Urinary Continence Outcomes after Puboprostatic Ligament Preserving Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy at a Sub-Saharan Hospital

Retropubic TFS Minisling for Postprostatectomy Male Incontinence: First Report

HYPOTHESIS

A structurally sound puboprostatic ligament (PPL), like the pubourethral ligament in the female, is the core structure for control of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in males.

METHODS

The hypothesis was tested at several levels. Twelve transperineal ultrasound examinations were performed to confirm reflex directional closure vectors around the PPL, with digital support for the PPL rectally and cadaveric testing with a tissue fixation system (TFS) minisling, and finally, 22 cases of postprostatectomy incontinence were addressed only with retropubic insertion of a 7-mm TFS sling between the bladder neck and perineal membrane to reinforce the PPL.

RESULTS

On ultrasound testing, 3 urethral closure muscles were confirmed to act reflexively around the PPL to close the urethra distally and at the bladder neck. A finger was inserted rectally, pressed against the symphysis only on one side of the urethra at the origin of the PPL that controlled urine loss on coughing. The mean pre-op pad loss was 3.8 pads at 9 months; the mean post-op loss was 0.7 pads; 13/22 (59%) patients were 100% improved; 7/22 (31%) improved >50% but <100%; 2/22 (9.1%) improved <50%.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7-mm-wide TFS minisling is the first retropubic minisling for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. It differs significantly from transobturator male operations surgically and in modus operandi. As in the female, reconstruction of the PPL alone was sufficient to cure/improve SUI, suggesting that preservation of the PPL is of critical importance during retropubic radical prostatectomy.

Anatomical, surgical and technical factors influencing continence after radical prostatectomy

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the most frequent treatment with curative intent performed for prostate cancer to date. Different surgical approaches (perineal, transperitoneal, and extraperitoneal) and techniques (laparoscopic and robot assisted) have been described to increase the efficiency and potentially diminish the postoperative complications of this procedure. The aim of this narrative review is to investigate and define the factors that influence postprostatectomy urinary continence. We highlighted the anatomical landmarks and the modifications of surgical techniques aimed at improving the continence rates and thus, patient quality of life. After RP, the long-term continence rates range from 84% to 97%. In order to achieve good continence rates, a careful dissection along with meticulous anatomical reconstruction is required. To this end, a detailed knowledge of the periprostatic anatomy is mandatory.