Quality of life, disability, well-being, and coping strategies in patients undergoing neurosurgical procedures: preoperative results in an Italian sample

Quality of life following awake surgery depends on ability of executive function, verbal fluency, and movement

INTRODUCTION

The outcome of awake surgery has been evaluated based on functional factors, return to work, and oncological aspects, and there have been no reports directly examining QOL. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of QOL following awake surgery and to determine the functional factors influencing QOL.

METHODS

Seventy patients with WHO grade II/III gliomas were included. For the assessment of QOL, we used the SF-36 and calculated summary and sub-component scores. Three summary component scores, including physical (PCS), mental (MCS), and role/social summary (RCS) component scores, were computed based on sub-component scores. Additionally, various assessments of neurological/neuropsychological function were performed. We performed univariate and multiple regression analyses to investigate the functional factors influencing the SF-36.

RESULTS

PCS and MCS were maintained, but only RCS was low to 42.0 ± 16.1. We then focused on the RCS and its sub-components: general health (GH), role physical (RP), social functioning (SF), and role emotional (RE). Multiple regression analysis showed following significant correlations between the sub-component scores and brain functions: GH to executive function and movement (p = 0.0033 and 0.032), RP to verbal fluency and movement (p = 0.0057 and 0.0010), and RE to verbal fluency (p = 0.020). Furthermore, when the sub-component scores were compared between groups with and without functional deficits related to GH, RP, and RE, each score was significantly lower in the groups with functional deficits (p = 0.012, 0.014, and 0.0049, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who underwent awake surgery, a subset of patients had low QOL because of poor RCS. Functional factors influencing QOL included executive function, verbal fluency, and movement.

Feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinic

PURPOSE

In the cohort of patients attending pain clinic, the primary goal has been shifting from pain reduction to improving activities of daily living and functional status. The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) is one of the useful tools for assessment of functional status across all psychiatric and medical diseases; however, its feasibility, reliability, and validity have not been assessed in these patients. Thus, in this study, we evaluated the feasibility, reliability, and validity of the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients attending the pain clinic at our university hospital.

METHODS

This is a prospective observational study including the patients aged 50 years or older who were attending the pain clinic at Nara Medical University between April 2019 and May 2019. Patient-related outcomes including functional status and activities of daily living were assessed with the 12-item WHODAS 2.0, EuroQol-5 dimension 5 levels, and the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index.

RESULTS

The response rate was 99.7%. The 12-item WHODAS2.0 had a floor effect but no ceiling effect and its Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.909. The correlation coefficients between the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 score and the EuroQol-5 dimension 5 levels and the Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Gerontology Index were -0.66 and -0.67, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 12-item WHODAS 2.0 is a useful measurement tool to assess disability of pain patients with high reliability and validity.

The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2 (WHODAS 2.0): remarks on the need to revise the WHODAS

Functioning and disability are concepts in increasing use in clinical settings and in public health. From the public health perspective, the use of functioning as a third health indicator could show more than the frequency of a disease and its death rates, offering information on how the population performs its activities and participation. Clinically, the functioning assessment can provide information for patient-centered health care and specific clinical interventions according to their functioning profile. WHODAS 2.0 is a generic tool to assess health and functioning according to the ICF functioning model. It is an alternative to assess functioning in a less time-consuming way, whereas the duration of the application is one of the main ICF critiques. This paper aims to present some of WHODAS 2.0 inconsistencies and weaknesses as well as strategies to cope with them. In this paper, we present some weaknesses related to the WHODAS layout; wording and scoring process. Some suggestions for strategies to correct these weaknesses are presented, as well.

Disability, emotional distress and well-being among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

To explore the disability, emotional distress and well-being of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the correlations between disability, emotional distress and well-being of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.

DESIGN

This study used a cross-sectional research design.

METHODS

Participants were 133 patients aged over 50 years who were experiencing lumbar spondylolisthesis. The research instruments included a demographic information questionnaire; the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS); the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI); the Chinese versions of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State (STAI-S) and Center for Epidemiological Study-Depression (CES-D); and the Psychological Well-being (PWB) Scale. Emotional distress was measured by the STAI-S and CES-D. Pearson's correlations coefficient, multiple linear regression and a mediating effect model were introduced to explore correlations between the variables and predictors of psychological well-being, and details of the methods are reported in coherence to STROBE criteria.

RESULTS

Eighty-six participants (64.6%) had moderate and severe anxiety, and 42 (31.6%) experienced depression. Participants reported medium to high levels of well-being; "satisfaction with interpersonal relationships" was rated the highest and "physical and mental health" the lowest. Disability, depression and anxiety had significant negative correlations with well-being. Depression and anxiety mediated the relationship between disability and well-being. Moreover, depression, family support, educational background and anxiety were predictors of well-being, accounting for 39.1% of the total variance.

CONCLUSIONS

Disability and emotional distress among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis had a negative impact on well-being. Anxiety and depression were closely correlated with and substantially influenced well-being.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Health professionals will enhance the understanding of important factors influencing well-being among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. This study suggests the conduct of depression and anxiety evaluations at outpatient clinics and prior to surgery, so that clinicians will be aware of the emotional distress status of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis and, therefore, enhance their well-being.

Prevalence and associated factors of preoperative functional disability in elective surgical patients over 55 years old: a prospective cohort study

PURPOSE

In preoperative settings, patients may have functional disabilities due to the disease for which surgery is being performed or comorbidities, but the associated and predictive factors remain unknown. This study examined the prevalence of preoperative functional disability and clarified the associated factors.

METHODS

Individuals aged ≥ 55 years who were scheduled to undergo surgery in a tertiary-care hospital in Japan between April 2016 and September 2016 were eligible for enrolment in the study. Patients with the diseases requiring psychiatric treatment and patients unable to complete the questionnaire without help were excluded. After obtaining informed consent, each patient was asked to complete the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule-2.0, which is a standardized evaluation tool for assessing comprehensive living function. Data from these questionnaires and the patients' characteristics were evaluated. Multiple logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine independent factors associated with preoperative functional disability.

RESULTS

Of 1201 recruited patients, 912 (75.9%) were included in our analysis. The prevalence of preoperative functional disability was 29.2%. Regression analysis identified six independent associated factors for preoperative functional disability: body mass index ≥ 30 kg m^-2, mixed lung disease, serum albumin values, malnutrition, risk of malnutrition, and preoperative use of corticosteroids.

CONCLUSIONS

In total, 29.2% of preoperative patients had functional disability. Obesity, nutritional deficiency, respiratory complications, and low serum albumin values were determined as potentially modifiable factors.

Emotional concerns and coping strategies in Low Grade Glioma patients and reliability of their caregivers in reporting these concerns: Findings from a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

To explore the emotional concerns and coping strategies of patients with Low Grade Glioma (LGG) and whether or not their caregivers are reliable in reporting these concerns as surrogate informants.

METHODS

An explorative cross-sectional study. Patients who had undergone a neurosurgical procedure at least one year before this study for LGG and who were capable of participating in a face-to-face interview were included. Each patient nominated a reference caregiver. Both the patient and the caregiver were interviewed independently, using the Beck Depression Inventory Scale, the State - Trait Anxiety Inventory, and the Jalowiec Coping Scale.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-six patients and 46 caregivers were included. The average scores of the Beck scale were homogeneous between patients and caregivers (7.76 [CI 95% 5.76-9.75] vs. 6.23 [CI 95% 4.57-7.90]; p = 0.102). Patients reported significantly greater state and trait anxiety (44.26 [CI 95% 40.21-48.31] and 37.95 [CI 95% 34.97-40.94]), respectively compared to their caregivers (40.28 [CI 95% 36.64-43.91] and 35.17 [CI 95% 32.16-38.18]). The coping strategies enacted were homogeneous between patients and caregivers (82.78 [CI 95% 77.21-88.35] vs (80.93 [CI 95% 76.32-85.55]; p = 0.102) while the kind of strategies adopted were significantly diverse.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients suffer from depression and greater state anxiety as compared to trait anxiety; moreover, they enact less than half of the available coping strategies. Caregivers may be involved as surrogate informants when necessary for health-care professionals to detect depression while more caution is advised for what concerns anxiety and the coping strategies enacted by patients.

World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review

PURPOSE

This systematic review examines research and practical applications of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) as a basis for establishing specific criteria for evaluating relevant international scientific literature. The aims were to establish the extent of international dissemination and use of WHODAS 2.0 and analyze psychometric research on its various translations and adaptations. In particular, we wanted to highlight which psychometric features have been investigated, focusing on the factor structure, reliability, and validity of this instrument.

METHOD

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, we conducted a search for publications focused on "whodas" using the ProQuest, PubMed, and Google Scholar electronic databases.

RESULTS

We identified 810 studies from 94 countries published between 1999 and 2015. WHODAS 2.0 has been translated into 47 languages and dialects and used in 27 areas of research (40% in psychiatry).

CONCLUSIONS

The growing number of studies indicates increasing interest in the WHODAS 2.0 for assessing individual functioning and disability in different settings and individual health conditions. The WHODAS 2.0 shows strong correlations with several other measures of activity limitations; probably due to the fact that it shares the same disability latent variable with them. Implications for Rehabilitation WHODAS 2.0 seems to be a valid, reliable self-report instrument for the assessment of disability. The increasing interest in use of the WHODAS 2.0 extends to rehabilitation and life sciences rather than being limited to psychiatry. WHODAS 2.0 is suitable for assessing health status and disability in a variety of settings and populations. A critical issue for rehabilitation is that a single "minimal clinically important .difference" score for the WHODAS 2.0 has not yet been established.

Health-related quality of life in outpatients with primary central nervous system lymphoma after radiotherapy and high-dose methotrexate chemotherapy

Chemoradiotherapy for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is associated with a considerable risk of long-term neurotoxicity. The present study aimed to assess the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of outpatients with PCNSL who have received radiotherapy and high-dose methotrexate (HDMTX) chemotherapy, and to determine the factors that cause a decline in HRQOL and interfere with home living. A total of 37 patients were surveyed 0.9-14.2 years after their initial diagnosis and treatment. Each patient completed a multi-part HRQOL questionnaire that was used to examine the associations of HRQOL scores with leukoencephalopathy, Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores, age, history of recurrence and HDMTX-based chemoradiotherapy. The results demonstrated that the history of recurrence, number of cycles of MTX chemotherapy and age affected the development of leukoencephalopathy. Reductions in KPS score were associated with a history of recurrence (P=0.03), but not with leukoencephalopathy (P=0.8). KPS score, leukoencephalopathy and age were significantly associated with a decline in HRQOL score. A decline in the HRQOL associated with a reduction in KPS score was also observed by multivariate analyses. Deterioration of the HRQOL among outpatients with PCNSL post-chemoradiotherapy was significantly associated with older age (≥66 years) and decreased KPS score. Older patients with a history of recurrence had a higher risk for deteriorated QOL due to development of leukoencephalopathy. Therefore, it is recommended that clinicians monitor the KPS score among outpatients with PCNSL. QOL examination for older patients with a lower KPS score was found to be particularly important for identifying any obstacles for home living.