Analysis of age as a possible prognostic factor for transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy

Balloon Dacryocystoplasty with Pushed Monocanalicular Intubation as a Primary Management for Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Given the improvement in the instrument and techniques, novel surgical interventions emerged to avoid the osteotomy from the gold standard dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) for treating primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). This study's aim is to compare the surgical outcomes of antegrade balloon dacryocystoplasty (DCP) with pushed monocanalicular intubation (MCI) to balloon DCP alone in patients with complete PANDO. Adult patients with complete PANDO receiving balloon DCP followed by pushed MCI or balloon DCP alone from December 2014 to May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 37 eyes of 29 patients were treated with balloon DCP with pushed MCI for 1 month, whereas 35 eyes of 28 patients were treated with balloon DCP alone. The success rates at 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after operation were 89.2%, 73.0%, and 70.2%, respectively, in balloon DCP with MCI group, and 62.9%, 62.9%, and 60.0%, respectively, in the balloon DCP alone group. The balloon DCP with pushed MCI group had a better success rate but only reached statistical significance at 1 month postoperatively (p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis was performed based on age. The success rate in those under 65 in the combined balloon DCP with MCI group was significantly higher than in balloon DCP alone group (72.7% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.004), whereas there was no significant difference between those aged at least 65 in the combined group and the balloon DCP alone group (69.2% vs. 83.3%, p = 0.2). Conclusively, there was no significant difference in the success rate between antegrade balloon DCP with and without pushed MCI in general. Nevertheless, the former procedure was associated with significantly higher surgical success rate than the latter in younger patients.

Endocanalicular Laser Dacryocystorhinostomy and its modifications: A systematic review of techniques and success rates

OBJECTIVE

the main objective of this work is to review the articles that refer to transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy (TCL-DCR) in acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO), as well as its modifications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A systematic review of publications related to TCL-DCR of the lacrimal duct from 2000 to March 2021 was carried out in the MEDLINE, EMBASE and COCHRANE LIBRARY databases. The search terms in Spanish and English were: «Endocanalicular laser», dacryocystorhinostomy or «primary DCR-L» or «laser» and «tear ducts».

RESULTS

After subjecting the articles to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we got 49 articles: 21 retrospective and 28 prospective studies. The bibliometric result obtained guaranteed, for this review, a level C recommendation according to the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network scale.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, the classic TCL-DCR has lower success rates than its modifications, so we suggest using the latter. We prefer TCL-DCR with IS-MMC or TCDL associated with endoscopy techniques, without being able to opt for any option, since their success rates are very similar. We leave the choice to the discretion of the surgeon, depending on the management skills of endonasal techniques. More studies, with longer follow-up, and better defined criteria are necessary to clarify which is the best TCL-DCR technique.

Anatomical and functional outcomes of transcanalicular diode laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy as a primary procedure

INTRODUCTION

The goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of transcanalicular diode laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy (TDL-DCR) for the treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a single center retrospective study. We included all patients who underwent TDL-DCR between July 2015 and October 2017 for chronic epiphora or chronic dacryocystitis. All procedures were performed under local anesthesia with sedation. The anatomical and functional success rates were studied as a function of each operative indication.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients were included (18 had chronic epiphora and 19 had chronic dacryocystitis). All but one patient had bicanalicular silicone stent intubation. Irrigation of the lacrimal system demonstrated postoperative patency in 78% of patients operated for chronic epiphora and 76% of those with chronic dacryocystitis. The functional success of the surgery (as defined by the Munk score) was higher if the operative indication was chronic dacryocystitis (62%) (whereas it was only 41% for the indication of chronic epiphora).

CONCLUSION

TDL-DCR has a lower anatomical and functional success rate than those reported in the literature for external or endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. However, it retains a place in the treatment of primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (in particular when it is complicated by chronic dacryocystitis), especially if there is an absolute or relative contraindication to the two other dacryocystorhinostomy techniques.

Transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy for acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction: an audit of 104 patients

PURPOSE

External dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) is considered as the gold standard in the treatment of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. However, many advances have been made towards the development of modern minimally invasive therapies. These new techniques were proven less harmful to the patients' skin and medial palpebral structures with their palpebral-canalicular pump mechanism. Options include endonasal and transcanalicular procedures. Here, we report on our 2-year experience with the surgical technique, results and complications of transcanalicular laser-assisted DCR.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study. A total of 104 patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction underwent transcanalicular laser-assisted DCR combined with bicanalicular silicon intubation. We then analyzed intra-/post-operative complications and subjective and objective success rates. The institutional ethics committee ruled that approval was not necessary. The trial was registered with the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00012879).

RESULTS

Transcanalicular laser-assisted DCR in combination with bicanalicular silicon intubation could be performed surgically successfully in 101 patients (97%). In three cases (3%) using the superior canalicular approach, positioning of the laser instrument at the anteroinferior rim of the middle turbinate failed. Complications included thermal injury to the canaliculus (one), canalicular infection (two) and silicon tube prolapse (ten). Functional success (resolution of preoperative symptoms) was achieved in 80 cases (77%), functional failure occured in 24 cases with all patients reporting persisting epiphora, 15 reporting failure to irrigate the nasolacrimal duct and 15 requiring secondary external DCR.

CONCLUSIONS

Laser-assisted DCR shows promising results with few complications. It seems well suited as a second-step procedure after failed recanalization and before external DCR.

Comparison of outcomes of conventional transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy and modified transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy

Introduction

Transcanalicular laser DCR (TL-DCR) approaches have been developed for the formation of a fistula between the nasal cavity and the lacrimal sac to ensure the continuity of the lacrimal drainage system over the years. However, the success rate of TL-DCR has varied widely.

Aim

To evaluate and compare the success rates of conventional transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy and modified transcanalicular multidiode laser dacryocystorhinostomy.

Material and methods

Ninety-one eyes of 91 adult patients admitted with epiphora and diagnosed with chronic dacryocystitis were included in the study. The participants were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 55 patients who were treated with conventional transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Group 2 consisted of 36 patients to whom the same surgical procedure was applied with the difference of nasal mucosa excision prior to laser osteotomy. The groups' intraoperative surgical ostium size, perioperative and postoperative complications, operative times and success rates were compared.

Results

The mean follow-up periods for each group were 8.88 ±2.99 months and 10.28 ±4.47 months, respectively (p = 0.077). Intraoperative mean surgical ostium sizes were 31.85 ±14.98 mm² and 42.25 ±18.09 mm², respectively (p = 0.004). The mean operation time in group 1 was significantly shorter compared to group 2 (18.55 ±4.05 min and 24.44 ±3.18 min, respectively, p = 0.0001). The overall success rate was 65.45% in group 1 and 75.00% in group 2 (p = 0.335).

Conclusions

Although the surgical ostium area was significantly greater in group 2, there was no significant difference in surgical success and patient satisfaction rates between the two groups.

Transcanalicular Diode Laser-assisted Dacryocystorhinostomy for the Treatment of Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction

Today's gold standard in the treatment of infrasaccal primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) is external dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), a relatively invasive procedure that can be performed after failure of recanalizing treatments. However, with progress in the field of diode laser technology, new approaches have emerged. Laser-assisted transcanalicular DCR with subsequent bicanalicular silicon intubation is a new option showing great promise as a viable minimally invasive procedure. Under permanent endoscopic visual control from the nasal cavity, a diode laser fiber is inserted into the lacrimal sac and laser energy is applied to create a bony ostium between the lacrimal sac and the nasal cavity. Since no skin incision needs to be made, advantages of this method comprise the sparing of the skin as well as the medial palpebral structures and the physiological palpebral-canalicular pump mechanism. The duration of surgery as well as reconvalescence is generally shorter than with external DCR. Complications include silicon tube prolapse, mild swelling and, rarely, canalicular infection and thermal injury. One-year functional success rates, defined as complete resolution of symptoms and ostium patency, are high, yet still range behind those of external DCR. However, secondary external DCR after failure of laser-assisted DCR can be performed without difficulty. Thus, laser-assisted transcanalicular DCR is a valid option that should be considered as a second-step procedure after failure of recanalization procedures and before external DCR.