Analgesia evaluation of 2 NSAID drugs as adjuvant in management of chronic temporomandibular disorders

The Role of TNF-α in the Pathogenesis of Temporomandibular Disorders

Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is an oral dentofacial disease that is related to multiple factors such as disordered dental occlusion, emotional stress, and immune responses. In the past decades, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), a pleiotropic cytokine, has provided valuable insight into the pathogenesis of TMD, particularly in settings associated with inflammation. It is thought that TNF-α participates in the pathogenesis of TMD by triggering immune responses, deteriorating bone and cartilage, and mediating pain in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Initially, TNF-α plays the role of "master regulator" in the complex immune network by increasing or decreasing the production of other inflammatory cytokines. Then, the effects of TNF-α on cells, particularly on chondrocytes and synovial fibroblasts, result in pathologic cartilage degradation in TMD. Additionally, multiple downstream cytokines induced by TNF-α and neuropeptides can regulate central sensitization and inflammatory pain in TMD. Previous studies have also found some therapies target TMD by reducing the production of TNF-α or blocking TNF-α-induced pathways. All this evidence highlights the numerous associations between TNF-α and TMD; however, they are currently not fully understood and further investigations are still required for specific mechanisms and treatments targeting specific pathways. Therefore, in this review, we explored general mechanisms of TNF-α, with a focus on molecules in TNF-α-mediated pathways and their potential roles in TMD treatment. In view of the high clinical prevalence rate of TMD and damage to patients' QOL, this review provides adequate evidence for studying links between inflammation and TMD in further research and investigation.

Hyaluronan injection versus oral glucosamine and diclofenac in the treatment of temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVES

This study was aimed to compare the effects of 4 biweekly hyaluronan (HA) injection with glucosamine and diclofenac oral administration on TMJ OA patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included TMJ OA patients who had the treatment of 4 biweekly HA injection (group HA) or oral glucosamine hydrochloride for 3 months and diclofenac sodium for 2 weeks (group G/D), and had complete data at first-visit, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Clinical signs and symptoms were scored by anamnestic dysfunction index (Ai) and clinical dysfunction index (Di), and condylar bone changes were evaluated by CBCT scoring system.

RESULTS

We included 22 patients in group HA and 20 patients in group G/D. After HA injection, Ai was decreased from 4.3 to 1.6(CI [- 4.0, - 1.4]) at 3-month follow-up, which was smaller than that in group G/D significantly. Di in group HA was declined significantly from 8.1 at first-visit to 3.6 at 3-month follow-up, while Di in group G/D scarcely changed until at 6- and 12-month follow-up. Neither HA injection nor oral glucosamine/diclofenac showed positive effect on the bone of TMJs during follow-ups with statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

HA injection alleviated signs and symptoms of TMJ OA rapidly and presented superior clinical effects over oral glucosamine with diclofenac. However, both treatments did not limit the bone destruction of TMJs significantly.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This cohort study provides knowledge on the symptom relief and bone changes of TMJ OA patients when treated with HA injection or glucosamine and diclofenac oral administration.

Pharmacologic Treatment for Temporomandibular and Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

Temporomandibular joint disorder is defined by pain and/or loss of function of the temporomandibular joint and its associated muscles and structures. Treatments include noninvasive pharmacologic therapies, minimally invasive muscular and articular injections, and surgery. Conservative therapies include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, muscle relaxants, benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and anticonvulsants. Minimally invasive injections include botulinum toxin, corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, hyaluronic acid, and prolotherapy with hypertonic glucose. With many pharmacologic treatment options and modalities available to the oral and maxillofacial surgeon, mild to moderate temporomandibular joint disorder can be managed safely and effectively to improve symptoms of pain and function of the temporomandibular joint.

Orally Administered NSAIDs-General Characteristics and Usage in the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis-A Narrative Review

Background: Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ OA) is a degenerative joint disease. The aim of this review was to present the general characteristics of orally administered nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and to present the efficacy of NSAIDs in the treatment of TMJ OA. Methods: PubMed database was analyzed with the keywords: "(temporomandibular joint) AND ((disorders) OR (osteoarthritis) AND (treatment)) AND (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug)". After screening of 180 results, 6 studies have been included in this narrative review. Results and Conclusions: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are one of the most commonly used drugs for alleviation of pain localized in the orofacial area. The majority of articles predominantly examined and described diclofenac sodium in the treatment of pain in the course of TMJ OA. Because of the limited number of randomized studies evaluating the efficacy of NSAIDs in the treatment of TMJ OA, as well as high heterogeneity of published researches, it seems impossible to draw up unequivocal recommendations for the usage of NSAIDs in the treatment of TMJ OA. However, it is highly recommended to use the lowest effective dose of NSAIDs for the shortest possible time. Moreover, in patients with increased risk of gastrointestinal complications, supplementary gastroprotective agents should be prescribed.

Evaluating the effectiveness of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug(s) for relief of pain associated with temporomandibular joint disorders: A systematic review

AIM

The aim of this systematic review was to compile the latest evidence to assess the effectiveness of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug(s) (NSAID) in patients with temporomandibular joint disorders (TMDs) in relieving pain. TMDs are a group of musculoskeletal disorders that affect the temporomandibular joint and/or masticatory muscles.

METHODS

After a literature review, a comprehensive search was conducted via Pubmed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases with a systematic search strategy. The inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials in humans, published in the last 50 years evaluating the effect of NSAIDs on TMDs. Although this duration chosen would potentially identify studies that have utilised outdated treatments, research methodology, and TMDs diagnostic criteria, and this has been considered before making clinical recommendation, it was used to advise future methodological changes necessary. The included studies were subjected to full-text review.

RESULTS

Out of 646 studies initially identified through searches, 12 were selected for full-text review of which 11 were included in the data synthesis. All 11 studies were randomised controlled trials. In total, 424 patients were included in this review. The earliest study included was 1996. Diagnostic criteria varied among all studies, and some did not specify enough signs and symptoms to construct a diagnosis. Intervention varied among all studies, as did the control. Nonspecific diagnosis, variable control groups, and heterogenous intervention protocols affected the outcome of this review. Despite the reduction of pain in the joint and/or masticatory muscles as well as improved range of motion, conclusive clinical recommendation could not be made.

CONCLUSION

Heterogeneity did not allow for definitive conclusion; however, there was some evidence to support the use of NSAIDs in patients with TMDs for relief of pain. Further studies with strict, consistent diagnostic criteria and treatment are required.

Comparison of Early Effectiveness of Three Different Intervention Methods in Patients with Chronic Orofacial Pain: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

Background

Occlusal appliances are still widely used instruments in the management of orofacial pain in dentistry, yet alone or as a part of multimodal therapy. However, some of those modalities have been lacking thorough randomized assessment, and there is a conflicting evidence available. It is hypothesized that pain symptoms might improve faster and in more tangible way due to combined therapy. Also, to our best knowledge, nimesulide was never examined in this aspect, too.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare early effectiveness of routine intervention methods in patients with myofascial pain (MP) after 3 weeks' notice. Three modalities were evaluated: occlusal appliance (OA) with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy (nimesulide), occlusal appliance with dry needling (DN), and occlusal appliance (OA-control group) therapy.

Design

Randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) in which ninety patients with MP, who met the inclusion criteria, were randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups. Sealed, opaque envelopes were used.

Methods

For evaluation, each patient completed a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Sleep and Pain Activity Questionnaire (SPAQ) twice, first at the beginning of the study and again after 3 weeks (0-3).

Results

Posttreatment test comparison between the control group and both treated groups reveal significant differences between the control and the NSAID + occlusal appliance groups. There were also differences reported between the control and the DN + occlusal appliance groups, but these differences were, however, not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Occlusal appliances in conjunction with NSAID showed better orofacial pain relief after 3 weeks of therapy, compared to the use of occlusal appliances alone or in conjunction with dry needling. Additionally, differences between pain perception and quality of life between OA and DN + OA groups were not found to be statistically significant.

Remaining Hurdles for Tissue-Engineering the Temporomandibular Joint Disc

The temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc, a fibrocartilaginous structure between the mandible and temporal bone, is implicated in temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). TMDs symptomatically affect approximately 25% of the population, of which 70% have internal derangement of the disc. Treatments lack efficiency, motivating novel therapies, including tissue-engineering toward TMJ disc regeneration. Recent developments in scaffold-based or scaffold-free approaches, cell sources, and biochemical and mechanical stimulation have resulted in constructs exhibiting native tissue mechanics. Safety and efficacy of tissue-engineered implants have shown promising results in orthotopic animal studies. However, many hurdles need to be overcome in tissue-engineering approaches, and clinical and regulatory pathways. Future studies present an opportunity for clinicians and researchers to work together toward safe and effective clinical trials.

Is nonsurgical management effective in temporomandibular joint disorders? - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Various nonsurgical interventions have been used for the management of patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders, but their clinical effectiveness remains unclear. Hence, the purpose of this systematic review and meta-analyses was to assess the evidence of the effectiveness of nonsurgical interventions in the management of TMJ disorders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search on five databases such as PubMed, PubMed Central Cochrane, TRIP, NGCH databases and hand searching was conducted for a period from October 1995 to 2015. Randomized control trials (RCTs) on the nonsurgical management of TMJ disorders were included and reported in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. The quality of the articles was assessed by JADAD scoring. Finally, out of 23 RCTs, 11 articles having any of the primary outcomes (pain pressure threshold [PPT], pain, maximal pain-free mouth opening, and level of dysfunction) were selected. The extracted data were analyzed using NCSS software.

RESULTS

The results showed the evidence of pain reduction (P = 0.00), maximal pain-free mouth opening (P = 0.0138), and decrease in level of dysfunction (P = 0.0007) but no improvement in PPT to a significant level (P = 0.6600).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the simplest, cost-effective nonsurgical treatments have a positive therapeutic effect on the initial management of TMJ disorders. However, a consistent methodology recording both the objective and subjective outcomes would be a better choice for added reliability.

Management of pain in patients with temporomandibular disorder (TMD): challenges and solutions

Thanks to advances in neuroscience, biopsychosocial models for diagnostics and treatment (including physical, psychological, and pharmacological therapies) currently have more clinical support and scientific growth. At present, a conservative treatment approach prevails over surgery, given it is less aggressive and usually results in satisfactory clinical outcomes in mild–moderate temporomandibular disorder (TMD). The aim of this review is to evaluate the recent evidence, identify challenges, and propose solutions from a clinical point of view for patients with craniofacial pain and TMD. The treatment we propose is structured in a multi-modal approach based on a biobehavioral approach that includes medical, physiotherapeutic, psychological, and dental treatments. We also propose a new biobehavioral model regarding pain perception and motor behavior for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with painful TMD.