Measurement of bed turning and comparison with age, gender, and body mass index in a healthy population: application of a novel mobility detection system

Chronic low back pain is associated with impaired bed turning ability: Evaluation by a mobility detection system

BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess and compare kinetics and kinematic variables of bed turning ability using a mobility detection system in patients with and without chronic low back pain and to observe the impacts of the disease on bed turning kinetics and kinematics.

METHODS

Thirty-five patients with chronic low back pain were enrolled and compared to healthy controls (n = 34). Pain scores and disability level were assessed by Numeric Pain Rating Scale and the function questionnaires including Oswestry Disability Index and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Bed turning ability was tested using the Mobile Detection System. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were applied to compare the differences between groups.

FINDINGS

Patients with chronic low back pain had significantly lower turning over and back force/weight ratio (p < 0.001) than those healthy controls. Turning over time was significantly longer in patients with Numeric Rating Scale score 3 than in those with Numeric Rating Scale score 2 (p = 0.015). Turning over and back force were significantly higher in male patients and patients with higher BMI after adjusting BMI and sex, respectively (all p < 0.001). When turning back, chronic low back pain patients with Numeric Rating Scale scores of 3 had lower turning back force/weight ratio than those with Numeric Rating Scale scores of 2 (p = 0.014). Male patients had higher turning back force/weight ratio after adjusting pain score (p = 0.001).

INTERPRETATION

The novel Mobility Detection System can provide more objective assessments of bed turning kinetics and kinematics in patients with chronic low back pain.

The trunk control: Which scale is the best in very acute stroke patients?

Background: It is important to evaluate trunk control, given that it is one of the indicators of adequate functional and motor recovery in patients following a stroke. The assessment should be feasible and adequate in clinical conditions in the acute phase. Objectives: The aim of this study was to detect the most appropriate scale used for trunk control assessment in very acute stroke patients in terms of time and ease of implementation. Methods: Sixty-five patients with very acute stroke were included in the study. The patients were assessed with the Trunk Impairment Scale-1 (VTIS), the Trunk Impairment Scale-2 (FTIS), the Motor Assessment Scale trunk subscale (T-MAS) and the Trunk Control Test (TCT), and Functional Impairment Measure (FIM). Floor/ceiling effects, reliability, validity responsiveness of all trunk control scales analyzed. The correlation between all scales and FIM were calculated. Results: All scales had similar reliability, responsiveness and construct validity level. T-MAS and TCT were more advantageous than other scales according to time. TCT and VTIS showed floor effect. The best predictive validity values were observed for the T-MAS and TCT. Conclusions: Four scales investigated in this study can also be used to evaluate the patients with very acute stroke. On the other hand, the advantages and disadvantages of the scales should be thoroughly assessed and researchers can use one of four scales considering their aim, patient populations and clinical characteristics of patients.

Analysis of trunk rolling in Parkinson's disease patients using a mattress mobility detection system

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative condition characterized by motor dysfunction and various types of non-motor impairments. The reaction time and movement time are reported to become more severe delayed in worse PD patients. Most tools for evaluating motor impairment are limited by relying on subjective observations and being qualitative in design. The aim of this study was to investigate trunk rolling performance in PD patients by using a recently developed system to detect turning in bed.

METHODS

The study included 20 PD patients and 42 healthy controls. A mattress mobility detection system was employed for quantitative measurements. Each test session consisted of subjects starting by lying in a supine position on a bed and rolling 10 times onto their left side and 10 times onto their right side. Strain gauges mounted under the feet of the bed recorded changes in the center of pressure (CoP).

RESULTS

For turning back, the patients compared with the controls had significantly longer movement time (P = 0.017), longer time to peak counteraction (P = 0.001), larger ratio of peak counteraction to movement time (P = 0.006), shorter CoP displacement (P < 0.0001), slower turning speed (P = 0.000), weaker peak counteraction (P = 0.013), and smaller ratio of peak counteraction to weight (P = 0.032). Results for turning over were similar except there was no significant difference in the ratio of peak counteraction to weight.

CONCLUSIONS

The mattress mobility detection system was useful for objectively assessing trunk rolling performance of PD patients. Improved assessment of trunk function in PD patients could lead to better treatments and improved rehabilitation procedures.

Analysis of Trunk Rolling Performances by Mattress Mobility Detection System in Poststroke Patients: A Pilot Study

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation of kinematic variables with quality of trunk control in poststroke patients. Methods. This cross-sectional study included stroke subjects with mild to moderate motor deficit corresponding to Brunnstrom stages 3-4. Trunk functional performance was measured using bed mobility monitor system. All tasks were repeated ten times for both directions in each subject. Outcome measurements included the movement time and displacement of center of pressure (CoP) from supine to side lying and returning. Results. The results revealed that a significant longer turning time was observed when turning from the paretic side toward the nonparetic side compared to the other direction, with an estimated mean difference of 0.427 sec (P = 0.005). We found a significant difference in the time of rolling back to supine position between two directions. The displacement of CoP in rolling back from side lying on the nonparetic side was smaller than that from the paretic side with an estimated mean difference of −0.797 cm (P = 0.023). Conclusions. The impaired trunk mobility was associated with increased movement time and decreased displacement of CoP in poststroke patients. Trunk rolling performance has potential in assessment of stroke patients.