Staging of Primary Abdominal Lymphomas: Comparison of Whole-Body MRI with Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT

Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Current Role in Patients with Lymphoma

Imaging of lymphoma is based on the use of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT) and/or contrast-enhanced CT, but concerns have been raised regarding radiation exposure related to imaging scans in patients with cancer, and its association with increased risk of secondary tumors in patients with lymphoma has been established. To date, lymphoproliferative disorders are among the most common indications to perform whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Whole-body MRI is superior to contrast-enhanced CT for staging the disease, also being less dependent on histology if compared to ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT. As well, it does not require exposure to ionizing radiation and could be used for the surveillance of lymphoma. The current role of whole-body MRI in the diagnostic workup in lymphoma is examined in the present review along with the diagnostic performance in staging, response assessment and surveillance of different lymphoma subtypes.

Assessment of naive indolent lymphoma using whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging and T2-weighted MRI: results of a prospective study in 30 patients

Background

We prospectively evaluated the diagnostic utility of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression and T2-weighted short-tau inversion recovery MRI (WB-DWIBS/STIR) for the pretherapeutic staging of indolent lymphoma in 30 patients.

Methods

This prospective study included 30 treatment-naive patients with indolent lymphomas who underwent WB-DWIBS/STIR and conventional imaging workup plus biopsy. The pretherapeutic staging agreement, sensitivity, and specificity of WB-DWIBS/STIR were investigated with reference to the multimodality and multidisciplinary consensus review for nodal and extranodal lesions excluding bone marrow.

Results

In the pretherapeutic staging, WB-DWIBS/STIR showed very good agreement (κ = 0.96; confidence interval [CI], 0.88–1.00), high sensitivity (93.4–95.1%), and high specificity (99.0–99.4%) for the whole-body regions. These results were similar to those of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT, except for the sensitivity for extranodal lesions. For extranodal lesions, WB-DWIBS/STIR showed higher sensitivity compared to ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT for the whole-body regions (94.9–96.8% vs. 79.6–86.3%, P = 0.058).

Conclusion

WB-DWIBS/STIR is an effective modality for the pretherapeutic staging of indolent lymphoma, and it has benefits when evaluating extranodal lesions, compared with ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT.

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) in oncology: an Italian survey

PURPOSE

To perform a survey among all members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM) to assess how whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) is performed in oncologic patients in Italy.

METHODS

On March 2019, we administered an online poll to all SIRM members about their use of WB-MRI in 2018 asking 15 questions regarding oncologic indications, imaging protocol, use of contrast media, experience in WB-MRI, duration of scan time and reporting time.

RESULTS

Forty-eight members participated to the survey. WB-MRIs/total MRIs ratio was 1%. Lymphoma was the most common indication (17/48, 35%), followed by myeloma and prostate cancer, with these three tumors representing the most common indication in 39/48 of cases (81%). WB-MRI acquisition time and reporting time were 46-60 min in 22/48 centers (46%) and 20-30 min in 19/48 (40%), respectively. WB-MRIs were mostly performed in 1.5T scanners (43/48, 90%), with surface coils (22/48, 46%) being preferred to Q-body (15/48, 31%) and integrated coils (11/48, 23%). Contrast media were injected in 22/48 of the centers (46%), mainly used for breast cancer (13/22, 59%). DWI was the most used sequence (45/48, 94%), mostly with b800 (27/48, 56%), b0 (24/48, 50%) and b1000 (20/48, 42%) values. In about half of cases, radiologists started evaluating WB-MRI non-contrast morphologic sequences, then checking DWI and post-contrast images.

CONCLUSION

WB-MRI was mainly performed at 1.5T unit, with lymphoma, myeloma and prostate cancer having been the most common indications. The extreme variability in the choice of imaging protocols and use of contrast agents demonstrates the need of a standardization of WB-MRI application in clinical practice.

Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging with DWIBS in staging Hodgkin lymphoma in pediatric patients: comparison with PET/CT

Objective

The aim of the study was to evaluate feasibility of diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS) method in diagnosing Hodgkin lymphoma in pediatric patients and to compare it with 18F-FDG PET/CT as a gold standard.

Materials and methods

Eleven patients (median age 14) with newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma were examined with 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI including whole-body DWIBS sequence (b = 0, 800 s/mm²), before the oncologic treatment. About 26 locations of lymphatic tissues were evaluated visually and quantitatively using ADC_mean (DWIBS) and SUV_max (18F-FDG PET/CT), respectively.

Results

All affected lymph node regions (n = 134) diagnosed in 18F-FDG PET/CT were found with DWIBS, presenting decreased diffusion. Significant correlation was found between ADC and SUV values (R² = − 0.37; p = 0.0001). Nevertheless, additional 33 regions were recognized only by DWIBS. They were significantly smaller than regions diagnosed by both methods.

Discussion

Agreement between DWIBS and 18F-FDG PET/CT for detection and staging of malignant lymphoma is high. DWIBS can be used for the evaluation of pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma.

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography may be helpful for characterizing and staging canine gastric tumors

In humans, computed tomography (CT) is a widely performed technique for the diagnosis and staging of gastric tumors. The purpose of this retrospective case series study was to describe CT findings in a group of dogs with confirmed gastric tumors. For each included dog, the following CT parameters were recorded: gastric tumor location, tumor shape, gastric involvement pattern, tumor enhancement pattern in early and late phases, presence and location of lymphadenopathy, gastric tumor attenuation values, attenuation values of enlarged lymph nodes, maximum short-axis diameter (mm) of enlarged lymph node, maximum long-axis diameter (mm) of enlarged lymph node, and short-axis diameter to long-axis diameter ratio (short axis/long axis). A total of 16 dogs met inclusion criteria and had the following final diagnoses: five lymphoma, six adenocarcinoma, three inflammatory polyps, and two leiomyoma. In the early- and delayed-phase postcontrast images, the mean CT attenuation value for lymphoma was lower than that of other gastric tumors. Lymphadenopathy was widespread in lymphomas and regional in adenocarcinomas. Lymphadenopathy was not detected in leiomyomas. Lymph node measurements in lymphoma were larger than lymph node measurements in adenocarcinoma. Although there were overlapping findings for the different types of gastric tumors, contrast-enhanced CT provided helpful information for characterizing gastric tumors based on the following criteria: early and late enhancement patterns, the site of origin of the mass lesion, and extent of local invasion and distant metastases. Lymphoma should be considered for canine gastric tumors with low mean attenuation values during early- and delayed-phase postcontrast images, and widespread, bulky, and rounded lymphadenopathy.

Whole-body MRI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for pretherapeutic assessment and staging of lymphoma: a meta-analysis

Purpose

¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the reference standard in staging of ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lymphomas; however, there is no recommended functional imaging modality for indolent lymphomas. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) with that of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for lesion detection and initial staging in patients with aggressive or indolent lymphoma.

Materials and methods

We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases for studies that compared WB-MRI with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for lymphoma staging or lesion detection. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using version 2 of the “Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies” tool. The pooled staging accuracy (μ) of WB-MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging and for assessing possible heterogeneity (χ²) across studies were calculated using commercially available software.

Results

Eight studies comprising 338 patients were included. In terms of staging, the meta-analytic staging accuracies of WB-MRI and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for Hodgkin lymphoma and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) were 98% (95% CI, 94%–100%) and 98% (95% CI, 94%–100%), respectively. The pooled staging accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT dropped to 87% (95% CI, 72%–97%) for staging in patients with indolent lymphoma, whereas that of WB-MRI remained 96% (95% CI, 91%–100%). Subgroup analysis indicated an even lower staging accuracy of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for staging of less FDG-avid indolent NHLs (60%; 95% CI, 23%–92%), in contrast to the superior performance of WB-MRI (98%; 95% CI, 88%–100%).

Conclusion

WB-MRI is a promising radiation-free imaging technique that may serve as a viable alternative to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT for staging of ¹⁸FDG-avid lymphomas, where ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT remains the standard of care. Additionally, WB-MRI seems a less histology-dependent functional imaging test than ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and may be the imaging test of choice for staging of indolent NHLs with low ¹⁸F-FDG avidity.

Current concepts in tumor imaging with whole-body MRI with diffusion imaging (WB-MRI-DWI) in multiple myeloma and lymphoma

Whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can now be used to stage and restage multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the standard tool to detect BM involvement (BMI). The 2016 diagnostic criteria of the International Myeloma Working Group identify WB-MRI and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) as the most sensitive imaging techniques for detecting skeletal and extra-skeletal MM invasion, respectively. Preliminary findings have also shown that WB-MRI is better than CT and equal to PET/CT in staging aggressive lymphoma and Hodgkin lymphoma, whereas MRI is better for diagnosing BMI in patients with low-grade lymphoma. Signal intensity (SI) and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) are useful metrics to quantify the chemotherapy response in WB-MRI.

Caecal leiomyoma detected by whole-body MRI in a patient with Hodgkin lymphoma: first case report

INTRODUCTION

Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) is one of the most curable malignant diseases. Modern treatments, like the combined radiochemotherapy and stem cell transplantation, have increased the number of malignant disease survivors. However, HL survivors are at risk of long-term effects, including the development of solid tumors. Secondary neoplasms are a major cause of late morbidity and mortality following treatment for HL.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a male patient, treated for HL by chemotherapy, who developed a large leiomyoma of the cecum one year after the treatment. A whole-body Magnetic Resonance (WBMRI) scan performed during the follow-up allowed the detection of this incidental caecal mass that was absent in a Computed Tomography (CT) scan performed immediately after the treatment. After a CT-guided biopsy, the lesion was surgically removed and the diagnosis of caecal leiomyoma was obtained.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first case report, according to the scientific literature, of caecal leiomyoma developing after chemotherapy in a HL survivor. Leiomyoma is a rare benign tumor that usually appears as a solitary small mass with a nodular growth and a benign course.

CONCLUSION

This case shows that WB-MRI allows detecting relevant incidental findings during the oncologic follow-up, avoiding both radiation exposure and contrast agent administration. Furthermore, leiomyoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis between the caecal masses with high growth rate.