Using coronary artery calcification combined with pretest clinical risk assessment as a means of determining investigation and treatment in patients presenting with chest pain in a rural setting

The Prognostic Value of CAC Zero Among Individuals Presenting With Chest Pain: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

There is little consensus on whether absence of coronary artery calcium (CAC) can identify patients with chest pain (CP) who can safely avoid additional downstream testing.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the utility of CAC assessment for ruling out obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) among patients with stable and acute CP, at low-to-intermediate risk of obstructive CAD undergoing coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).

METHODS

The authors searched online databases for studies published between 2005 and 2021 examining the relationship between CAC and obstructive CAD (≥50% coronary luminal narrowing) on coronary CTA among patients with stable and acute CP.

RESULTS

In this review, the authors included 19 papers comprising 79,903 patients with stable CP and 13 papers including 12,376 patients with acute CP undergoing simultaneous CAC and coronary CTA assessment. Overall, 45% (95% CI: 40%-50%) of patients with stable CP and 58% (95% CI: 50%-66%) of patients with acute CP had CAC = 0. The negative predictive values for CAC = 0 ruling out obstructive CAD were 97% (95% CI: 96%-98%) and 98% (95% CI: 96%-99%) among patients with stable and acute CP, respectively. Additionally, the prevalence of nonobstructive CAD among those with CAC = 0 was 13% (95% CI: 10%-16%) among those with stable CP and 9% (95% CI: 5%-13%) among those with acute CP. A CAC score of zero predicted a low incidence of major adverse cardiac events among patients with stable CP (0.5% annual event rate) and acute CP (0.8% overall event rate).

CONCLUSIONS

Among over 92,000 patients with stable or acute CP, the absence of CAC was associated with a very low prevalence of obstructive CAD, a low prevalence of nonobstructive CAD, and a low annualized risk of major adverse cardiac events. These findings support the role of CAC = 0 in a value-based health care delivery model as a "gatekeeper" for more advanced imaging among patients presenting with CP.

Debates over NICE Guideline Update: What Are the Roles of Nuclear Cardiology in the Initial Evaluation of Stable Chest Pain?

Recent clinical trials have demonstrated the values of cardiac computed tomography (CT) in the initial evaluation of stable chest pain which led to drastic changes in the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines in 2016. According to the updated NICE guidelines, cardiac CT should be performed as the initial cardiac testing in stable chest pain regardless of pre-test probability (PTP) of coronary artery disease (CAD). As a result, cardiac CT is now considered as a validated gatekeeper for assessing stable chest pain, which precedes all the functional studies including nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Nuclear MPI, in contrast, has been assigned as one of the second-line studies, which is inevitably dependent on the results of cardiac CT. However, nuclear MPI has genuine values in the diagnosis, treatment decision, and prognostic stratification of stable chest pain, which cannot be replaced by cardiac CT. In this review, the updated NICE guidelines and related cardiac CT trials will be critically reviewed from the view of nuclear physicians and the exceptional values of nuclear MPI will be described along with the future perspectives.