an usability study involving expert surgeons who use surgical robots regularly, expert surgeons without robotic surgery experience, and a control group. The results of the study, which was based on a traditional Peg-board exercise and Camera Control task, demonstrate the simulator's high usability and intuitive control across diverse user groups, including those with limited experience. This offers evidence that this affordable system is a promising solution for expanding robotic surgery training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Neri
- Biomedical Robotics Lab, Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Computer Science, Bioengineering, Robotics and Systems Engineering (DIBRIS), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Mara Coduri
- Department of Computer Science, Bioengineering, Robotics and Systems Engineering (DIBRIS), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
- Simulation and Advanced Education Center, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Veronica Penza
- Biomedical Robotics Lab, Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Santangelo
- Biomedical Robotics Lab, Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessandra Oliveri
- Department of Computer Science, Bioengineering, Robotics and Systems Engineering (DIBRIS), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Enrico Turco
- Humanoid and Human Centred Mechatronics (HHCM), Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Information Engineering and Mathematics, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | | | | | - Domenico Soriero
- Unit of Surgical Oncology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | | | - Serena Ricci
- Department of Computer Science, Bioengineering, Robotics and Systems Engineering (DIBRIS), University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
- Simulation and Advanced Education Center, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Leonardo S. Mattos
- Biomedical Robotics Lab, Advanced Robotics, Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boal MWE, Anastasiou D, Tesfai F, Ghamrawi W, Mazomenos E, Curtis N, Collins JW, Sridhar A, Kelly J, Stoyanov D, Francis NK. Evaluation of objective tools and artificial intelligence in robotic surgery technical skills assessment: a systematic review. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad331. [PMID: 37951600 PMCID: PMC10771126 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a need to standardize training in robotic surgery, including objective assessment for accreditation. This systematic review aimed to identify objective tools for technical skills assessment, providing evaluation statuses to guide research and inform implementation into training curricula. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Ovid Embase/Medline, PubMed and Web of Science were searched. Inclusion criterion: robotic surgery technical skills tools. Exclusion criteria: non-technical, laparoscopy or open skills only. Manual tools and automated performance metrics (APMs) were analysed using Messick's concept of validity and the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) Levels of Evidence and Recommendation (LoR). A bespoke tool analysed artificial intelligence (AI) studies. The Modified Downs-Black checklist was used to assess risk of bias. RESULTS Two hundred and forty-seven studies were analysed, identifying: 8 global rating scales, 26 procedure-/task-specific tools, 3 main error-based methods, 10 simulators, 28 studies analysing APMs and 53 AI studies. Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills and the da Vinci Skills Simulator were the most evaluated tools at LoR 1 (OCEBM). Three procedure-specific tools, 3 error-based methods and 1 non-simulator APMs reached LoR 2. AI models estimated outcomes (skill or clinical), demonstrating superior accuracy rates in the laboratory with 60 per cent of methods reporting accuracies over 90 per cent, compared to real surgery ranging from 67 to 100 per cent. CONCLUSIONS Manual and automated assessment tools for robotic surgery are not well validated and require further evaluation before use in accreditation processes.PROSPERO: registration ID CRD42022304901.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew W E Boal
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks’ Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
| | - Dimitrios Anastasiou
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Freweini Tesfai
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks’ Hospital, London, UK
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Walaa Ghamrawi
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks’ Hospital, London, UK
| | - Evangelos Mazomenos
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, UCL, London, UK
| | - Nathan Curtis
- Department of General Surgey, Dorset County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorchester, UK
| | - Justin W Collins
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ashwin Sridhar
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - John Kelly
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
- University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Danail Stoyanov
- Wellcome/ESPRC Centre for Interventional Surgical Sciences (WEISS), University College London (UCL), London, UK
- Computer Science, UCL, London, UK
| | - Nader K Francis
- The Griffin Institute, Northwick Park & St Marks’ Hospital, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, Research Department of Targeted Intervention, UCL, London, UK
- Yeovil District Hospital, Somerset Foundation NHS Trust, Yeovil, Somerset, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rudiman R, Mirbagheri A, Candrawinata VS. Assessment of robotic telesurgery system among surgeons: a single-center study. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2757-2761. [PMID: 37710051 PMCID: PMC10678790 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01709-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
The field of robotic-assisted surgery is expanding rapidly; therefore, future robotic surgeons will need to be trained in an organized manner. Here, we aimed to examine surgeon performance on the Sinaflex Robotic Telesurgery System for correlation with training hours spent in training program. This is a prospective study of a single-center experience at the Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung City of West Java, Indonesia. We included 43 surgeons from 11 departments, all invited to train using the Sinaflex Robotic Telesurgery system at the Hasan Sadikin Hospital. All study cohorts have never performed a robotic surgery procedure beforehand and have had at least five years of field experience. The surgeons were free to choose their training duration and simulation. After finishing the training session, they were asked to perform several tasks with increasing difficulty levels. There were nine training tasks in total with increasing levels of difficulty. A total of 43 surgeons from 11 different department were included in this prospective study. Our study was separated into 3 different batches and most surgeons failed to pass the examination (n = 12, 8, and 9, for batches 1, 2, and 3, respectively). The "failed" surgeon, additionally, tended to be older than the "passed" cohort (49.3 ± 7.4 vs 42.1 ± 7.3 years old, p = 0.005). In terms of duration of hours spent training on the robot, there was little difference training hours between the cohort that passed and the cohort that failed cohort (10.0 [8.4-10.1] vs 10.0 [8.0-10.0], respectively) with a p value of 0.265. We found no correlation between the total hours spent in the training program and surgeon performance on the Sinaflex robotic telesurgery system. Structured robot surgical training courses must be incorporated into the training programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reno Rudiman
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Universitas Padjadjaran, West Java, Bandung, Indonesia.
| | - Alireza Mirbagheri
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine and also Research Center for Biomedical Technologies and Robotics (RCBTR), Advanced Medical Technologies and Equipment Institute (AMTEI), both at Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Baeten IGT, Hoogendam JP, Schreuder HWR, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Gerestein CG, Zweemer RP. Introducing a novice surgeon to an experienced robotic gynaecological oncology team: An observational cohort study on the impact of a structured curriculum on outcomes of cervical cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 178:153-160. [PMID: 37865051 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect on patient outcomes when introducing a novice robotic surgeon, trained in accordance with a structured learning curriculum, to an experienced robotic surgery team treating cervical cancer patients. METHODS Patients with early-stage cervical cancer who were treated with primary robot-assisted surgery between 2007 and 2019 were retrospectively included. In addition to the 165 patients included in a former analysis, we included a further 61 consecutively treated patients and divided all 226 patients over three groups: early learning phase of 61 procedures without structured training (group 1), experienced phase of 104 procedures (group 2), and the 61 procedures during introduction of a novice with structured training (group 3). Risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) analysis was performed to assess the learning curve effect. Patient outcomes between the groups were compared. RESULTS Based on RA-CUSUM analysis, no learning curve effect was observed for group 3. Regarding surgical outcomes, mean operation time in group 3 was significantly shorter than group 1 (p < 0.001) and similar to group 2 (p = 0.96). Proportions of intraoperative and postoperative adverse events in group 3 were not significantly different from the experienced group (group 2). Regarding oncological outcomes, the 5-year disease-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival in group 3 were not significantly different from the experienced group. CONCLUSIONS Introducing a novice robotic surgeon, who was trained in accordance with a structured learning curriculum, resulted in similar patient outcomes as by experienced surgeons suggesting novices can progress through a learning phase without compromising outcomes of cervical cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilse G T Baeten
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Jacob P Hoogendam
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Henk W R Schreuder
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ina M Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis G Gerestein
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald P Zweemer
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Division of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Although substantial advancements have been achieved in robot-assisted surgery, the blueprint to existing snake robotics predominantly focuses on the preliminary structural design, control, and human–robot interfaces, with features which have not been particularly explored in the literature. This paper aims to conduct a review of planning and operation concepts of hyper-redundant serpentine robots for surgical use, as well as any future challenges and solutions for better manipulation. Current researchers in the field of the manufacture and navigation of snake robots have faced issues, such as a low dexterity of the end-effectors around delicate organs, state estimation and the lack of depth perception on two-dimensional screens. A wide range of robots have been analysed, such as the i²Snake robot, inspiring the use of force and position feedback, visual servoing and augmented reality (AR). We present the types of actuation methods, robot kinematics, dynamics, sensing, and prospects of AR integration in snake robots, whilst addressing their shortcomings to facilitate the surgeon’s task. For a smoother gait control, validation and optimization algorithms such as deep learning databases are examined to mitigate redundancy in module linkage backlash and accidental self-collision. In essence, we aim to provide an outlook on robot configurations during motion by enhancing their material compositions within anatomical biocompatibility standards.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bielsa VF. Virtual reality simulation in plastic surgery training. Literature review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74:2372-2378. [PMID: 33972199 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2019] [Revised: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Major changes have occurred in the medical environment leading to an evolution from the traditional residency programmes to competency-based ones. Virtual reality (VR) represents a promising simulation resource for surgical training. Several types of VR simulators can be considered, depending on the level of immersion they offer. The goal of the article is to review the progress of VR simulation in plastic surgery (PS) training. A systematic search of the literature was performed on PUBMED/MEDLINE with the following key words: (Simulation OR Virtual Reality) AND (Education OR Training) AND Plastic Surgery from January 1998 to September 2019. A total of 244 results were found, and 80 of them were selected for abstract review. Sixty-four articles were selected for complete reading. Several attempts have been made to create VR simulators and most of them are non-immersive or partially immersive. The main conclusions of them are summarized. VR simulation has been proven to have a role in PS training, offering many advantages. Furthermore, VR simulation can be used for safety training, team interaction and decision-making education. Validation is a key point for acceptance of simulators. Further efforts are required to include simulation in PS curricula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Fuertes Bielsa
- Plastic Surgery Department University Hospital Miguel Servet Paseo Isabel la Católica, 1-3, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alshuaibi M, Perrenot C, Hubert J, Perez M. Concurrent, face, content, and construct validity of the RobotiX Mentor simulator for robotic basic skills. Int J Med Robot 2020; 16:e2100. [PMID: 32112491 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess several criteria, such as concurrent, face, content, and construct validity of the RobotiX Mentor (RXM) simulator for basic robotic skills and to compare virtual and actual dry lab dome. METHODS A prospective study was conducted from December 2017 to May 2018 using RXM and a da Vinci Si robot. 37 subjects, divided into three groups according to their initial surgical training (expert, intermediate, and novice), were evaluated in terms of six representative exercises of basic robotic specific skills as recommended by the fundamentals of robotic surgery. RESULTS There was a correlation between the automatic data from the RXM and the subjective evaluation with the robot. The face and content validity, which were evaluated by the experts, were generally considered high (71.5% and 62.5%, respectively). Three levels (analysis of variance [ANOVA]; P = .01) and two levels (P = .001) of experience were clearly identified by the simulator. CONCLUSION Our study proves the concurrent validity and confirms the face, content, and construct validity of the RXM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muaath Alshuaibi
- Department of Urology, Brabois Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,Department of Urology, Hospital University, Ha'il, Saudi Arabia
| | - Cyril Perrenot
- School of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Lorraine University, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,Department of Visceral, Metabolic and Cancerology Surgery, Brabois Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Jacques Hubert
- Department of Urology, Brabois Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,School of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Lorraine University, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,IADI Laboratory, INSERM-U1254, Nancy University, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Manuela Perez
- Department of Visceral, Metabolic and Cancerology Surgery, Brabois Hospital, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.,IADI Laboratory, INSERM-U947, Nancy University, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shahin GMM, Brandon Bravo Bruinsma GJ, Stamenkovic S, Cuesta MA. Training in robotic thoracic surgery-the European way. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2019; 8:202-209. [PMID: 31032203 DOI: 10.21037/acs.2018.11.06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The increasing demand for robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) in Europe requires a structured and standardized training module. Until now, Intuitive Surgical Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA, USA) has delivered the only available robotic surgery platform. Although the training program that is organized by Intuitive is divided in an initial and an advanced course, the success of the training depends on many external factors. Until now the training focused on experienced thoracic surgeons. The aim of this article is to offer a stepwise training module, which can be adopted by experienced open (thoracotomy) surgeons or video-assisted thoracic (VATS) surgeons but is primarily meant for thoracic surgery fellows and residents, as it is our sincere opinion that we should focus on training for this type of surgery as early in their careers as possible. In order to maintain surgical technique and minimize the chance of complications, on-going training and certification of the surgeons and the team is deemed necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghada M M Shahin
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Isala Heart Centre, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Miguel A Cuesta
- Department of General Surgery, Vrije Universiteit Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen R, Rodrigues Armijo P, Krause C, Siu KC, Oleynikov D. A comprehensive review of robotic surgery curriculum and training for residents, fellows, and postgraduate surgical education. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:361-367. [PMID: 30953199 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06775-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 105] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2017, the utilization of robotic-assisted surgery had grown 10-40-fold relative to laparoscopic surgery in common general surgery procedures. The rapid rise in the utilization of robotic-assisted surgery has necessitated a standardized training curriculum. Many curricula are currently being developed and validated. Additionally, advancements in virtual reality simulators have facilitated their integration into robotic-assisted surgery training. This review aims to highlight and discuss the features of existing curricula and robotic-assisted surgery training simulators and to provide updates on their respective validation process. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature review was conducted using PubMed from 2000-2019 and commercial websites. Information regarding availability, content, and status of validation was collected for each current robotic-assisted surgery curriculum. This review did not qualify as human subjects research, so institutional review board approval was not required. RESULTS The daVinci Technology Training Pathway and Fundamentals of Robotic Surgery are purely web-based and self-paced robotic-assisted surgery training. The Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeon Robotic Masters Series, Fundamental Skills of Robot-Assisted Surgery training program, and the Robotics Training Network curriculum require trainees to be on site in order to provide expert feedback on surgical techniques and robot maintenance. Currently, there are few virtual reality simulators for robotic-assisted surgical training available on the market. CONCLUSIONS Didactic courses are available in all of these training programs, but their contents are inconsistent. Furthermore, the availability and nature of hands-on training offered by these curriculums are widely variable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Chen
- College of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Medical Center, 986245, Omaha, NE, 68198-6245, USA
| | - Priscila Rodrigues Armijo
- Center for Advanced Surgical Technology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Medical Center, 986246, Omaha, NE, 68198-6246, USA
| | - Crystal Krause
- Center for Advanced Surgical Technology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Medical Center, 986246, Omaha, NE, 68198-6246, USA
| | | | - Ka-Chun Siu
- Center for Advanced Surgical Technology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Medical Center, 986246, Omaha, NE, 68198-6246, USA.,College of Allied Health Professions, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Medical Center, 984420, Omaha, NE, 68198-4420, USA
| | - Dmitry Oleynikov
- Center for Advanced Surgical Technology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Medical Center, 986246, Omaha, NE, 68198-6246, USA. .,Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Medical Center, 986245, Omaha, NE, 68198-6245, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rusch P, Ind T, Kimmig R, Maggioni A, Ponce J, Zanagnolo V, Coronado PJ, Verguts J, Lambaudie E, Falconer H, Collins JW, Verheijen RHM. Recommendations for a standardised educational program in robot assisted gynaecological surgery: Consensus from the Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS). Facts Views Vis Obgyn 2019; 11:29-41. [PMID: 31695855 PMCID: PMC6822956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Society of European Robotic Gynaecological Surgery (SERGS) aims at developing a European consensus on core components of a curriculum for training and assessment in robot assisted gynaecological surgery. METHODS A Delphi process was initiated among a panel of 12 experts in robot assisted surgery invited through the SERGS. An online questionnaire survey was based on a literature search for standards in education in gynaecological robot assisted surgery. The survey was performed in three consecutive rounds to reach optimal consensus. The results of this survey were discussed by the panel and led to consensus recommendations on 39 issues, adhering to general principles of medical education. RESULTS On review there appeared to be no accredited training programs in Europe, and few in the USA. Recommendations for requirements of training centres, educational tools and assessment of proficiency varied widely. Stepwise and structured training together with validated assessment based on competencies rather than on volume emerged as prerequisites for adequate and safe learning. An appropriate educational environment and tools for training were defined. Although certification should be competence based, the panel recommended additional volume based criteria for both accreditation of training centres and certification of individual surgeons. CONCLUSIONS Consensus was reached on minimum criteria for training in robot assisted gynaecological surgery. To transfer results into clinical practice, experts recommended a curriculum and guidelines that have now been endorsed by SERGS to be used to establish training programmes for robot assisted surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Rusch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Duisburg-Essen; Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany. .
| | - T Ind
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, The Royal Marsden, London, UK;,St George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Blackshaw Road, Tooting, London,
| | - R Kimmig
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Duisburg-Essen; Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany. .
| | - A Maggioni
- Division of Gynaecology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti, 435,
20141 Milano, Italy. .
| | - J Ponce
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, c/ Feixa Llarga, sn, 08907 L’ Hospitalet de Llobregat. Barcelona, Spain.
| | - V Zanagnolo
- Division of Gynaecology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti, 435,
20141 Milano, Italy. .
| | - PJ Coronado
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Avda. de Séneca, 2, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
| | - J Verguts
- Division of Gynaecology, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti, 435,
20141 Milano, Italy. . ;,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospitals Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;,Department of
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jessa Hospital, 3500 Hasselt, Belgium,
| | - E Lambaudie
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Oscar Lambret, 3 Rue Frédéric Combemale, 59000 Lille, France;,Aix Marseille Université, Site Timone, Timone 27, boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille cedex 5, France.
| | - H Falconer
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet/University Hospital, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - JW Collins
- Department of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Solna, D1:01 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - RHM Verheijen
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, UMCU Cancer Center,
University Medical Center, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rapoport LM, Bezrukov EA, Tsarichenko DG, Martirosyan GA, Sukhanov RB, Krupinov GE, Slusarenco RI, Morozov AO, Avakyan SK, Sargsyan NA. [Methods for training of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy]. Khirurgiia (Mosk) 2019:89-94. [PMID: 30789615 DOI: 10.17116/hirurgia201901189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Robotic surgery is a future method of minimal invasive surgery. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a common method of surgical treatment of prostate cancer. Due to significant differences of the surgical technique of RARP compared to open or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) new methods of training are needed. At the moment there are many opinions how to train physicians best. Which model is the most effective one remains nowadays controversial. OBJECTIVE Analyze currently available data of training methods of RARP. Determine the most effective training model and evaluate its advantages and disadvantages. Establish a standardized plan and criteria for proper training and certification of the entire surgical team. MATERIAL AND METHODS Literature review based on PubMed database, Web of Science and Scopus by keywords: robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, training of robot-assisted prostatectomy, training in robot-assisted operations, a learning curve of robot-assisted prostatectomy, virtual reality simulators (VR-simulators) in surgery. RESULTS According to the literature in average 18 to 45 procedures are required for a surgeon to achieve the plateau of the learning curve of the RARP. Parallel training, pre-operative warm-up and the use of virtual reality simulators (VR-simulators) can significantly increase the learning curve. There are many described models of RARP training. CONCLUSIONS The absence of accepted criteria of evaluation of the learning curve does not allow to use this parameter as a guide for the surgeon's experience. Proper training of robotic surgeons is necessary and requires new methods of training. There are different types of training programs. In our opinion the most effective training program is when a surgeon observes the performance of tasks or any steps of operation on the VR-simulator, then he performs them and analyzes mistakes by video recording. Then the surgeon observes real operations and performs some steps of the operation which are already leant on the simulator under supervision of the mentor and analyzes mistakes by video recording. Thus, mastering first the simple stages under supervision of a mentor, the surgeon effectively adopts the surgical experience from him. It is necessary to train not only the surgeons but also the entire surgical team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Rapoport
- Research Institute of Uronephrology and Human Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - E A Bezrukov
- University clinic of Urology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - D G Tsarichenko
- University clinic of Urology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - G A Martirosyan
- Research Institute of Uronephrology and Human Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - R B Sukhanov
- University clinic of Urology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - G E Krupinov
- University clinic of Urology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - R I Slusarenco
- University clinic of Urology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - A O Morozov
- Research Institute of Uronephrology and Human Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - S K Avakyan
- University clinic of Urology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - N A Sargsyan
- University clinic of Urology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hvolbek AP, Nilsson PM, Sanguedolce F, Lund L. A prospective study of the effect of video games on robotic surgery skills using the high-fidelity virtual reality RobotiX simulator. ADVANCES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION AND PRACTICE 2019; 10:627-634. [PMID: 31616197 PMCID: PMC6699361 DOI: 10.2147/amep.s199323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2018] [Accepted: 06/15/2019] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted surgery is a growing field. Prior video game experience might give advantage to novice robotic surgeons. AIM Assessing if prior video gaming experience gives advantage in performing high-fidelity virtual reality (VR)-simulated robotic surgery. METHODS In this observational study, 30 medical students and 2 interns (17 females; 15 males) with median age 25 years (range, 24-26 years) were recruited and subsequently divided into groups according to prior gaming experience; gamers (≥6 video game hours/week) vs nongamers (<6 video game hours/week). Participants performed VR-simulated urethrovesical anastomosis on RobotiX Mentor, which measured performance parameters. Participants answered a questionnaire for demographics and gaming experience. Groups were compared using Mann-Whitney U and multiple regression. RESULTS Gamers significantly outperformed nongamers in 3 of 24 performance metrics (p<0.05), and there was a trend toward better results for 7 of the 21 remaining metrics. Males outperformed females in 5 of 24 metrics (p<0.05) but were overrepresented among gamers. CONCLUSION Prior video game experience >6 hrs/week might give advantage in simulated robotic surgery. We recommend future studies testing this hypothesis to develop simulator programs for certification of robotic surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Philip Mørkeberg Nilsson
- Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen and the Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Lars Lund
- Department of Urology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Urology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Correspondence: Lars LundDepartment of Urology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsloew Vej 4, Entrance 20, Penthouse, 2. Floor, OdenseC DK-5000, DenmarkTel +45 5 140 8982Email
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Shim JS, Noh TI, Kim JY, Pyun JH, Cho S, Oh MM, Kang SH, Cheon J, Lee JG, Kim JJ, Kang SG. Predictive Validation of a Robotic Virtual Reality Simulator: The Tube 3 module for Practicing Vesicourethral Anastomosis in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Urology 2018; 122:32-36. [PMID: 30144481 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2018] [Revised: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To predict actual performance in real surgery when vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) is performed in patients after Tube 3 module training of robot-naive surgeons. METHODS Forty-five patients were enrolled and divided into 3 groups according to chronological trends (each containing 15 patients). Three robot-naive surgeons in a single center completed VUA in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) following robotic virtual reality simulator (RVRS) training. The practicing tool used in robotic virtual reality simulator was Tube 3, which was invented for the dV-Trainer that imitates a VUA in RARP. The effects of performance were investigated by analyzing the number of repetitions and the time required to complete the task until achieving the predetermined proficiency level. RESULTS The targeted time (predetermined proficiency level) for completing tasks of Tube 3 and the number of required task repetitions to achieve the proficiency level were 283.1 s and 36 times, respectively, whereas in actual VUA procedures, the number of required attempts was 24, with an average time of 14.9 minutes. The mean time for completing VUA in real surgery significantly decreased with serial cases among all surgeons (1-15 vs 16-30 vs 31-45 cases, P <.001), as well as comparisons between groups (P <.001). CONCLUSION The Tube 3 module can represent a valuable educational tool for procedure-specific robotic training by bridging the gap between safe acquisition of surgical skills and effective performance during actual VUA in RARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Sung Shim
- Department of Urology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Il Noh
- Department of Urology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Yoon Kim
- Department of Urology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Hyun Pyun
- Department of Urology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok Cho
- Department of Urology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi Mi Oh
- Department of Urology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok Ho Kang
- Department of Urology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jun Cheon
- Department of Urology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Gu Lee
- Department of Urology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Je Jong Kim
- Department of Urology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Gu Kang
- Department of Urology, Korea University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Malukhin K, Ehmann K. Mathematical Modeling and Virtual Reality Simulation of Surgical Tool Interactions With Soft Tissue: A Review and Prospective. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018. [DOI: 10.1115/1.4039417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
This is an informed assessment of the state of the art and an extensive inventory of modeling approaches and methods for soft tissue/medical cutting tool interaction and of the associated medical processes and phenomena. Modeling and simulation through numerical, theoretical, computational, experimental, and other methods was discussed in comprehensive review sections each of which is concluded with a plausible prospective discussion biased toward the development of so-called virtual reality (VR) simulator environments. The finalized prospective section reflects on the future demands in the area of soft tissue cutting modeling and simulation mostly from a conceptual angle with emphasis on VR development requirements including real-time VR simulator response, cost-effective “close-to-reality” VR implementations, and other demands. The review sections that serve as the basis for the suggested prospective needs are categorized based on: (1) Major VR simulator applications including virtual surgery education, training, operation planning, intraoperative simulation, image-guided surgery, etc. and VR simulator types, e.g., generic, patient-specific and surgery-specific and (2) Available numerical, theoretical, and computational methods in terms of robustness, time effectiveness, computational cost, error control, and accuracy of modeling of certain types of virtual surgical interventions and their experimental validation, geared toward ethically driven artificial “phantom” tissue-based approaches. Digital data processing methods used in modeling of various feedback modalities in VR environments are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kostyantyn Malukhin
- McCormick School of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Department, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208 e-mail:
| | - Kornel Ehmann
- Fellow ASME McCormick School of Engineering, Mechanical Engineering Department, Northwestern University, 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208 e-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alsalamah A, Campo R, Tanos V, Grimbizis G, Van Belle Y, Hood K, Pugh N, Amso N. Face and content validity of the virtual reality simulator 'ScanTrainer®'. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 14:18. [PMID: 28959176 PMCID: PMC5596038 DOI: 10.1186/s10397-017-1020-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2017] [Accepted: 08/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Ultrasonography is a first-line imaging in the investigation of women’s irregular bleeding and other gynaecological pathologies, e.g. ovarian cysts and early pregnancy problems. However, teaching ultrasound, especially transvaginal scanning, remains a challenge for health professionals. New technology such as simulation may potentially facilitate and expedite the process of learning ultrasound. Simulation may prove to be realistic, very close to real patient scanning experience for the sonographer and objectively able to assist the development of basic skills such as image manipulation, hand-eye coordination and examination technique. Objective The aim of this study was to determine the face and content validity of a virtual reality simulator (ScanTrainer®, MedaPhor plc, Cardiff, Wales, UK) as reflective of real transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) scanning. Method A questionnaire with 14 simulator-related statements was distributed to a number of participants with differing levels of sonography experience in order to determine the level of agreement between the use of the simulator in training and real practice. Results There were 36 participants: novices (n = 25) and experts (n = 11) who rated the simulator. Median scores of face validity statements between experts and non-experts using a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS) ratings ranged between 7.5 and 9.0 (p > 0.05) indicated a high level of agreement. Experts’ median scores of content validity statements ranged from 8.4 to 9.0. Conclusions The findings confirm that the simulator has the feel and look of real-time scanning with high face validity. Similarly, its tutorial structures and learning steps confirm the content validity. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s10397-017-1020-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amal Alsalamah
- School of Medicine, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Office 220, 45 Salisbury road, Cathays, Cardiff, CF24 4AB UK
| | - Rudi Campo
- European Academy of Gynaecological Surgery, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Gregoris Grimbizis
- First Department Obstetrics/Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Yves Van Belle
- European Academy of Gynaecological Surgery, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kerenza Hood
- Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical & Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Neil Pugh
- Department of Medical Physics and Radiology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK
| | - Nazar Amso
- School of Medicine, College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Office 220, 45 Salisbury road, Cathays, Cardiff, CF24 4AB UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW There has been a rapid and widespread adoption of the robotic surgical system with a lag in the development of a comprehensive training and credentialing framework. A literature search on robotic surgical training techniques and benchmarks was conducted to provide an evidence-based road map for the development of a robotic surgical skills for the novice robotic surgeon. RECENT FINDINGS A structured training curriculum is suggested incorporating evidence-based training techniques and benchmarks for progress. This usually involves sequential progression from observation, case assisting, acquisition of basic robotic skills in the dry and wet lab setting along with achievement of individual and team-based non-technical skills, modular console training under supervision, and finally independent practice. Robotic surgical training must be based on demonstration of proficiency and safety in executing basic robotic skills and procedural tasks prior to independent practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin N. Sridhar
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, University College London, London, UK
| | - Tim P. Briggs
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - John D. Kelly
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, University College London, London, UK
| | - Senthil Nathan
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Cancer, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Moglia A, Perrone V, Ferrari V, Morelli L, Boggi U, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A. Influence of videogames and musical instruments on performances at a simulator for robotic surgery. MINIM INVASIV THER 2016; 26:129-134. [PMID: 27981866 DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2016.1267018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess if exposure to videogames, musical instrument playing, or both influence the psychomotor skills level, assessed by a virtual reality simulator for robot-assisted surgery (RAS). MATERIALS AND METHODS A cohort of 57 medical students were recruited: playing musical instruments (group 1), videogames (group 2), both (group 3), and no activity (group 4); all students executed four exercises on a virtual simulator for RAS. RESULTS Subjects from group 3 achieved the best performances on overall score: 527.09 ± 130.54 vs. 493.73 ± 108.88 (group 2), 472.72 ± 85.31 (group 1), and 403.13 ± 99.83 (group 4). Statistically significant differences (p < .05) between group 3 and group 4 were found for overall score (p = .009) and for time of completion (p = .044). As regards experience with the piano, subjects from group 3 outperformed those from group 1 on overall score (496.98 ± 122.71 vs. 470.25 ± 92.31), but without statistically significant difference (p = .646). CONCLUSIONS The present study suggests that the level of psychomotor skills in subjects exposed to both musical instrument playing and videogames is higher than that in those practicing either one alone. The effect of videogames appears negligible in individuals playing the piano.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Moglia
- a EndoCAS, Center for Computer Assisted Surgery , University of Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| | - Vittorio Perrone
- b Cisanello Teaching Hospital of Pisa , Pisa , Italy.,c Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery , University Hospital of Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ferrari
- a EndoCAS, Center for Computer Assisted Surgery , University of Pisa , Pisa , Italy.,d Information Engineering Department , University of Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| | - Luca Morelli
- b Cisanello Teaching Hospital of Pisa , Pisa , Italy.,c Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery , University Hospital of Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- b Cisanello Teaching Hospital of Pisa , Pisa , Italy.,c Multidisciplinary Center of Robotic Surgery , University Hospital of Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| | - Mauro Ferrari
- a EndoCAS, Center for Computer Assisted Surgery , University of Pisa , Pisa , Italy.,b Cisanello Teaching Hospital of Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| | - Franco Mosca
- a EndoCAS, Center for Computer Assisted Surgery , University of Pisa , Pisa , Italy.,b Cisanello Teaching Hospital of Pisa , Pisa , Italy
| | - Alfred Cuschieri
- e Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna of Pisa , Pisa , Italy.,f Institute for Medical Science and Technology, University of Dundee , Dundee , UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Arcerito M, Changchien E, Bernal O, Konkoly-Thege A, Moon J. Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Technique and Early Experience. Am Surg 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/000313481608201035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair has been shown to have multiple advantages compared with open repair such as less postoperative pain and earlier resume of daily activities with a comparable recurrence rate. We speculate robotic inguinal hernia repair may yield equivalent benefits, while providing the surgeon added dexterity. One hundred consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repairs with mesh were performed with a mean age of 56 years (25–96). Fifty-six unilateral hernias and 22 bilateral hernias were repaired amongst 62 males and 16 females. Polypropylene mesh was used for reconstruction. All but, two patients were completed robotically. Mean operative time was 52 minutes per hernia repair (45–67). Five patients were admitted overnight based on their advanced age. Regular diet was resumed immediately. Postoperative pain was minimal and regular activity was achieved after an average of four days. One patient recurred after three months in our earlier experience and he was repaired robotically. Mean follow-up time was 12 months. These data, compared with laparoscopic approach, suggest similar recurrence rates and postoperative pain. We believe comparative studies with laparoscopic approach need to be performed to assess the role robotic surgery has in the treatment of inguinal hernia repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Arcerito
- University of California Riverside, Riverside, California
- Department of Surgery, Mission Surgical Clinic, Riverside, California
| | - Eric Changchien
- University of California Riverside, Riverside, California
- Department of Surgery, Mission Surgical Clinic, Riverside, California
| | - Oscar Bernal
- Riverside Community Hospital, Riverside, California
| | | | - John Moon
- University of California Riverside, Riverside, California
- Department of Surgery, Mission Surgical Clinic, Riverside, California
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
|
20
|
Robotic surgery simulation validity and usability comparative analysis. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:3720-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4667-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2015] [Accepted: 11/06/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
21
|
A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery. Eur Urol 2015; 69:1065-80. [PMID: 26433570 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 153] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT No single large published randomized controlled trial (RCT) has confirmed the efficacy of virtual simulators in the acquisition of skills to the standard required for safe clinical robotic surgery. This remains the main obstacle for the adoption of these virtual simulators in surgical residency curricula. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the level of evidence in published studies on the efficacy of training on virtual simulators for robotic surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION In April 2015 a literature search was conducted on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the Clinical Trials Database (US) and the Meta Register of Controlled Trials. All publications were scrutinized for relevance to the review and for assessment of the levels of evidence provided using the classification developed by the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The publications included in the review consisted of one RCT and 28 cohort studies on validity, and seven RCTs and two cohort studies on skills transfer from virtual simulators to robot-assisted surgery. Simulators were rated good for realism (face validity) and for usefulness as a training tool (content validity). However, the studies included used various simulation training methodologies, limiting the assessment of construct validity. The review confirms the absence of any consensus on which tasks and metrics are the most effective for the da Vinci Skills Simulator and dV-Trainer, the most widely investigated systems. Although there is consensus for the RoSS simulator, this is based on only two studies on construct validity involving four exercises. One study on initial evaluation of an augmented reality module for partial nephrectomy using the dV-Trainer reported high correlation (r=0.8) between in vivo porcine nephrectomy and a virtual renorrhaphy task according to the overall Global Evaluation Assessment of Robotic Surgery (GEARS) score. In one RCT on skills transfer, the experimental group outperformed the control group, with a significant difference in overall GEARS score (p=0.012) during performance of urethrovesical anastomosis on an inanimate model. Only one study included assessment of a surgical procedure on real patients: subjects trained on a virtual simulator outperformed the control group following traditional training. However, besides the small numbers, this study was not randomized. CONCLUSIONS There is an urgent need for a large, well-designed, preferably multicenter RCT to study the efficacy of virtual simulation for acquisition competence in and safe execution of clinical robotic-assisted surgery. PATIENT SUMMARY We reviewed the literature on virtual simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Validity studies used various simulation training methodologies. It is not clear which exercises and metrics are the most effective in distinguishing different levels of experience on the da Vinci robot. There is no reported evidence of skills transfer from simulation to clinical surgery on real patients.
Collapse
|
22
|
Bric JD, Lumbard DC, Frelich MJ, Gould JC. Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:2169-78. [PMID: 26304107 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4517-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2015] [Accepted: 08/06/2015] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Worldwide, the annual number of robotic surgical procedures continues to increase. Robotic surgical skills are unique from those used in either open or laparoscopic surgery. The acquisition of a basic robotic surgical skill set may be best accomplished in the simulation laboratory. We sought to review the current literature pertaining to the use of virtual reality (VR) simulation in the acquisition of robotic surgical skills on the da Vinci Surgical System. MATERIALS AND METHODS A PubMed search was conducted between December 2014 and January 2015 utilizing the following keywords: virtual reality, robotic surgery, da Vinci, da Vinci skills simulator, SimSurgery Educational Platform, Mimic dV-Trainer, and Robotic Surgery Simulator. Articles were included if they were published between 2007 and 2015, utilized VR simulation for the da Vinci Surgical System, and utilized a commercially available VR platform. RESULTS The initial search criteria returned 227 published articles. After all inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, a total of 47 peer-reviewed manuscripts were included in the final review. CONCLUSIONS There are many benefits to utilizing VR simulation for robotic skills acquisition. Four commercially available simulators have been demonstrated to be capable of assessing robotic skill. Three of the four simulators demonstrate the ability of a VR training curriculum to improve basic robotic skills, with proficiency-based training being the most effective training style. The skills obtained on a VR training curriculum are comparable with those obtained on dry laboratory simulation. The future of VR simulation includes utilization in assessment for re-credentialing purposes, advanced procedural-based training, and as a warm-up tool prior to surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin D Bric
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Derek C Lumbard
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Matthew J Frelich
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA
| | - Jon C Gould
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W. Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Hung AJ, Shah SH, Dalag L, Shin D, Gill IS. Development and Validation of a Novel Robotic Procedure Specific Simulation Platform: Partial Nephrectomy. J Urol 2015; 194:520-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.2949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/11/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J. Hung
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, California
| | - Swar H. Shah
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, California
| | - Leonard Dalag
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel Shin
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, California
| | - Inderbir S. Gill
- Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hanzly MI, Al-Tartir T, Raza SJ, Khan A, Durrani MM, Fiorica T, Ginsberg P, Mohler JL, Kuvshinoff B, Guru KA. Simulation-Based Training in Robot-Assisted Surgery: Current Evidence of Value and Potential Trends for the Future. Curr Urol Rep 2015; 16:41. [DOI: 10.1007/s11934-015-0508-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
25
|
Teishima J, Hattori M, Inoue S, Ikeda K, Hieda K, Ohara S, Egi H, Ohdan H, Matsubara A. Retention of robot-assisted surgical skills in urological surgeons acquired using Mimic dV-Trainer. Can Urol Assoc J 2014; 8:E493-7. [PMID: 25132896 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We assess the retention of robot-assisted surgical skills among urologic surgeons. METHODS The robot-assisted surgery skills of 20 urologic surgeons were assessed using a Mimic dV-Trainer program (Mimic Technologies, Inc., Seattle, WA) consisting of 6 tasks. These 20 surgeons had no previous experience either using the Mimic dV-Trainer or acting as the main surgeon in robot-assisted surgery. The surgeons completed the program 4 times in a row; after 1 year, they completed it again for a fifth time. Performance scores were recorded using the Mimic dV-Trainer's built-in algorithm. RESULTS For all 6 tasks, there were significant improvements to the scores in the fourth trials compared with those in the first trials. The scores in the fifth trials did not significantly decline compared with those in the fourth trials. There was no significant difference between the fifth trial scores of surgeons with laparoscopic surgery skills/experience and those without. CONCLUSION Our results indicate that fundamental robot-assisted surgical skills can be retained in the long-term after they are acquired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Teishima
- Department of Urology, Integrated Health Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Minoru Hattori
- Advanced Medical SkillsTraining Center, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Shogo Inoue
- Department of Urology, Integrated Health Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Ikeda
- Department of Urology, Integrated Health Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Keisuke Hieda
- Department of Urology, Integrated Health Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Shinya Ohara
- Department of Urology, Integrated Health Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Egi
- Advanced Medical SkillsTraining Center, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan; ; Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hideki Ohdan
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Akio Matsubara
- Department of Urology, Integrated Health Sciences, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Smith R, Truong M, Perez M. Comparative analysis of the functionality of simulators of the da Vinci surgical robot. Surg Endosc 2014; 29:972-83. [PMID: 25125099 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3748-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2013] [Accepted: 07/10/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implementation of robotic technology in minimally invasive surgery has led to the need to develop more efficient and effective training methods, as well as assessment and skill maintenance tools for surgical education. Multiple simulators and procedures are available for educational and training purposes. A need for comparative evaluations of these simulators exists to aid users in selecting an appropriate device for their purposes. METHODS We conducted an objective review and comparison of the design and capabilities of all dedicated simulators of the da Vinci robot, the da Vinci Skill Simulator (DVSS) (Intuitive Surgical Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA), dV-Trainer (dVT) (Mimic Technologies Inc., Seattle, WA, USA), and Robotic Surgery Simulator (RoSS) (Simulated Surgical Skills, LLC, Williamsville, NY, USA). This provides base specifications of the hardware and software, with an emphasis on the training capabilities of each system. RESULTS Each simulator contains a large number of training exercises, DVSS = 40, dVT = 65, and RoSS = 52 for skills development. All three offer 3D visual images but use different display technologies. The DVSS leverages the real robotic surgeon's console to provide visualization, hand controls, and foot pedals. The dVT and RoSS created simulated versions of all of these control systems. They include systems management services which allow instructors to collect, export, and analyze the scores of students using the simulators. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to provide comparative information of the three simulators functional capabilities with an emphasis on their educational skills. They offer unique advantages and capabilities in training robotic surgeons. Each device has been the subject of multiple validation experiments which have been published in the literature. But those do not provide specific details on the capabilities of the simulators which are necessary for an understanding sufficient to select the one best suited for an organization's needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roger Smith
- Florida Hospital Nicholson Center, 404 Celebration Place, Celebration, FL, 34747, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|