An ex vivo model in human femoral heads for histopathological study and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant primary stability

Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Quality: Correlation Between Histomorphometric Analysis and Lekholm and Zarb Classification

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the bone quality of the maxilla and mandible by using the classification proposed by Lekholm and Zarb (L & Z) and histomorphometry.

METHODS

Sixty edentulous areas were evaluated. The classification by L & Z was obtained through the evaluation of periapical and panoramic radiographs associated with the surgeon's tactile perception during milling and implant installation. Before implant installation, bone biopsies of standardized sizes were performed for histological evaluation.

RESULTS

Type III bone quality was more frequent in the posterior (73.33%) and anterior (73.33%) maxilla, whereas type II bone quality was more frequent in the posterior (53.33%) and anterior (60.00%) mandible. Through histometry, statistical difference was observed for the amount of bone tissue of the posterior region of the maxilla in relation to the anterior and posterior regions of the mandible (P ≤ 0.043). However, there was no difference in osteocyte counts between alveolar regions (P = 0.2946). In the female gender, the age showed a low positive correlation with the L & Z classification (rho = 0.398; P = 0.006) and in the male gender, a moderate negative correlation was observed (rho = -0.650, P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Both methods detected differences in the bone quality of the alveolar regions of the maxilla/mandible and that the classification by L & Z is a reliable method, since it was consistent with histomorphometry, considered the "gold standard" method for the evaluation of bone quality and greater bone density was observed in older men.

The effects of intraperitoneal metoprolol administration on healing of bone defects in rat tibia: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES

Metoprolol is a cardioselective competitive beta-1 adrenergic receptor antagonist with antihypertensive properties, devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Various studies have suggested the effect of beta-blockers on bone remodeling. We aimed to investigate whether metoprolol affects bone remodeling by altering anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory cytokines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Surgical defects of 3 mm diameter were created in tibiae of 72 Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats were randomly assigned to a control group without metoprolol treatment (n = 36), and a test group treated with 0.1 mg/kg/day metoprolol (n = 36). Six rats from each group were sacrificed at days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14. The percentages of cells, which showed positive immunohistochemical staining for IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and RANKL, were assessed in the defect area. Differences in percentages of stained cells within each of the test and control groups over various time intervals were tested using one-way ANOVA test. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

No significant differences in IL-1β, IL-10, IL-6, and RANKL expressions were found between test and control groups at the same interval. Significant reduction was observed at different time intervals in the same group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Metoprolol did not reduce bone-active cytokine: IL-1β, IL-6, and RANKL. It also did not elevate IL-10 expression levels. Thus, it does not appear to decrease osteoclastogenesis.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Results from this animal model help us understand any effect of metoprolol on bone healing by potential contribution to different real-world clinical research.

Monitoring the Changes of Material Properties at Bone-Implant Interface during the Healing Process In Vivo: A Viscoelastic Investigation

The aim of this study was to monitor the changes of viscoelastic properties at bone-implant interface via resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and the Periotest device during the healing process in an experimental rabbit model. Twenty-four dental implants were inserted into the femoral condyles of rabbits. The animals were sacrificed immediately after implant installation or on day 14, 28, or 56 after surgery. Viscoelastic properties at bone-implant interface were evaluated by measuring the implant stability quotient (ISQ) using RFA and by measuring the Periotest values (PTVs) using the Periotest device. The bone/implant specimens were evaluated histopathologically and histomorphometrically to determine the degree of osseointegration (BIC%). The BIC% values at different time points were then compared with the corresponding ISQ values and PTVs. The mean ISQ value increased gradually and reached 81 ± 1.7 on day 56, whereas the mean PTV decreased over time, finally reaching −0.7 ± 0.5 on day 56. Significant correlations were found between ISQ and BIC% (r = 0.701, p < 0.001), PTV and BIC% (r = −0.637, p < 0.05), and ISQ and PTV (r = −0.68, p < 0.05). These results show that there is a positive correlation between implant stability parameters and peri-implant-bone healing, indicating that the RFA and Periotest are useful for measuring changes of viscoelastic properties at bone-implant interface and are reliable for indirectly predicting the degree of osseointegration.

Factors Affecting Dental Implant Stability Measured Using the Ostell Mentor Device: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to review the literature on factors that may affect dental implant stability as measured with the Ostell mentor device.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed in Pubmed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases using dental implants, stability, and resonance frequency analysis as key words.

RESULTS

The most relevant randomized controlled trials and clinical trials (n = 39) were selected from among 264 articles.

CONCLUSIONS

Many factors can affect dental implant stability as measured with the Ostell mentor device. This may be a useful instrument for deciding the timing of implant loading, but additional research is required to establish the reliability and predictability of resonance frequency analysis for the future osseointegration of dental implants, which remains controversial.

Influence of the Localization of Frontal Bone Defects on Primary Stability Values of 2 Different Implant Designs: An In Vitro Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of different frontal bone defect localizations on primary stability values of 2 different implant designs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight cow rib segments were prepared before implant installation, as 2 segments with coronal, 2 with middle, and 2 with apical defects and 2 with control. Thirty-two cylindrical and 32 tapered implants were placed in the remaining 4 segments. Implant stability measurements were performed using electronic percussive testing and resonance frequency analysis.

RESULTS

No significance was detected between the stability values of the 2 implant designs except the implant stability quotient (ISQ) of control groups. The tapered implants control group showed significantly higher lateral ISQs compared with cylindrical implants (P = 0.033). For both implant types, stability values were significantly lower in coronal defects (P < 0.01). No significant differences were detected in other defect types.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, it may be concluded that coronal defects may influence primary stability negatively, compared with middle and apical defects. Although statistically not significant, coronal defects caused lower primary stability values with the tapered design compared with parallel design.