Geographic-Related Differences of Pituitary Adenomas Hormone Profile: Analysis of Two Groups Coming from Southeastern and Eastern Europe

Non-functioning pituitary macroadenoma: surgical outcomes, tumor regrowth, and alterations in pituitary function-3-year experience from the Iranian Pituitary Tumor Registry

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess clinical features and therapeutic outcomes in patients with clinically non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas (NFPMAs).

METHOD

This is a retrospective cohort study of NFPMA patients treated surgically and followed periodically between 2015 and 2017 in a tertiary care center in Iran. Descriptive analysis was performed applying appropriate tests. Binary logistic regression models were used to determine the predictive factors for subtotal tumor resection (STR) and hormonal recovery. Data were analyzed by Stata software.

RESULT

A total of 71 patients with a mean age of 50.6 ± 1.4 years were studied. The mean diameter of the adenoma was 26.8 ± 1.1 mm. The most frequent symptoms were headache (85.75%), visual field defect (VFD) (78.3%), and hypogonadal symptoms (40.3%). Gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 45.1%. Preoperative hypopituitarism was observed in 50.7% of patients. Recovery of at least one axis occurred in 36.1% of the patients suffering from hypopituitarism preoperatively, while new-onset postoperative hormonal deficiency appeared in 14.3% of patients. Multivariate analyses showing preoperative tumor size (OR = 38.2; P = 0.008) and cavernous sinus extension (OR = 13.4; P = 0.020) were predictors of STR. Moreover, hormonal recovery was observed not to be related to age, gender, tumor size, or the extent of tumor resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size and cavernous sinus extension are the main predictors for STR. Notably, recovery of the gonadal axis in a large proportion of patients supports the surgical resection of NFPAM in patients suffering from gonadal deficiency, even in the absence of VFD.

Socioeconomic Predictors of Pituitary Surgery

Background: There exists a lack of data on the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on outcomes for pituitary tumors, which have been associated with significant morbidity. The goal of this population-level study is to investigate the role of SES on receiving treatment and survival in patients with pituitary tumors.

Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program database from the National Cancer Institute was used to identify patients diagnosed with pituitary tumors between 2003 and 2012. SES was determined using a validated composite index. Race was categorized as Caucasian and non-Caucasian. Treatment received included surgery, radiation, and radiation with surgery. Odds of receiving surgery and survival probability were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards model, respectively.

Results: A total of 25,802 patients with pituitary tumors were identified for analysis. High SES tertile (odds ratio (OR) = 1.095; 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.059, 1.132]) and quintile (OR = 1.052; 95% CI [1.031, 1.072]) were associated with higher odds of receiving surgery (p<0.0001). Caucasian patients had higher odds of receiving surgery when compared to non-Caucasian patients (OR = 1.064; 95% CI [1.000, 1.133]; p<0.05). Neither SES nor race were significant predictors of survival probability.

Conclusion: Socioeconomic status and race were found to be associated with higher odds of receiving surgery for pituitary tumors, and thus serve as independent predictors of surgical management. Further studies are required to investigate possible causes for these findings.