Volume change and liver parenchymal signal intensity in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging after portal vein embolization prior to hepatectomy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:684754. [PMID: 25302304 PMCID: PMC4180892 DOI: 10.1155/2014/684754]

EFFICIENCY PORTAL VEIN X-RAY VASCULAR EMBOLIZATION IN EXTENDED HEPATIC RESECTION

Relevance. To evaluate the effectiveness of X-ray endovascular embolization of the portal vein branch in terms of preparation for extensive liver resections.  Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of 74 right-sided hemihepatectomies performed in one stage (classical, n = 54) or in two stages (X-ray endovascular embolization of the right portal vein followed by liver resection was performed, n = 20).

Results. X-ray endovascular embolization of the right portal vein was accompanied by a significant increase in the planned liver remainder by an average of 37.3 %. This made it possible to reduce the volume of intraoperative blood loss, the incidence of postresection hepatic failure from 43.1 to 15.9 %, and postoperative mortality from 9.3 to 5.0 %.

Conclusions. Preoperative X-ray endovascular embolization of the right portal vein leads to vicarious enlargement of the left lobe of the liver. This makes it possible to reliably reduce the incidence of post-resection hepatic failure after right-sided hemihepatectomy and, accordingly, reduce the frequency of deaths.

Effects of Interventional Therapy on Liver Metastases-Measurement of Liver Volume by Abdominal Computed Tomography

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of transhepatic arterial infusion (TAI) with transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) on liver volume of patients with liver metastases, by liver volumetry using 256-slice CT (iCT 256, Philips Healthcare). Methods: A retrospective analysis of 19 patients with liver metastases, who received combination treatment of TAI with TAE, were conducted. Residual liver volumes (LV) were measured before (LV0), after the first (LV1) and the second treatment (LV2) with iCT 256. Bland-Altman method was used to evaluate the agreements of residual liver volume between two reviewers. Residual liver volume changes were compared by One-Way ANOVA. Results: For the first reviewer, LV0, LV1, LV2 were: 872.67±139.31, 960.63±143.91, 842.13±141.45 cc. LV1 > LV0, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.061). LV2 < LV0, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.013). LV2 < LV0, and the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.509). For the second reviewer, LV0, LV1, LV2 were: 909.99±135.46, 996.36±180.10, 845.70±131.632 cc. LV1 > LV0, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.083). LV2 < LV1, the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.003). LV2 < LV0, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.194). Conclusion: Combination treatment of TAI with TAE did not induce significant liver damage in patients with metastatic liver cancer, and iCT256 volumetry provided a precise measurement of liver volume and may play a critical role in the development of interventional surgery.

Portal Vein Embolization: Radiological Findings Predicting Future Liver Remnant Hypertrophy

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the radiologic findings predicting the future liver remnant hypertrophy ratio after portal vein embolization of the right branch. MATERIALS AND METHODS. The associations between the radiologic findings and the future liver remnant hypertrophy ratio for 79 patients who underwent portal vein embolization of the right branch between July 2007 and April 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Multiple linear regression was performed to adjust for potential confounders, and the volume ratio of the right lobe anterior segment, number of proximal small branches from the right anterior and posterior portal veins, transient hepatic parenchymal enhancement, portal vein invasion, and variants of main portal vein anatomy were evaluated. The potential confounders were age, ratio of future liver remnant hypertrophy to total liver volume, indocyanine green clearance rate, maximum serum total bilirubin before portal vein embolization, and history of chemotherapy. RESULTS. Statistically significant associations were found between the future liver remnant hypertrophy ratio and the number of proximal small branches from the right anterior and posterior portal veins (p < 0.001), transient hepatic parenchymal enhancement (p < 0.001), portal vein invasion (p = 0.017), and variants of main portal vein anatomy (p = 0.048). The mean future liver remnant hypertrophy rate was 51.0% (n = 16) in patients without the radiologic findings showing statistically significant differences, and 25.8% (n = 63) in patients with at least one significant finding. CONCLUSION. When added to previously reported factors, the radiologic findings identified can help determine the indications for portal vein embolization and novel strategies for major hepatectomy.

Gd-EOB-DTPA based magnetic resonance imaging for predicting liver response to portal vein embolization

AIM

To evaluate the correlation between degree of kinetic growth (kGR) of the liver following portal vein embolization (PVE) liver and the enhancement of the during the hepatobiliary phase of contrast administration and to evaluate if the enhancement can be used to predict response to PVE prior to the procedure.

METHODS

Seventeen patients were consented for the prospective study. All patients had an MR of the abdomen with Gd-EOB-DTPA. Fourteen patients underwent PVE. The correlation between the kGR of the liver and the degree of enhancement was evaluated with linear regression (strong assumptions) and Spearman’s correlation test (rank based, no assumptions). The correlation was examined for the whole liver, segments I, VIII, VII, VI, V, IV, right liver and left liver.

RESULTS

There was no correlation between the degree of enhancement during the hepatobiliary phase and kGR for any segment, lobe of the liver or whole liver (P = 0.19 to 0.91 by Spearman’s correlation test).

CONCLUSION

The relative enhancement of the liver during the hepatobiliary phase with Gd-EOB-DTPA cannot be used to predict the liver response to PVE.