The efficacy of nebulized furosemide and salbutamol compared with salbutamol alone in reactive airway disease: a double blind randomized, clinical trial

Nebulized medications in the emergency department: A narrative review of nontraditional agents

PURPOSE

This article summarizes emerging nontraditional therapies administered via the nebulization route for use in the emergency department (ED).

SUMMARY

Although traditional routes of medication administration (eg, intravenous) have been the mainstay of administration modalities for decades, these routes may not be appropriate for all patients. Nowhere is this more readily apparent than in the ED setting, where patients with a variety of presentations receive care. One unique route for medication administration that has increasingly gained popularity in the ED is that of aerosolized drug delivery. This route holds promise as direct delivery of medications to the site of action could yield a more rapid and effective therapeutic response while also minimizing systemic adverse effects by utilizing a fraction of the systemic dose. Medication administration via nebulization also provides an alternative that is conducive to rapid, less invasive access, which is advantageous in the emergent setting of the ED. This review is intended to analyze the existing literature regarding this route of administration, including the nuances that can impact drug efficacy, as well as the available literature regarding novel, noncommercial nebulized medication therapy given in the ED.

CONCLUSION

Multiple medications have been investigated for administration via this route, and when implementing any of these therapies several practical considerations must be taken into account, from medication preparation to administration, to ensure optimal efficacy while minimizing adverse effects. The pharmacist is an essential bedside team member in these scenarios to assist with navigating unique and complex nuances of this therapy as they develop.

Effects of inhaled furosemide on dyspnea and pulmonary function in people with COPD: A literature review

PURPOSE

To determine whether inhaled furosemide can be effectively used in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to improve feelings of dyspnea and improve pulmonary function values.

METHODS

This literature review was conducted using randomized control trials and a literature review in which the participants consisted of or included patients with COPD receiving inhaled furosemide as a potential treatment option for their dyspnea and low pulmonary function values.

RESULTS

Searches in four databases and secondary sources using five key terms yielded 83 unduplicated articles. Ultimately, four studies, one of which was a literature review, were included which studied the short-term result of inhaled furosemide on dyspnea and pulmonary function values. All studies measured dyspnea as an outcome and three found a statistically significant improvement in patient reported symptoms. Pulmonary function values were measured in all studies which all found improvements.

CONCLUSION

The effect of inhaled furosemide on the dyspnea and pulmonary function values in people with COPD remains uncertain, and questions have emerged regarding the long-term impact on these patients. While this therapy is promising for dyspnea relief and improvement of pulmonary function values in people with COPD, further consideration and additional data still need to be gathered.

Efficiency of Nebulizing Furosemide in the Treatment of Chronic Pulmonary Obstructive Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most common chronic illnesses in humans. Among both oral and intravenous diuretics, nebulizing furosemide (Lasix) is the most commonly used agent. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the therapeutic effects of nebulizing furosemide compared with placebo in the treatment of COPD using a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This review was performed based on the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) protocol. The databases of Web of Science, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus were independently searched by two researchers using MeSH keywords. Studies published between 2002 and 2018 in different parts of the world were considered. The meta-analysis was performed through STATA 14 software and the heterogeneity was assessed using Q statistic or I² index.

RESULTS

From 40 selected articles, 8 articles were finally included in the systematic review process. The analyses were performed considering two groups; nebulizing furosemide treatment (i.e. case) and placebo (i.e. control). Based on the forest plots, the average values of PaCO₂ were 48.3 (39.04-57.56) and 46.56 (39.94-53.18) in the case and control groups, respectively. Also, the mean forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) was 49 (31.32-66.67) and 46.87 (31.44-62.30) in the case and control groups, respectively. Meta-regression analysis showed that both heart and pulse rates in the nebulizing furosemide group decreased by increasing the year of study and sample size (P <0.001). The heterogeneity among the studies was found to be 72.2%, which is classified as severe heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

nebulizing furosemide can improve and normalize the vital signs and other respiratory variables in patients with COPD.

Combination adjunctive nebulized furosemide and salbutamol versus single agent therapy in COPD patients: A randomized controlled trial

Background

COPD patients often require multiple therapies to enhance their lung function and reduce their symptoms in exacerbations. This study aimed to investigate the relative effects of combination adjunctive nebulized furosemide and salbutamol therapy versus single agent treatment in COPD patients.

Methods

Sixty-nine COPD patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first group (G1, 34 cases) received salbutamol in their first episode. The second group (G2, 35 cases) received furosemide in their first episode. Spirometry indices (FEV1, FVC, and FEV1/FVC), mMRC and BORG (COPD assessment) were assessed and recorded for all patients.To study the efficacy of combination adjunctive therapy, in 2nd episodes, the nebulized furosemide was added to nebulized salbutamol in the G1, and nebulized salbutamol was added to nebulized furosemide in G2. The aforementioned indices were then re-assessed.

Results

The mean age was (64.92 ± 11.71 years, 55% males. The use of nebulized furosemide and salbutamol as single agents slightly improved the spirometeric parameters, but it was not noteworthy compared to the significant improvement of the FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, mMRC, and Borg parameters with combination therapy (p-value< 0.001). In the first episode, there was no difference in spirometeric indices, between groups (p-value > 0.1), so furosemide is considered as effective as nebulized salbutamol. Also, the results of sequential drugs administration, in the two groups was similar.

Conclusion

Conjunction of nebulized furosemide and salbutamol is more effective than single therapy and can be considered as preferred drug regimen without any reported side effect in the treatment of COPD.

Subdiuretic dose of furosemide enhances albuterol effects in asthmatic mice rather than bumetanide

BACKGROUND

One of the loop diuretics, furosemide, was found useful in bronchial asthma. It enhanced anti-asthmatic effects of albuterol. The underlying mechanism is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study was planned to investigate whether the enhancing effect of furosemide for albuterol in ovalbumin-induced asthmatic BALB/c mice is diuretic-related or not.

METHODS

Two sets of experiments were performed. In the first, effects of inhaled subdiuretic doses of furosemide and bumetanide (another loop diuretic) were compared. Treatments (mg/mL) were given as 15 minute-inhalation before final ovalbumin provocation as follows: albuterol (2.5), furosemide (0.08), bumetanide (0.005), (albuterol+furosemide, 2.5+0.08), and (albuterol+bumetanide, 2.5+0.005). Airway hyperreactivity (AHR) to inhaled methacholine, levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and differential white blood cells in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF), and lung histopathology were evaluated. In the second set, effects of oral diuretic doses (mg/kg) of furosemide (10) and bumetanide (0.25) were given before final ovalbumin provocation. Urine volume and asthma parameters were measured.

RESULTS

Ovalbumin-asthmatic mice showed significant increases in AHR, levels of IL-6, TNF-α, and inflammatory cells in BALF, and lung inflammatory cell infiltration. Inhaled furosemide significantly decreased these changes while inhaled bumetanide failed. Albuterol and albuterol+bumetanide significantly decreased these changes more than furosemide while albuterol+furosemide produced the most significant decreases. Both oral furosemide and bumetanide exerted equivalent diuretic effects but failed to improve asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Inhaled subdiuretic dose of furosemide enhanced effects of albuterol more in ovalbumin-asthmatic mice rather than bumetanide, while oral diuretic doses of both drugs failed to improve asthma, indicating that this enhancing effect is not diuretic-related.